Overview of Foot and Ankle Assessment
Original Editor - Shala Cunningham
Top Contributors - Ewa Jaraczewska, Stacy Schiurring and Vidya Acharya
Introduction
The foot and ankle structures are complex, consisting of many bones, joints, ligaments and muscles.[1] A clinician's ability to understand the anatomical structures of the foot and ankle is crucial for assessment and treatment, especially for clinicians working with clients with musculoskeletal conditions. A thorough evaluation ensures accurate diagnosis, appropriate treatment planning, and optimal patient outcomes.[2]
This Physiopedia page covers the essential components of foot and ankle assessment in physiotherapy practice. It follows a systematic approach from subjective history-taking through objective testing and special tests for common pathologies.
Subjective Assessment
The mnemonic L-M-N-O-P-Q-R-S-T ensures comprehensive gathering of patient history and helps develop hypothetical diagnoses while ruling out comorbid conditions.[3]
L: location of symptoms and level of functional impairment
The location of symptoms can help narrow differential diagnoses based on which tissues are affected. When the location of symptoms includes the anterior shin/tibia, consider medial tibial stress syndrome (shin splints). [4] Calf pain with gastrocnemius stretch may lead to the diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy, particularly if pain increases during the push-off phase of gait. [5] [6] Plantar fasciopathy may be characterised by heel pain, which is typically worse with first morning steps.[7] [6]Paraesthesias along plantar foot indicate tarsal tunnel syndrome. [8] Morton's neuroma preesents with pain between 3rd and 4th metatarsals.[9]
M: medical factors (medications) and mechanism of injury
We need to find out what medications a patient is taking (including supplements) and what co-morbidities they may have. We also want to determine when and how the injury occurred, including foot position, if remembered:
- Forced inversion or eversion: consider ankle sprain or possible fracture[10]
- Inability to plantar flex after injury: consider Achilles tendon rupture[11]
Red flags: sudden onset, severe pain without incident or accident, neurological symptoms at time of injury
N: neurological symptoms
Neurological symptoms include numbness, tingling, paraesthesias, sharp or burning pain, and weakness.
When neurological symptoms are present, we need to determine whether they have a sock-like distribution, which may suggest involvement of multiple dermatomes or peripheral nerves. It is essential to consider that peripheral neuropathy (from diabetes, vitamin B12 deficiency, or certain medications) can present similarly.[12]
Clinical tip: Verify duration of symptoms and any changes if peripheral neuropathy is present in medical history.
O: occupation, including limitations
Are there any work- or activity-related factors that are relevant?[13][14] Is there a possibility of overuse?
P: palliating and provoking symptoms
Identify what makes symptoms better or worse. Assess tissue irritability by determining how long symptoms take to resolve after provocation and document positions, activities, or interventions that provide relief.[15]
Red flag: constant, unrelenting symptoms that neither improve nor worsen with any intervention
Q: quality of symptoms/pain
Describe the character of symptoms as well as the pattern and nature of pain. Find out whether symptoms are sharp, dull, stabbing, aching, or electric-shock-like, and whether there is any numbness, tingling, or a feeling of weakness/clumsiness.[3]
R: radiation of symptoms
Document radiation patterns carefully. Ask the following questions relating to radiating symptoms:[6]
- What is the exact location of radiating symptoms?
- How long did the radiating symptoms last?
- Where are the symptoms related to activity or position?
- Did symptoms include electric shock sensation, numbness, or tingling?
Red flag: multiple dermatomes involved
S: severity of symptoms
Rate using Visual Analogue Scale or the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, but also assess impact on daily activities, functional limitations, and effect on quality of life.[3]
Red flag: sudden onset of severe pain without incident or accident
T: timing of symptoms
Document the timing of symptoms in 24 hours and in relation to activity. These symptoms include morning stiffness, night pain, and an activity-related pattern.[16]
Red flags: symptoms interrupting sleep, symptoms worse at night, constant symptoms throughout 24 hours.
Constitutional Symptoms (Screening)
Always screen for red flags, such as unexplained weight loss, fever or night sweats, general malaise, recent infections, and a history of cancer.[3]
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
Standardised questionnaires help quantify impairments, track progress, and establish treatment goals. Choose questionnaires that best capture your patient's specific limitations and functional goals.[17] Review each tool to understand what impairments they assess, ensuring alignment with your patient's presentation.
