Jump to content

Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome

Introduction

Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome (ACNES) represents a distinct and often misunderstood chronic pain condition affecting the abdominal wall. This neuropathic disorder occurs when sensory nerves become entrapped as they pass through the rectus abdominis muscle, leading to severe, Localised pain that significantly impacts patient well-being[1]. Despite its prevalence and substantial effect on quality of life, ACNES remains one of the most underdiagnosed causes of chronic abdominal pain in medical practice.[2] The condition manifests as intense, treatment-resistant discomfort in the region between the diaphragm and pelvis, often mimicking various intra-abdominal pathologies[1]. This diagnostic challenge, combined with limited awareness among healthcare providers, frequently results in delayed diagnosis and suboptimal treatment outcomes for affected individuals[3]. Understanding ACNES as a peripheral nerve entrapment condition rather than an internal abdominal disorder is crucial for proper diagnosis and management of this debilitating syndrome[4].

[5]

Clinically Relevant Anatomy

The fundamental anatomy of ACNES involves the anterior cutaneous branches of thoracic nerves T7 through T12. These nerves form an intricate network that supplies sensation to the anterior abdominal wall nerves follow a specific anatomical course. To understand their path, let's follow their journey from origin to termination.[6]

They initially travel between the transversus abdominus and internal oblique muscles toward the rectus sheath. The crucial anatomical feature occurs at the posterior rectus sheath, where these nerves make a dramatic 90-degree turn to enter the rectus abdominis muscle through specific channels[7].

Nerve course

Thoracoabdominal Nerves

These mixed spinal nerves emerge from their respective thoracic neural foramina, forming the ventral rami that give rise to the thoracoabdominal nerves. Each nerve contains both somatic sensory and motor components, though ACNES primarily involves their sensory function[6].

The thoracoabdominal nerves follow a precise anatomical course through multiple tissue planes. After emerging from the neural foramina, they traverse laterally in the intercostal space, adhering to the neurovascular plane beneath the costal groove. At the posterior axillary line, they penetrate the posterior intercostal membrane and continue their course between the internal intercostal and innermost intercostal muscles[6].

The Muscular Course

As these nerves approach the anterior abdominal wall, they navigate through distinct fascial compartments. The initial passage occurs between the transversus abdominis and internal oblique muscles, maintaining intimate contact with their respective fascial investments. This intermuscular course creates the first potential site of nerve compression, particularly where the nerves penetrate the aponeurotic elements of these muscles[6].

The Critical Turn at Rectus Sheath

The most critical anatomical relationship occurs at the lateral border of the rectus abdominis muscle. Here, the nerves execute a precisely controlled 90-degree sharp bend angulation to penetrate the posterior rectus sheath. This transition occurs through anatomically distinct neurovascular foramina, known as the fibrous rings[4].

The Fibrous Ring

After making this turn, the nerves enter the "rectus channel." This entrance occurs through a specialized structure known as a fibrous ring, positioned just anterior to the posterior rectus sheath. These rings, typically numbering five on each side, represent specialized connective tissue channels that guide and protect the neurovascular bundles. The fibrous ring serves as a passage point but can also become a point of constriction[7].

The Neurovascular Bundle

Within these channels, the nerves don't travel alone. They form part of a neurovascular bundle, combining with blood vessels that supply the surrounding tissues. This arrangement is particularly important because any compression or disturbance can affect both neural and vascular components, potentially contributing to symptoms through both mechanical and ischemic mechanisms[4].

Each bundle consists of:

  • The anterior cutaneous nerve branch
  • Accompanying anterior branches of intercostal arteries
  • Associated lymphatic vessels
  • Surrounding connective tissue investment[4]

Terminal Distribution

After traversing the rectus abdominis muscle, these neurovascular bundles penetrate the anterior rectus sheath through secondary fibrous foramina. The nerves then divide into terminal branches that innervate the superficial fascia and overlying skin of the anterior abdominal wall. This terminal arborization creates distinct sensory territories, or dermatomes, that correspond to their respective thoracic levels[7].

