Tendon Biomechanics: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
</div>  
</div>  
== Tendon Structure &amp; Composition  ==
== Tendon Structure &amp; Composition  ==
[[File:Tendon-structure.png|thumb|536x536px|Tendon structure ]]
[[Tendon Anatomy|Tendons]] have a hierarchical arrangement that is sequentially composed of [[collagen]] molecules, fibrils, fibres, fascicles, and lastly the tendon unit. Tendon units are encased in epitenon, which reduces friction with neighbouring tissues.<ref name="Wang 2012" />


Tendons have a hierarchy of fibrillar arrangement that is sequentially composed of collagen molecules, fibrils, fibers, fascicles (or fiber bundles), and the tendon unit. Tendon units are surrounded by epitenon, which functions to reduce friction with adjacent tissues.  
The tensile strength of a tendon is dependent on collagen.  


The key to the tendons’ tensile strength is collagen.11 Type I collagen accounts for about 70–80% of the dry weight of normal tendons. In addition to type I collagen, many other types of collagen are also present, including type III (form rapid cross-links in stabilizing repair sites in the case of tears), type V (regulates collagen fibril diameter), and type XII (provides lubrication between collagen fibers).  
* Type I collagen comprises approximately 70–80% of the dry weight of a normal tendon.  
* Many other types of collagen are also present, including type III (functions to form rapid cross-links in stabilizing repair sites in torn tendons), type V (regulates collagen fibril diameter), and type XII (provides lubrication between collagen fibres).<ref name="Wang 2012" />


In addition to collagen, many proteoglycans (e.g. aggrecan and decorin) and glycoproteins (e.g. tenascin-C, fibronectin, and elastin) also have important functions in tendons. Aggrecan holds water and resists compression, and decorin facilitates fibrillar slippage. Tenascin-C, fibronectin, and elastin function to enhance mechanical stability, facilitate tendon healing, and allow tendons to return to their prestretched lengths after physiological loading, respectively.  
Additionally to collagen, many proteoglycans (e.g. aggrecan and decorin) and glycoproteins (e.g. elastin, fibronectin, and tenascin-C) also have important functions in tendons.  


== Tendon Mechanical Properties ==
* Aggrecan binds water and resists compression
* Decorin promotes fibrillar slippage.
* Elastin, fibronectin, and tenascin-C function to enhance mechanical stability, aid tendon healing, and allow tendons to revert back to their pre-stretched lengths after normal physiological loading, respectively.<ref name="Wang 2012" />


The structure and composition of tendons allow for their unique mechanical behavior, reflected by a stress–strain curve consisting of four regions: [[Image:S-s curve intechopen.jpeg|right|400x230px|Tendon Stress-Strain Curve]]
For more on tendon anatomy, refer [http://www.physio-pedia.com/Tendon_Anatomy here].  
== Tendon Mechanical Properties: Non-Linear Elasticity  ==


#'''Toe region (tendon strain &lt;2%)''': this is where “stretching out” of crimped tendon fibrils occurs due to mechanical loading on the tendon. Depending on the type and location of the tendon, this wavy fibril pattern results in different initial mechanical properties due to the varying angle and length of “crimping.”
The structure and composition of tendons allow for their unique mechanical behaviour, reflected by a stress-strain curve consisting of three distinct regions (Fig. 1):<ref name="Robi 2013" />
#'''Linear region (tendon strain &lt;4%)''': this is the physiological upper limit of tendon strain whereby the collagen fibrils orient themselves in the direction of tensile mechanical load. The slope of this region is the Young’s modulus of the tendon, which represents tendon stiffness.
#'''Microscopic failure (tendon strain &gt;4%)''': microscopic tearing of tendon fibers occurs, resulting in microtear failure of the tendon.  
#'''Macroscopic failure (tendon strain &gt;8-10%)''': macroscopic tearing of tendon fibers ensues, eventually leading to tendon rupture.


