Clinical Frailty Scale: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="editorbox">
<div class="editorbox">
'''Original Editor '''- [[User:User Name|User Name]]
'''Original Editor '''- [[User:Vidya Acharya|Vidya Acharya]]


'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}  &nbsp;   
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}  &nbsp;   
</div>  
</div>  


<div class="noeditbox">
This article or area is currently under construction and may only be partially complete. Please come back soon to see the finished work! ({{REVISIONDAY}}/{{REVISIONMONTH}}/{{REVISIONYEAR}})
</div>
== Objective  ==
Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is used commonly to assess frailty. The CFS is utilized to predict the outcomes of older people hospitalized with acute illnesses.<ref name=":1" /> The CFS is commonly used to predict health outcomes that are significantly associated are mortality, comorbidity, functional decline, mobility, and cognitive decline.


The scale was developed from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging, and it provides a summary tool for clinicians to assess frailty and fitness. Initially, it was scored on a scale from 1 (very fit) to 7 (severely frail). It was modified to a 9-point scale to include very severely frail and terminally ill.<ref name=":1">Mendiratta P, Latif R. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559009/ Clinical Frailty Scale]. StatPearls [Internet]. 2020 Jun 22.</ref> It evaluates specific domains, including comorbidity, function, and cognition, to generate a frailty score ranging from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill).<ref name=":0">Church S, Rogers E, Rockwood K, Theou O. [https://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12877-020-01801-7.pdf A scoping review of the Clinical Frailty Scale]. BMC geriatrics. 2020 Dec;20(1):1-8.</ref><br>
== Introduction ==
[[File:Elderly woman.jpeg|thumb|Frail lady with carer]]
The Clinical [[Introduction to Frailty|Frailty]] Scale (CFS) is a straightforward and accessible tool that can be used to quickly and simply assess frailty. It has been validated in adults aged over 65 years. This tool can help optimize [[Quality of Life|quality of life]] outcomes for geriatric patients.<ref name=":1">Mendiratta P, Latif R. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559009/ Clinical Frailty Scale]. StatPearls [Internet]. 2020 Jun 22.</ref>


== Intended Population ==
Key Points
The frail elderly population, all individuals over the age of 70 years should be screened for frailty.<ref name=":0" />
 
* A score from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill) is given based on the descriptions and pictographs of activity and functional status.
* Intended Population: Frail elderly population, all individuals [[Older People Introduction|> 65 years]] should be screened for frailty.
* Particular attention should be paid to those who score 5 or more as this is the marker for requiring a [[Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment|comprehensive geriatric assessment]] and often referral to geriatric or frailty specialists.<ref>[[Introduction to Frailty]]</ref>
* The Clinical Frailty Scale focuses on items that can be readily observed without specialist training, including mobility, [[balance]], use of [[Walking Aids|walking aids]], and the abilities to eat, dress, shop, cook, and bank. Scoring should match the description, and should not be based solely on the pictures that accompany each level.
 
[[File:CFS.jpg|center|1018x1018px|alt=|frameless]]


== Method of Use ==
== Method of Use ==
[[File:CFS.jpg|center|thumb|400x400px]]
The CFS is easy and quick to  administer in a clinical setting. It requires data collection by observing the patient mobilise and inquiring about their habitual [[Physical Activity|physical activity]] and ability.
 
<br>


It can be readily be administered in a clinical setting. Applying the CFS to patients is quick and requires data collection by watching the patient (mobilize), inquiring about their habitual physical activity and ability. The clinicians assess whether the patient can independently perform tasks such as bathing, dressing, housework, going upstairs, going out alone, going shopping, taking care of finances, taking medications, and preparing meals<ref name=":0" />.
The clinicians assess whether the patient can independently perform tasks such as bathing, dressing, housework, going upstairs, going out alone, going shopping, taking care of finances, taking medications, and preparing meals<ref name=":0">Church S, Rogers E, Rockwood K, Theou O. [https://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12877-020-01801-7.pdf A scoping review of the Clinical Frailty Scale]. BMC geriatrics. 2020 Dec;20(1):1-8.</ref>. A person with a score ≥of 5 is considered frail.<ref name=":1" />