Clinical Significance

Understanding this complex anatomical pathway helps explain why ACNES develops. The fibrous ring plays a crucial role. During changes in intra-abdominal pressure, surrounding connective fat tissue can herniate within this ring. This herniation can create a compression point, leading to neural ischemia and subsequent pain development[4]. The multiple turns and confined spaces through which these nerves travel help explain why they are vulnerable to entrapment and why symptoms can be so Localised and severe. At the microscopic level, each nerve is invested by multiple connective tissue layers:

  1. Epineurium: The outer connective tissue sheath.
  2. Perineurium: The intermediate layer surrounding nerve fascicles.
  3. Endoneurium: The innermost layer surrounding individual nerve fibres.

These protective layers of Nerve become relevant at points of angulation and compression, where mechanical stress can affect both the neural elements and their vascular supply.

This anatomical understanding is essential for clinicians, as it guides both diagnostic approaches and treatment strategies, particularly when surgical intervention becomes necessary. The precise knowledge of these anatomical relationships has led to the development of specific surgical techniques targeting the nerve at various points along its course, with different success rates depending on the point of intervention[4].

Pathophysiology

The pathophysiological mechanism underlying ACNES is intricate. The cutaneous nerves involved are enclosed within adipose-enriched neurovascular bundles, making them particularly susceptible to external influences as the surrounding adipose tissue degenerates. Prolonged mechanical stress at crucial anatomical points, combined with potential nerve compression from muscle contraction, can lead to both mechanical and ischemic irritation of the affected nerves. This complex interplay of factors results in the development of chronic pain that characterizes ACNES[1].

Mechanisms of Peripheral Nerve Entrapment in ACNES

Anatomical Basis of Entrapment

Peripheral nerve entrapment predominantly occurs at specific anatomical locations where nerves navigate through confined spaces or change direction.[4] These sites typically include:

  1. Points where nerves enter fibrous tunnels.
  2. Locations where nerves traverse osseofibrous passages.
  3. Areas where nerves pass over fibrous or muscular bands.

The susceptibility to entrapment at these locations stems from their anatomical configuration, which creates potential points of mechanical stress and compression[4].

Mechanical Factors

The mechanical basis for nerve entrapment involves several interrelated factors. Muscle contraction can directly compress the nerve at these vulnerable points. Additionally, muscular activity may create traction forces that further stress the nerve tissue. These mechanical forces are particularly significant at points where the nerve changes direction or passes through confined anatomical spaces[4].

Pathophysiological Process

The pathophysiology of nerve entrapment follows a progressive sequence:

Initial mechanical irritation triggers Localised tissue swelling which,

  • Directly damage the nerve structure.
  • Compromise vascular circulation to the nerve.
  • Create a cycle of increasing compression and inflammation.[4]
The Valleix Phenomenon

A characteristic finding in nerve entrapment is the Valleix phenomenon, where nerve trunk tenderness extends beyond the primary site of entrapment. This manifests in two ways:

Proximal tenderness, May result from:

  • Vascular spasm in the nerve trunk
  • Abnormal traction forces acting against the entrapment point[4]

Distal tenderness, Extends below the site of primary involvement:

In the context of ACNES (Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome), all these mechanisms operate simultaneously. The complex interplay between anatomical constraints, mechanical forces, and physiological responses creates the characteristic presentation of ACNES. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for both diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic intervention.[4]

Aetiology

Patient demographics reveal that ACNES is more commonly observed in young or middle-aged females with normal BMI. The development of ACNES involves a complex interplay of anatomical and physiological factors. The condition affects approximately one in 1,800 individuals globally[4], with a notable gender disparity, females are four times more likely to develop ACNES than males. Age distribution shows two distinct peaks of incidence, one between 15-20 years and another between 35-45 years, though cases have been documented across all age groups[1], affects 13% of children diagnosed with functional abdominal pain[8].

