Considerations When Performing Muscle Testing of the Trunk and Lower Limbs

Original Editor - Lenie Jacobs based on the course by Shala Cunningham

Top Contributors - Lenie Jacobs, Jess Bell and Tarina van der Stockt

This article or area is currently under construction and may only be partially complete. Please come back soon to see the finished work! 25/May/2024

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Muscle strength testing is used by rehabilitation teams to measure strength deficits, monitor rehabilitation progress and assess readiness to return to sporting activities.

Additionally, muscle strength testing provides valuable insights into various implications such as quadriceps strength, which longitudinal data indicates as a robust predictor of functional decline and mortality associated with coronary artery disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. [1] This article will delve into the factors and conditions to consider when assessing manual muscle strength of the trunk and lower limb.

Age and Developmental Stage[edit | edit source]

Geriatric population[edit | edit source]

As the population ages, the issue of frailty garners increasing attention due to the progressive changes in muscle mass and strength experienced by individuals. Frailty has become prevalent among older adults, associated with a higher risk of fractures, recurring falls, and disability, as well as an increased likelihood of adverse outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. [2]

Sarcopenia is characterised by the loss of muscle mass, strength, and physical function linked to aging, resulting from a combination of genetic, environmental, and physiological factors. Additionally, it is associated with an elevated risk of health problems.[3]

While the loss of muscle mass has traditionally signalled sarcopenia, recent research highlights muscle strength as a more effective indicator of the adverse health outcomes of sarcopenia.[4] Additionally, a study of older adults revealed a strong association between hand grip strength and lower limb strength, with significant correlations across examined muscle groups, except for the ankle dorsiflexion muscles, which held substantial importance for the regression model.[5]

Paediatric population[edit | edit source]

When assessing infants and toddlers, strength testing primarily involves observation. Instead of isolating muscles, the focus is on observing movements across muscle groups. To determine if a baby has the necessary strength to explore their environment, specific muscle actions during movements against gravity are observed.

According to a study of 6-9-year-old children, conducted by Thams L, et al.,[6] it was concluded that the leg press, hand grip, squat jump, and long jump tests are reliable measurements of children's muscle strength and function, even without familiarisation. In contrast, the sit-to-stand requires familiarisation to ensure adequate reliability.

Pain[edit | edit source]

Musculoskeletal pain is widely acknowledged to influence descending motor drive and muscle activation. Experimental studies have revealed reduced voluntary activation, decreased motor unit firing, and altered intracortical network excitability during experimentally induced muscle pain.[7]

Patients with pain often report weakness in the extremities. While the American Medical Association Guides recommend manual muscle testing to determine strength deficits, this method is problematic, particularly when the deficit is 25% or less. Studies have indicated that this testing may overlook a 50% strength loss, potentially leading to incorrect identification of "give away weakness," suggesting malingering.[8]

Objective methods, using various equipment such as a dynamometer, have been more recently developed and should be preferred for precise strength evaluation. These objective methods should be favoured over manual muscle testing.[8]

Cerebral Palsy (CP)[edit | edit source]

When conducting muscle testing of a patient with CP, it is important to take into account the individual's spasticity levels and make necessary adjustments to the testing procedure to ensure accurate results. Similarly, being mindful of muscle imbalances is crucial, and the testing procedure should be adapted to accommodate these imbalances. Additionally, considering the individual's coordination and control during muscle testing is essential, as they may encounter challenges with movement patterns.

Children with CP encounter challenges with spatial and temporal aspects of bimanual coordination. [9] In the clinical assessment of children with CP, a comprehensive understanding of muscle tone and strength is paramount. Notably, these children frequently exhibit muscle tone alterations, which are often accompanied by signs of underlying muscle weakness.

The Functional Strength Measurement - Cerebral Palsy (FSM-CP) are reliable and appear valid for measuring functional strength.[10]

Critically-Ill Patients[edit | edit source]

Depending on the diagnostic criteria, neuromuscular complications develop in 9 – 87% of ICU patients, leading to prolonged mechanical ventilation, extended hospital stay, rehabilitation time, and potentially increased mortality.[11]

When assessing a critically-ill patient's muscle strength, several factors should be considered:

Endurance - due to potential limitations, the patient may not complete multiple muscle strength tests in one session; thus, it is advisable to conduct only one or two tests per session.

Contractures - compensation for any developed contractures is essential, achieved by appropriately supporting the limb, and documenting any adaptations made during testing.

Lines - it's important to be mindful of contraindications related to lines such as arterial lines, internal jugular catheters for dialysis, and central venous catheters. Remember to document any adaptations.

Summary[edit | edit source]

Muscle strength serves as both a measure of physical strength and a predictor of functional decline and mortality. When evaluating the muscle strength of a patient experiencing pain, it's important to consider the potential negative impact of pain on motor activation. Additionally, it's important to document any adjustments made to accommodate pain, contractures, lines, and other relevant factors during muscle strength testing.

References [edit | edit source]

  1. Sahu PK, Goodstadt N, Ramakrishnan A, Silfies SP. Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of knee extensor strength measured by a novel device incorporated into a weight stack machine vs. handheld and isokinetic dynamometry. PloS one. 2024 May 22;19(5):e0301872–2.
  2. Xu W, Zhao X, Zeng M, Wu S, He Y, Zhou M. Exercise for frailty research frontiers: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review. Frontiers in medicine. 2024 May 1;11.
  3. Pedauyé-Rueda B, García-Fernández P, Maicas-Pérez L, José Luis Maté-Muñoz, Hernández-Lougedo J. Different Diagnostic Criteria for Determining the Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. Journal of clinical medicine. 2024 Apr 25;13(9):2520–0.
  4. Ito S, Hiroshi Takuwa, Saori Kakehi, Someya Y, Hideyoshi Kaga, Nobuyuki Kumahashi, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies a locus associated with knee extension strength in older Japanese individuals. Communications biology. 2024 May 20;7(1).
  5. Strandkvist V, Larsson A, Pauelsen M, Nyberg L, Vikman I, Lindberg A, et al. Hand grip strength is strongly associated with lower limb strength but only weakly with postural control in community-dwelling older adults. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2021 May;94:104345.
  6. Thams L, Hvid LG, Damsgaard CT, Hansen M. Test-Retest Reliability of Muscle Strength and Physical Function Tests in 6–9-Year-old Children. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2021 Jun 20;1–9.
  7. Myles Calder Murphy, Ebonie Kendra Rio, Whife C, Latella C. Maximising neuromuscular performance in people with pain and injury: moving beyond reps and sets to understand the challenges and embrace the complexity. BMJ open sport & exercise medicine. 2024 May 1;10(2):e001935–5.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Ambroz A, Zucker R, Ambroz C. Strength Testing in Pain Assessment. Pract Pain Manag. 2006;6(8).
  9. Crompton J, Galea MP, Phillips B. Hand-held dynamometry for muscle strength measurement in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(2):106–11. doi:10.1111/j.1469- 8749.2007.00106.
  10. Aertssen W, Smulders E, Smits-Engelsman B, Rameckers E. Functional strength measurement in cerebral palsy: feasibility, test–retest reliability, and construct validity. Developmental Neurorehabilitation. 2018 Sep 12;22(7):453–61.
  11. Ciesla N, Dinglas V, Fan E, Kho M, Kuramoto J, Needham D. Manual Muscle Testing: A Method of Measuring Extremity Muscle Strength Applied to Critically Ill Patients. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2011 Apr 12;(50).