Sitting Ergonomics And The Impact on Low Back Pain
Original Editors - Victoria Mcloughlin, Jordan Smith, Rosanna Massie and Laura Dales as part of the Nottingham University Spinal Rehabilitation Project
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Epidemiology
- 3 Clinically Relevant Anatomy of The Lower Back
- 4 Low Back Pain
- 5 What Is A Good Sitting Posture?
- 6 Prevention And Rehabilitation Of Sitting Induced Low Back Pain
- 7 COVID-19
- 8 References
IntroductionErgonomics, often referred to as "Human Factors" ergonomics, is the science of applying physical and psychological principles within an environment to increase both productivity and well-being. The study of ergonomics can be divided into three main areas of research:
- Physical Ergonomics
- Cognitive Ergonomics
- Organizational Ergonomics
Physical Ergonomics places a greater emphasis on the human anatomy, physiology, and biomechanical factors influencing movement patterns and posture. This area of ergonomics is therefore of significant interest to physiotherapists and one in which we regularly address due to having a rich, in-depth understanding and knowledge of these factors.
Research by Dul and Neuman (2009) stated that ergonomics are important because they improve workplace performance. Ergonomics are an important consideration both when working from home and it the workplace.
In 2019 the Health and Safety Executive completed a health and safety at work report for Great Britain. Within this report MSK disorders reported in 2018 and 2019 are displayed. 40% of all MSK disorders reported were related to the back. While this does not break down into specific types of back problems it is clear there is a link between work-related ergonomics and back pain. Explanations suggested for the high incidence rate were awkward or tiring body positions, keyboard work (desk sitting), repetitive actions, and poor manual handling.
Clinically Relevant Anatomy of The Lower Back
The Lumbar Spine
The lumbar spine is where most back pain occurs, in and around the five vertebrae (numbered L1-L5) . In between each vertebra, there is an intervertebral disc. This is known as the intervertebral disc joint. There are also two (left and right) facet joints between each vertebra. L5 is also attached to the sacrum. The sacrum then attaches to the pelvis, creating the sacroiliac joint .
Each vertebra consists of many features, including a vertebral body, a spinous process, the spinal canal for the spinal cord, and transverse processes. There are several distinct features of the typical lumbar vertebra. These include:
- Large vertebral body
- Short and thick spinous process
- Relatively vertical facet joint
- A mammillary process on the posterior aspect of the superior articular process
- L5 has the largest body and transverse process of all vertebra
The main function of the lumbar spine is to bear the weight of the body. It absorbs the stress of lifting and carrying objects as well as general movement . Below are the structural function of the spine:
- The spine holds an increasing amount of weight as you move down into the lumbar region. For this reason, the lumbar vertebra has the larger bodies in the spine.
- Due to the relative size of the spinous process and body, the lumbar spine has the largest degree of extension.
- The lumbar spine allows flexion, extension, and lateral flexion but not rotation and this is due to the orientation of the facet joints.
- The mammillary process provides an attachment point for many lower back muscles.
The Intervertebral Disc
|Nucleus pulposus||It is a highly hydrophilic substance that is located in the centre of the intervertebral disc. It acts as a shock absorber as it allows for the distribution of pressure in all directions.|
|Annulus fibrosis||It contains multiple fibrocartilaginous bands. It surrounds the nucleus pulposus and the main function is to protect the nucleus pulposus.|
|Cartilage endplates||It is found on the superior and inferior ends of the disc and represents the anatomic limit of the disc. It's main functions includes protecting the contents of the disc and providing a source of nutrition to the disc (Twomey and Taylor, 1994)|
The main ligaments of the lumbar spine include:
|Anterior longitudinal ligament||It is a thick band of tissue that runs along the anterior surfaces of the vertebral bodies. It protects against hyperextension of the spine.|
|Posterior longitudinal ligament||It is thinner than it's anterior counterpart and runs along the anterior wall of the vertebral canal. It is involved in preventing disc prolapse.|
|Interspinous ligaments||It connects consecutive spinous processes together within the spine. It mainly limits the flexion of the spine.|
|Ligamentum flavum||It runs between each consecutive laminae and is extremely elastic. It's function is to help maintain an upright posture and to resume this position after flexion. It also prevents buckling of the ligament during extension.|
|Supraspinous ligament||It connects the ends of each spinous process and helps to prevent hyperflexion.|
|Iliolumbar ligaments||It consists of two parts: an anterior and posterior part. It plays a huge role in the stability and restricts both side flexion and rotational movement at the lumbosacral junction.|
Muscles Of The Trunk
There are multiple muscle groups that support the spine. Each plays an important role in stabilizing the trunk and allowing movement into flexion, extension and rotation.