== Technique ==
== Technique ==
The scale can be introduced by saying something like: “I’d like to know how you are [your parent is] doing overall.” The clinician can inquire about<ref name=":2">Rockwood K, Theou O. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458601/ Using the clinical frailty scale in allocating scarce health care resources.] Canadian Geriatrics Journal. 2020 Sep;23(3):210.</ref>:
The scale can be introduced by saying something like: “I’d like to know how you are doing overall.” and then enquiring about<ref name=":2">Rockwood K, Theou O. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458601/ Using the clinical frailty scale in allocating scarce health care resources.] Canadian Geriatrics Journal. 2020 Sep;23(3):210.</ref>:
* How the patient moved, functioned, thought, and felt about their health over the last two weeks?
* How the person moved, functioned, thought, and felt about their health over the last two weeks?
* How active the person is?
* How active the person is?
* Which medications the patient is taking; experienced clinicians can quickly assay which illnesses are likely present from what medications are being prescribed and/or used?
* Which [[Medication and Older People|medications]] the patient is taking. Experienced clinicians can quickly estimate which illnesses are likely to be present from what medications are being prescribed and/or used.


==== Using the CFS to Grade Degrees of Fitness Prior to the Level of Risk Associated with Frailty ====
==== Elaboration Of CFS Levels  ====
'''Level 1– Very Fit''': People who are robust, active, energetic, and motivated. These people commonly exercise regularly. They are among the fittest for their age
'''Level 1– Very Fit''': People who are robust, active, energetic, and motivated. These people commonly exercise regularly. They are among the fittest for their age.


'''Level 2 – Fit:''' Previously known as well: People who have no intense disease symptoms but are less fit than category 1. Often, they exercise or are very active occasionally, e.g., seasonally.
'''Level 2 – Fit:''' Previously known as well: People who have no intense disease symptoms but are less fit than level 1. Often, they exercise or are very active occasionally, e.g., seasonally.


'''Level 3 – Managing Well:''' People whose medical problems are well controlled, but are not regularly active beyond routine walking.
'''Level 3 – Managing Well:''' People whose medical problems are well controlled, but are not regularly active beyond routine walking.


==== Using the CFS to Grade Clinically Meaningfully Increased Risk ====
'''Level 4 –'''  '''Living with Very Mild Frailty-'''While not dependent on others for daily help, often symptoms limit activities. A common complaint is being “slowed-up” and being tired during the day.
Key factors for Levels 4 to 7are mobility, function, and cognition. Each level reflects high-order aspects of health: they integrate a lot of information. Mobility problems may be present, for example, a sprained ankle, diabetic nerve damage, dehydration, heart failure, kidney damage, or pneumonia. In consequence, these key domains are sensitive signs of health but are not very specific. Impaired function and impaired mobility are commonly accompanied by several illnesses, which results in frailty.<ref name=":2" />


'''Level 4 ''' previously “Vulnerable” is now '''Living with Very Mild Frailty-'''While not dependent on others for daily help, often symptoms limit activities. A common complaint is being “slowed-up” and being tired during the day.<ref name=":1" />
'''Level 5 – Living with Mild Frailty''': These people usually have more evident slowing and need help in higher-order instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) such as finance, transportation, heavy housework, medications. Typically, mild frailty progressively impairs shopping and walking outside alone, meal preparation, and housekeeping.


'''Level 5 – Living with Mild Frailty''' (previously “Mildly Frail”): These people usually have more evident slowing and need help in higher-order instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) such as finance, transportation, heavy housework, medications. Typically, mild frailty progressively impairs shopping and walking outside alone, meal preparation, and housekeeping.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" />
'''Level 6 – Living with Moderate Frailty''': They need help with all outside activities and with keeping house. Inside, they often have problems with stairs and need help with bathing, and might need minimal assistance (standby) with dressing.


'''Level 6 – Living with Moderate Frailty''' (previously “Moderately Frail”): They need help with all outside activities and with keeping house. Inside, they often have problems with stairs and need help with bathing, and might need minimal assistance (standby) with dressing.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":1" />
'''Level 7 – Living with Severe Frailty''': is characterized by progressive dependence in personal ADLs. Completely dependent on personal care from whatever cause (physical or cognitive). Even though they seem stable and not at high risk of dying (within six months). People living with severe frailty can be mobile. Progressively taking to bed—but not being largely bedfast—is the hallmark of the progression of severe frailty.