Recent retrospective studies have provided valuable insights into the causative factors of ACNES. Approximately 54% of cases develop spontaneously without any identifiable trigger, while 20% are associated with previous surgical procedures. Pregnancy-related cases account for about 9% of diagnoses, with the remaining cases attributed to various or undetermined causes.[3]

Clinical Presentation

Pain Characteristics

Acute Pain
  • Localised, dull, or burning pain with a sharp component
  • Usually occurs on one side
  • Radiates horizontally in upper abdomen
  • Radiates obliquely downward in lower abdomen
  • Pain may be triggered by: Twisting, Bending, Sitting up and Lying down may either help or worsen symptoms
  • More common in younger, physically active individuals[4]
Chronic Pain
  • More commonly seen in older patients during daytime
  • Can occur intermittently over extended periods
  • May disappear for varying lengths of time (sometimes years)
  • Episodes can last several days or weeks[4]
Clinical Presentation Patterns

In Women

  • Often initially present with concerns about ovarian problems
  • May be misdiagnosed as gynaecologic pathology
  • Can lead to unnecessary diagnostic laparoscopies
  • History may include previous surgeries for "ovarian cysts" or "adhesions"[4]

In Men

  • Younger men often present with concerns about hernias or ulcers
  • May present during daytime hours
  • In Older Patients
  • More likely to express concerns about cancer
  • Often have history of multiple abdominal operations
  • May have multiple surgical scars[4]
Associated Features

Patient Behaviour

  • Typically lie quietly with hand placed over area of discomfort
  • Unlike urolithiasis patients who often present writhing in pain[4]

Psychological Impact

  • Patients often experience considerable anxiety
  • May worry about undiscovered conditions
  • Frequently misdiagnosed with psychiatric conditions like:
  • Anxiety
  • somatisation
  • Depression[4]

Often prescribed: Antidepressants, Tranquilizers, Muscle relaxants and Pain relievers[4]

Key Clinical Indicators

  • Well-Localised pain
  • Usually unilateral
  • May present bilaterally at same level
  • Can involve multiple nerves at different levels
  • Persistence of symptoms despite normal diagnostic workup
  • History of multiple abdominal surgeries
  • Presence of multiple surgical scars.[4]

Diagnostic Procedures

Physical Examination: The cornerstone of ACNES diagnosis lies in the careful application of specific physical examination techniques: Multiple abdominal surgical scars should raise suspicion for ACNES[4].

The clinical manifestation of ACNES typically begins with acute pain that gradually transitions into a persistent dull ache. The intensity of this pain can significantly vary, ranging from mild discomfort to severe pain episodes that substantially impact daily activities. What makes ACNES particularly distinctive is its precise localisation patients can often identify the exact point of pain using just a fingertip, with the affected area typically measuring < 2 square centimetres[1][2][3] [4].

The nature of pain in ACNES is complex, presenting as a combination of dull and sharp sensations. Many patients describe a radiating pattern that extends to the ipsilateral half of the abdomen, following the anatomical course of the affected nerves[4]. This characteristic pain distribution often serves as a crucial diagnostic indicator for healthcare providers.

An intriguing aspect of ACNES is that approximately 50% of patients experience concurrent visceral symptoms. These manifestations frequently include abdominal bloating, nausea, and alterations in defecation patterns. Understanding this association is vital as these additional symptoms can sometimes lead clinicians to initially pursue incorrect diagnostic pathways focused on internal organ pathology[9].

laboratory and Radio-imaging Finding: Supporting diagnostic evidence should include normal laboratory findings without signs of inflammation or infection, alongside unremarkable imaging studies[2]. The absence of any clear surgical cause for the pain further strengthens the diagnosis of ACNES.

Diagnostic Injection: Temporary positive relief in pain response of at least by 50% after injecting a local anaesthetic (usually lidocaine) at the diagnostic trigger point[4].

Outcome Measures

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) or Numeric Pain Rating Scale (0-10): Quantify pain levels during different activities and at rest. This allows for objective tracking of improvement over time and helps guide treatment progression[10].