Muscles that attach into the lumbar vertebrae:
- Erector spinae
- Latissimus dorsi
- Serratus posterior inferior
Effect Of Sitting On Anatomy
There are many studies that look into how sitting affects our spine, some of these even look into how we change physiologically.
One study found that when flexing the spine, to flatten the lumbar spine, improves the transport of metabolites in the intervertebral discs, reduces the stresses on the facet joints and gives the spine a high compressive strength. This suggests very positive effects of flexing the spine. However, this study did also report negative effects including increasing stress on the annulus fibrosis and increasing the hydrostatic pressure in the nucleus pulposus. It is also important to consider that this paper is from 1985 and does not discuss who participated in the studies and therefore this may not be generalizable to the population as a whole. Further studies have found that sitting in a flexed position also reduces the activity of abdominal muscles which play a key role in stabilizing the back .
Finally, a recent study found that when a person sat for prolonged periods of time (for 4 hours), there was a significant reduction in the height of L4-5 intervertebral disc. However, the sample size had a female predominance and studies have found that males and females do respond to static lumbar flexion differently and therefore this may not be generalizable to the population as a whole.
Low Back Pain
Low back pain can be defined as pain originating in the low back region that may or may not radiate down into the legs. This pain can further be categorized by sensation such as dull or sharp pain as well as duration:
- Acute (<6 weeks)
- Sub-acute (6-12 weeks)
- Chronic (>12 weeks)
Low back pain is an extremely common disorder with a mean point prevalence rate of 18.1%. Furthermore, 38.1% of these individual's will suffer from low back pain for up to a year. This presents a vast array of knock on effects with the most notable being that on the UK economy. It is estimated that low back pain costs £1623 million annually via direct healthcare-related costs and indirectly £10668 million through avenues such informal care and loss of productivity. This is partly due to 15.5% of all employed low back pain suffers requiring absence from work at some point and for varying sustained periods.
Sitting And Low Back Pain
Occupational low back pain is one of the most prevalent types of back pain. Multiple factors can be responsible (e.g. heavy lifting and poor manual handling) putting multiple professions at risk. However, for the purpose of our Physiopedia page we have focused on those working in a sedentary role.
The main causes for this sitting induced back pain have been identified as:
- Sustained sitting
- Increased activation of the spinal muscles due to specific sitting postures
- Lack of variation of movement
As a result of the high prevalence of this occupational back pain extensive government guidance exists for both employers and employees to follow:
What Is A Good Sitting Posture?
From research it seems that protecting our lower back when sitting is multifactorial. The factors like the environment, time and posture influence lower back pain.
One study found that adapting our environment is important for low back pain. This includes making sure our eyes are inline with monitors, devices such as keyboards are close and chair is in a good height.
The NHS also suggests these changes when explaining how to sit correctly . This highlights that it is not just our physical posture that helps us to sit correctly but also our surroundings.
The length of time we sit may also have an impact on lower back pain. Recent evidence has proven that sitting time is positively associated with LBP intensity. This study looked at 201 blue-collar workers and the length of time they sat in both their day job and leisure time and found that those who sat for longer throughout the day had a higher prevalence of low back pain. However, this study used a cross-sectional study design and therefore a causal relationship cannot be made. One paper recommends moving every 20 minutes in order to reduce the likelihood of lower back pain caused by sitting.