Since there are many muscles in the body, each tendon differs in its function and therefore its mechanical properties. For example, the Young’s modulus of the human patellar tendon is 660 ± 266 MPa (mean ± standard deviation), whereas the tibialis anterior tendon is about 1200 MPa. Aging also significantly affects the mechanical properties of tendons: Young’s modulus of human patellar tendons aged 29–50 years is about 660 ± 266 MPa, but is about 504 ± 222 MPa in those aged 64–93 years.  
{| cellpadding="2" border="0"
|-
| width="500" |
#'''Toe region''': this is where “stretching out” or "un-crimping" of crimped tendon fibrils occurs from mechanically loading the tendon up to 2% strain. This region is responsible for nonlinear stress/strain curve, because the slope of the toe region is not linear.
#'''Linear region''': this is the physiological upper limit of tendon strain whereby the collagen fibrils orient themselves in the direction of tensile mechanical load and begin to stretch. The tendon deforms in a linear fashion due to the inter-molecular sliding of collagen triple helices. If strain is less than 4%, the tendon will return to its original length when unloaded, therefore this portion is elastic and reversible and the slope of the curve represents the Young's modulus.
#'''Yield and failure region''': this is where the tendon stretches beyond its physiological limit and intramolecular cross-links between collagen fibres fail. If micro-failure continues to accumulate, stiffness is reduced and the tendon begins to fail, resulting in irreversible plastic deformation. If the tendon stretches beyond 8-10% of its original length, macroscopic failure soon follows.<br>
 
| width="300" |
[[Image:S-s curve intechopen.jpeg|center|400x250px|Tendon Stress-Strain Curve]]'''&nbsp; &nbsp; Figure 1<ref name="Robi 2013" />'''
 
|}
 
Since there are many [[Muscle Cells (Myocyte)|muscles]] in the body, each tendon differs in its function and therefore its mechanical properties.<ref name="Wang 2012" /> For example, the Young’s modulus of the human [[Patellar Tendinopathy|patellar tendon]] is 660 ± 266 MPa (mean ± standard deviation),<ref name="Johnson 1994">Johnson GA, Tramaglini DM, Levine RE, Ohno K, Choi NY, Woo SL. Tensile and viscoelasticfckLRproperties of human patellar tendon. J Orthop Res, 1994; 12(6): 796–803.</ref> whereas the [[Tibialis Anterior|tibialis anterior]] tendon is about 1200 MPa.<ref name="Maganaris 1999">Maganaris CN, Paul JP. In vivo human tendon mechanical properties. J Physiol, 1999; 521 (Pt 1): 307–313.</ref> [[Older People Introduction|Aging]] also significantly affects the mechanical properties of tendons:<ref name="Wang 2012" /> Young’s modulus of human patellar tendons aged 29–50 years is about 660 ± 266 MPa, but is about 504 ± 222 MPa in those aged 64–93 years.<ref name="Johnson 1994" />
 
== Tendon Mechanical Properties: Viscoelasticity  ==


<br> Tendons also have viscoelastic properties (likely the result of collagenous proteins, water, and the interactions between collagens and proteoglycans), meaning their mechanical behaviour is dependent on the rate of mechanical strain A viscoeleastic material is more deformable at low strain rates but less deformable at high strain rates. Therefore, tendons at low strain rates tend to absorb more mechanical energy but are less effective in carrying mechanical loads. However, tendons become stiffer and more effective in transmitting large muscular loads to bone at high strain rates.  
Tendons also have viscoelastic properties (likely the result of collagenous proteins, water, and the interactions between collagens and proteoglycans), meaning their mechanical behaviour is dependent on the rate of mechanical strain.<ref name="Wang 2012">Wang JHC, Guo Q, Li B. Tendon Biomechanics and Mechanobiology - A Minireview of Basic Concepts and Recent Advancements. Journal of Hand Therapy, 2012; 25(2):133–141.</ref> In other words, the relationship between stress and strain for a tendon is not constant but depends on the time of displacement or load.<ref name="Robi 2013">Robi K, Jakob N, Matevz K, Matjaz V (2013). Chapter 2: The Physiology of Sports Injuries and Repair Processes. In Hamlin M (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-1031-6, InTech, DOI: 10.5772/54234.</ref> A viscoeleastic material is more deformable at low strain rates but less deformable at high strain rates. Therefore, tendons at low strain rates tend to absorb more mechanical energy but are less effective in carrying mechanical loads. However, tendons become stiffer and more effective in transmitting large muscular loads to bone at high strain rates.<ref name="Wang 2012" />


There are three major characteristics of a viscoelastic material of tendons:  
There are three major characteristics of a viscoelastic material of tendons:<ref name="Robi 2013" />


