Interpreting a Qualitative Research Paper

Original Editor - Mariam Hashem

Top Contributors - Mariam Hashem, Kim Jackson, Ewa Jaraczewska, Mandy Roscher and Tarina van der Stockt  

Introduction

Interpreting a qualitative research paper is an analysis of the quality of the material between your hands. It allows you to understand the reliability of the research and the construction of the paper.

CASP checklist

CASP stands for the critical appraisal skills programme. The CASP offers free downloadable checklists that help in critiquing research papers.

It is formed of ten questions.

Section A, and it looks at the validity of the study results. This can be subjective as these studies don't have statistical significance instead there is a heavy reliance on the essence of the qualitative research by critically appraise and reflect on the methods and the design of the research.

Section B looks at the findings or the results of the study.

Section C is concerned with the applicability of the results.

Analysing the qualitative research, think about these questions:

• Is there a clear statement of the aims of the study?
• What are the goals of the study?
• What was the rationale for this research?
• How relevant is this?
• Is the research question clearly formulated? Is it important?

A-The research introduction should give the context and reflect the importance of the research question leading up to the rationale of the research. It should also discuss the gap in the area that's been researched with the angle of focus. Previous research should also be discussed and a highlight on similarities and limitations to explain why this research should take place and it's significant to find answers,

B- Analysis of the qualitative research methods and the used approach. Is it appropriate for the questions? is a qualitative approach appropriate? Qualitative methods are used when illuminating some actions or subjective experiences of participants or looking to gain an in-depth understanding of a phenomenon.

C- Reflecting on the study design and whether it's appropriate for the research question or not. For example, using ethnography would be an appropriate design when studying a particular cultural group.

D- Analysing the recruitment strategy. For example, exploring the experience of rural dwelling, older adults in communicating with family members during the COVID pandemic. Recruiting participants through social media and using the snowballing technique is a good way to encourage a large sector of participants but using it a the sole recruitment strategy could dismiss or potentially exclude people who aren't good with using technology or those who haven't used technology to communicate with their families.

E- The sampling strategy. Are the inclusion and exclusion criteria clear and purposeful to recruit specific participants who the interesting subject of the research? Also, think if the sampling was probably quite inclusive and left any cohorts out?

F-The data collection method. Looking into the methods used in the research whether they were justified to meet the criteria of the research question and does it match the subject of research? are the methods varied enough to give participants choice? Also, analysing the way the authors used and documented the methods. For example, if interviews were used to collect data, we should be looking into was the interview structured? Was it semi-structured? Or was it unstructured? And why was that? so the details of the method and the rationale that justifies the use and the application of the method.

Resources

• bulleted list
• x

or

1. numbered list
2. x