Stiff Person Syndrome: A Case Study: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
(Added a bunch of stuff)
Line 92: Line 92:
His self reported ABC score was 50% indicating that he is moderately confident with his balance and has a fear of falling <ref name=":2">Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale [Internet]. Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. 2013 [cited 2021May10]. Available from: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/activities-specific-balance-confidence-scale</ref> <ref name=":3">Academy Of Neurologic Physical Therapy [Internet]. Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale. 2019 [cited 2021May10].  Available from: https://www.neuropt.org/docs/default-source/cpgs/core-outcome-measures/activities-specific-balance-confidence-scale-proof8-(2)17db36a5390366a68a96ff00001fc240.pdf?sfvrsn=d7d85043_0</ref>. This finding indicates that his lack of participation in his ADLs is mostly due to his lack of confidence and is at a fall risk <ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3" />.
His self reported ABC score was 50% indicating that he is moderately confident with his balance and has a fear of falling <ref name=":2">Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale [Internet]. Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. 2013 [cited 2021May10]. Available from: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/activities-specific-balance-confidence-scale</ref> <ref name=":3">Academy Of Neurologic Physical Therapy [Internet]. Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale. 2019 [cited 2021May10].  Available from: https://www.neuropt.org/docs/default-source/cpgs/core-outcome-measures/activities-specific-balance-confidence-scale-proof8-(2)17db36a5390366a68a96ff00001fc240.pdf?sfvrsn=d7d85043_0</ref>. This finding indicates that his lack of participation in his ADLs is mostly due to his lack of confidence and is at a fall risk <ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3" />.


The patient's lower extremity and trunk strength may also be a factor impending his balance. His trunk impairment score was 10/23, indicating that his siting static and dynamic balance is poor <ref>Khan F, Chevidikunnan MF, Almalki RA, Mirdad MK, Nimatallah KA, Al-Zahrani S, Alshareef AA. Stiff-Person Syndrome Outpatient Rehabilitation: Case Report. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice. 2020 Oct;11(4):651. Doi: [https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715081]</ref><ref>Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Mertin J, Preger R, Kiekens C, De Weerdt W. The Trunk Impairment Scale: a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. Clinical rehabilitation. 2004 May;18(3):326-34. doi: [https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr733oa]</ref>. His BBS score is 40 which indicates that he is at an increased risk for falls (<45 indicates increased risk of falls) <ref>Donoghue D, Stokes EK. How much change is true change? The minimum detectable change of the Berg Balance Scale in elderly people. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2009 Apr 5;41(5):343-6.doi: [https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0337]</ref><ref>Berg KO, Maki BE, Williams JI, Holliday PJ, Wood-Dauphinee SL. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1992 Nov 1;73(11):1073-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.5555/uri:pii:000399939290174U</ref>. His TUG score is 30s indicating that he is at an increased risk of falling (normal for his age is 9s+/- 3s) <ref>Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L. Age-and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speeds. Physical therapy. 2002 Feb 1;82(2):128-37. doi: [https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/82.2.128]</ref><ref>Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. Physical therapy. 2000 Sep 1;80(9):896-903. doi: [https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/80.9.896]</ref><ref>Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of the American geriatrics Society. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x</ref>. His RMI score is 7/15, a higher score would indicate he has better mobility performance <ref>Rivermead Mobility Index [Internet]. Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. 2013 [cited 2021May10]. Available from: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/rivermead-mobility-index</ref><ref>Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, Bradshaw CM. The Rivermead mobility index: a further development of the Rivermead motor assessment. International disability studies. 1991 Jan 1;13(2):50-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/03790799109166684</ref>. These findings indicate a need to include balance, gait intervention, and reassessment of appropriate gait aids in his treatment plan due to his overall increased risk of falls.  
The patient's lower extremity and trunk strength may also be a factor impending his balance. His trunk impairment score was 10/23, indicating that his siting static and dynamic balance is poor <ref>Khan F, Chevidikunnan MF, Almalki RA, Mirdad MK, Nimatallah KA, Al-Zahrani S, Alshareef AA. Stiff-Person Syndrome Outpatient Rehabilitation: Case Report. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice. 2020 Oct;11(4):651. Doi: [https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715081]</ref><ref>Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Mertin J, Preger R, Kiekens C, De Weerdt W. The Trunk Impairment Scale: a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. Clinical rehabilitation. 2004 May;18(3):326-34. doi: [https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr733oa]</ref>. His BBS score is 40 which indicates that he is at an increased risk for falls (<45 indicates increased risk of falls) <ref name=":4">Donoghue D, Stokes EK. How much change is true change? The minimum detectable change of the Berg Balance Scale in elderly people. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2009 Apr 5;41(5):343-6.doi: [https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0337]</ref><ref>Berg KO, Maki BE, Williams JI, Holliday PJ, Wood-Dauphinee SL. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1992 Nov 1;73(11):1073-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.5555/uri:pii:000399939290174U</ref>. His TUG score is 30s indicating that he is at an increased risk of falling (normal for his age is 9s+/- 3s) <ref name=":5">Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L. Age-and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speeds. Physical therapy. 2002 Feb 1;82(2):128-37. doi: [https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/82.2.128]</ref><ref name=":6">Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. Physical therapy. 2000 Sep 1;80(9):896-903. doi: [https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/80.9.896]</ref><ref name=":7">Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of the American geriatrics Society. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x</ref>. His RMI score is 7/15, a higher score would indicate he has better mobility performance <ref name=":8">Rivermead Mobility Index [Internet]. Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. 2013 [cited 2021May10]. Available from: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/rivermead-mobility-index</ref><ref name=":9">Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, Bradshaw CM. The Rivermead mobility index: a further development of the Rivermead motor assessment. International disability studies. 1991 Jan 1;13(2):50-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/03790799109166684</ref>. These findings indicate a need to include balance, gait intervention, and reassessment of appropriate gait aids in his treatment plan due to his overall increased risk of falls.  