Carnett's Sign: Serves as a key diagnostic and progress-monitoring tool, indicating abdominal wall pain when positive. This significant diagnostic procedure involves the examiner applying pressure to the point of maximum tenderness while the patient contracts their abdominal muscles by raising their head or torso with crossed arms. A positive Carnett's test is indicated when pain either intensifies or remains constant during muscle contraction, whereas pain originating from visceral sources typically diminishes during this maneuver[1].

Pinch Test: This test consists of picking up the patient’s skin and subcutaneous fat with the thumb and index finger, first on one side of the midline of the abdomen and then on the other side, squeezing a fold containing the patient’s skin and subcutaneous fat between thumb and index finger, the area of interest hurts compared to the contralateral side[3]

The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS): The DVPRS assesses pain on a numeric scale from 0 to 10, Four supplemental questions measure how the pain affects their daily activities, mood, sleep, and stress over the previous 24 hours. DVPRS is valid and reliable.[11]

36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36): SF-36 is a 36-item questionnaire that indicates the level of disability. Lower scores represent higher levels of disability along six sub-scales.[10]

Interventions

Medical Interventions

First-Line Treatment: Systemic Medication

The initial treatment approach typically involves systemic medications, though their effectiveness is often limited due to the mechanical nature of the nerve irritation. The medication protocol generally includes:

  • Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like paracetamol
  • Antiepileptic agents, specifically gabapentin and pregabalin
  • Low-dose tricyclic antidepressants, primarily amitriptyline
  • Weak opioids such as tramadol in some cases
  • Muscle relaxants may be added to the regimen[2]
Trigger Point Injections

These serve a dual purpose as both diagnostic and therapeutic tools. The procedure involves injecting lidocaine (1%) at specific trigger points where nerve entrapment occurs. Studies have demonstrated impressive immediate pain reduction rates of 83% among patients with suspected ACNES. Approximately 20% of patients who respond positively to the initial injection maintain long-term pain relief. The technique traditionally relies on feeling a loss of resistance as the needle passes through the aponeurosis of the rectus abdominis[2].

When corticosteroids are added to the local anaesthetic, patients often experience more sustained pain relief, likely due to the anti-inflammatory effects that help reduce ectopic nerve firing. However, this combination therapy carries risks, particularly muscle atrophy and systemic adverse reactions. Notably, no direct comparative studies exist between lidocaine-only and lidocaine-plus-corticosteroid approaches.[2]

Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks

This more advanced approach has gained prominence over the past decade as an alternative to blind injections. The technique offers several distinct advantages:

  • Real-time visualization of the injection process
  • Increased accuracy in medication delivery
  • Reduced risk of complications
  • Better identification of anatomical landmarks[2]

The procedure can be performed in three ways:

  1. Direct trigger point injection at the site of maximum tenderness
  2. Rectus sheath block
  3. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block[2]

Studies show that ultrasound-guided blocks using local anaesthetics (such as 0.5% bupivacaine or 0.2% ropivacaine) combined with corticosteroids (typically triamcinolone 40mg) can provide significant pain relief. The optimal volume ranges from 3-10mL depending on the specific technique used.[2]

Chemical Neurolysis

This historical approach involves using absolute alcohol or phenol (5-6% aqueous solution) at the nerve entrapment point. While older studies showed promising results with complete pain relief in many patients and sustained relief for 3-4 years, recent research is lacking. The proposed mechanism suggests that dilute phenol may form scar tissue around the entrapped nerve, preventing herniation while maintaining pinprick sensation.[2]

Radiofrequency Ablation

PRF represents a newer[2], minimally invasive treatment option that offers several advantages:

  • Utilizes high-frequency intermittent current
  • Maintains tissue temperatures below 42°C
  • Provides nerve stunning effect without permanent damage
  • Serves as an alternative to neurectomy
  • Clinical trials support its efficacy in ACNES treatment[12]

Surgical Interventions

Anterior Neurectomy

Surgical intervention becomes necessary when conservative treatments fail to provide adequate relief. The primary surgical approach is anterior neurectomy, which involves releasing the strained nerve. This procedure has demonstrated a success rate of approximately 70% in properly selected patients[2].