The following tools are recommended:
- Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
- Comprehensive assessment of lower extremity function
- Captures a variety of functional activities
- Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)
- Specific to foot and ankle conditions
- Sensitive to changes in this region
- Olerud-Molander Ankle Score
- Assesses the symptoms and function of a patient following an ankle fracture
- Uses a summated rating scale format and consists of 9 questions
- The highest possible score is 100, and higher scores indicate better outcomes
Objective Assessment
Observation
Gait analysis: carefully observe walking pattern, focusing on initial contact, loading response, foot position, terminal stance, foot adaptation, and antalgic patterns.[6]
Standing posture assessment: evaluate static positioning for weight distribution, calcaneal symmetry, foot arch, and overall alignment.[18]
Footwear examination: shoe wear patterns provide valuable insights into overpronation or oversupination, preferential weight-bearing areas, and asymmetrical wear between feet.[19][20]
Specific foot observations should include navicular height, alignment/ deformities in forefoot position, and varus/valgus positioning of the calcaneus.[3]
Oedema Measurement
- Standard Circumferential Measurements use bony landmarks to ensure consistency:[3]
- metatarsal heads level: 3 cm proximal
- around malleoli
- 10 cm proximal to malleoli
- Figure-Eight Measurement may miss metatarsal swelling or areas proximal to malleoli:[3]
Clinical importance: If swelling extends beyond the figure-eight pattern, use standard circumferential measurements at bony landmarks instead.
Functional Screening
Assess functional capacity with weight-bearing activities that include:[3][21]
- Single-leg stance to assess balance and stability
- Squatting to assess full weight-bearing dorsiflexion (adjust depth based on patient tolerance)
- Sit-to-stand or its alternative for patients with significant pain
- Sport-specific movements for athletes when appropriate
Safety consideration: Ensure activities are appropriate for the patient's current symptoms and functional level.
Palpation
Key palpation points at the foot and ankle are listed in Table 1.
| Bony Prominences
(assess for discomfort) |
|
|---|---|
| Soft Tissue and Muscle
(assess for discomfort and potential atrophy) |
|
Range of Motion Testing
It is important to assess active and passive range of motion, including with over-pressure. For more information on the range of motion assessment, please see: Assessing Range of Motion.
Table 2 shows normative values for foot and ankle range of motion and typical end feel.
| Movement | Active range of motion | Typical end feel |
|---|---|---|
| Dorsiflexion | 0-25 degrees | Firm |
| Plantarflexion | 0-50 degrees | Firm |
| Supination* | 0-20 degrees | Firm |
| Pronation* | 0-5 degrees | Firm |
| Inversion* | 0-30 degrees | Firm |
| Eversion* | 0-18 degrees | Firm |
| *The literature presents vast ranges of subtalar motion ranging from 5° to 65°[22] | ||
| Abduction | a few degrees | Firm |
| Adduction | 0-11 degrees | Firm |
| Flexion (interphalangeal joints) | 0-45 degrees | Firm |
| Extension (interphalangeal joints ) | 0-70 degrees | Firm |
Ankle kinematics can vary between individuals. Factors that affect ankle range of motion include activities of daily living (with geographical and cultural differences), age, gender, and the method used to assess range of motion.
Resisted Range of Motion
Assess the strength of the four compartments of the lower leg muscles ( anterior, superficial posterior, deep posterior, and lateral), as well as dorsal and plantar muscles of the foot.[23]
For more information on the strength assessment, please see Assessing Muscle Strength. For detailed information on the muscles of the foot and ankle, please see Functional Anatomy of the Foot and Functional Anatomy of the Ankle.
Clinical importance: weight-bearing dorsiflexion provides more functional information than non-weight-bearing assessment. Perform when patient tolerates weight-bearing.