Mr. Reed's health prior to the diagnosis of SPS was fair as he had type 1 diabetes, hypertension and high cholesterol. However, he did partake in some activities and was relatively active for his age. His activities have been limited for six months now by his fear of falling, progressive rigidity and painful spasms in the lower extremities with his left side being worse than his right. It is believed that Mr. R would be a good candidate for physiotherapy to assist with improving his confidence, balance, and strength while reducing his muscle rigidity. Furthermore, Mr. R’s care should extend to a multidisciplinary approach which will be explored later in this case.
Mr. Reed's health prior to the diagnosis of SPS was fair as he had type 1 diabetes, hypertension and high cholesterol. However, he did partake in some activities and was relatively active for his age. His activities have been limited for six months now by his fear of falling, progressive rigidity and painful spasms in the lower extremities with his left side being worse than his right. It is believed that Mr. R would be a good candidate for physiotherapy to assist with improving his confidence, balance, and strength while reducing his muscle rigidity. Furthermore, Mr. R’s care should extend to a multidisciplinary approach which will be explored later in this case.
Line 142: Line 142:
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+
|+
|}
{| class="wikitable"
!
!
!Frequency
!Frequency
!Intensity  
!Intensity
!Time  
!Time
!Rationale
!Rationale
|-
|-
Line 152: Line 154:
* Role of PT
* Role of PT
* Pain management
* Pain management
* Environmental modifications  
* Environmental modifications
* Appropriate use of gait aids
* Appropriate use of gait aids
|During his initial appointment and then in subsequent check-ins  
|During his initial appointment and then in subsequent check-ins
|N/A
|N/A
|Ongoing  
|Ongoing
|Problem List (6,7,17)
|Problem List (6,7,17)
To make sure the patient understands the role of the physiotherapist, how to manage his symptoms and what needs to be done in order to see improvements.
To make sure the patient understands the role of the physiotherapist, how to manage his symptoms and what needs to be done in order to see improvements.
Line 163: Line 165:


* Standing shoulder width apart
* Standing shoulder width apart
** Eyes open  
** Eyes open
** Eyes closed
** Eyes closed
** Foam surface
** Foam surface
* Standing tandem stance  
* Standing tandem stance
* Stand heel toe
* Stand heel toe
* Picking up objects off the floor
* Picking up objects off the floor
Line 173: Line 175:
** Backwards
** Backwards
** Sideways
** Sideways
* Turning around (360s) in parallel bars  
* Turning around (360s) in parallel bars
|In clinic:  
|In clinic:  
2x/week for the first 8 weeks then progressing to 1x/week  
2x/week for the first 8 weeks then progressing to 1x/week  
Line 181: Line 183:
At home: 2x/week at home for the first 8 weeks then progressing to 3x a week at home
At home: 2x/week at home for the first 8 weeks then progressing to 3x a week at home
|As tolerated, but actively trying to push past limits
|As tolerated, but actively trying to push past limits
|Initially 15 minutes a day then progressing to 30 minutes  
|Initially 15 minutes a day then progressing to 30 minutes
|Problem list (1,2)
|Problem list (1,2)


Line 188: Line 190:
|Gait
|Gait


* Walk with nordic poles  
* Walk with nordic poles
* Parallel bar walking  
* Parallel bar walking  
** Forewards
** Forewards
** Backwards
** Backwards
** Sideways  
** Sideways
** Over obstacles
** Over obstacles
|In clinic: 2x/week then progressing to 1x/week
|In clinic: 2x/week then progressing to 1x/week
Line 200: Line 202:


3x a week then progressing to 4x/week at home
3x a week then progressing to 4x/week at home
|Light intensity  
|Light intensity
|10 minutes initially the progressing to 15 minutes  
|10 minutes initially the progressing to 15 minutes
|Problem list (1,2,17)
|Problem list (1,2,17)
Improve Mr. Rs gait mechanics, walking endurance (20) as well as increase his confidence and decrease his risk of falls.
Improve Mr. Rs gait mechanics, walking endurance (20) as well as increase his confidence and decrease his risk of falls.
Line 207: Line 209:
|Strengthening  
|Strengthening  


