Jump to content

Gait Deviations in Individuals with Lower Limb Amputations

Introduction

When assessing the gait of individuals with amputations, it is important to understand the gait cycle, common features of prosthetic gait, and the link between gait deviations and function. Individuals with amputation often develop certain gait deviations to compensate for, or adapt to, prosthetic and personal factors. It is important to identify these deviations and the resultant functional changes to ensure appropriate rehabilitation interventions.[1][2][3][4]

Gait Cycle

The gait cycle has two phases, stance phase and swing phase.[5] Stance phase makes up 60% of the gait cycle. Some part of the foot is in contact with the ground during stance phase. This creates a closed chain environment and introduces ground reaction forces.[6] Swing phase makes up 40% of the gait cycle. The foot is not in contact with the ground during the swing phase of gait.[5]

If you would like to read more about the gait cycle, please see:

Body Functions During Gait

There are five key body functions during gait, which can be remembered using the acronym BEEPS. In individuals with amputation, these functions can be compromised by the prosthetic device or physiological limitations (described in the next section):[6][7]

  • B = balance and stability
    • a stable standing posture is necessary for walking
  • E = energy conservation
    • energy consumption is increased in individuals with lower-limb amputation vs those without amputation[8][9]
  • E = equality and symmetry
    • individuals with lower-limb amputation often have asymmetrical gait patterns, particularly in unilateral and transfemoral amputation[10][11]
  • P = forward progression
    • during gait, the centre of mass moves forward continuously
  • S = shock absorption
    • various mechanisms reduce forces on the joints during gait

When body functions are compromised, individuals with amputation might experience secondary medical conditions, such as osteoarthritis,[10] back pain[12][13] and pressure injuries.[6] The goal of rehabilitation is to focus on restoring or improving body functions.[7]

Causes of Gait Deviations in Individuals with Amputations

Gait deviations in individuals with lower-limb amputations can have patient / physiological causes and prosthetic causes.

Patient / physiological causes can include muscle weakness, contracture, pain, the length of the residual limb, pressure wounds, sheer injuries or other potential injuries to the skin, decreased confidence in the prosthesis or residual limb and habitual or learned behaviours. [14][6]

Prosthetic causes can include the type of prosthetic, prosthetic malalignment and a poor-fitting prosthetic socket.[14][6]

Gait Assessment Forms

The Gait Assessment and Intervention Toolbox (G.A.I.T) can be used to assist with your gait analysis. The Comprehensive G.A.I.T and Quick G.A.I.T forms are available from Enability.

When using this tool, you analyse both the intact and the amputated limb to identify specific deviations at each joint (from the foot to the trunk) during each phase of gait. The G.A.I.T form also includes temporal-spatial gait deviations, such as step length, step width, etc. Finally, it includes an "Intervention Focus" section that highlights which of the five functions of gait (BEEPS) should be targeted in rehabilitation.[15]

Using this form can help remove the guesswork from observational gait analysis -- Vibhor Agrawal[6]

Common Gait Deviations in Individuals with Lower-Limb Amputations

Using the Comprehensive G.A.I.T or Quick G.A.I.T can help to simplify your gait assessment. The following tables provide further information on some of the common gait deviations in individuals with lower-limb amputations and their potential causes. They also include videos of different gait deviations to help with your gait analysis.

These tables are not exhaustive and they focus on the prosthetic limb. As highlighted in the G.A.I.T form, gait analysis should also consider the intact limb. Some of the potential causes relate to the prosthesis and others to the individual. Understanding these causes can help guide the overall rehabilitation plan.

Remember, it is important to link the deviation with specific gait functions. This functional emphasis changes the focus of rehabilitation from correcting specific gait deviations to helping individuals with amputations achieve and optimise gait functions.[6]

Transtibial Gait Deviations

Table 1. Transtibial gait deviations in the prosthetic limb[16][17][18][19][20][21][22]
Deviation Description Potential causes Illustration
Absent/reduced knee flexion
  • The knee does not flex as expected during loading response or it hyperextends
  • The patient may report it feels like they are walking up a hill
  • Faulty suspension of the prosthesis
  • The socket is set in too much extension or too far posteriorly
  • Heel cushion is hard
  • Too much flexion damping (i.e. too much resistance to knee flexion) in the prosthetic knee
  • Too much plantar flexion at the ankle
  • Weak quadriceps
  • Reduced confidence or ability to control prosthetic knee flexion mechanisms
  • Poor trunk or hip alignment
Excessive knee flexion
  • Increased knee flexion at heel strike / midstance, the patient may report that it feels like their knee is unstable or as if they are walking downhill
  • Faulty suspension of the prosthesis
  • Socket is set in too much flexion or too far anteriorly
  • Too much dorsiflexion at the ankle
  • Heel cushion is too firm
  • Inadequate flexion damping in the prosthetic knee
  • Flexion contracture of the knee or hamstring tightness
  • Eccentric weakness of quadriceps
Foot external rotation External rotation of the prosthetic foot at heel strike
  • The prosthetic heel is too hard
  • The socket is loose
  • Weak hip extensors
  • Reduced push-off on the intact limb
Knee instability
  • Slow progression through stance phase
  • Knee flexion is ‘jerky’ or 'hesitant' during heel strike to foot flat
  • Weak quadriceps
  • Deconditioning
  • Too much dorsiflexion or anterior translation of the socket over the foot
Excessive lateral or medial thrust of the prosthesis (valgus/varus moment) The knee shifts laterally or medially during prosthetic stance phase
  • Lateral thrust:
    • foot is placed medially (inset) in relation to the socket
    • quadriceps weakness
  • Medial thrust:
    • foot is placed laterally (outset) in relation to the socket
    • hip abductor weakness
  • Socket is loose (for both medial and lateral thrust)

