Rancho Los Amigos Level of Cognitive Functioning Scale

Introduction[edit | edit source]

The Rancho Los Amigos Level of Cognitive Funtioning Scale, commonly known as The Ranchos Scale, is an integral and widely used tool in the cognitive and behavioural assessment of persons following a traumatic brain injury (TBI).

The Ranchos Scale, was originally developed by Dr. Chris Hagen and team in 1972 at the Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center in Downey, California. It has since been revised several times to more accurately reflect individuals with more independence at higher levels of cognitive recovery.  The original Rancho Los Amigos Scale (RLAS) had 8 levels[1] but was expanded to 10 levels and renamed the Rancho Los Amigos Revised Scale (RLAS-R). The Ranchos scale development is based on assumption that proper observation of the nature and quality of a patient’s behavioural responses can be used to estimate the cognitive level at which the patient is functioning during their recovery from.a TBI. [2]

Ranchos Exam Overview[edit | edit source]

The Ranchos Scale is a widely used standardised measure which describes the cognitive and behavioural patterns commonly observed in patients as they recover from a TBI. 

  • It takes into consideration both (1) the patient’s state of consciousness and the (2) level of assistance they require to complete cognitive and physical functions when rating the patient.[3] 
  • It can be completed by any trained healthcare professional.[3]
  • It can be used to facilitate communication[3] among the multidisciplinary team (MDT) to better understand the patient’s abilities, impairments, and prognosis, which will aid in the creation of a more holistic and inclusive treatment plan.
  • It is often used alongside the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) during acute care assessment following the initial injury.[3]  However, unlike the GCS, the Ranchos Scale can be used throughout the patient’s recovery and rehabilitation journey.

Scale and Interpretation[edit | edit source]

The current iteration of the Ranchos Scale, the RLAS-R, is a 10-level descriptive scale.[3] Not every patient will fit neatly into a single level, they may show aspects or behaviors of multiple categories at the same time.  Not all patients will move forward through the levels in a single direction, some will experience “backslides” while others skip levels all together.  Progress and regression along the Scale depend on an individual’s neurorecovery - which can be effected by the quality and intensity of their rehabilitation.[4]

Different levels are given below:

Level Cognitive response/need of assistance Clinical Features
Level I No response/total assistance
  • no response to external stimuli
Level II Generalised response/total assistance
  • respond inconsistently and non-purposefully to external stimuli
  • responses are often the same regardless of the stimulus applied
Level III Localised response/total assistance
  • respond inconsistently and specifically to external stimuli
  • responses are directly related to the stimulus
  • tend to be more responsive to familiar people (friends and family) than to strangers
Level IV Confused and agitated/max assist
  • individual is in a hyperactive state with bizarre and non-purposeful behaviour
  • demonstrate agitated behaviour that originates more from internal confusion than the external environment
Level V Confused, inappropriate non-agitated/max assist
  • individual show an increase in consistency with following and responding to simple commands, their responses are non-purposeful and random to more complex commands
  • behaviour and verbalization are often inappropriate, and the patient can appear confused and often confabulates
  • individual can perform an action or task if it is first modeled or demonstrated for them, they do not yet initiate tasks on own
  • memory is severely impaired and learning new information is difficult
  • can show agitation to unpleasant external stimuli
Level VI Confused, appropriate/ mod assist
  • able to follow simple commands consistently
  • able to retain learning for familiar tasks they performed pre-injury (brushing teeth, washing face) however are unable to retain learning for new tasks
  • demonstrate an increased awareness of self, situation, and their environment but are unaware of any specific impairments and safety concerns
  • responses may be incorrect secondary to memory impairments but appropriate to the situation
Level VII Automatic, appropriate/ min assist for ADL's
  • oriented in familiar settings
  • able to perform a daily routine automatically with absent to minimal confusion
  • demonstrate carry over for new tasks and learning in addition to familiar tasks
  • can be superficially aware of diagnosis but unaware of specific impairments
  • continue to demonstrate a lack of insight, decreased judgment and safety awareness
  • beginning to show interest in social and recreational activities in structured settings
  • require at least minimal supervision for learning and safety purposes.
Level VIII Purposeful, appropriate/ stand by assist
  • consistently oriented to person, place, and time 
  • can independently carry out familiar tasks in a non-distracting environment
  • beginning to show awareness of their specific impairments and how they interfere with tasks, however, they still require stand by assistance with compensatory skills
  • able to use assistive memory devices to recall a daily schedule
  • acknowledge other people’s emotional states and require only minimal assistance to respond appropriately
  • demonstrate improvement of memory and ability to consolidate past and future event
  • often depressed, irritable, and demonstrate a low threshold to frustration
Level IX Purposeful, appropriate/ stand by assist on Request
  • able to shift between different tasks and complete them independently
  • aware of and acknowledge their impairments when they interfere with tasks
  • able to use compensatory strategies to cope
  • able to independently anticipate obstacles that may arise secondary to any lingering impairments
  • able to consider the consequences of actions and decisions with assistance
  • continue to demonstrate depression and low frustration thresholds
Level X Purposeful, appropriate/ modified independent
  • able to multitask in many different environments with extra time for task completion or devices to assist
  • able to create their own methods and tools for memory retention
  • can independently anticipate obstacles that may occur as a result of their impairments and take corrective actions
  • able to independently make decisions and act appropriately but may require more time or compensatory strategies
  • may still demonstrate intermittent periods of depression and a lowered threshold for frustration when under stress
  • able to appropriately interact with others in social situations