* Kitchen sink exercises  
* Kitchen sink exercises
* Isometrics
* Isometrics
** Quadriceps  
** Quadriceps
** Calves  
** Calves
** Hamstring  
** Hamstring
* Postural strengthening/motor control
* Postural strengthening/motor control


Line 249: Line 251:
|ROM
|ROM


* Trunk  
* Trunk
* Hip
* Hip
* Knee  
* Knee  
** Extension  
** Extension
** Flexion  
** Flexion
* Ankle  
* Ankle  
** Dorsiflexion
** Dorsiflexion


* General ROM with stationary bike  
* General ROM with stationary bike
|At home:
|At home:
3x/ week progressing to 6x/week  
3x/ week progressing to 6x/week  
Line 288: Line 290:


* Soft tissue mobilizations of lower back and lower extremity muscles
* Soft tissue mobilizations of lower back and lower extremity muscles
* Joint mobilizations of lower extremity joints  
* Joint mobilizations of lower extremity joints
* Heat therapy  
* Heat therapy
|In clinic:
|In clinic:
2x/week moving to 1x/week
2x/week moving to 1x/week
Line 318: Line 320:
Improve his muscle extensibility and joint mobility allowing for improvements in Mr.Rs overall mobility.
Improve his muscle extensibility and joint mobility allowing for improvements in Mr.Rs overall mobility.
|}
|}
== Interprofessional Health Team ==
It is important to include a variety of healthcare professionals in Mr. R’s care plan. For instance, his family physician plays a crucial role in managing his acute and chronic conditions and determining other underlying conditions he may have <ref>Phillips WR, Haynes DG. The domain of family practice: scope, role, and function. Fam Med. 2001 Apr;33(4):273-7. PMID: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11322520/ 11322520.]</ref>. As well, family physicians are one of the first point of contact in the healthcare system and can refer to other specialists when needed. Neurologists are also vital in Mr. R’s care as they are specialized to diagnose, treat, or manage Stiff Person Syndrome. They could prescribe the appropriate medication to manage his symptoms, perform tests such as nerve conduction studies and electromyography to evaluate the integrity of the nervous system as the condition progresses, and provide appropriate interventions to manage the condition when needed<ref>What is a neurologist? [Internet]. AAN. [cited 2021May1]. Available from: https://www.aan.com/tools-and-resources/medical-students/careers-in-neurology/what-is-a-neurologist/ </ref>.
In addition to his family physician and neurologist, there are other professionals that need to be involved. Considering Mr. R’s age, high-cholesterol and type 1 diabetes, it was viewed as essential that he was referred to a dietitian. Considering Mr. R’s comorbidities, and complexity as a case, a professional opinion was required. A dietitian can provide vital advice to assist Mr. R with his self management of his diabetes and high cholesterol which can assist in reducing long term complications commonly involved with diabetes and also improve his quality of life <ref>Reddy M, Rilstone S, Cooper P, Oliver NS. Type 1 diabetes in adults: supporting self management. BMJ 2016; 352 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i998</ref>.
A  social worker may also be included in his plan of care, as they can provide resources and services to overcome barriers with regards to aspects such as psychosocial, physical, and emotional well-being <ref>The role of the social worker in interdisciplinary geriatric teams. Social Work Interest Group of the Hartford Geriatric Interdisciplinary Team Training (GITT) Program. Continuum. 1999 Jan-Feb;19(1):4-6. PMID: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10387182/ 10387182.]</ref>. In Mr. R’s case, a social worker may direct him to appropriate resources as he reported feeling socially isolated due to COVID and frustrated with his diagnosis. A social worker may also help implement interventions to prevent caregiver burden that his wife may experience if Mr. R’s condition was to progress.
As well, an occupational therapist may be included to help enhance Mr. R’s quality of life and become more independent with his ADLs. They can provide assessments to determine whether adaptive equipment or home modifications are needed as his physical ability changes <ref name=":10">College of Occupational Therapists of Ontario. [Internet]. What Occupational Therapists (OTs) Do. [cited 2021May1]. Available from: https://www.coto.org/you-and-your-ot/what-occupational-therapists-do#:~:text=Occupational%20therapists%20are%20health%20care,their%20home%2C%20and%20much%20more </ref>. Furthermore, they can determine if appropriate adaptations should be made or if new skills are to be learned, to allow Mr. R to engage in his gardening hobby, go grocery shopping, or perform his ADLs with ease (30). Occupational therapists could also provide education and guidance to Mr. R’s spouse about how to provide accommodations and care when needed <ref name=":10" />.
== Outcome ==
Based on the initial assessment, it was determined that Mr. Reed should receive four months of physiotherapy to address his impairments and implement a home exercise program. He was seen twice a week for the first eight weeks, and once a week for the remaining eight weeks. He was reassessed at the end of his six month treatment to determine how to proceed with ongoing therapy.  
Major outcomes included: Increased ROM, improved overall balance and confidence, balance control, tone, gait mechanisms and paid reduction/management. While he now feels more confident gardening and walking around the block, he still has mild balance impairments, thoracic kyphosis, rigidity, and mild mobility concerns. His current scores are:
* ABC: 70%
* RMI: 10/15
* BBS: 47
* TUG: 13s
* Trunk Impairment Score: 18/23
After 16 weeks of the prescribed treatment Mr. Reed’s BBS score improved to a 47/56 which indicates a minimal detectable change occurred and along with a decreased risk of falls <ref name=":4" />. His ABS score improved from 50% to 70%, which still leaves him in the moderate level of physical functioning category. However, this change indicates a minimal important difference (range 11-13%) and that he is no longer at a fall risk as his score is above a 67% <ref name=":2" />,<ref name=":3" />. His TUG score improved to 13s, which further underscores a lower risk of falls and more functional independence <ref name=":5" />,<ref name=":6" />,<ref name=":7" />. and his RMI score improved to 10/15, indicating better mobility performance <ref name=":8" />, <ref name=":9" />.
Overall, Mr. Reed achieved all his short-term and most of his long-term goals during the 16 weeks of treatment. Mr. Reed’s RMI score improved significantly but did not meet his LTG (b). It was decided at the end of the 16 weeks that the frequency of his visits would decrease to once a month, and additional long-term and short-term goals were set. A one-month follow-up was scheduled to check-in, reassess, and provide progressions to his home exercise treatment plan; this is a progressive disorder and the focus remains on maintenance and continued communication between Mr. Reed’s interprofessional health team.
== Discussion ==