Further studies found that sitting for more than half a workday and sitting in an “awkward posture” significantly increased the likelihood of LBP . This shows that posture does impact back pain, but usually when maintained for a long period. A study found that people who sat in a flexed, more relaxed position for long periods of time did experience more back pain than those who did not .
Due to all of this evidence, it is important for us as physiotherapists to consider all of these factors when helping someone with sitting induced LBP. It could be argued that there is no one answer to “what is good sitting posture” and that as long as we keep moving, make sure our environment is adequate and keep a natural posture, we can say that we are maintaining a good sitting posture.
Prevention And Rehabilitation Of Sitting Induced Low Back Pain
As with most incidences of low back pain there are multiple approaches that physiotherapists can take in order to help manage symptoms and prevent reoccurrence. The four main areas explored in the literature for the management of low back pain induced by sitting are as follows: Education around postural awareness, discouraging long sedentary periods, prescribing exercises to improve postural control and recommending equipment that will support a neutral spine.
A study was conducted on physiotherapists to see what they believed the best posture was. That same study was also conducted on people experiencing and not experiencing LBP. They found again, that there was no consensus on what good posture looked like and this really adds to the importance of educating both physiotherapists and our patients.
Further to this, one study found that improvements in postural awareness were longitudinally associated with reduced pain in patients with spinal pain and this really highlights the importance of educating our patients. However, it is important to consider that this study, again used mostly female participants and therefore these results are not generalizable, it also uses uncontrolled longitudinal data and therefore we can not make any causal inferences.
Finally, one study educated office workers about ergonomics and found a significant change in perception of health and reported less pain and discomfort at work when sitting .
Movement For Prevention And Rehabilitation Of Sitting Related Low Back Pain
Various interventions are used across the spectrum of occupational settings in an attempt to both minimize the risk of low back pain arising but also reduce the impact of sitting on those with already existent low back pain. However, the utility and effectiveness of these interventions is somewhat mixed within the literature. The main source of evidence regarding these interventions comes in the form of a Cochrane systematic review by Parry et al. (2019) who, after exploring research surrounding the use of such interventions as sit-stand workstations, treadmill workstations, and activity trackers, found the effectiveness of these interventions in reducing both the intensity and presence of low back pain for sitting based individuals at work was poor. Another movement based intervention not included within the Cochrane systematic review involves the use of "dynamic sitting" which involves the used of both active and passive implements to encourage regular movement of the trunk and lower extremities in a seated position. O'Sullivan et al. (2012) investigated the effectiveness of dynamic sitting via a systematic review. They concluded that although the evidence regarding this topic was of high quality, there were inconsistent results to support and recommend the use of said intervention.
The primary movement-based intervention that the literature appears to moderately support is the implementation of movement breaks throughout the day for those individuals who are in a seated position for prolonged periods of time such as office workers. Waongenngarm, Areerak and Janwantanakul (2018) carried out a systematic review evaluating "movement schedules" with work durations ranging from 5 minutes to 2 hours and breaks lasting 20 seconds to 30 minutes. They found low-quality evidence supporting both a reduction in pain and discomfort for those carrying out movement breaks which also included simple changes in postural position with detriment on productivity. This is further supported by a later study by Sheahan, Diesbourg and Fischer (2016) who also found that even short, regular breaks of standing from a seated position reduced both the regularly and intensity of acute low back pain within a office worker population.
Postural rehabilitation describes performing exercises that are specifically focused on increasing core strength and body alignment in order to improve postural control. Prescribing strength and flexibility exercises particularly, allows for better control of the lumbar region during both slow-voluntary and fast-reflexive movements; thus reducing the likelihood of low back pain.
Several different methods of postural rehabilitation have been devised, each putting greater emphasis on a different element of postural control e.g. proprioception, balance and core muscle strength. However, all have the ultimate aim of preventing and managing low back pain.