Neurovascular Testing
Complete neurological screening includes dermatomes, myotomes, reflexes (Achilles reflex), and neural tension.[21]
Accessory Movements/Joint Mobility Testing
Joint mobilisation assessment evaluates joint play and helps identify restrictions that may contribute to functional limitations. Assessment should be completed in open-packed (resting) positions. The left and right sides must be compared for movement quality and end-feel. Documentation should include patient response to mobilisation.[24]
Table 3 identifies which accessory movements you can assess at the foot and ankle:[24]
Additional joints to assess include tibiofibular joint, subtalar joint, and midtarsal joints.[24]
Assessment for Common Foot and Ankle Pathologies
Special tests help confirm clinical hypotheses developed during history and objective examination.
Achilles Tendon Pathology
Achilles Tendon Palpation Test
- To assess for Achilles tendinopathy
- Patient Position: Prone with ankles hanging over the bed edge
- Technique:
- Gently palpate the entire Achilles tendon
- Squeeze the tendon between thumb and index finger
- Positive Test: Reproduces the patient's pain
Painful Arc Sign for Achilles Tendon
- To assess for Achilles tendinopathy
- Patient Position: Prone with ankles hanging over the bed edge
- Technique:
- Palpate the Achilles tendon to identify the area of maximal swelling
- Patient actively plantar flexes and dorsiflexes the ankle
- Observe if the swelling area moves with the tendon or remains static
- Positive Test: area of maximal swelling moves proximally and distally with the tendon during movement
- To assess for Achilles tendinopathy
- Patient Position: Prone with ankles hanging over the bed edge
- Technique:
- Palpate the Achilles tendon to identify the most tender portion
- Patient actively dorsiflexes ankle maximally and holds position
- Re-palpate the most tender portion
- Positive Test: Decrease or absence of pain in the maximally dorsiflexed position compared to the relaxed position
- To assess for Achilles tendon rupture
- Patient Position: Prone
- Technique:
- Patient actively flexes knees to 90 degrees
- Ankles remain relaxed
- Positive Test: Affected foot falls into neutral or dorsiflexion. The test is negative if the foot remains in slight plantar flexion with the Achilles tendon intact.
- To assess for Achilles tendon rupture
- Patient Position: Prone
- Technique:
- The therapist gently squeezes the patient's calf muscles
- Positive Test: Ankle remains still (no plantar flexion). The test is negative if the ankle plantar flexes when the calf is squeezed.
Ankle Ligament Stability
- To assess the anterior stability of the talocrural joint and the lateral ligaments
- Patient Position: Supine or sitting (alternative: prone with ankle over bed edge)
- Technique:
- Stabilise the distal tibia and fibula with one hand
- Position the ankle in 20 degrees of plantar flexion
- Grasp around the heel and draw the talus anteriorly toward the therapist's body
- Alternative prone technique: push down on the heel to anteriorly translate the talus
- Positive Test: Pain or anterior subluxation of the talus
- To assess the lateral stability of the ankle
- Patient Position: Supine
- Technique:
- Stabilise the distal tibia and fibula with one hand
- Position the ankle in neutral
- Apply varus force to the talus
- Position-Specific Ligament Bias:
- Neutral: Calcaneofibular ligament (CFL)
- Plantar flexion: Anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL)
- Dorsiflexion: Posterior talofibular ligament (PTFL)
- Positive Test: Pain or excessive laxity compared to the unaffected ankle
- To assess medial stability and deltoid ligament integrity
- Patient Position: Supine
- Technique:
- Stabilise the distal tibia and fibula with one hand
- Position the ankle in neutral
- Apply valgus force to talus
- Position-Specific Ligament Bias:
- Neutral: Tibionavicular and tibiocalcaneal ligaments
- Plantar flexion: Anterior tibiotalar ligament
- Dorsiflexion: Posterior tibiotalar ligament
- Positive Test: Pain or excessive laxity compared to the unaffected ankle
High Ankle Sprain (Syndesmosis Injury)
Crossed Leg Test[25]
- To assess for high ankle sprain and syndesmosis integrity
- Patient Position: Sitting with affected leg crossed over unaffected leg
- Technique:
- Pivot point at the junction of the middle and distal third of the affected tibia
- Patient applies a gentle downward force on the medial knee of the affected leg
- Positive Test: Pain in the distal syndesmotic area
Dorsiflexion Compression Test
- To assess for high ankle sprain and syndesmosis integrity
- Patient Position: Standing
- Technique:
- Patient actively dorsiflexes the ankle by lunging forward with the unaffected leg in front
- Repeat movement with the therapist applying manual compressive force around the malleoli
- Positive Test: Significant increase in ankle range of motion and/or decrease in pain at end range with added compression
- To assess for high ankle sprain and syndesmosis integrity
- Patient Position: Crook lying or sitting
- Technique:
- Therapist manually compresses fibula against tibia
- Apply compression above the midpoint of the calf with both hands
- Positive Test: Pain over the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis
Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome
Dorsiflexion Eversion Test
- To assess for tarsal tunnel syndrome or tibial nerve compression.
