Total Ankle Arthroplasty

What is an Ankle Arthroplasty?[edit | edit source]

Ankle arthroplasty is when the ankle joint (Talocrural Joint) is replace with prosthetic components comprised of polyethylene and metal and is preferred to ankle arthrodesis (fusion) as range of movement and function an not compromised. Main objectives of the arthroplasty are to

  1. Replicate ROM of the talocrural joint
  2. Function well under weight bearing
  3. Be wear resistent 
  4. Maintain alignment and stability 

History of Total Ankle Arthroplasty [edit | edit source]

Ankle replacement surgery has been available for over two decades however it is a far less common procedure than hip or knee arthroplasty owing to the less frequent incidence of osteoarthritis ankle pathology. The majority of ankle osteoarthritis is secondary to trauma.[1]

Until relatively recently, ankle joint arthrodesis (fusion) was the gold standard of treatment, but this was not without its complications, e.g. non-union,Osteoarthritis in the other mid/hind foot joints and stiffness and loss of proprioception[2]

     Total ankle replacement was developed in the 1970's but initially was plagued with high long term failure rates. The older prosthesis loosened or malfunctioned and frequently needed to be removed[3].  In the late 70's Dr. Frank G. Alvine an orthopedic surgeon from Sioux Falls, SD developed the Agility Ankle which was the first FDA approved total ankle implant in use in the United States[4]. Since its introduction the Agility Ankle System has gone through several modifications. Currently the Agility Ankle System is the most widely used ankle prosthesis. With more than 20 years of experience it has the longest followup of any fixed bearing device[5].

On May 29, 2009 the medical news today announced the FDA approved the first mobile bearing device called the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (STAR). As a condition of FDA approval the company (Small Bone Innovations Inc.) must evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the device during the next eight years[6].

     In a systematic review of the literature published in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery in 2007, the intermediate outcome of total ankle arthroplasty appears to be similiar to that of ankle arthrodesis however data was sparse[7].  In a study comparing reoperation rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty SooHoo, Zingmond and Ko confirmed that ankle replacement is associated with a higher risk of complications as compared with ankle fusion, but also has potential advantages in terms of a decreased risk of the patient requiring subtalar joint fusion[8].  In a seven to sixteen year follow up on the Agility Total Ankle Arthroplasty, Knecht, Estin, Callagham et al concluded that the relatively low rates of radiographic hindfoot arthritis and revision procedures at an average of nine years after the arthroplasty are encouraging[9].

     Although interest in total ankle replacements is increasing, midterm clinical results to date are few and often have not been validated by independent pratitioners. In addition no level I or II studies have been published[10].

Clinically Relevant Anatomy[edit | edit source]

For detailed anatomy see here

[11]

[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]

Talocrural Joint[edit | edit source]

The ankle joint is a synovial hinge joint comprised of hyaline covered articular surfaces of the talus, the tibia as well as the fibula, allowing up to 20 degrees dorsiflexion and 50 degress plantarflexion. The distal ends of the tibia and fibula are held together firmly by ligaments of the medial (Deltoid) and lateral ligament complexes of the ankle which can be damaged and contribute to ankle arthritis (Ankle Sprain). The ligaments hold the tibia and fibula into a deep bracket-like shape in which the talus sits[16].

The Talus
  • TheROOF of the joint is the distal inferior surface of the tibia
  • The MEDIAL SIDE of the joint is formed of the medial malleolus of the tibia
  • The LATERAL SIDE of the joint is formed of the lateral malleolus of the fibula


The articular part of the talus looks like a cylinder and fits snugly into the bracket provided by the syndemosis of the tibia and fibula, when looking down upon the talus the articular surface is wider anteriorly than posteriorly. Subsequently this increases the congruent, stable nature of this joint when it is in dorsiflexion. As this is a synovial joint, a membrane is present as well as a fibrous membrane providing the same functions as any other synovial jointSynovial Membrane[16]


The Arthroplasty[edit | edit source]

