Original Editor - Jacintha McGahan
Top Contributors -

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Dysarthria pertains to a category of neurogenic speech disorders distinguished by an anomaly in the strength, speed, availability, stableness, tone, or accuracy of movements necessary for breathing, phonatory, resonatory, articulatory, or prosodic features of speech creation[1].

These anomalies are the result of one or several sensorimotor issues, including weakness or paralysis, incoordination, involuntary movements, or immoderate, declined, or inconstant muscle tone[1]. Dysarthria can negatively impact the comprehensibility of speech, realism of speech, or both. It is necessary to be aware that intelligence can be normal in some speakers with dysarthria. Dysarthria might co-exist with other neurogenic language, cognitive, and swallowing disorders[2].

Mechanism of Injury / Pathological Process[edit | edit source]

Cranial nerve VII bells palsy

Damage to the nervous system causes hypotonicity in the muscles that create speech sounds. This may impact the muscles in one or several of the following areas:

The neurological damage that can result in dysarthria can be from[1]:

Incidence and Prevalence[edit | edit source]

  • Stroke: Estimated that 8%–60% of patients with stroke present with dysarthria.
  • Traumatic brain injury: Approximately 10%–65% of patients post traumatic brain injury have dysarthria.
  • Parkinson's disease: Estimation that dysarthria impacts approximately 70%–100% of patients post Parkinson's disease.
  • Multiple sclerosis: Amidst 25% and 50% of patients with multiple sclerosis show with dysarthria at some stage during the continuity of their disease.
  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Dysarthria can be seen as an initial symptom in up to 30% of patients with this condition, with relatively all patients developing dysarthria in later stages[2]

Clinical Presentation[edit | edit source]

Depending on the location of the neurological damage different types of dysarthria have been described;

  • Flaccid: affiliated with conditions of the lower motor neuron system and/or muscle, for instance damage to the peripheral nervous system (PNS). Hallmarked by difficulty pronouncing consonants.
  • Spastic: affiliated with bilateral illnesses of the upper motor neuron system. Patients may have speech issues alongside muscle weakness and abnormal reflexes.
  • Ataxic: affiliated with conditions of the cerebellar control unit. Symptoms of slurred speech and lack of coordination.
  • Hypokinetic: affiliated with infirmity of the basal ganglia control unit, such as insult caused by neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson’s and Huntington’s. Presents as quiet, breathy, or monotone voice, difficulty initiating sentences, a stutter or slurred speech, struggles pronouncing consonants, rigidity or lacked movement in the face and neck, swallow difficulty that can result in drooling and tremors or muscle spasms.
  • Hyperkinetic: affiliated with ailment of the basal ganglia control unit. Symptoms include slurred or slow speech, shaky voice, shortness of breath or fatigue while speaking, muscle spasms and tremors, involuntary twitchy or flailing movements or atypical muscle tone.
  • Unilateral upper motor neuron: affiliated with unilateral disorders of the upper motor neuron system
  • Mixed: variety blend of dysarthria types (for example spastic-ataxic; flaccid-spastic)
  • Undetermined: observed features are in line with a dysarthria but do not clearly place into any of the identified dysarthria types[2][3].

Diagnostic Procedures[edit | edit source]

Physiotherapists treating patients with neurogenic type conditions, may assist in screening for dysarthria. This screening is not required to give a diagnosis or a specific narration of the severity and features of speech deficits affiliated with dysarthria but, rather, highlights the need for additional assessment. Assessment of patients with suspected dysarthria should be performed by a Speech and Language Therapist.

Objective measures that a physiotherapist could assess, and are included as a component in the non-speech examination;

  • Completion of a cranial nerve exam (CN V, VII, IX, X, XI, XII)—to examine facial, oral, velopharyngeal, and laryngeal function and symmetry
  • Observation of facial and neck muscle tone, both at rest and during non-speech activities[4].


Outcome Measures[edit | edit source]

  • PATA and PATAKA tests: Patients requested to say the bisyllabic phrase “PATA” or “PATAKA” as many times as possible in a defined amount of time, for example PATA 10 seconds and PATAKA for 15 seconds.
  • Oral motor examination: Part of the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia examination includes repeated articulations of specific words and repeated motor movements marked as the total of specific categorical rulings.
  • Assessment of the Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech (AIDS) test: Involves a standardised vocabulary of speech samples from patients is recorded and then evaluated for intelligibility.
  • Cookie theft picture description task of the Boston Aphasia examination: A patient is asked to detail the scene in a picture of a child taking a cookie. A score is given as the total of intelligible words in a 2‐minute period[6].

Management / Interventions[edit | edit source]

Speech and language therapists (SLTs) utilise a range of interventions in their treatment of dysarthria, inclusive of behavioral and compensatory methods, conversation partner training, counselling, and speech supplementation[7]. Tongue and lip exercises are commonly utilised in dysarthria treatment, to raise levels of tension, endurance and power of weak muscles. These exercises, recognised as speech mechanism exercises or non-speech oromotor exercises (NSOMExs) have a long establishment in history for treatment of dysarthria[7][8]. Despite NSOMExs frequent use, its continued application is not supported by any strong evidence of betterment to speech and is often discrepant with current expert conjecture[7].


