Neonatal Physiotherapy Assessment: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 41: Line 41:
The following chart details areas to observe in the newborn and within those areas what is important to see and take note of.
The following chart details areas to observe in the newborn and within those areas what is important to see and take note of.
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+
 
*
 
|}
The following chart provides a summary of areas to observe with the newborn and within those areas what information if relevant and impo
The following chart provides a summary of areas to observe with the newborn and within those areas what information if relevant and impo
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"

Revision as of 15:50, 17 January 2023

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Physiotherapists working in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) strive to support movements and posture for the infant that are applicable to the gestational age. Working in this setting, physiotherapists regularly interacts with the family and other NICU clinicians to determine the baby's needs and the most beneficial approaches to meet those needs. [1] Regular interaction with the NICU clinicians is key to providing the best care possible. The role of the physiotherapist in the NICU setting is as follows:

  1. help the infant bond with their family members
  1. facilitate good developmental skills
  2. officer supportive positioning and handling
  3. improve carryover of the therapeutic strategies

** It is important that the interventions have carryover to family and nursing staff, therefore PTs play a large role in education[2]

The NICU physiotherapy examination is composed of many facto

** The evaluation always takes into account what is important for the family and what their goals are[2]

Subjective[edit | edit source]

Topics Questions Related to
Pregnancy History
Birth History
Medical Procedures
Social History
Environmental History

Objective[edit | edit source]

Observation[edit | edit source]

The following chart details areas to observe in the newborn and within those areas what is important to see and take note of.

The following chart provides a summary of areas to observe with the newborn and within those areas what information if relevant and impo
Areas to Observe Noteworthy Significance
tone mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Physiologic flexion
Vitals heart rate, respiratory rate, skin colour
Reflexes
Posture
Developmental positions
Quality of movement
Symmetry of movement
Head shape
Reaction to Stimuli

Standardised Tests[edit | edit source]

NBO[edit | edit source]

The Newborn Behavioral Observation (NBO) is a relationship-based intervention delivered by NBO-trained health practitioners aiming to sensitise parents to the infant’s capacities, uniqueness and behavioural communication cues [5]. By increasing parental competence and confidence the intervention may contribute to more sensitive parenting and a positive parent-infant relationship. [3]

he NBO is a family-centered, developmentally supportive instrument that was designed to elucidate newborn neurobehavior for the purposes of crafting interventions that promote optimal newborn self-regulation and caregiver-infant interaction. The NBO is based on an appreciation of the richness and complexity of the newborn’s behavioral repertoire and the agency of the baby in shaping parent-infant interactions.7,13 NBO items focus on the baby’s behavior and communication cues, which are a window into the baby’s mental state. The twenty neurobehavioral items are designed to capture the infant’s visual, auditory, perceptual, and self-regulatory abilities as the infant attempts to stabilize autonomic, motor, and state behavior across the first weeks and months of life. The NBO has been shown to improve caregiver-infant interactions13,14 and provider confidence.15[4]

NBAS[edit | edit source]

Functional developmental outcomes of generally healthy neonates are perhaps better predicted using a neurobehavioral approach than the established clinical neurologic assessments. Neurobehavior encompasses state and emotion regulation, which predict a variety of developmental outcomes, including psychopathology and social functioning later in childhood.6 The Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (NBAS)7 was one of the early instruments that utilized a neurobehavioral model to evaluate neonates, marking an important step forward in the understanding of and ability to measure early infant development. The NBAS has been widely studied and shown to predict later developmental outcom. However significant time required for training and administration of both the NNNS and NBAS limit their practicality and accessibility to most clinicians and researchers, leading NBAS author Nugent and colleagues to create a shorter clinical tool, the Newborn Behavioral Observations (NBO) system. [4]

Test of Infant Performance[edit | edit source]

The Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) can be used across cultures, and item difficulty can be used to detect small subtle changes in motor performance in infants born both preterm and term in Brazil. Parent education needs to be targeted to the age and the needs of the child. The IMP is a video-based instrument for infants aged three to 18 months, or rather to the moment when the child is able to walk independently for some months. It is based on the infant’s self-generated movements during a playful interaction with the assessor. The IMP consists of 80 items that provide information on the infant’s motor behavior in five domains: variation, adaptability, symmetry, fluency and performance. The domains of variation and adaptability are based on the Neuronal Group Selection Theory. The three other domains are traditional domains of motor development. This also means that the IMP has four domains evaluating the quality of motor behavior and one domain that evaluates performance, i.e., motor skills or motor milestones. The IMP results in five domain scores and one total score. The assessment itself takes about 15 minutes and its off-line scoring about 10 minutes. Recently, the IMP-manual became available, including many video examples, an app to calculate the scores and IMP-norms (percentile values) [14]. Additionally, the IMP does not require a specific tool kit, but toys that can be easily acquired [5]