Indication for Procedure
[edit | edit source]

There is no well-defined indication for a Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Surgery is considered only when conservative treatment has been attempted with no improvement. The operation is mainly being executed in patients who suffer from different types of arthrides. This cause advanced arthritic changes of disabling pain and loss of ankle motion. The ankle is most frequently affected by post-traumatic arthritis.[17] Total ankle joint replacement is also indicated following unsuccessful ankle arthrodesis [18] the ‘ideal’ patient for ankle joint replacement is an elderly person with the low physical demands who has good bone stock, normal vascular status, no immune-suppression, and excellent hind foot-ankle alignment.[19] Generally here are common indications for arthroplasty:

  1. Primary or post-traumatic osteoarthritis
  2. Severe rheumatoid arthritis
  3. Rejected arthrodesis

Common contraindications are:

  1. Severe talus subluxation, severe valgus or varus deformity
  2. Substantial osteoporosis
  3. Neurological disorders or recurrent infection

Pre-operative Procedure and Definitive Diagnosis[edit | edit source]

Weight bearing A-P and lateral mortise views of bilateral ankles is required to make effective preparation and anticipation of that will be required in the surgery. The rearfoot alignment (Cobey/Saltzman) view is essential to evaluate the ankle joint and identify any calcaneal-totibial deformities. This is performed by getting the patient to stand, elevated with a cassette positioned at 15 degres anteriorly inclined with the x-ray bemed perpendicular to the film. This position is altered if deformities are present, after this has been taken anterior distal tibial angle (ADTA) is measured. The ADTA is formed by the mechanical axis of the tibia and the joint orientation line of the ankle in the sagittal plane and measures 80° ± 3° in the normal lower extremity. In the coronal plane, the lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA), the tibial-talar angle and the calcaneal tibial alignment should be measured. The LDTA is formed by the distal tibial articular surface and the anatomical axis of the tibia and measures 89° ± 3°.29, if this is decreased this represents a varus deformity. The tibial-talar angle (Figure 3C) is defined by the tibial and talar articular surfaces in the ankle joint. When the tibialtalar angle is >10° the joint is defined as incongruent (unstable)[20].

"If an abnormal ADTA or LDTA is present (sagittal or coronal deformity), the center of rotation of angulation (CORA) is measured. The CORA is the intersection of the mid-diaphyseal line and the line starting from the middle of the joint and perpendicular to the abnormal ADTA or LDTA (Figure 4). The CORA can be located at the joint line level (usually due to anatomical joint line malalignment or to ankle degeneration) or proximally (usually due to tibial deformities/fractures)"[20]. So as you can see there are many consideration to be taken, and multiple angles to be analysed and this is important and any  instability and malalignment of the new prosthesis can be excessively worn or may even fail[20].

Surgical Procedure[edit | edit source]

To perfrom the procedure the patient is positioned supine with the hip slightly elevated and a tourniquet on the proxinal thight to restrict blood flow during the procedure. Next a 10 cm incision is made over the centre of the joint line to expose the relevent anatomical structures. Once the structures have been exposed the crucial nerves and tendons are identified as to protect and ensure their integrity to minimise operative complications, these include; peroneal nerves, tibialis anterior and extensor hallucis longus. This is also to achieve correct talocrural alignment and soft tissue balance to ensure the prosthesis can achieve plantar grade in standing. It is also important to debride and correct any osteophytes or any other structures that can contribute to malalignment. Depending on the natural angle of the talocrural joint (varus or valgus) more bone medially or laterally may have ot be removed, this also may occur if the joint is deep or shallow as it may need to be reduced or elevated[20].


Once the joints have been corrected and bones properly aligned the new components are trialed making sure rull ROM and stability is achieved. If dorsiflexion is limited and not due to malalignment then achilles tendon lengthening is required, the same goes for if there is instability in inversion or eversion the ligaments are reconstructed. Persistent malalignment can occure and may need separate procedures to correct such as subtalar fusion depending on severity and correctability[20]

Physical Therapy Management
[edit | edit source]

As it will be explained in the pre-operation and post-operation phase the multi-disciplinary team involved with the patient have a big role in making the arrangements before and after the surgery, this may involve physiotherapists, occupational therapists, discharge nurses, staff nurses, healthcare assistants as well as doctors. Both pre and post operative phases are integral to the progress of the patient and the pre-op should not be overlooked as important as it can be easy to focus on post-op.