'''Level 7 – Living with Severe Frailty''' (previously “Severely Frail”): is characterized by progressive dependence in personal ADLs. Completely dependent on personal care from whatever cause (physical or cognitive). Even though they seem stable and not at high risk of dying (within six months). People living with severe frailty can be mobile. Progressively taking to bed—but not being largely bedfast—is the hallmark of the progression of severe frailty.
'''Using the CFS in People Towards the End of Life'''


==== Using the CFS in People Towards the End of Life ====
'''Level 8 – Living with Very Severe Frailty''': These patients are completely dependent, approaching the end of life. Typically, they could not recover even from minor illnesses. A frail person often takes to bed for weeks, prior to dying. This is either heralded by an identifiable episode, such as an infection, or the person just slips away, commonly after some days of reduced oral intake. Very severely frail people who die without a single apparent cause typically follow such a trajectory, commonly with little pain or even distress, often, except impaired bowel function. <ref name=":2" />
The understanding of what happens at the end of life has evolved in relation to its association with ageing. Older people who are terminally ill are much more likely to receive formal palliative care esp in cancer than if they have a disease with a recognized terminal phase, such as dementia or heart failure.


'''Level 8 Living with Very Severe Frailty''' (previously “Very Severely Frail”): These patients are completely dependent, approaching the end of life. Typically, they could not recover even from minor illnesses. is the not uncommon state in which a frail person takes to bed, often for weeks, prior to dying. This is either heralded by an identifiable episode, such as an infection, or the person just slips away, commonly after some days of reduced oral intake. Very severely frail people who die without a single apparent cause typically follow such a trajectory, commonly without much pain or even distress, often, with the exception of impaired bowel function.
'''Level 9 Terminally Ill:''' Approaching the end of life. This category applies to people with a life expectancy of under 6 months, which are not otherwise evidently frail<ref name=":1" />. This level is notable for being the only level in which the current state surpasses the baseline state. The terminally ill person might have been operating at any frailty level at baseline. On the CFS card, a person in this category is pictured seated in a chair, reflecting the fact that many older adults who die with a single system illness (like [[Oncology and Palliative Care|cancer]]), have a reasonable level of function until about the very end. In case a terminally ill person is completely dependent for personal care at baseline, they will be scored as Level 8.<ref name=":2" />


'''Level 9 – Terminally Ill:''' Approaching the end of life. This category applies to people with a life expectancy of under 6 months, which are not otherwise evidently frail<ref name=":1" />. This level is notable for being the only level in which the current state trumps the baseline state, in that the terminally ill person might have been operating at any frailty level at baseline. On the Clinical Frailty Scale card, this person is pictured seated in a chair. This reflects the fact that many older adults who are dying with a single system illness—notably cancer—have a reasonable level of function until about the very end. That is why we portray the situation in that way. Even so, if a terminally ill person was completely dependent for personal care at baseline, they would be scored as Level 8.<ref name=":2" />
'''Pointers About Scoring and Next Steps'''


== Evidence  ==
Individual characteristics will vary within each level of the CFS. About 80% or more of people fit the description offered for a given level. If they fit two categories equally well, in routine care it is best to score the scale at the higher or more dependent level. Clinicians also need to recognize the possibility of some variability in judgement in specific circumstances.<ref name=":2" />


=== Reliability  ===
'''Scoring the CFS in People with Cognitive Impairment:''' The degree of [[dementia]] is correlated to the level of frailty.<ref name=":2" />
Clinical Frailty Scale is a reliable instrument to identify frailty in the emergency department. It might provide ED clinicians with useful information for decision-making with triage, disposition, and treatment.<ref>Kaeppeli T, Rueegg M, Dreher-Hummel T, Brabrand M, Kabell-Nissen S, Carpenter CR, Bingisser R, Nickel CH. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0196064420302183#:~:text=Among%202%2C393%20patients%2C%20the%20Clinical,and%20demonstrated%20good%20interrater%20reliability. Validation of the clinical frailty scale for prediction of thirty-day mortality in the emergency department.] Annals of emergency medicine. 2020 Sep 1;76(3):291-300.</ref> Applying the CFS to patients requires a clinical judgment of the examining clinician and thus may lead to inter-observer variation<ref name=":1" />. The inter-rater reliability of the CFS is generally very good, however, several biases may play a role in scoring, especially with clinicians who are inexperienced using the scale<ref>https://www.physiospot.com/research/frailty-scale-classification-tree/ Accessed on 27/2/21</ref>. In light of this, a new classification tree to improve CFS scoring by inexperienced raters has been created.
* Mild dementia would go with mild frailty. In both cases, the person is independent in their personal or basic ADLs, but dependent on one or more instrumental [[Activities of Daily Living|ADLs]] (such as finance, transportation, heavy housework, medications).
* Recent memory is very impaired in people with moderate dementia, even though they seemingly can remember their past life events well. As with moderate frailty, they can do their personal care with prompting or set-up.
* In severe dementia, as in severe frailty, people have progressive difficulty in performing personal ADLs and require increasing amounts of hands-on assistance.