- Patient Position: Supine with knee flexed 20 degrees
- Technique:
- Fully dorsiflex and evert the ankle
- Extend all metatarsophalangeal joints
- Hold position 5-10 seconds while palpating over the tarsal tunnel
- Positive Test: Tenderness on palpation or reproduction of local neurogenic symptoms
Tinel's Sign for Tarsal Tunnel
- To assess for tarsal tunnel syndrome or tibial nerve compression.
- Patient Position: Supine
- Technique:
- Tap repeatedly on the tibial nerve posterior to the medial malleolus
- Positive Test: Pain or tingling in the distribution of the tibial nerve
Plantar Fasciitis
- To assess for plantar fasciitis
- Non-Weight-Bearing Position: Patient sitting or supine
- Technique:
- Stabilise calcaneus with one hand
- Maximally extend the first metatarsophalangeal joint with the other hand
- Technique:
- Weight-Bearing Position: Patient standing on the step with toes hanging off the edge
- Technique:
- Therapist maximally extends the first metatarsophalangeal joint
- Technique:
- Positive Test: Reproduction of the patient's plantar pain near the calcaneus
Summary
- The foot and ankle assessment requires systematic evaluation from subjective history through objective testing and special tests. Using the L-M-N-O-P-Q-R-S-T mnemonic ensures comprehensive data gathering, while standardised outcome measures quantify functional limitations.
- Thorough documentation should include a clear description of the mechanism of injury, specific location and quality of symptoms, functional limitations and goals, objective measurements with comparison to the contralateral side, results of special tests, clinical reasoning for diagnosis, as well as treatment plan and prognosis.
- During the assessment, clinicians should always consider red flag symptoms requiring immediate referral, peripheral neuropathy affecting assessment reliability, patient tolerance for weight-bearing activities, and appropriate test selection based on acuity of injury.
Resources
- The foot and ankle: an overview of arthrokinematics and selected joint techniques
- Approach to the Exam of the Ankle and Foot
References
- ↑ Yavuz U, Celayir A, Karaismailoglu B. Clinical Anatomy of the Foot and Ankle. In: Clinical and Radiological Examination of the Foot and Ankle: The Path to Definitive Diagnosis 2024 Aug 20 (pp. 33-51). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
- ↑ Frain J. Exploring Symptoms: An Evidence-based Approach to the Patient History. John Wiley & Sons; 2025 Jan 13.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 Cunningham S. Foot and Ankle Evaluation. Plus course 2025
- ↑ Lee I, Jeon HG, Ha S, Jeong H, Lee SY. How Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome Is Affected by Alignment, Range of Motion, Strength, and Gait Biomechanics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2024 Nov 22;34(2):134-55.
- ↑ Traweger A, Scott A, Kjaer M, Wezenbeek E, Scattone Silva R, Kennedy JG, Butler JJ, Gomez-Florit M, Gomes ME, Snedeker JG, Dakin SG. Achilles tendinopathy. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2025 Mar 27;11(1):20.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Tingan AS, Bowen A, Salas-Tam C, Roland M, Srivastav A. Current concepts in the evaluation, management, and prevention of common foot and ankle injuries in the runner. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports. 2024 Jun;12(2):200-9.
- ↑ Lippi L, Folli A, Moalli S, Turco A, Ammendolia A, INVERNIZZI M. Efficacy and tolerability of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with plantar fasciopathy: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2024 Sep 11;60(5):832.