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 05:13, 14 May 2021

Abstract[edit | edit source]

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Stiff Person Syndrome (SPS) is a rare neurological condition in which the rate of diagnosis is approximately 1 diagnosis for every 1 million people [1]. The low occurrence of the condition may contribute to there being limited research in regard to the effectiveness of a physiotherapy intervention. In individuals who have SPS it is typical to present with a hyper-lordodic posture, rigidity, and fluctuating muscle spasms[2] [3]. The symptoms typically have an insidious onset with increased tone starting in the paraspinals, proximal lower extremities, and abdominal muscles[2] [3]. Individuals with SPS may also present with episodic spasms particularly in the lower limbs that may also have an associated trigger [2][3]. The spasms may also cause the patient to fall like tin-man [3]. The typical differential diagnosis for SPS may differ from patient to patient as symptoms vary but it may include: Multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, or psychiatric disorders secondary to phobias and emotional triggers[2].

In a case reported by Hegyi in 2011, a 24 year old woman who had also been diagnosed with SPS for approximately one year. In Hegyi’s report, the patient attended 17 sessions across 15 weeks of outpatient physio. The chief concerns of the patient were pain, muscle spasms, gait anomalies and ROM deficits particularly in the left lower extremity. In this case, the patient’s physiotherapy interventions were guided to treat for pain, muscle spasms, gait and range of motion. The particular interventions used were therapeutic ultrasound, soft tissue mobilizations, manual stretching, therapeutic exercise, and fitting for an ankle-foot orthoses. It was found these interventions were successful and improved the symptoms treated.

In a case reported by Potter in 2006, a 33 year old man was being treated in in-patient physiotherapy for 10 days. This man had been diagnosed with SPS for 3 years prior to the recorded physiotherapy intervention. The man presented with decreased static and dynamic balance in standing that was indicated by requiring a rollator walker to ambulate short distances and only being able to maintain a standing position with no handheld supports for 5 seconds [3]. When required to ambulate, the man typically used a wheelchair. The patient also presented with axial rigidity, hyper-lordosis, and bilateral lower extremity rigidity [3]. During the patients past medical history it was indicated that he had suffered from anxiety, depression, substance abuse and chronic bronchitis. The patient also had pain that ranged from 4/10 in quiet sitting that could reach 10/10 depending on the circumstances.

The patient averaged 45 minutes a day of physiotherapy for 10 days with treatment focused on improving functional independence and basic motor skills. The physiotherapy consisted of therapeutic exercises and functional retraining. The patient was given a home exercise program that focused on stretching his lower extremities and flexion based truncal exercises. Although the physiotherapy treatment was scheduled for a longer period, the patient requested early discharge and it was still found there were improvements in his functioning. In this case by Potter in 2006 the patient appears to have a much more progressed case of SPS compared to our patient who will be explored below. However, the goals and physiotherapy management are still similar and will apply in our case. We can use this case to support the efficacy of the physiotherapy techniques used in the case of a patient with SPS which has been questioned before [2].