{| cellpadding="2" border="0"
{| cellpadding="2" border="0"
Line 32: Line 49:
'''1. Creep'''  
'''1. Creep'''  


*Indicates increasing deformation under constant load.  
*Indicates increasing deformation under constant load (Fig. 2).  
*This is in contrast with the usual elastic material, which does not elongate, no matter how long the load is applied.<br>
*This is in contrast with the usual elastic material, which does not elongate, no matter how long the load is applied.<br>


Line 50: Line 67:


| width="300" |  
| width="300" |  
[[Image:Creep curve intechopen.jpeg|center|400x250px]]'''&nbsp; &nbsp; Figure 2'''  
[[Image:Creep curve intechopen.jpeg|center|400x250px]]'''&nbsp; &nbsp; Figure 2<ref name="Robi 2013" />'''  


|-
|-
Line 56: Line 73:
'''2. Stress relaxation'''  
'''2. Stress relaxation'''  


*Indicates stress acting upon a tendon will eventually reduce under a constant deformation.<br>
*Indicates stress acting upon a tendon will eventually reduce under a constant deformation (Fig. 3).<br>


<br>  
<br>  
Line 75: Line 92:


| width="300" |  
| width="300" |  
[[Image:S-r curve intechopen.jpeg|center|400x250px]]'''&nbsp; &nbsp; Figure 3'''  
[[Image:S-r curve intechopen.jpeg|center|400x250px]]'''&nbsp; &nbsp; Figure 3<ref name="Robi 2013" />'''  


|-
|-
Line 81: Line 98:
'''3. Hysteresis or energy dissipation'''  
'''3. Hysteresis or energy dissipation'''  


*When a viscoelastic material is loaded and unloaded, the unloading curve is different from the loading curve.  
*When a viscoelastic material is loaded and unloaded, the unloading curve is different from the loading curve (Fig. 4).  
*The difference between the two curves represents the amount of energy that is lost during loading.  
*The difference between the two curves represents the amount of energy that is lost during loading.  
*If loading and unloading are repeated several times, different curves can be obtained.  
*If loading and unloading are repeated several times, different curves can be obtained.  
*After about 10 cycles, however, the loading and unloading curves no longer change (although they are still different) and the amount of hysteresis is reduced allowing the stress-strain curve to become reproducible.<br>
*After about 10 cycles, however, the loading and unloading curves no longer change (although they are still different) and the amount of hysteresis is reduced allowing the stress-strain curve to become reproducible (Fig. 5).<br>


<br>  
<br>  
Line 111: Line 128:


| width="300" |  
| width="300" |  
[[Image:Hysteresis curve intechopen.jpeg|center|400x250px]]'''&nbsp; &nbsp; Figure 4'''  
[[Image:Hysteresis curve intechopen.jpeg|center|400x250px]]'''&nbsp; &nbsp; Figure 4<ref name="Robi 2013" />'''  


<br> '''[[Image:Rep loading-unloading curve intechopen.jpeg|center|400x250px]]'''&nbsp; '''&nbsp; Figure 5'''  
<br> <br> [[Image:Rep loading-unloading curve intechopen.jpeg|center|400x250px]]&nbsp; '''&nbsp; Figure 5<ref name="Robi 2013" />'''  


|}
|}
Line 119: Line 136:
== Factors Affecting Mechanical Forces  ==
== Factors Affecting Mechanical Forces  ==


Wang 2006
Many factors affect the mechanical forces on tendons during normal locomotion.<ref>Wang, JHC. Mechanobiology of Tendon. Journal of Biomechanics, 2006; 39: 1563–1582.</ref>
 
Several factors affect the mechanical forces on tendons during normal locomotion. First, different tendons in the body are subjected to different levels of mechanical loads. For example, the Achilles tendon withstands higher tensile forces than those of the tibialis anterior. In humans, it has been estimated that the peak force transmitted through the Achilles tendon during running is 9 kN, which is equivalent to 12.5 times body weight. In human hand flexor tendons, it has been shown that the intratendinous force of the tendon depends on whether the force was generated passively or actively, and on whether the position of the joint was in flexion or extension. During passive mobilization of the wrist, the flexor tendon force was found to range between 1-6 N and up to 9 N during similar mobilization of the fingers. During a 35 N tip-pinch, the tendon force measured up to 12 N whereas during active, unresisted finger motion, the tendon force reached about 35 N. Second, both the level of muscle contraction and the tendon’s relative size influence mechanical forces on a tendon. In general, the greater the cross-sectional area of a muscle, the higher force it produces and the larger stress a tendon undergoes (e.g. patellar tendon vs. hamstring). Similarly, varying the rate and frequency of mechanical loading result in different levels of tendon forces.  