GMA[edit | edit source]

s GMA requires only 3−5 minutes observation of an infant’s spontaneous movement (i.e., the infant needs not to be touched by the assessor), it is an evaluation far easier to be carried out than most assessments for neurological development. Hence GMA is suitable for daily clinical applications, particularly in low-resource settings. Being entirely non-intrusive, GMA is widely accepted by caregivers with divergent social and cultural backgrounds[6]

GMA is performed through direct or video-recorded observation by a specifically trained operator, resulting in a qualitative description of the motor performance of the infants. However, the need for a trained examiner to accurately classify GMs over the[7]

General Movements Assessment (GMA), developed by Dr. Heinz Prechtl first in 1979 [9, 10]. This assessment describes the repertoire of complex, highly variable, whole-body movements which emerge in the fetus and continue until the first 4 to 5 months of life [11, 12]. Specific patterns exist at set developmental stages (preterm, writhing, and fidgety), and patterns of stereotypy have also been identified that are associated with CP[8]

AIMS[edit | edit source]

One of the standardized tools for evaluating motor development is the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). The AIMS considers both quantitative (e.g., occurrences of motor skills) and qualitative characteristics (e.g., the manner of motor performance). The scale may be applied by healthcare professionals involved in infants' development screening up to 18 months of age for either clinical or research purpose[9]

PEABODY[edit | edit source]

The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-Second Edition (PDMS-2) is a valid and reliable instrument used in several countries, including Brazil, to assess gross and fine motor skills and identify motor deficits and eligibility for intervention for children with and without disabilities. [10]Ho

BAYLEY[edit | edit source]

Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development is an extensive formal developmental assessment tool for diagnosing developmental delays in early childhood[11]

Assessment[edit | edit source]

  • positioning
  • handling

Resources[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Doğan, İ.E., Balcı, N.Ç. and Gündüz, A.G., 2022. Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Approaches to Premature Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Units. Journal of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Studies & Reports. SRC/JPMRS/168. DOI: doi. org/10.47363/JPMRS/2021 (4), 150, pp.2-5.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Eskay, K. Infant Assessment and Intervention. Plus. 2023
  3. Høifødt, R.S., Nordahl, D., Landsem, I.P., Csifcsák, G., Bohne, A., Pfuhl, G., Rognmo, K., Braarud, H.C., Goksøyr, A., Moe, V. and Slinning, K., 2020. Newborn behavioral observation, maternal stress, depressive symptoms and the mother-infant relationship: results from the northern babies longitudinal study (NorBaby). BMC psychiatry, 20(1), pp.1-14.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Congdon JL, Nugent JK, McManus BM, Coccia M, Bush NR. A Pilot Validation Study of the Newborn Behavioral Observations System: Associations with Salivary Cortisol and Temperament. Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics: JDBP. 2020 Dec;41(9):716.
  5. Machado LR, da Silva CF, Hadders-Algra M, Tudella E. Psychometric properties of the Infant Motor Profile (IMP): A scoping review protocol. Plos one. 2022 Nov 16;17(11):e0277755.
  6. Silva N, Zhang D, Kulvicius T, Gail A, Barreiros C, Lindstaedt S, Kraft M, Bölte S, Poustka L, Nielsen-Saines K, Wörgötter F. The future of General Movement Assessment: The role of computer vision and machine learning–A scoping review. Research in developmental disabilities. 2021 Mar 1;110:103854.
  7. Fontana C, Ottaviani V, Veneroni C, Sforza SE, Pesenti N, Mosca F, Picciolini O, Fumagalli M, Dellacà RL. An Automated Approach for General Movement Assessment: A Pilot Study. Frontiers in pediatrics. 2021:868.
  8. Seesahai J, Luther M, Church PT, Maddalena P, Asztalos E, Rotter T, Banihani R. The assessment of general movements in term and late-preterm infants diagnosed with neonatal encephalopathy, as a predictive tool of cerebral palsy by 2 years of age—a scoping review. Systematic reviews. 2021 Dec;10(1):1-3.
  9. Eliks M, Gajewska E. The Alberta Infant Motor Scale: A tool for the assessment of motor aspects of neurodevelopment in infancy and early childhood. Frontiers in Neurology. 2022;13.
  10. Valentini NC, Zanella LW. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2: The Use of Rasch Analysis to Examine the Model Unidimensionality, Motor Function, and Item Difficulty. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2022 Apr 20;10:852732-.
  11. Balasundaram P. Bayley scales of infant and toddler development.[Updated 2021 Nov 24]. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. 2022.