In the case to be discussed we will refer to our patient as “Mr. Reed”. Mr. R is a 75 year old man who was diagnosed with classical SPS approximately one year ago. Mr. R presents increased axial stiffness, and bilateral lower extremity stiffness, with his right side more affected compared to his left lower extremity. Mr. R presents with hyper-lordosis, low back pain, hypertonic trunk musculature and hypertonic lower extremity musculature. Although SPS is a rare neurological disorder and there is limited evidence regarding the efficacy of physiotherapy as a treatment, the two cases above support the indication of physiotherapy for Mr. R’s case. The objectives of this case study to provide more information and literature regarding the efficacy  of physiotherapy applied to an individual with SPS in an outpatient setting.

Client Characteristics[edit | edit source]

Mr. Reed is a 75-year-old male. He is a retired data analyst, who lives at home with his wife in Kingston, Ontario. Mr. R began noticing he had decreased balance two and a half years ago with increased amounts of falls (last fall ~two weeks ago) which has progressively gotten worse with low back pain starting a year and a half ago. Within the last year, he noticed increased pain in his lower extremities with muscle spasms particularly affecting the left leg. He was referred to a neurologist and diagnosed with SPS. He received a referral for outpatient physiotherapy to perform a falls risk assessment, help with his balance and gait, manage muscle rigidity and spasms, and maintain his independence and quality of life.

Examination Findings[edit | edit source]

Subjective[edit | edit source]

  • Patient Profile (PP): 75 y/o male, right hand dominant
  • History of Present Illness (HPI): diagnosed with stiff person syndrome 1 year ago, left plantar flexor contracture (~2 months), muscle spasms, and progressive rigidity (~ 1 year) and lower extremity pain (~6 months), chronic low back pain (~1.5 years).
  • Past medical history: Type 1 diabetes, hypertension, high cholesterol.
  • Medications: Oral diazepam, gabapentin (1), and insulin
  • Health Habits: Non-smoker, drinks occasionally (~2 drinks a week).
  • Psychosocial: The patient describes feeling lonely due to COVID-19 as well as frustrated with the diagnosis. Over the past 6 months, he has avoided gardening and groceries due to feeling unsteady and having a fear of falling. He lives with his wife and his son lives 20 minutes away and visits weekly where his daughter lives 1 hour away and visits monthly.
  • Home: Bungalow, 5 stairs into the home with railings on the right at both front and back door. The bathroom has a stand-up shower with railings.
  • Previous Functional Status: Able to ambulate more than 200m with no gait aid, active in gardening and golfing, no issues performing activities of daily living (ADLs)  
  • Current Functional Status: Less confident walking outdoors, feeling unsteady, rigidity and painful spasms in both lower extremities prevented him from engaging in his hobbies (gardening, watching golf, sailing)
  • Imaging/Diagnostic testing: MRI and X-ray for chronic low back pain (all negative), Blood tests (Anti-GAD body 92.5 units/mL), nerve conduction studies (No abnormalities)
  • Precautions/Contraindications: None
  • Chief complaint: decreased balance control, increased rigidity and painful spasms in lower extremities particularly in the left leg limiting his ability to do ADLs.

Objective[edit | edit source]

General[edit | edit source]

  • Vital signs
    • Pulse 80bpm, BP 145/95mm HG, RR 15 bpm
  • Pain
    • Visual analogue scale
      • 3/10 constant pain in the lower back
      • 4/10 during painful spasms in the right lower extremity, due to hot weather and stress
      • 7/10 during painful spasms in left lower extremities, due to hot weather and stress

Posture[edit | edit source]

  • Thoracic kyphosis
  • Hyper-lordosis

Gait[edit | edit source]

  • Slow and wide gait, appears to walk stiff legged
  • Left ankle stiff and lack dorsiflexion, than right LE
  • Max walking distance 200m  
  • Typically ambulates with a 4WW outdoors and single cane indoors  
  • Shuffling
  • Decreased arm swing

Tone[edit | edit source]

  • Increased tone in the lower extremities, more increased tone on the left
  • Mild plantar flexion contracture, as well as lack of knee extension

AROM[edit | edit source]

  • Knee flexion (right 135°, left 120°)
  • Knee extension (right -10°, left -20°)  
  • Ankle dorsiflexion (10° right, left -5°)
  • Ankle eversion  (10° right, left 5°)
  • All other ROM within normal limit (WNL)

PROM[edit | edit source]

  • Knee extension (right -5°, left -10°)
  • All other ROM within normal limit (WNL)

Strength[edit | edit source]

Sensation[edit | edit source]

Neurological testing[edit | edit source]

Self-Reported Outcome Measures[edit | edit source]

Outcome Measures[edit | edit source]

Clinical Impressions[edit | edit source]

The patient is a 75 year old male with mild SPS. His subjective interview indicates that initially in his diagnosis he was able to participate in his regular ADLs but for six months now has avoided doing his regular ADLs due to feeling unsteady, having progressive rigidity and having a fear of falling. Major clinical findings from the objective assessment revealed: hyper-lordosis, mild left plantar flexor contracture, lack of ROM in his ankles and knees. His left ankle dorsiflexion and knee extension are particularly affected, he also presents with chronic low back pain, rigidity, painful muscular spasms in lower extremities (left affected more than right), and decreased trunk and lower extremity strength.