== Pathological Mechanoresponses  ==
# First, different tendons in the body are subjected to different levels of mechanical loads.<ref>Maganaris CN. Tensile properties of in vivo human tendinous tissue. Journal of Biomechanics, 2002; 35: 1019–1027.</ref> For example, it has been estimated that the peak force transmitted through the [[Achilles Tendon|Achilles tendon]] in humans during running is 9 kN, which is equivalent to 12.5 times body weight.<ref>Komi PV, Fukashiro S, Jarvinen M. Biomechanical loading of Achilles tendon during normal locomotion. Clinics in Sports Medicine, 1992; 11: 521–531.</ref> In human hand flexor tendons, it has been shown that the intra-tendinous force of the tendon depends on whether the force is generated passively or actively, and whether the position of the joint is in flexion or extension. During passive mobilization of the wrist, the flexor tendon force was found to be between 1-6 N and up to 9 N during similar mobilization of the fingers. During a 35 N fingertip pinch, tendon forces can be measured up to 12 N whereas during active, unresisted finger motion, tendon force can reach approximately 35 N.<ref>Schuind F, Garcia-Elias M, Cooney WP, An KN. fckLRFlexor tendon forces: in vivo measurements. Journal of Hand Surgery [American], 1992; 17: 291–298.</ref>
# Second, both the level of muscle contraction and the tendon’s relative size influence mechanical forces on a tendon. In general, the greater the cross-sectional area of a muscle, the higher force it can produce and the larger stress its tendon undergoes (e.g. [[Patella|patellar]] tendon vs. [[Hamstrings|hamstring]]).<ref>Kellis E. Quantification of quadriceps and hamstring antagonist activity. Sports Medicine, 1998; 25: 37–62.</ref>
# Third, different activities induce different levels of forces, even on the same tendon (in animal models).<ref>Korvick DL, Cummings JF, Grood ES, Holden JP, Feder SM, Butler DL. The use of an implantable force transducer to measure patellar tendon forces in goats. Journal of Biomechanics, 1996; 29: 557–561.</ref> Similarly, varying the rate and frequency of mechanical loading results in different tendon forces.<ref>Finni T, Komi PV, Lukkariniemi J. Achilles tendon loading during walking: application of a novel optic fiber technique. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 1998; 77: 289–291.</ref><ref>Kyrolainen H, Finni T, Avela J, Komi PV. Neuromuscular behaviour of the triceps surae muscle-tendon complex during running and jumping. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 2003; 24: 153–155.</ref><br />


== The Differential Effects of Mechanical Loading on Tendons<ref name="Wang 2012">Wang JHC, Guo Q, Li B. Tendon Biomechanics and Mechanobiology - A Minireview of Basic Concepts and Recent Advancements. J Hand Ther, 2012; 25(2): 133–141.</ref>  ==
== The Differential Effects of Mechanical Loading on Tendons<ref name="Wang 2012" />  ==


{| cellpadding="2" border="1" style="border: 1px solid darkgray;"
{| cellpadding="2" border="1" style="border: 1px solid darkgray;"
Line 143: Line 160:


|  
|  
• ↑ Tensile strength <br> • ↑ Collagen synthesis <br> • ↓ Collagen degradation <br> • ↓ Adhesions <br> • ↓ Inflammatory mediator (e.g. prostaglandin E2, PGE2) <br> • ↑ Tendon stem cells (TSCs) differentiating into tenocytes  
• ↑ Tensile strength <br> • ↑ Collagen synthesis <br> • ↓ Collagen degradation <br> • ↓ Adhesions <br> • ↓ Inflammatory mediator (e.g. prostaglandin E2) <br> • ↑ Tendon stem cells (TSCs) differentiating into tenocytes  


|-
|-
Line 150: Line 167:


| width="600" |  
| width="600" |  
• ↓ Tensile strength <br> • ↓ Collagen organization <br> • ↑ Myofibroblasts <br> • ↑ Inflammatory mediators <br> • ↑ TSCs differentiating into nontenocytes (adipocytes, osteocytes, chondrocytes) <br> • ↑ Leukotrienes (↑ edema)  
• ↓ Tensile strength <br> • ↓ Collagen organization <br> • ↑ Myofibroblasts <br> • ↑ Inflammatory mediators <br> • ↑ Tendon stem cells differentiating into non-tenocytes ([[Adipose Tissue|adipocytes]], osteocytes, chondrocytes) <br> • ↑ Leukotrienes (↑ edema)  


|}
|}


<br>  
It can be seen from the above that in general<ref name="Wang 2012" />, mechanical loading at physiological levels is beneficial to tendons, but excessive loading or disuse of tendons is detrimental
 