Additional treatments that directly target speech production subsystems include those that impact respiration[2] and where physiotherapists can aid in dysarthria rehabilitation;

  • Postural adjustments, such as sitting upright to enhance breath support for speech.
  • Inhaling deeply prior onset of speech vocalisation, named as preparatory inhalation.
  • Use of optimal breath groups when speaking, so for each breath, speak solely the number of words that can be created with ease.
  • Use expiratory muscle strength training to develop strength of the expiratory muscles. The patient blows into a pressurised device with sufficient effort to pass a preset threshold.
  • Use inspiratory muscle strength training to develop strength of the inspiratory muscles to allow better prolonged or repeated inhalations. The patient uses a handheld instrument that is set to need a minimum inspiratory pressure for inspiration to continue.
  • Use maximal vowel prolongation exercises to enhance length and volume of speech.
  • Use controlled exhalation exercises, where air is exhaled slowly over a period to improve control of exhalation for speaking.
  • Use non-speech exercises to improve subglottal air pressure and respiratory support, for instance, blowing into a water glass manometer.

Respiratory muscle strength training has been demonstrated to be effective in treatment of dysarthria. A recent prospective RCT [10] that aimed to investigate the efficaciousness of combined inspiratory and expiratory respiratory muscle training (RMT) with regard to swallow function, pulmonary function, functional performance, and dysarthria in patients post stroke demonstrates. This study concluded that a 6-week combined inspiratory and expiratory RMT is a workable adjunct to therapy for stroke patients to enhance fatigue level, respiratory muscle strength, lung volume, respiratory flow, and dysarthria[10]. In comparison, a less recent study that examined the effect of expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) on voice production, dysarthria, and voice-related quality-of-life issues in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). This study concluded EMST improved expiratory muscle strength but did not statistically alter objective and subjective elements of voice/speech production in PwMS[11]. However, this later study examined effect of expiratory muscle training solely on outcomes, whereas the more recent RCT examined combined inspiratory and expiratory muscle training.

Differential Diagnosis[edit | edit source]

Various dysarthria types, for instance, ataxic, hyperkinetic, and unilateral upper motor neuron may apportion some characteristics with Apraxia of Speech and can be difficult to differentiate[12]. One comparison is the presence or absence of muscle weakness or spasticity. Apraxia of Speech does not extant with muscle weakness or spasticity unless there is a concurrent dysarthria[2].

Aphasia impacts language discernment and expression in both spoken and written formats; dysarthria impacts only speech creation. Therefore, assessment of written language expression in conjunction with assessment of written language understanding may be warranted to make a conclusive diagnosis[2].

Finally, Speech and Language Therapists will assess the effect of culture and linguistic components on the patient's communication manner and the possible ramifications of ailment on function. Diversifications in dialect should be taken into account prior marking linguistics in error, as they may not have been part of the patient's spoken language or dialect initially to the injury or disease[2].

Resources[edit | edit source]

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Duffy JR. Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management, 3rd edn. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier, Mosby. 2013.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Dysarthria in Adults. Available from: https://www.asha.org/PRPSpecificTopic.aspx?folderid=8589943481&section=Overview [accessed 26 October 2020].
  3. Medical News Today. What to know about dysarthria. Available from: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/327362 [last accessed 27/10/2020].
  4. Clark HM, Solomon NP. Muscle tone and the speech-language pathologist: Definitions, neurophysiology, assessment, and interventions. Perspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia). 2012 Mar;21(1):9-14.
  5. University of Leicester. Examination of the Cranial Nerves - Demonstration. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdaq-Ecz7Co [last accessed 09/11/2020]
  6. Singh A, Epstein E, Myers LM, Farmer JM, Lynch DR. Clinical measures of dysarthria in Friedreich Ataxia. Movement disorders. 2010 Jan 15;25(1):108-11.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 MacKenzie C, Muir M, Allen C, Jensen A. Non‐speech oro‐motor exercises in post‐stroke dysarthria intervention: a randomized feasibility trial. International journal of language & communication disorders. 2014 Sep;49(5):602-17.
  8. Hustad KC, Weismer G. Interventions to improve intelligibility and communicative success for speakers with dysarthria. Motor speech disorders. 2007:217-28.
  9. . Video Model: oral motor exercises for speech therapy. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgXwVlEi2JY [last accessed 23/11/2020]
  10. 10.0 10.1 Liaw MY, Hsu CH, Leong CP, Liao CY, Wang LY, Lu CH, Lin MC. Respiratory muscle training in stroke patients with respiratory muscle weakness, dysphagia, and dysarthria–a prospective randomized trial. Medicine. 2020 Mar 1;99(10):e19337.
  11. Chiara T, Martin D, Sapienza C. Expiratory muscle strength training: speech production outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 2007 May;21(3):239-49.
  12. Bislick L, McNeil M, Spencer KA, Yorkston K, Kendall DL. The nature of error consistency in individuals with acquired apraxia of speech and aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2017 Jun 22;26(2S):611-30.