His self reported ABC score was 50% indicating that he is moderately confident with his balance and has a fear of falling [4] [5]. This finding indicates that his lack of participation in his ADLs is mostly due to his lack of confidence and is at a fall risk [4][5].

The patient's lower extremity and trunk strength may also be a factor impending his balance. His trunk impairment score was 10/23, indicating that his siting static and dynamic balance is poor [6][7]. His BBS score is 40 which indicates that he is at an increased risk for falls (<45 indicates increased risk of falls) [8][9]. His TUG score is 30s indicating that he is at an increased risk of falling (normal for his age is 9s+/- 3s) [10][11][12]. His RMI score is 7/15, a higher score would indicate he has better mobility performance [13][14]. These findings indicate a need to include balance, gait intervention, and reassessment of appropriate gait aids in his treatment plan due to his overall increased risk of falls.

Mr. Reed's health prior to the diagnosis of SPS was fair as he had type 1 diabetes, hypertension and high cholesterol. However, he did partake in some activities and was relatively active for his age. His activities have been limited for six months now by his fear of falling, progressive rigidity and painful spasms in the lower extremities with his left side being worse than his right. It is believed that Mr. R would be a good candidate for physiotherapy to assist with improving his confidence, balance, and strength while reducing his muscle rigidity. Furthermore, Mr. R’s care should extend to a multidisciplinary approach which will be explored later in this case.

Problem List[edit | edit source]

  1. Decreased balance
  2. Decreased confidence and increased fear of falling
  3. Hypertension
  4. High cholesterol
  5. Type 1 Diabetes
  6. Lower back pain
  7. Lower extremity pain (due to muscular spasms)
  8. Decreased left ankle dorsiflexion and eversion ROM
  9. Mild ankle plantar flexor contracture
  10. Decreased left knee flexion and knee extension ROM
  11. Kyphotic posture in thoracic spine
  12. Hyper-lordosis in lumbar spine
  13. Decreased lower extremity strength
  14. Rigidity
  15. Hypertonia
  16. High Anti GAD levels
  17. Abnormal gait

Intervention[edit | edit source]

Short term goals[edit | edit source]

  1. Improve his ABC score from 50% to 64% in 6 weeks
  2. Decrease his lower back pain from a 3/10 to a 1/10 at rest in 5 weeks
  3. Decrease his pain from muscle spasms from a 7/10 to a 4/10 in the left leg and a 4/10 to a 2/10 in the right leg, in 5 weeks
  4. Increase his left ankle dorsiflexion ROM from a -5° to a 0° in 6 weeks
  5. Increase his left ankle eversion ROM from 5° to 8° in 6 weeks
  6. Increase his knee extension AROM from -10° to -5° on the right and -20°to -15° on the left in 5 weeks
  7. Increase his left knee flexion ROM from 120° to 127° in 6 weeks
  8. Improve his lower extremity strength from a 4/5 to a 5/5 on the right and a 3+/5 to a 4/5 on the left side in 6 weeks
  9. Improve his TUG score from 30 to 18 in 6 weeks
  10. Improve his trunk impairment score from a 10 to 15 in 6 weeks

Long term goals[edit | edit source]

  1. Improve his BBS from 40 to 47 in 16 weeks
  2. Improve his RMI score from 7 to 12 in 16 weeks
  3. Walk around the block with his wife with improved gait mechanics in 16 weeks
  4. Be able to garden for 30 minutes a day in 16 week

Treatment Plan[edit | edit source]

The following exercises were not completed in one session but exercises used throughout the 16 week, treatment session as the patient progressed. These exercises should be performed with caution in order to prevent muscle spasms.

Frequency Intensity Time Rationale
Education
  • Role of PT
  • Pain management
  • Environmental modifications
  • Appropriate use of gait aids
During his initial appointment and then in subsequent check-ins N/A Ongoing Problem List (6,7,17)

To make sure the patient understands the role of the physiotherapist, how to manage his symptoms and what needs to be done in order to see improvements.

Balance training
  • Standing shoulder width apart
    • Eyes open
    • Eyes closed
    • Foam surface
  • Standing tandem stance
  • Stand heel toe
  • Picking up objects off the floor
  • Perturbations
    • Forewards
    • Backwards
    • Sideways
  • Turning around (360s) in parallel bars
In clinic:

2x/week for the first 8 weeks then progressing to 1x/week


At home: 2x/week at home for the first 8 weeks then progressing to 3x a week at home

As tolerated, but actively trying to push past limits Initially 15 minutes a day then progressing to 30 minutes Problem list (1,2)

Increase Mr.Rs confidence with his balance and decrease his risk of falls.