Pre-Operative Phase[edit | edit source]

Before the surgery one of the main job for the team is to educate the patient about what will happen before, during and after the surgery as this will give the patient the opportunity to prepare, mentally rehearse, ensure smooth transition through short-term to long-term goals but also help control and reduce post-operative pain[21]

ROM, muscle strength, gait and deviations will all be recorded as to compared before and after arthroplasty and ensure the patient is as optimal strength prior to operation if possible. For safety and ease of transition is can be important that the patient learns how to walk with crutches so they can perform ADL’s as soon as possible post arthroplasty but also understand that they will be non-weight bearing after the arthroplasty[22].

As will all procedures under general anesthetic there are common pulmonary postoperative complications (PPC's) which need to be controlled and risk reduced and this can be explained at this stage as well. 


Post-Operative Phase[edit | edit source]

It is important to ensure the risk of PPC's are reduced and respiratory physiotherapy may be used at this early stage, cough, deep breathing exercises and early mobility are essential here to reduce atelectasis and reinstate the muscoscilliary elevator as soon as possible. 


Atelecatsis occurs in 90% of anesthetized patients which leads to a 16-20% reduction in functional residual capacity which is why the alveoli tend collapse resulting in increased work of breathing, hypoxia, reduced compliance, V/Q mismatch and risk of pneumonia[23][24]. There is a 9% chance of developing pneumonia and this is where physiotherapy intervention is crucial at reducing the rate of all of these complications[25].


IT IS IMPORTANT TO KNOW YOUR OWN HOSPITALS/SURGEONS GUIDELINES FOLLOWING ARTHROPLASTY OR ANY OPERATION AND THE FOLLOWING SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO EDUCATE AND CONSIDER SOME BASIC/COMMON PROTOCOLS

THIS SHOULD NOT BE USED IN REPLACEMENT OF THE SURGEONS PROTOCOL

THIS IS A PROTOCOL BY THE ROYAL NATIONAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL NHS TRUST[26], utilising the best available evidence[27][28][29][30][31][32]


Initial Rehab 0-4 Weeks[edit | edit source]

Restrictions:

  • Non-weight bearing 2/52 with a back slab
  • Below knee POP at 2/52 and begin full weight bearing in this POP
  • POP removed at 4/52 and aircast boot is considered
  • Elevation
  • If sedentary employment, return to work at 4/52 as long as elevated and protected

Goals:

  • Safe and independent mobility with walking aid
  • Independent with exercise programme
  • Know monitoring and protection

Treatment:

  • POP
  • Pain-relief
  • POLICE
  • Basic circulatory exercises
  • Mobility

Progress when:

Out of POP, fully weight bearing, no complications and then refer to physiotherapy out patients


Recovery Rehab 4 weeks - 3 months[edit | edit source]

Restrictions:

  • No strengthening against resistance until 3 months if any tendon transfers 
  • No stretching tendons if transferred

Goals:

  • Independent from aircast boot
  • Achieve full ROM 

Treatment:

  • Pain relief, swelling management
  • Advice, education, postural advice, monitoring complications, pacing
  • Gait re-education
  • Exercises --> PROM,AAROM, AROM, light strengthening, core stability, balance/proprioception, stretching
  • Hydrotherapy
  • Orthotics
  • Manual therapy --> SSTM's, mobilisations

Progress when:

Full ROM, independently mobile, neutral foot position in standing


Intermediate Rehab 12 weeks - 6 months[edit | edit source]

Restrictions: 

  • None

Goals:

  • Independent with no aids
  • Normal footwear
  • Grade 5 strength
  • Grade 4 strength in tendons transferred