The most widely researched and recommended approaches are Pilates and the McKenzie method. The focus of Pilates is to encourage postural control through engagement in isometric contraction of the deep core and pelvic floor muscles; it also puts a strong emphasis on breathing control during movement. The McKenzie method takes a slightly different approach, focusing on correcting posture, usually through the restoration of lumbar lordosis. Below are links to the corresponding Physiopedia pages, providing further detail on the specific content of these two approaches:
In 2019, Paolucci et al conducted a literature review that investigated and compared the effectiveness of these two techniques, alongside three other methods of postural rehabilitation. The review concluded that each approach had sufficient evidence to support its efficacy in reducing back pain and disability, and improving quality of life; for Pilates and the McKenzie method particularly, the corresponding exercises were found to be more effective than alternative pharmacological and instrumental treatments. Though the review did not focus of sitting induced back pain specifically, the principles of the postural rehabilitation techniques included are applicable to our population of interest.
Use Of Equipment For Prevention And Management
With back pain being such a common issue, the market has been flooded with equipment to try and alleviate back pain or relieve the symptoms. The equipment ranges from exercise balls and back braces to standing desks. Research has been carried out on all the equipment to varying degrees. For example there is minimal research on sitting exercise balls rather then chairs and back braces specifically for low back pain rather than post-operative. However, they are used frequently due to them being cheap and easily accessible.
One of the most common tools in rehabilitation and exercise is the exercise ball. Their popularity has risen in recent times as they are cheap and easily accessible, claiming not just to combat back pain but also to aid concentration whilst working. Research on its effects on back pain is limited, but generally does not show favorable results.
One of the first studies was conducted by Kingma and Dieën (2008), who investigated static vs. dynamic posture. This was done by comparing females working at computers on an office chair to those on an exercise ball, and measuring muscle activity in the spinal muscles. Sitting on a ball led to 33% more trunk motion and 66% more variation in lumbar muscle activation – however, it also led to more spinal shrinkage. They concluded that whilst the advantages may slightly outweigh the disadvantages, overall, the real term benefits of sitting on an exercise ball were negligible.
In addition to this, Elliot et al. (2016) conducted a study comparing sitting on a ball for 90 minutes per day instead of a chair, to investigate the effects on lower back pain and core muscle endurance. Their results were not statistically significant, and they concluded exercise balls have little-to-no benefit for lower back pain, but did somewhat improve core endurance in the sagittal plane.
Back Support Seat Attachment
A variety of seat attachments exist, for chairs in the office, at home and in the car, which claim to reduce lower back pain. However, the literature is mixed on the effect they have.
One of the earlier studies specifically targeted so-called ‘Ergonomic Chairs’, have built-in lumbar support with the intent to improve posture and alleviate back pain, conducted by van Niekerk et al. (2012). Some subjects reported a reduction in back pain after the intervention. However, the study reported that they used poor randomization procedures and lacked concealed allocation. This would suggest the chairs were possibly only useful for specific members of the population, and/or the existence of the placebo effect. They further stated being unable to make any strong recommendations due to the amount, level and quality of evidence being insufficient.
Following on from this, Curran et at. (2014) found that the addition of a backrest and seat pan actually increased lower back pain in individuals with extensor-related pain, and generally provided no reduction in lower back pain for the general population. This is also supported by Ortiz et al. (2020), who investigated back supports for prolonged car journeys, and found little benefit.
Evidence surrounding back braces is conflicting and does not form a strong conclusion. For example, when combined with physical therapy and pain medication, some studies suggest increased mobility and pain scores with a back brace compared to without – whilst some studies highlight a concern that back bracing may lead to muscle atrophy (Dang, 2018). Overall, research is very limited, with methods and patient participation being of poor quality, and thus more research needs to conducted in this area.
Standing desks for workplaces have grown in popularity in recent times, orbiting the idea that standing and moving are beneficial to reducing back pain. These range in quality, from around $150 to well over $1000, all with the same fundamental idea: to allow you to work in a standing posture when necessary, and being able to adjust back to normal desk height to allow for flexibility.