Normal tendons can show a disorganised response to loading as well as improved tendon structure with over long term loading. &nbsp;Normal tendons in Australian football athletes have been shown on UTC imaging to demonstrate disorganisation as a normal response to the mechanical loading of a game, this disorganisation returned to normal after 4 days<ref>Samuel D Rosengarten1, Jill L Cook, Adam L Bryant, Justin T Cordy, John Daffy, Sean I Docking.  Australian football players’ Achilles tendons respond to game loads within 2 days: an ultrasound tissue characterisation (UTC) study. Br J Sports Med 2015;49:183-187</ref>. &nbsp;In the same research series the Australian football players showed an improvement in tendon structure over a 5 month pre season training period&nbsp;with increased fibrillar alignment<ref>Docking SI, Rosengarten SD, Cook J1. Achilles tendon structure improves on UTC imaging over a 5-month pre-season in elite Australian football players. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 May 5.</ref>.
 
== Resources  ==
 
[http://www.intechopen.com/books/current-issues-in-sports-and-exercise-medicine/the-physiology-of-sports-injuries-and-repair-processes The Physioology of Sports Injuries and Repair Processes (Chapter)] by&nbsp;Robi K, Jakob N, Matevz K, and Matjaz V (2013)
 
 


== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed])  ==
<div class="researchbox">
<rss>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1jq74NZspErMZoVOSQJLbF30E6yEauYB8XX3SWheN3XyiLjQGV|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss>
</div>
== References  ==
== References  ==


Line 166: Line 187:
<br>  
<br>  


[[Category:Anatomy]] [[Category:Biomechanics]] [[Category:Tendons]] [[Category:Musculoskeletal/Orthopaedics|Musculoskeletal/Orthopaedics]]
[[Category:Anatomy]]  
[[Category:Biomechanics]]  
[[Category:Tendons]]  
[[Category:Musculoskeletal/Orthopaedics|Musculoskeletal/Orthopaedics]]
[[Category:Sports Medicine]]
[[Category:Rehabilitation Foundations]]
[[Category:Biomechanics]]
[[Category:Tendinopathy]]
[[Category:Course Pages]]

Latest revision as of 05:32, 17 June 2022

Tendon Structure & Composition[edit | edit source]

Tendon structure

Tendons have a hierarchical arrangement that is sequentially composed of collagen molecules, fibrils, fibres, fascicles, and lastly the tendon unit. Tendon units are encased in epitenon, which reduces friction with neighbouring tissues.[1]

The tensile strength of a tendon is dependent on collagen.

  • Type I collagen comprises approximately 70–80% of the dry weight of a normal tendon.
  • Many other types of collagen are also present, including type III (functions to form rapid cross-links in stabilizing repair sites in torn tendons), type V (regulates collagen fibril diameter), and type XII (provides lubrication between collagen fibres).[1]

Additionally to collagen, many proteoglycans (e.g. aggrecan and decorin) and glycoproteins (e.g. elastin, fibronectin, and tenascin-C) also have important functions in tendons.

  • Aggrecan binds water and resists compression
  • Decorin promotes fibrillar slippage.
  • Elastin, fibronectin, and tenascin-C function to enhance mechanical stability, aid tendon healing, and allow tendons to revert back to their pre-stretched lengths after normal physiological loading, respectively.[1]

For more on tendon anatomy, refer here.