Information provided in the above table adapted from Lin K, Wroten M. Ranchos los amigos. 2022.[3]

Administering the RLAS-R[edit | edit source]

Administering the Ranchos Scale requires practice and mentorship from a healthcare professional experienced in using the Scale.  There is also a training manual available for purchase from the Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center. Administering the Ranchos Scale involves a healthcare professional’s best subjective assessment. A score or level is assigned based on the examiner’s subjective assessment of the patient’s behavior rather than on performance-based objective measures.

Thorough documentation will support a single practitioner’s rating and will help track a patient’s recovery progress.

{Source} Completing the Ranchos Scale Assessment should only take a few minutes.

Even when comparing two seemly identical brain injuries, patients can demonstrate different symptoms, behaviors and speeds of recovery.  Think of the Ranchos Scale as a guide rather than a rule.  Not every patient will fit neatly into a single level, they may show aspects or behaviors of multiple categories at the same time.  Not all patients will move forward through the levels in a single direction, some will experience “backslides” while others skip levels all together.  It all depends on an individual’s neurorecovery - which can be effected by the quality and intensity of their rehabilitation.

For treating rehabilitation therapists and professionals, assessing and assigning a Ranchos Level can come from that day’s treatment interventions and interactions.  The real-time nature of therapy interventions provide an ideal opportunity to witness a patient’s abilities and behaviors from day to day.

There is no single expected outcome or timeframe for recovery following a TBI, but the Ranchos Scale can provide some guidance to a individual patient’s progress.

Psychometric Properties[edit | edit source]

  • Interrater reliabilities ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 and test re-test reliability of 0.82.[2]
  • Concurrent validity with the Stover Zeiger scale was 0.92[2]
  • Predictive validity from admission to discharge 0.57 to 0.68[2]

Links[edit | edit source]

http://www.traumaticbraininjury.com/symptoms-of-tbi/ranchos-los-amigos-scale/ http://www.neuroskills.com/resources/rancho-los-amigos-revised.php

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Hagen, C., Malkmus, D., & Durham, P. (1972). Levels of cognitive functioning. Downey, CA: Rancho L.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Flannery J, Abraham I. Psychometric properties of a cognitive functioning scale for patients with traumatic brain injury. Western journal of nursing research. 1993 Aug;15(4):465-82. available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/019394599301500406
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Lin K, Wroten M. Ranchos los amigos. 2022.
  4. Schiurring, S. Neuroassessment Programme. Rancho los Amigos Level of Cognitive FunctioningScale. Plus. 2023.