Claus et al. (2008) conducted a systematic review that suggested standing desks only provided benefits to a specific subgroup of the population – those with degenerated inter vertebral disks. They stated that for a healthy individual, sitting was no worse than standing for the incidence of lower back pain.
However, following on from this, Pillastrini et al. (2010) claimed that standing desks reduced both the severity and risk of lower back pain. In a longitudinal study conducted over 30 months, they studied 100 video display terminal workers, following up at 5, 12 and 30 months to question the effects. However, one issue with this study was that it was not solely focused on standing desks, but included other interventions over the course of the 30 months.
As such, overall, more research – and more specific research – would need to be conducted to evaluate the effects of this trend. Research would also have to study the differences in quality between cheaper and more expensive desks, to understand if there was then a difference in outcome.
With COVID-19 and the lockdown people have been forced to stay at home and work from home as much as possible if they are non-essential. This could lead to poor ergonomics and lack of movement leading to an increase in low back pain. There is advice on the Gov.co.uk website which if you are struggling might be helpful to read. The document Protect Home Workers is PDF with information and a video showing how to set up a temporary workspace at home that is ergonomically correct. There is also other advice from the NHS on low back pain and sitting. You can refer to these if you are working from home and need help or suffer from low back pain.
- Definition Of ERGONOMICS. Merriam-webster.com. Available from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ergonomics [last accessed 11/11/2020]
- Dul, J., & Neumann, W. P. (2009). Ergonomics contributions to company strategies. Applied ergonomics, 40(4), 745–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.07.001
- Health and Safety Executive. (2019) Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorder Statistics. In Great Britain, 2019. [PDF] London: 7-8.[last accessed 11/11/2020].
- Low Back Pain. (2020) [ebook] Maryland: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEA, p.2. [last accessed 11/11/2020].
- Drake, R., Vogl, W. and Mitchell, A. (2005) Gray's Anatomy For Students. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier 33-45.
- Hines, T. (2018) Spine Anatomy, Anatomy Of The Human Spine. Mayfieldclinic.com. [last accessed 11/11/2020].
- Waxenbaum J, Reddy V, Williams C. and Futterman B. (2020) Anatomy, Back, Lumbar Vertebrae. [last accessed 11/11/2020]
- Drake, R., Vogl, W. and Mitchell, A., 2005. Gray's Anatomy For Students. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier, pp.33-45.
- Waxenbaum J, Reddy V, Williams C. and Futterman B. (2020) Anatomy, Back, Lumbar Vertebrae [last accessed 11/11/2020]
- Adams MA, Hutton WC. The effect of posture on the lumbar spine. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume. 1985 Aug;67(4):625-9.
- Wong AY, Chan TP, Chau AW, Cheung HT, Kwan KC, Lam AK, Wong PY, De Carvalho D. Do different sitting postures affect spinal biomechanics of asymptomatic individuals?. Gait & posture. 2019 Jan 1;67:230-5.
- Billy GG, Lemieux SK, Chow MX. Changes in lumbar disk morphology associated with prolonged sitting assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. PM&R. 2014 Sep 1;6(9):790-5.
- Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, Buchbinder R. The epidemiology of low back pain. Best practice & research Clinical rheumatology. 2010 Dec 1;24(6):769-81.
- Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain. 2000 Jan 1;84(1):95-103.
- Wynne-Jones G, Cowen J, Jordan JL, Uthman O, Main CJ, Glozier N, van der Windt D. Absence from work and return to work in people with back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2014 Jun 1;71(6):448-56.
- Al-Otaibi ST. Prevention of occupational back pain. Journal of family & community medicine. 2015 May;22(2):73.
- How To Sit At Your Desk Correctly. nhs.uk. (2019). Available from https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/healthy-body/how-to-sit-correctly/?tabname=head [last accessed 11/11/2020].
- Gupta, N., Christiansen, C., Hallman, D., Korshøj, M., Carneiro, I. and Holtermann, A. (2015) Is Objectively Measured Sitting Time Associated with Low Back Pain? A Cross-Sectional Investigation in the NOMAD study. PLOS ONE 10(3): e0121159.