- ↑ Haq II, Banerjee AA, Arshad Z, Iqbal AM, Bhatia M. The management of tarsal tunnel syndrome: A scoping review. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2024 Jul 1;54:102489.
- ↑ Matthews BG, Thomson CE, Harding MP, McKinley JC, Ware RS. Treatments for Morton's neuroma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2024(2).
- ↑ Wall R, Plant C, Chapman AW. Ankle fractures in athletes: epidemiology, anatomy, and management considerations. Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2024 Feb 1;38(1):2-6.
- ↑ Wang CC, Chen PY, Yang KC, Wang CL, Chen H. Current treatment concepts for Achilles tendon rupture. Tzu Chi Medical Journal. 2024 Jan 1;36(1):46-52.
- ↑ Şahin E, Tanrıöver A. General Examination of the Ankle. In Clinical and Radiological Examination of the Foot and Ankle: The Path to Definitive Diagnosis 2024 Aug 20 (pp. 83-96). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
- ↑ Sharma A, Sidiq M, Sharma J, Kashoo F, Gujral T, Aldhahi MI, Alshehri MM. Predictors of heel pain among healthy street vendors in Delhi: a cross-sectional study. Scientific Reports. 2025 Nov 12;15(1):39562.
- ↑ Santos W, Rojas C, Isidoro R, Lorente A, Dias A, Mariscal G, Benlloch M, Lorente R. Efficacy of Ergonomic Interventions on Work-Related Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025 Apr 28;14(9):3034.
- ↑ Malliaras P, Silbernagel KG, de Vos RJ, Bourke J, Sancho I, Hanlon SL, Agergaard AS, Bahr R, Bittencourt NF, Bordalo M, Brorsson A. Diagnostic domains, differential diagnosis and conditions requiring further medical attention that are considered necessary in the assessment for Achilles tendinopathy: a Delphi consensus study. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2025 Jul 1;59(13):891-901.
- ↑ Kandasamy S, Wukich DK. Foot and Ankle Pain. In Musculoskeletal Pain: Evidence-Based Clinical Evaluation and Management 2025 May 25 (pp. 341-355). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
- ↑ Gundtoft PH, Erichsen JL, Terndrup M, Walsøe L, Pedersen L, Viberg B, Ørts A, Abrahamsen C. Comparison of four patient-reported outcome measures in patients with ankle fracture: A study on patient preferences and psychometric properties. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2025 Jan 1;31(1):58-64.
- ↑ Neal BS, Griffiths IB, Dowling GJ, Murley GS, Munteanu SE, Franettovich Smith MM, Collins NJ, Barton CJ. Foot posture as a risk factor for lower limb overuse injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of foot and ankle research. 2014 Dec 19;7(1):55.
- ↑ Young CC, Niedfeldt MW, Morris GA, Eerkes KJ. Clinical examination of the foot and ankle. Primary care: Clinics in office practice. 2005 Mar 1;32(1):105-32.
- ↑ Barton CJ, Bonanno D, Menz HB. Development and evaluation of a tool for the assessment of footwear characteristics. Journal of foot and ankle research. 2009 Apr 23;2(1):10.
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 21.2 Alazzawi S, Sukeik M, King D, Vemulapalli K. Foot and ankle history and clinical examination: A guide to everyday practice. World J Orthop. 2017 Jan 18;8(1):21-29.
- ↑ Ball P, Johnson GR. Technique for the measurement of hindfoot inversion and eversion and its use to study a normal population. Clinical Biomechanics 11(3):165–169, 1996
- ↑ da Fonseca LF, Jeyaraman M, Jeyaraman N, Inojossa TR, Maciel ES, de Cesar Netto C, Mansur NS, Astur DC. Normative values of ankle strength and its importance for rehabilitation and return to activity: A cross-sectional study. World J Orthop. 2025 Oct 18;16(10):108858.
- ↑ 24.0 24.1 24.2 Loudon JK, Bell SL. The foot and ankle: an overview of arthrokinematics and selected joint techniques. J Athl Train. 1996 Apr;31(2):173-8.
- ↑ Kiter E, Bozkurt M. The crossed-leg test for examination of ankle syndesmosis injuries. Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Feb;26(2):187-8.