Tendon Mechanical Properties: Non-Linear Elasticity[edit | edit source]

The structure and composition of tendons allow for their unique mechanical behaviour, reflected by a stress-strain curve consisting of three distinct regions (Fig. 1):[2]

  1. Toe region: this is where “stretching out” or "un-crimping" of crimped tendon fibrils occurs from mechanically loading the tendon up to 2% strain. This region is responsible for nonlinear stress/strain curve, because the slope of the toe region is not linear.
  2. Linear region: this is the physiological upper limit of tendon strain whereby the collagen fibrils orient themselves in the direction of tensile mechanical load and begin to stretch. The tendon deforms in a linear fashion due to the inter-molecular sliding of collagen triple helices. If strain is less than 4%, the tendon will return to its original length when unloaded, therefore this portion is elastic and reversible and the slope of the curve represents the Young's modulus.
  3. Yield and failure region: this is where the tendon stretches beyond its physiological limit and intramolecular cross-links between collagen fibres fail. If micro-failure continues to accumulate, stiffness is reduced and the tendon begins to fail, resulting in irreversible plastic deformation. If the tendon stretches beyond 8-10% of its original length, macroscopic failure soon follows.
Tendon Stress-Strain Curve
    Figure 1[2]

Since there are many muscles in the body, each tendon differs in its function and therefore its mechanical properties.[1] For example, the Young’s modulus of the human patellar tendon is 660 ± 266 MPa (mean ± standard deviation),[3] whereas the tibialis anterior tendon is about 1200 MPa.[4] Aging also significantly affects the mechanical properties of tendons:[1] Young’s modulus of human patellar tendons aged 29–50 years is about 660 ± 266 MPa, but is about 504 ± 222 MPa in those aged 64–93 years.[3]

Tendon Mechanical Properties: Viscoelasticity[edit | edit source]

Tendons also have viscoelastic properties (likely the result of collagenous proteins, water, and the interactions between collagens and proteoglycans), meaning their mechanical behaviour is dependent on the rate of mechanical strain.[1] In other words, the relationship between stress and strain for a tendon is not constant but depends on the time of displacement or load.[2] A viscoeleastic material is more deformable at low strain rates but less deformable at high strain rates. Therefore, tendons at low strain rates tend to absorb more mechanical energy but are less effective in carrying mechanical loads. However, tendons become stiffer and more effective in transmitting large muscular loads to bone at high strain rates.[1]

There are three major characteristics of a viscoelastic material of tendons:[2]

1. Creep

  • Indicates increasing deformation under constant load (Fig. 2).
  • This is in contrast with the usual elastic material, which does not elongate, no matter how long the load is applied.








Creep curve intechopen.jpeg
    Figure 2[2]

2. Stress relaxation

  • Indicates stress acting upon a tendon will eventually reduce under a constant deformation (Fig. 3).









S-r curve intechopen.jpeg
    Figure 3[2]

3. Hysteresis or energy dissipation

  • When a viscoelastic material is loaded and unloaded, the unloading curve is different from the loading curve (Fig. 4).
  • The difference between the two curves represents the amount of energy that is lost during loading.
  • If loading and unloading are repeated several times, different curves can be obtained.
  • After about 10 cycles, however, the loading and unloading curves no longer change (although they are still different) and the amount of hysteresis is reduced allowing the stress-strain curve to become reproducible (Fig. 5).













Hysteresis curve intechopen.jpeg
    Figure 4[2]

Rep loading-unloading curve intechopen.jpeg
    Figure 5[2]

Factors Affecting Mechanical Forces[edit | edit source]

Many factors affect the mechanical forces on tendons during normal locomotion.[5]

  1. First, different tendons in the body are subjected to different levels of mechanical loads.[6] For example, it has been estimated that the peak force transmitted through the Achilles tendon in humans during running is 9 kN, which is equivalent to 12.5 times body weight.[7] In human hand flexor tendons, it has been shown that the intra-tendinous force of the tendon depends on whether the force is generated passively or actively, and whether the position of the joint is in flexion or extension. During passive mobilization of the wrist, the flexor tendon force was found to be between 1-6 N and up to 9 N during similar mobilization of the fingers. During a 35 N fingertip pinch, tendon forces can be measured up to 12 N whereas during active, unresisted finger motion, tendon force can reach approximately 35 N.[8]
  2. Second, both the level of muscle contraction and the tendon’s relative size influence mechanical forces on a tendon. In general, the greater the cross-sectional area of a muscle, the higher force it can produce and the larger stress its tendon undergoes (e.g. patellar tendon vs. hamstring).[9]
  3. Third, different activities induce different levels of forces, even on the same tendon (in animal models).[10] Similarly, varying the rate and frequency of mechanical loading results in different tendon forces.[11][12]