During anterior neurectomy, surgeons make a 3-5 cm transverse incision at the site of maximal tenderness. They then identify and remove the branches of the trapped anterior cutaneous nerve. Studies have shown that about 71% of patients experience significant pain reduction following this procedure, with another 9% reporting moderate improvement lasting at least one year[2].

For cases where initial anterior neurectomy fails, secondary surgical options exist.

  1. Posterior neurectomy: Targeting the nerve bundle at the posterior abdominal fascia
  2. Secondary anterior neurectomy: Re-exploring the operated site to remove remaining nerve endings

About 66% of patients who undergo these secondary procedures experience significant improvement in their symptoms when followed up to 25 months post-operation.[2]

Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Reinforcement

A newer surgical technique, intraperitoneal onlay mesh reinforcement, has shown promise in preventing nerve entrapment. This laparoscopic procedure involves placing a polytetrafluoroethylene mesh at the painful area, overlapping the site by at least 4 cm in all directions. Initial studies have reported impressive success rates of 90% in the short term and 71% in the long term. The mesh is thought to work by decreasing intra-abdominal pressure on the fibrous ring where the nerve typically becomes entrapped[2].

Following a structured treatment approach that progresses from medical to surgical interventions when necessary, healthcare providers can achieve up to a 90% success rate in managing ACNES. This strategic progression typically involves starting with local injections, moving to anterior neurectomy if needed, and considering reoperation in failed cases[2].

Physical Therapy Intervention

comprehensive physiotherapy approach provides a structured, evidence-based framework for treating ACNES, focusing on both symptom management and addressing underlying contributing factors. The success of treatment often depends on proper identification of the condition and appropriate application of these various therapeutic approaches in a systematic manner. Physiotherapy plays a crucial role in its non-invasive management[10].

This comprehensive approach based on a case study[10] combines manual therapy techniques, therapeutic exercise, and self-management strategies to address both the primary symptoms and underlying contributing factors of ACNES, providing a non-invasive alternative to traditional medical interventions.

Pain Management

Cold Therapy Application

The recommended technique involves wrapping an ice cube in a thin washcloth. This approach serves two therapeutic purposes:

  • Functions as a local anaesthetic
  • Reduces nerve inflammation and surrounding tissue swelling[4]

Compression Therapy

Elastic bandage application can provide symptom relief through targeted counterpressure. The compression should be carefully monitored to ensure appropriate pressure distribution and patient comfort[4].

Heat Therapy

The application of heat serves as an effective intervention for addressing muscle spasm associated with ACNES. This modality specifically targets the muscular component of the condition rather than the primary nerve entrapment.

When implementing these conservative measures, clinicians should:

  • Provide specific instructions for duration and frequency of applications
  • Monitor patient response to each modality
  • Adjust treatments based on individual patient response
  • Consider these methods as part of a comprehensive pain management strategy.[4]
Primary Treatment Approaches
  • Manual Therapy Techniques:
  1. Osteopathic Manipulation Techniques (OMT)
  2. Soft tissue mobilization
  3. Myofascial release
  • Active Release Techniques (ART): active release techniques are applied to address muscle tension in the muscle. The ART technique helps release muscle tension and improve tissue mobility in the affected area.
  • Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM): This treatment is applied for five minutes and helps release muscle tension and improve tissue mobility.
  • Directional Cupping: A unique approach to tissue mobilization involves directional cupping using a 4 cm vacuum suction cup. The skin is first lubricated with lotion, and the cup is applied over the area of pain. The therapist moves the cup laterally and medially along the course of the anterior cutaneous nerve for three 10-second periods. This technique is believed to help mobilize the nerve and break up potential adhesions between the skin and anterior abdominal sheath.
  • Exercise Program: The rehabilitation program incorporates both stretching and strengthening components.[10]

Differential Diagnosis

The challenge in accurately diagnosing ACNES lies in its ability to mimic various other conditions affecting the abdominal region. Healthcare providers must consider a broad spectrum of potential causes, ranging from musculoskeletal to neurological conditions.