=== Validity ===
== Evidence ==
CFS score is a valid diagnostic instrument to measure frailty in older hospitalized patients and patients in the emergency department.<ref>Stille K, Temmel N, Hepp J, Herget-Rosenthal S. [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41999-020-00370-7 Validation of the Clinical Frailty Scale for retrospective use in acute care]. European Geriatric Medicine. 2020 Dec;11(6):1009-15.</ref> CFS-Korean version is a valid scale for measuring frailty in older Korean patients
'''Reliability:''' The CFS is a reliable instrument to identify frailty in the emergency department. It might provide useful information for decision-making with triage, disposition, and treatment.<ref>Kaeppeli T, Rueegg M, Dreher-Hummel T, Brabrand M, Kabell-Nissen S, Carpenter CR, Bingisser R, Nickel CH. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0196064420302183#:~:text=Among%202%2C393%20patients%2C%20the%20Clinical,and%20demonstrated%20good%20interrater%20reliability. Validation of the clinical frailty scale for prediction of thirty-day mortality in the emergency department.] Annals of emergency medicine. 2020 Sep 1;76(3):291-300.</ref> Applying the CFS to patients requires a clinical judgment of the examining clinician and thus may lead to inter-observer variation<ref name=":1" />. The inter-rater reliability of the CFS is very good, however, several biases may play a role in scoring, especially with clinicians who are inexperienced using the scale<ref name=":3">https://www.physiospot.com/research/frailty-scale-classification-tree/ Accessed on 27/2/21</ref>.  
 
This scale has largely not been validated in younger people as disability in younger people (including both acquired, as in spinal cord injury, and life-long, as in intellectual disability) does not have the same meaning for prognosis that it does with age-related disability<ref name=":2" />.
 
=== Responsiveness  ===


=== Miscellaneous<span style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal;" class="Apple-style-span"></span>  ===
'''Validity:''' CFS score is a valid diagnostic instrument to measure frailty in older hospitalized patients and patients in the emergency department.<ref>Stille K, Temmel N, Hepp J, Herget-Rosenthal S. [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41999-020-00370-7 Validation of the Clinical Frailty Scale for retrospective use in acute care]. European Geriatric Medicine. 2020 Dec;11(6):1009-15.</ref> CFS-Korean version is a valid scale for measuring frailty in older Korean patients.<ref>Ko RE, Moon SM, Kang D, Cho J, Chung CR, Lee Y, Hong YS, Lee SH, Lee JH, Suh GY. [https://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12877-021-02008-0 Translation and validation of the Korean version of the clinical frailty scale in older patients.] BMC geriatrics. 2021 Dec;21(1):1-8.</ref> This scale has largely not been validated in younger people as a disability in younger people (including both acquired, as in spinal cord injury, and life-long, as in intellectual disability) does not have the same meaning for prognosis that it does with age-related disability<ref name=":2" />.
Since the CFS is seen as one of the most promising and practical ways of screening frailty in routine assessment and especially in acute care as it combines clinical judgment with objective measurement. It provides valuable information to guide patient care and health policy development. Studies shows that the CFS has been suggested as a tool that can guide the rationing of critical care resources during the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies have shown that the CFS is mostly used within geriatric medicine, cardiology, intensive care, general medicine, emergency medicine, surgery, and dialysis. The CFS is also not commonly used to predict patient-oriented measures such as quality of life. Using the CFS to assess the degree of frailty in clinical settings extends beyond evaluating risk to mitigating frailty by understanding disease presentation, acute management, recovery time, and rehabilitation potential. Further research into the potential of this tool is warranted and will likely reveal novel applications to improve medical care of older adults. For example, investigation is warranted into whether implementing CFS in routine practice will improve care. In certain NHS centers in the United Kingdom, the CFS is routinely used to screen all patients over the age of 75 who are admitted to hospital via the Emergency Department [10]. Data from these institutions will be highly valuable in the advancement of frailty research.