Treatment:

  • Pain relief, swelling management
  • Advice, education, postural advice, monitoring complications, pacing
  • Gait re-education
  • Exercises --> PROM,AAROM, AROM, light strengthening, core stability, balance/proprioception, stretching
  • Hydrotherapy
  • Orthotics
  • Manual therapy --> SSTM's, mobilisations

Progress when:

Normal footwear, independent with no aids, pain controlled, strength 5/5 (4/5 if tendon transferred)


Final Rehab 6 months - 1 year[edit | edit source]

Goals:

  • Return to gentle no-impact/low impact sports
  • Grade 5 strength in transferred tendons

Treatment:

  • Maximise function
  • End stage exercises, balance and proprioception and sport specific
  • Manual therapy


Additional Information[edit | edit source]

After the surgery it is important that the patient keeps moving and performing his daily activities. However there is still discussion between physicians about when the patient should start again with exercising. There are some that allow exercise immediately after surgery. But some say it is considered best to wait until there is a satisfactory bony in growth as shown radio graphically. However it’s the job of the physician to try to improve:  the patient’s ROM of the ankle, maintain the ROM in the hip and knee, increase the muscle strength with exercise for the Gluteus Maximus, Quadriceps femoris muscles and the muscles that are responsible for dorsal flexion and the plantar flexion of the ankle[33]. Postoperative mobilization begins early, with rapid progression to resumption of normal activities.[34] The goal is to obtain 10° of dorsal flexion and 30° of plantar flexion. For patients who have almost no motion in their ankle is any motion an improvement.[35] 

In early postoperative period it is important that the incision heals and the implant becomes solidly fixed to the bony bed to do this they will use a below knee non-weight bearing immobilization. This is maintained until there is satisfactory bony in growth. [36]. Another goal is to increase the ROM of the ankle and maintain the hip and the knee ROM.

After a few months the patient needs to make an appointment with the doctor. Here they will take X-ray scans to see if there are no complications like: joint debridement for osseous impingement; the next most common procedures were extra-articular procedures for axial misalignments and component replacements.[37] 


Prognosis & Outcome[edit | edit source]

Outcome of ankle arthroplasty includes pain, function implant survival and complications. There are numerous studies looking at survival rate of implants and rates are reported around 67-94% at 5 years[38][39][40] and 75% at ten years[38] which is reasonably reliable. 

A systematic review of intermediate and long term outcomes of arthrolplasty and arthrodesis performed by Haddal et al[41] had interesting results. It reviewed 49 primary studies of 1262 patients and utilised the AOFAS score (Americal Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society). This score is out of 100 (0=worst outcome, 100=best outcome) broken into 8 sections of pain, function walking distance, walking surface, gait abnormality, sagittal mobility, hindfoot mobility, ankle hindfoot mobility and alignment. The score has mixed reviews and the objective aspect of the score is hard to make reliable between therapists[42]

The mean AOFAS score was 78.2 points for the patients treated with total ankle arthroplasty and 75.6 points  for those treated with arthrodesis. Meta-analytic mean results showed 38% of the patients treated with total ankle arthroplasty had an excellent result, 30.5% had a good result, 5.5% had a fair result, and 24% had a poor result. In the arthrodesis group, the corresponding values were 31%, 37%, 13%, and 13%. The five-year implant survival rate was 78% and the ten-year survival rate was 77%. The revision rate following total ankle arthroplasty was 7% with the primary reason for the revisions being loosening and/or subsidence (28%). The revision rate following ankle arthrodesis was 9% , with the main reason for the revisions being nonunion (65%). One percent of the patients who had undergone total ankle arthroplasty required a below-the-knee amputation compared with 5% in the ankle arthrodesis group. Their conclusion was that on the basis of these findings,

"the intermediate outcome of total ankle arthroplasty appears to be similar to that of ankle arthrodesis; however, data were sparse. Comparative studies are needed to strengthen this conclusion"[41].