- Lis, A., Black, K., Korn, H. and Nordin, M. (2006) Association between sitting and occupational LBP. European Spine Journal 16(2): 283-298.
- Womersley, L. and May, S. (2006) Sitting Posture of Subjects With Postural Backache. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 29(3): 213-218.
- O'Sullivan, K., O'Keeffe, M., O'Sullivan, L., O'Sullivan, P. and Dankaerts, W. (2013) Perceptions of sitting posture among members of the community, both with and without non-specific chronic low back pain. Manual Therapy 18(6): 551-556.
- Cramer H, Mehling W, Saha F, Dobos G. and Lauche R. (2018) Postural awareness and its relation to pain: validation of an innovative instrument measuring awareness of body posture in patients with chronic pain. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 19: 109
- Bohr, P. (2000) Efficacy of Office Ergonomics Education. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 10(4): 243-255.
- Parry, S., Coenen, P., Shrestha, N., O'Sullivan, P., Maher, C. and Straker, L. (2019) Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 11.Art. No. CD012487
- O'Sullivan, K., O'Keeffe, M., O'Sullivan, L., O'Sullivan, P. and Dankaerts, W. (2012) The effect of dynamic sitting on the prevention and management of low back pain and low back discomfort: a systematic review. Ergonomics 55(8): 898-908.
- Waongenngarm, P., Areerak, K. and Janwantanakul, P. (2018) The effects of breaks on low back pain, discomfort, and work productivity in office workers: A systematic review of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. Applied Ergonomics 68: 230-239.
- Sheahan, P., Diesbourg, T. and Fischer, S. (2016) The effect of rest break schedule on acute low back pain development in pain and non-pain developers during seated work. Applied Ergonomics 53: 64-70.
- Cramer H, Mehling W, Saha F, Dobos G. and Lauche R. (2018) Postural awareness and its relation to pain: validation of an innovative instrument measuring awareness of body posture in patients with chronic pain. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 19: 109
- Paolucci T, Attanasi C, Cecchini W, Marazzi A, Capobianco S. and Santilli V. (2019) Chronic low back pain and postural rehabilitation exercise: a literature review. Journal of Pain Research 12: 95-107
- Kingma, I. and Dieën, J. (2008) Static and Dynamic Postural Loadings During Computer Work in Females: Sitting on an Office Chair Versus Sitting on an Exercise Ball. Applied Ergonomics 40(2): 199-205.
- Elliott, T., Marshall, K., Lake, D., Wofford, N. and Davies, G. (2016) The Effect of Sitting on Stability Balls on Non-Specific Lower Back Pain, Disability, and Core Endurance: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study. SPINE 41(18).
- Van Niekerk, S., Louw, Q. and Hillier, S. (2012) The effectiveness of a chair intervention in the workplace to reduce musculoskeletal symptoms. A systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 13(1).
- Curran, M., Dankaerts, W., O'Sullivan, P., O'Sullivan, L. and O'Sullivan, K. (2014) The effect of a backrest and seatpan inclination on sitting discomfort and trunk muscle activation in subjects with extension-related low back pain. Ergonomics 57(5): 733-743.
- Dang, S. (2018), Using a Back Brace for Lower Back Pain Relief, Spine Health. Available from https://www.spine-health.com/treatment/alternative-care/using-back-brace-lower-back-pain-relief#vh_footnotes [last accessed 11/11/2020]
- Claus, A., Hides, J., Moseley, L. and Hodges, P. (2008) Sitting versus standing: Does the intradiscal pressure cause disc degeneration or low back pain?. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 18(4): 550-558.
- Pillastrini, P., Mugnai, R., Bertozzi, L., Costi, S., Curti, S., Guccione, A., Mattioli, S. and Violante, F. (2010) Effectiveness of an ergonomic intervention on work-related posture and low back pain in video display terminal operators: A 3 year cross-over trial. Applied Ergonomics 41(3): 436-443.