Research has been suggested that CFS can be used as a tool that can guide the rationing of critical care resources if they become overwhelmed in the COVID-19 pandemic. For this reason, we published a guide for using the Clinical Frailty Scale for people new to the scale
'''Miscellaneous'''<span style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal;" class="Apple-style-span"></span>
* CFS is seen as one of the most promising and practical ways of screening frailty in routine assessment and especially in acute care as it combines clinical judgment with objective measurement. It provides valuable information to guide patient care and health policy development.<ref name=":0" />
* Studies have shown that the CFS is mostly used within geriatric medicine, cardiology, intensive care, general medicine, emergency medicine, surgery, and dialysis. <ref name=":0" />
* Research has suggested that CFS can be used as a tool that can guide the rationing of critical care resources if they become overwhelmed in the COVID-19 pandemic.<ref name=":0" />


== Links  ==
== Links  ==
[https://www.dal.ca/sites/gmr/our-tools/clinical-frailty-scale/cfs-guidance.html CFS GUIDANCE & TRAINING]


== References  ==
== References  ==


<references />
<references />
[[Category:Older People/Geriatrics]]
[[Category:Older People/Geriatrics - Assessment and Examination]]
[[Category:Outcome Measures]]

Latest revision as of 17:57, 17 January 2023

Original Editor - Vidya Acharya

Top Contributors - Vidya Acharya, Lucinda hampton and Aminat Abolade  


Introduction[edit | edit source]

Frail lady with carer

The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a straightforward and accessible tool that can be used to quickly and simply assess frailty. It has been validated in adults aged over 65 years. This tool can help optimize quality of life outcomes for geriatric patients.[1]

Key Points

  • A score from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill) is given based on the descriptions and pictographs of activity and functional status.
  • Intended Population: Frail elderly population, all individuals > 65 years should be screened for frailty.
  • Particular attention should be paid to those who score 5 or more as this is the marker for requiring a comprehensive geriatric assessment and often referral to geriatric or frailty specialists.[2]
  • The Clinical Frailty Scale focuses on items that can be readily observed without specialist training, including mobility, balance, use of walking aids, and the abilities to eat, dress, shop, cook, and bank. Scoring should match the description, and should not be based solely on the pictures that accompany each level.

Method of Use[edit | edit source]

The CFS is easy and quick to administer in a clinical setting. It requires data collection by observing the patient mobilise and inquiring about their habitual physical activity and ability.

The clinicians assess whether the patient can independently perform tasks such as bathing, dressing, housework, going upstairs, going out alone, going shopping, taking care of finances, taking medications, and preparing meals[3]. A person with a score ≥of 5 is considered frail.[1]

Technique[edit | edit source]

The scale can be introduced by saying something like: “I’d like to know how you are doing overall.” and then enquiring about[4]:

  • How the person moved, functioned, thought, and felt about their health over the last two weeks?
  • How active the person is?
  • Which medications the patient is taking. Experienced clinicians can quickly estimate which illnesses are likely to be present from what medications are being prescribed and/or used.

Elaboration Of CFS Levels[edit | edit source]

Level 1– Very Fit: People who are robust, active, energetic, and motivated. These people commonly exercise regularly. They are among the fittest for their age.

Level 2 – Fit: Previously known as well: People who have no intense disease symptoms but are less fit than level 1. Often, they exercise or are very active occasionally, e.g., seasonally.

Level 3 – Managing Well: People whose medical problems are well controlled, but are not regularly active beyond routine walking.

Level 4 – Living with Very Mild Frailty-While not dependent on others for daily help, often symptoms limit activities. A common complaint is being “slowed-up” and being tired during the day.

Level 5 – Living with Mild Frailty: These people usually have more evident slowing and need help in higher-order instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) such as finance, transportation, heavy housework, medications. Typically, mild frailty progressively impairs shopping and walking outside alone, meal preparation, and housekeeping.

Level 6 – Living with Moderate Frailty: They need help with all outside activities and with keeping house. Inside, they often have problems with stairs and need help with bathing, and might need minimal assistance (standby) with dressing.

Level 7 – Living with Severe Frailty: is characterized by progressive dependence in personal ADLs. Completely dependent on personal care from whatever cause (physical or cognitive). Even though they seem stable and not at high risk of dying (within six months). People living with severe frailty can be mobile. Progressively taking to bed—but not being largely bedfast—is the hallmark of the progression of severe frailty.