Resources
[edit | edit source]

[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1lg0RU4SkRVBqMFj5d-bSyy2dkWVinKpajNeDAG9Bmj8Xqj5o|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS 

Read 4 Credit[edit | edit source]

Quiz-image.jpg

Would you like to earn certification to prove your knowledge on this topic?

All you need to do is pass the quiz relating to this page in the Physiopedia member area.

Find out more about a Physiopedia membership

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Ankle Replacement Surgery. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2006 July;88(4):417-418
  2. Ankle Replacement Surgery. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2006 July;88(4):417-418
  3. http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/11222.php
  4. http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/11222.php
  5. Cerrato R, Myerson MS. Total Ankle Replacement:the Agility LP prosthesis. Foot and Ankle Clin. 2008 Sept; 13(3): 485-94.
  6. http://medicalnewstoday.com/printerfriendlynews.php?newsid=151776
  7. Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R. et al. Intermediate and Long-Term Outcomes of Total Ankle Arthroplasy and Ankle Arthrodesis. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:1899-1905.
  8. SooHoo NF, Zingmond DS, Ko CY. Comparison of Reoperation Rates Following Ankle Arthrodesis and Total Ankle Arthroplasty. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:2143-2149.
  9. Knecht SI, Estin M, Callaghan JJ et al. The Agility Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Seven to Sixteen-Year Follow-up. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2004;86:1161-1171.
  10. Cracchiolo A 3rd, Deorio JK. Design features of current total ankle replacements: implants and instrumentation. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. 2008 Sept:16(9):530-40.
  11. Ankle Joint - Anatomy Zone - Available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPLdoFQlZXQ
  12. Muscles of the Leg - Part 1 - Posterior Compartment - Antomy Zone. Available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1J0HbV2n5s
  13. Muscles of the Leg - Part 2 - Anterior and Lateral Compartment - Anatomy Zone - Available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83_ctEOFkhM
  14. Muscles of the Foot Part 1 - Anatomy Zone - Available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocUiJYXebHs
  15. Muscles of the Foot Part 2 - Anatomy Zone - available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOBHTkSamWw
  16. 16.0 16.1 Drake, R. Vogl, A. Mitchell, A. Gray's Anatomy for Students. 2nd ed. 2010: 609. Churchill Livingstone: Elsevier: Philadelphia.
  17. MURNAGHAN J.M., WARNOCK D.S., HENDERSON S.A.., ‘Total Ankle Replacement: Early experience with STAR prothesis’, The Ulster Medical Journal, 2005, May, vol. 74, nr. 1, p. 9-13
  18. SMITH C.L., L.T., M.S.C., U.S.N., ‘Physical therapy management of patients with total ankle replacement’, Physical Therapy, 1980, March, vol. 60, nr. 8, p. 303-306
  19. SALTZMAN C.L., MCLFF T.E., BUCKWALTER J.A., BROWN T.D., ‘Total Ankle Replacement revisited’, Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 2000, February, vol.nr. 30(2), p. 56-67
  20. 20.0 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 Bonasia DE. Dettoni F. Femino JE. Phisitkul P. Germano M. Amendola A. Total Ankle Replacement: When, Why and How? The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal 2010(30)119-130
  21. Grawe JS. Mirow L. Bouchard R. Lindig M. Huppe M. Impact of preoperative patient education on postoperative pain in consideration of individual coping style. Schmerz 2010;24(6):575-86
  22. SMITH C.L., L.T., M.S.C., U.S.N., ‘Physical therapy management of patients with total ankle replacement’, Physical Therapy, 1980, March, vol. 60, nr. 8, p. 303-306
  23. Neligan, Patrick. Anesthesiology Clin. 2013:30; 495-511
  24. Neligan, Patrick. Anesthesiology Clin. 2013:30; 495-511
  25. Tusman, Gerardo, et al. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 2012:25;1-10