Gait
  • Walk with nordic poles
  • Parallel bar walking
    • Forewards
    • Backwards
    • Sideways
    • Over obstacles
In clinic: 2x/week then progressing to 1x/week


At home: walking with nordic poles

3x a week then progressing to 4x/week at home

Light intensity 10 minutes initially the progressing to 15 minutes Problem list (1,2,17)

Improve Mr. Rs gait mechanics, walking endurance (20) as well as increase his confidence and decrease his risk of falls.

Strengthening
  • Kitchen sink exercises
  • Isometrics
    • Quadriceps
    • Calves
    • Hamstring
  • Postural strengthening/motor control
  • Sit to stand
  • Step-ups in parallel bars  
  • Kneeling to standing and vice versa
At home:

3x/week

In clinic:

2x/week then progressing to 1x/week

65%of 1RM/light

intensity


Light intensity

3 sets of 12 reps




2 sets of 15 reps

Problem list (11,12,13,15)

Postural strengthening  and motor control are a key portion of both gait and balance, therefore taking steps to improve Mr.R posture/motor control will help improve his gait and balance

furthermore

Strengthening of the lower extremity will lead to improvements in balance and gaits. As such, strengthening these will allow Mr. R to return to his ADLs at a quicker pace.

ROM
  • Trunk
  • Hip
  • Knee
    • Extension
    • Flexion
  • Ankle
    • Dorsiflexion
  • General ROM with stationary bike
At home:

3x/ week progressing to 6x/week




In clinic:

2x/week then moving to 1x/week

Light pressure to start then proceeding moderate. Stretching to the point of slight discomfort and when you feel a stretch



Light intensity

30s static stretch repeated twice a day



For 5-10 minutes before ROM exercises

Problem list (8,9,10,14,15)

Improvement of his ROM will translate to better gait and balance and as such will speed up his ability to participate in his ADLs.

Additional treatments
  • Soft tissue mobilizations of lower back and lower extremity muscles
  • Joint mobilizations of lower extremity joints
  • Heat therapy
In clinic:

2x/week moving to 1x/week



Heat therapy as needed at home

5-10 Passes




As tolerated

Ongoing




10 minutes 3 times a week

Problem list (8,9,10,14,15)

Improve his muscle extensibility and joint mobility allowing for improvements in Mr.Rs overall mobility.

Interprofessional Health Team[edit | edit source]

It is important to include a variety of healthcare professionals in Mr. R’s care plan. For instance, his family physician plays a crucial role in managing his acute and chronic conditions and determining other underlying conditions he may have [15]. As well, family physicians are one of the first point of contact in the healthcare system and can refer to other specialists when needed. Neurologists are also vital in Mr. R’s care as they are specialized to diagnose, treat, or manage Stiff Person Syndrome. They could prescribe the appropriate medication to manage his symptoms, perform tests such as nerve conduction studies and electromyography to evaluate the integrity of the nervous system as the condition progresses, and provide appropriate interventions to manage the condition when needed[16].

In addition to his family physician and neurologist, there are other professionals that need to be involved. Considering Mr. R’s age, high-cholesterol and type 1 diabetes, it was viewed as essential that he was referred to a dietitian. Considering Mr. R’s comorbidities, and complexity as a case, a professional opinion was required. A dietitian can provide vital advice to assist Mr. R with his self management of his diabetes and high cholesterol which can assist in reducing long term complications commonly involved with diabetes and also improve his quality of life [17].

A  social worker may also be included in his plan of care, as they can provide resources and services to overcome barriers with regards to aspects such as psychosocial, physical, and emotional well-being [18]. In Mr. R’s case, a social worker may direct him to appropriate resources as he reported feeling socially isolated due to COVID and frustrated with his diagnosis. A social worker may also help implement interventions to prevent caregiver burden that his wife may experience if Mr. R’s condition was to progress.

As well, an occupational therapist may be included to help enhance Mr. R’s quality of life and become more independent with his ADLs. They can provide assessments to determine whether adaptive equipment or home modifications are needed as his physical ability changes [19]. Furthermore, they can determine if appropriate adaptations should be made or if new skills are to be learned, to allow Mr. R to engage in his gardening hobby, go grocery shopping, or perform his ADLs with ease (30). Occupational therapists could also provide education and guidance to Mr. R’s spouse about how to provide accommodations and care when needed [19].

Outcome[edit | edit source]

Based on the initial assessment, it was determined that Mr. Reed should receive four months of physiotherapy to address his impairments and implement a home exercise program. He was seen twice a week for the first eight weeks, and once a week for the remaining eight weeks. He was reassessed at the end of his six month treatment to determine how to proceed with ongoing therapy.  

