Clinical Prediction Rules: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:


*[[CPR for Lumbar Stabilisation|CPR for Lumbar Stabilisation]]  
*[[CPR for Lumbar Stabilisation|CPR for Lumbar Stabilisation]]  
*[[Traction for Neck Pain CPR|Traction for Neck Pain CPR]]
*[[Knee OA: CPR for Hip Mobs|Knee OA: CPR for Hip Mobs]]
*Stabilization for Low Back Pain  
*Stabilization for Low Back Pain  
*Manipulation for Low Back Pain  
*Manipulation for Low Back Pain  
Line 31: Line 29:
*Patellar Taping for Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome  
*Patellar Taping for Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome  
*Thoracic Manipulation for Neck Pain  
*Thoracic Manipulation for Neck Pain  
*Cervical Manipulation for Neck Pain  
*[[Traction for Neck Pain CPR|Cervical Manipulation for Neck Pain]]
*Mechanical Traction for Neck Pain  
*Mechanical Traction for Neck Pain  
*Hip Mobilization for Knee Osteoarthritis  
*[[Knee OA: CPR for Hip Mobs|Hip Mobilization for Knee Osteoarthritis]]
*Cervicothoracic Manipulation for Shoulder Pain
*Cervicothoracic Manipulation for Shoulder Pain



Revision as of 16:00, 19 September 2013

Introduction
[edit | edit source]

The intent of CPRs is to assist clinicians in making a diagnosis, establishing a prognosis, or implementing an intervention[1]. It has been suggested that well-constructed CPRs can improve clinical decision making and practice, there is a lack of consensus as to what constitutes a methodologically sound CPR.[2]

CPRs
[edit | edit source]

Diagnosis[edit | edit source]

Intervention[edit | edit source]

Resources[edit | edit source]

http://orthopedicmanualpt.com/clinical-decision-making/clinical-prediction-rules/

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Childs JD, Cleland JA. Development and application of clinical prediction rules to improve decision making in physical therapist practice. Phys Ther. 2006;86:122–131.
  2. Jason M Beneciuk, Mark D Bishop, Steven Z George. Clinical Prediction Rules for Physical Therapy Interventions: A Systematic Review. Phys Ther. 2009 February; 89(2): 114–124.