  26. Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust. Physiotherapy Rehabilitation Guidelines - Total Ankle Replacement Surgery. [ONLINE] available from: http://www.rnoh.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/physiotherapy_rehabilitation_guidelines_-_total_ankle_replacement_surgery.doc accessed [26/05/2014]
  27. Ali et al. Intermediate results of Buechel Pappas unconstrained total ankle replacement for osteoarthritis. The journal of foot and ankle surgery. 2007;46(1):16-20
  28. Buechel at al. Twenty-year evaluation of cementless mobile-bearing total ankle replacements. clinical othopaedics and related research. 2004;424:19-26
  29. Coetzee J. Caatro M. Accurate measurement of ankle range of motion after total ankle arthroplasty. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2004 27-31
  30. Conti S. Wong YS. Complications of total ankle replacements. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2001;391:105-114
  31. Knecht et al. The agility of total ankle arthroplasty. The journal of bone and joint surgery. 2004 1161-1171
  32. Kontis et al. The management of failed ankle replacement. The jounrla of bone and joint surgery. 2006 1039-1047
  33. SMITH C.L., L.T., M.S.C., U.S.N., ‘Physical therapy management of patients with total ankle replacement’, Physical Therapy, 1980, March, vol. 60, nr. 8, p. 303-306.
  34. SMITH C.L., L.T., M.S.C., U.S.N., ‘Physical therapy management of patients with total ankle replacement’, Physical Therapy, 1980, March, vol. 60, nr. 8, p. 303-306.
  35. SALTZMAN C.L., MCLFF T.E., BUCKWALTER J.A., BROWN T.D., ‘Total Ankle Replacement revisited’, Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 2000, February, vol.nr. 30(2), p. 56-67
  36. SALTZMAN C.L., MCLFF T.E., BUCKWALTER J.A., BROWN T.D., ‘Total Ankle Replacement revisited’, Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 2000, February, vol.nr. 30(2), p. 56-67
  37. ADRIENNE A. SPIRT, MATHIEU ASSAL, SIGVARD T. HANSEN Jr., ‘Complications and Failure After Total Ankle Arthroplasty’, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2004, June, vol. 86-A, nr. 6, p.1172-1178
  38. 38.0 38.1 Haddad, S.L.; Coetzee, J.C.; Estok, R.; Fahrbach, K.; Banel, D.; Nalysnyk, L. (2007). "Intermediate and Long-Term Outcomes of Total Ankle Arthroplasty and Ankle Arthrodesis. A Systematic Review of the Literature". Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 89A (9): 1899–905
  39. Stengel, Dirk; Bauwens, Kai; Ekkernkamp, Axel; Cramer, Jörg (2005). "Efficacy of total ankle replacement with meniscal-bearing devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 125 (2): 109–19
  40. Gougoulias, Nikolaos; Khanna, Anil; Maffulli, Nicola (2009). "How Successful are Current Ankle Replacements? All though most total ankle replacement are successful by reducing pain and improving mobility there is a very high possibility that the pain may be ten times worse. There have been several cases where the doctors have recommended amputation to resolve the issue of pain that was not there prior to the total ankle replacement. : A Systematic Review of the Literature". Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 468: 199–208.
  41. 41.0 41.1 Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Nalysnyk L. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Sep;89(9):1899-905.
  42. Madeley NJ1, Wing KJ, Topliss C, Penner MJ, Glazebrook MA, Younger AS.Responsiveness and validity of the SF-36, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot Score, and Foot Function Index in end stage ankle arthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Jan;33(1):57-63
  43. Dr Selene Parekh Ankle Replacement Surgery https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxqRUzmxviIRrz3MBt6Xxew [Accessed 24/05/2014]
  44. Dr Selene Parekh Ankle Replacement Surgery https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxqRUzmxviIRrz3MBt6Xxew [Accessed 24/05/2014]
  45. Dr Selene Parekh Ankle Replacement Surgery https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxqRUzmxviIRrz3MBt6Xxew {Accessed 24/05/2014]
  46. Total Ankle Replacement Surgery educational video. Available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGjyRJNWAbA [Accessed 24/05/2014]fckLR|}