Using the CFS in People Towards the End of Life

Level 8 – Living with Very Severe Frailty: These patients are completely dependent, approaching the end of life. Typically, they could not recover even from minor illnesses. A frail person often takes to bed for weeks, prior to dying. This is either heralded by an identifiable episode, such as an infection, or the person just slips away, commonly after some days of reduced oral intake. Very severely frail people who die without a single apparent cause typically follow such a trajectory, commonly with little pain or even distress, often, except impaired bowel function. [4]

Level 9 – Terminally Ill: Approaching the end of life. This category applies to people with a life expectancy of under 6 months, which are not otherwise evidently frail[1]. This level is notable for being the only level in which the current state surpasses the baseline state. The terminally ill person might have been operating at any frailty level at baseline. On the CFS card, a person in this category is pictured seated in a chair, reflecting the fact that many older adults who die with a single system illness (like cancer), have a reasonable level of function until about the very end. In case a terminally ill person is completely dependent for personal care at baseline, they will be scored as Level 8.[4]

Pointers About Scoring and Next Steps

Individual characteristics will vary within each level of the CFS. About 80% or more of people fit the description offered for a given level. If they fit two categories equally well, in routine care it is best to score the scale at the higher or more dependent level. Clinicians also need to recognize the possibility of some variability in judgement in specific circumstances.[4]

Scoring the CFS in People with Cognitive Impairment: The degree of dementia is correlated to the level of frailty.[4]

  • Mild dementia would go with mild frailty. In both cases, the person is independent in their personal or basic ADLs, but dependent on one or more instrumental ADLs (such as finance, transportation, heavy housework, medications).
  • Recent memory is very impaired in people with moderate dementia, even though they seemingly can remember their past life events well. As with moderate frailty, they can do their personal care with prompting or set-up.
  • In severe dementia, as in severe frailty, people have progressive difficulty in performing personal ADLs and require increasing amounts of hands-on assistance.

Evidence[edit | edit source]

Reliability: The CFS is a reliable instrument to identify frailty in the emergency department. It might provide useful information for decision-making with triage, disposition, and treatment.[5] Applying the CFS to patients requires a clinical judgment of the examining clinician and thus may lead to inter-observer variation[1]. The inter-rater reliability of the CFS is very good, however, several biases may play a role in scoring, especially with clinicians who are inexperienced using the scale[6].

Validity: CFS score is a valid diagnostic instrument to measure frailty in older hospitalized patients and patients in the emergency department.[7] CFS-Korean version is a valid scale for measuring frailty in older Korean patients.[8] This scale has largely not been validated in younger people as a disability in younger people (including both acquired, as in spinal cord injury, and life-long, as in intellectual disability) does not have the same meaning for prognosis that it does with age-related disability[4].

Miscellaneous

  • CFS is seen as one of the most promising and practical ways of screening frailty in routine assessment and especially in acute care as it combines clinical judgment with objective measurement. It provides valuable information to guide patient care and health policy development.[3]
  • Studies have shown that the CFS is mostly used within geriatric medicine, cardiology, intensive care, general medicine, emergency medicine, surgery, and dialysis. [3]
  • Research has suggested that CFS can be used as a tool that can guide the rationing of critical care resources if they become overwhelmed in the COVID-19 pandemic.[3]

Links[edit | edit source]

CFS GUIDANCE & TRAINING

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Mendiratta P, Latif R. Clinical Frailty Scale. StatPearls [Internet]. 2020 Jun 22.
  2. Introduction to Frailty
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Church S, Rogers E, Rockwood K, Theou O. A scoping review of the Clinical Frailty Scale. BMC geriatrics. 2020 Dec;20(1):1-8.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 Rockwood K, Theou O. Using the clinical frailty scale in allocating scarce health care resources. Canadian Geriatrics Journal. 2020 Sep;23(3):210.
  5. Kaeppeli T, Rueegg M, Dreher-Hummel T, Brabrand M, Kabell-Nissen S, Carpenter CR, Bingisser R, Nickel CH. Validation of the clinical frailty scale for prediction of thirty-day mortality in the emergency department. Annals of emergency medicine. 2020 Sep 1;76(3):291-300.
  6. https://www.physiospot.com/research/frailty-scale-classification-tree/ Accessed on 27/2/21
  7. Stille K, Temmel N, Hepp J, Herget-Rosenthal S. Validation of the Clinical Frailty Scale for retrospective use in acute care. European Geriatric Medicine. 2020 Dec;11(6):1009-15.
  8. Ko RE, Moon SM, Kang D, Cho J, Chung CR, Lee Y, Hong YS, Lee SH, Lee JH, Suh GY. Translation and validation of the Korean version of the clinical frailty scale in older patients. BMC geriatrics. 2021 Dec;21(1):1-8.