Major outcomes included: Increased ROM, improved overall balance and confidence, balance control, tone, gait mechanisms and paid reduction/management. While he now feels more confident gardening and walking around the block, he still has mild balance impairments, thoracic kyphosis, rigidity, and mild mobility concerns. His current scores are:

  • ABC: 70%
  • RMI: 10/15
  • BBS: 47
  • TUG: 13s
  • Trunk Impairment Score: 18/23


After 16 weeks of the prescribed treatment Mr. Reed’s BBS score improved to a 47/56 which indicates a minimal detectable change occurred and along with a decreased risk of falls [8]. His ABS score improved from 50% to 70%, which still leaves him in the moderate level of physical functioning category. However, this change indicates a minimal important difference (range 11-13%) and that he is no longer at a fall risk as his score is above a 67% [4],[5]. His TUG score improved to 13s, which further underscores a lower risk of falls and more functional independence [10],[11],[12]. and his RMI score improved to 10/15, indicating better mobility performance [13], [14].

Overall, Mr. Reed achieved all his short-term and most of his long-term goals during the 16 weeks of treatment. Mr. Reed’s RMI score improved significantly but did not meet his LTG (b). It was decided at the end of the 16 weeks that the frequency of his visits would decrease to once a month, and additional long-term and short-term goals were set. A one-month follow-up was scheduled to check-in, reassess, and provide progressions to his home exercise treatment plan; this is a progressive disorder and the focus remains on maintenance and continued communication between Mr. Reed’s interprofessional health team.

Discussion[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Bhatti AB, Gazali ZA. Recent advances and review on treatment of stiff person syndrome in adults and pediatric patients. Cureus. 2015 Dec;7(12). doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.427
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Hegyi CA. Physical therapist management of stiff person syndrome in a 24-year-old woman. Physical therapy. 2011 Sep 1;91(9):1403-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100303
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Potter K. Physical therapy during in-patient rehabilitation for a patient with stiff-person syndrome. pre. 2006 Mar 1;30(1):28-38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NPT.0000282147.18446.b8
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale [Internet]. Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. 2013 [cited 2021May10]. Available from: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/activities-specific-balance-confidence-scale
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Academy Of Neurologic Physical Therapy [Internet]. Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale. 2019 [cited 2021May10].  Available from: https://www.neuropt.org/docs/default-source/cpgs/core-outcome-measures/activities-specific-balance-confidence-scale-proof8-(2)17db36a5390366a68a96ff00001fc240.pdf?sfvrsn=d7d85043_0
  6. Khan F, Chevidikunnan MF, Almalki RA, Mirdad MK, Nimatallah KA, Al-Zahrani S, Alshareef AA. Stiff-Person Syndrome Outpatient Rehabilitation: Case Report. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice. 2020 Oct;11(4):651. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715081
  7. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Mertin J, Preger R, Kiekens C, De Weerdt W. The Trunk Impairment Scale: a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. Clinical rehabilitation. 2004 May;18(3):326-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr733oa
  8. 8.0 8.1 Donoghue D, Stokes EK. How much change is true change? The minimum detectable change of the Berg Balance Scale in elderly people. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2009 Apr 5;41(5):343-6.doi: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0337
  9. Berg KO, Maki BE, Williams JI, Holliday PJ, Wood-Dauphinee SL. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1992 Nov 1;73(11):1073-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.5555/uri:pii:000399939290174U
  10. 10.0 10.1 Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L. Age-and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speeds. Physical therapy. 2002 Feb 1;82(2):128-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/82.2.128
  11. 11.0 11.1 Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. Physical therapy. 2000 Sep 1;80(9):896-903. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/80.9.896
  12. 12.0 12.1 Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of the American geriatrics Society. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x
  13. 13.0 13.1 Rivermead Mobility Index [Internet]. Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. 2013 [cited 2021May10]. Available from: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/rivermead-mobility-index
  14. 14.0 14.1 Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, Bradshaw CM. The Rivermead mobility index: a further development of the Rivermead motor assessment. International disability studies. 1991 Jan 1;13(2):50-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/03790799109166684
  15. Phillips WR, Haynes DG. The domain of family practice: scope, role, and function. Fam Med. 2001 Apr;33(4):273-7. PMID: 11322520.
  16. What is a neurologist? [Internet]. AAN. [cited 2021May1]. Available from: https://www.aan.com/tools-and-resources/medical-students/careers-in-neurology/what-is-a-neurologist/
  17. Reddy M, Rilstone S, Cooper P, Oliver NS. Type 1 diabetes in adults: supporting self management. BMJ 2016; 352 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i998
  18. The role of the social worker in interdisciplinary geriatric teams. Social Work Interest Group of the Hartford Geriatric Interdisciplinary Team Training (GITT) Program. Continuum. 1999 Jan-Feb;19(1):4-6. PMID: 10387182.
  19. 19.0 19.1 College of Occupational Therapists of Ontario. [Internet]. What Occupational Therapists (OTs) Do. [cited 2021May1]. Available from: https://www.coto.org/you-and-your-ot/what-occupational-therapists-do#:~:text=Occupational%20therapists%20are%20health%20care,their%20home%2C%20and%20much%20more