The Differential Effects of Mechanical Loading on Tendons[1][edit | edit source]

Mechanical Load Level Effects on Tendon

Low

• ↓ Tensile strength
• ↓ Size
• ↓ Collagen production
• ↓ Anabolic activities
• ↑ Catabolic activities

Moderate

• ↑ Tensile strength
• ↑ Collagen synthesis
• ↓ Collagen degradation
• ↓ Adhesions
• ↓ Inflammatory mediator (e.g. prostaglandin E2)
• ↑ Tendon stem cells (TSCs) differentiating into tenocytes

Excessive

• ↓ Tensile strength
• ↓ Collagen organization
• ↑ Myofibroblasts
• ↑ Inflammatory mediators
• ↑ Tendon stem cells differentiating into non-tenocytes (adipocytes, osteocytes, chondrocytes)
• ↑ Leukotrienes (↑ edema)

It can be seen from the above that in general[1], mechanical loading at physiological levels is beneficial to tendons, but excessive loading or disuse of tendons is detrimental

Normal tendons can show a disorganised response to loading as well as improved tendon structure with over long term loading.  Normal tendons in Australian football athletes have been shown on UTC imaging to demonstrate disorganisation as a normal response to the mechanical loading of a game, this disorganisation returned to normal after 4 days[13].  In the same research series the Australian football players showed an improvement in tendon structure over a 5 month pre season training period with increased fibrillar alignment[14].

Resources[edit | edit source]

The Physioology of Sports Injuries and Repair Processes (Chapter) by Robi K, Jakob N, Matevz K, and Matjaz V (2013)


References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 Wang JHC, Guo Q, Li B. Tendon Biomechanics and Mechanobiology - A Minireview of Basic Concepts and Recent Advancements. Journal of Hand Therapy, 2012; 25(2):133–141.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 Robi K, Jakob N, Matevz K, Matjaz V (2013). Chapter 2: The Physiology of Sports Injuries and Repair Processes. In Hamlin M (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-1031-6, InTech, DOI: 10.5772/54234.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Johnson GA, Tramaglini DM, Levine RE, Ohno K, Choi NY, Woo SL. Tensile and viscoelasticfckLRproperties of human patellar tendon. J Orthop Res, 1994; 12(6): 796–803.
  4. Maganaris CN, Paul JP. In vivo human tendon mechanical properties. J Physiol, 1999; 521 (Pt 1): 307–313.
  5. Wang, JHC. Mechanobiology of Tendon. Journal of Biomechanics, 2006; 39: 1563–1582.
  6. Maganaris CN. Tensile properties of in vivo human tendinous tissue. Journal of Biomechanics, 2002; 35: 1019–1027.
  7. Komi PV, Fukashiro S, Jarvinen M. Biomechanical loading of Achilles tendon during normal locomotion. Clinics in Sports Medicine, 1992; 11: 521–531.
  8. Schuind F, Garcia-Elias M, Cooney WP, An KN. fckLRFlexor tendon forces: in vivo measurements. Journal of Hand Surgery [American], 1992; 17: 291–298.
  9. Kellis E. Quantification of quadriceps and hamstring antagonist activity. Sports Medicine, 1998; 25: 37–62.
  10. Korvick DL, Cummings JF, Grood ES, Holden JP, Feder SM, Butler DL. The use of an implantable force transducer to measure patellar tendon forces in goats. Journal of Biomechanics, 1996; 29: 557–561.
  11. Finni T, Komi PV, Lukkariniemi J. Achilles tendon loading during walking: application of a novel optic fiber technique. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 1998; 77: 289–291.
  12. Kyrolainen H, Finni T, Avela J, Komi PV. Neuromuscular behaviour of the triceps surae muscle-tendon complex during running and jumping. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 2003; 24: 153–155.
  13. Samuel D Rosengarten1, Jill L Cook, Adam L Bryant, Justin T Cordy, John Daffy, Sean I Docking. Australian football players’ Achilles tendons respond to game loads within 2 days: an ultrasound tissue characterisation (UTC) study. Br J Sports Med 2015;49:183-187
  14. Docking SI, Rosengarten SD, Cook J1. Achilles tendon structure improves on UTC imaging over a 5-month pre-season in elite Australian football players. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 May 5.