The presence of well-Localised, typically unilateral pain, combined with a history of normal diagnostic workups and multiple abdominal surgeries, strongly suggests ACNES. When patients report persistent abdominal pain of undetermined origin, ACNES should be considered as a primary differential diagnosis[4]

Differential Diagnoses with respect to Anatomical Distribution

Upper Abdomen (T6-T9)

  • T6-T8: May mimic pleurisy, costochondritis, or slipping rib syndrome
  • T8-T9 (right side): May be confused with cholecystitis or peptic ulcer[4]

Mid-Abdomen (T11-T12)

  • Pain runs at oblique angle
  • May mimic urolithiasis
  • Right side T11 involvement can suggest appendicitis[4]

Lower Abdomen (T12/L1)

  • Can present with bilateral pain
  • May involve multiple nerves at different levels
  • Pain may radiate to scrotum or vulva
  • Can present with posterolateral tenderness below iliac crest
  • May be confused with inguinal/femoral hernia[4]

1. Musculoskeletal Conditions:

  • Thoracic disc herniation
  • Rectus abdominis strain/tear
  • Lower rib pain syndromes
  • Xiphoidalgia[3]

2. Neurological Conditions:

  • Thoracic nerve radiculopathies
  • Iliohypogastric nerve entrapment
  • Intercostal nerve entrapment[3]

Additionally, conditions such as abdominal wall hernias, endometriosis, and even sacroiliac joint pathology must be considered, as the latter has been shown to refer pain to the abdomen in approximately 2% of cases[3].

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Ari BC, Sahin E., Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome: An Underestimated Diagnosis, Cureus. 2023 Nov 2;15(11):e48165.
  2. ↑ 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.14 2.15 Chrona E, Kostopanagiotou G, Damigos D, Batistaki C., Anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome: management challenges, J Pain Res. 2017 Jan 13;10:145-156.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 van Assen T, Brouns JA, Scheltinga MR, Roumen RM.,Incidence of abdominal pain due to the anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome in an emergency department, Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Feb 8;23:19.
  4. ↑ 4.00 4.01 4.02 4.03 4.04 4.05 4.06 4.07 4.08 4.09 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14 4.15 4.16 4.17 4.18 4.19 4.20 4.21 4.22 4.23 4.24 4.25 4.26 4.27 4.28 4.29 4.30 4.31 Applegate WV., Abdominal Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome (ACNES): A Commonly Overlooked Cause of Abdominal Pain, Perm J. 2002 Summer.
  5. ↑ Strong Medicine, Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome, Available from:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2ZPgP0HWSM [last accessed 16/12/24]
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Henry Gray (1825–1861). Anatomy of the Human Body. 1918. Available from: https://www.bartleby.com/lit-hub/anatomy-of-the-human-body/6c-the-thoracic-nerves
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 Frédérique M.U. Mol, Arno Lataster, Marc Scheltinga, Rudi Roumen, Anatomy of abdominal anterior cutaneous intercostal nerves with respect to the pathophysiology of anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): A case study. Translational Research in Anatomy, Volumes 8–9, 2017, Pages 6-10.
  8. ↑ Jasper Markus, Iris C. Sibbing, Johannes C.F. Ket, et al, Treatment strategies for anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome in children: A systematic review, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Volume 56, Issue 3, 2021, Pages 605-613,
  9. ↑ Jacobs MLYE, Janssen L, Stassen LPS, et al. Visceral symptoms in patients with anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES): expression of viscerosomatic reflexes? Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):127-134.
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 Newman DP, Holkup SM, Masi EL, et al, A Novel Approach to Assessing and Conservatively Treating Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome: A Case Study. Cureus. 2023 Sep 8;15(9):e44912.
  11. ↑ Polomano RC, Galloway KT, Kent ML, et al. Psychometric Testing of the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS): A New Pain Scale for Military Population. Pain Med. 2016;17:1505–1519.
  12. ↑ Susheel Govindan, Christopher Lam, Usman Latif Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation for Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome: A Case Report: PRF For ACNES: A Case Report, RRNMF Neuromuscular Journal vol 2, 2021/02/19.