Drop off (early knee flexion) Heel off occurs too early causing early knee flexion
  • The foot is positioned too far back (posterior) in relation to the socket
  • Excessive dorsiflexion of the foot
  • Keel or toe lever arm is too soft or too short
  • Shoe heel height is too high
Knee hyperextension (or delayed knee flexion)
  • Heel off is delayed, potentially causing hyperextension of the knee
  • Patient might report it feels like they are walking uphill
  • The foot is set too far forward (anterior) in relation to the socket
  • Excessive plantar flexion of the foot
  • Heel cushion is too soft
  • Keel or toe lever arm is too firm or too long
Pistoning The tibia moves vertically during the weight bearing and non-weight bearing periods of gait
  • Loose or inadequate suspension
  • Socket is too large
  • Socket is faulty


Transfemoral Gait Deviations

Table 2. Transfemoral gait deviations in the prosthetic limb[16][20][21][22]
Deviation Description Potential causes Illustration
Prosthetic knee instability The prosthetic knee has a tendency to buckle on weight bearing
  • Knee is set too far anteriorly
  • Heel bumper is too firm
  • Hip extensor weakness
  • Socket is not sufficiently flexed to match the degree of contraction
Foot slap The foot progresses too quickly from heel strike to foot flat, creating an audible slapping noise
  • Lack of plantar flexion resistance in the prosthetic foot
  • The individual forces foot contact to gain knee stability
  • Plantar flexion bumpers are excessively soft
  • Excessive dorsiflexion

Abducted gait
  • Increased base of support during gait
  • The prosthetic foot is placed more laterally
  • There is pain / pressure on the ramus or lateral distal femur
  • Medial brim of the socket is too high
  • Prosthesis is too long
  • Weakness
  • Contracture
  • There is space in the lateral wall of the socket
  • Fear / lack of confidence when transferring weight onto the prosthesis
Lateral trunk bending Trunk leans towards the prosthesis during prosthetic stance phase
  • The prosthesis is too short
  • Short residual limb
  • Abduction of the socket (especially when the residual limb is short)
  • There is space in the socket
  • Weakness / contracture of hip abductors
  • There is pain / pressure on the ramus or lateral distal femur
  • Foot is excessively outset
  • Lack of balance
  • Habit[16]
Increased lumbar lordosis Lumbar lordosis is exaggerated during prosthetic stance phase

  • Poor shaping of the posterior wall of the prosthesis or pain on ischial weight bearing, resulting in anterior pelvic rotation
  • Flexion contracture at the hip
  • Weak hip extensors and abdominal muscles
  • Lack of support from the anterior wall of the socket
  • Insufficient socket flexion
  • Habit[16]
Whip (lateral or medial) During swing phase (observed at or just after toe-off), the foot ‘whips’ laterally or medially
  • Poor suspension
  • Socket internally or externally rotated
  • Incorrect donning of the prosthesis
  • Loose socket

Pistoning The femur moves vertically during the weight bearing and non-weight bearing periods of gait
  • Insufficient suspension
  • Socket is too loose / doesn't fit well
Excessive heel rise Prosthetic heel rises more than the heel on the intact limb
  • Inadequate resistance to knee flexion

Circumduction

The limb swings out to the side in a wide arc during swing phase on the prosthesis side
  • The prosthesis is too long
  • The ankle is set in too much plantar flexion
  • Hip flexor weakness
  • Incorrect activation pattern, with excessive use of the hip abductors to initiate swing
  • Lack of confidence or ability to initiate swing and enable appropriate knee flexion
  • Issues with the brim of the socket
  • Poor suspension, which causes the prosthesis to slip
  • Extension assist is too strong
  • Knee flexion resistance is extreme
Vaulting The individual rises onto the toe of the intact limb during swing phase on the prosthetic limb to help achieve foot clearance
  • The prosthesis is too long
  • Increased mechanical resistance to knee flexion
  • Loose suspension - the prosthesis drops off (effectively lengthening) during swing phase
Excessive terminal impact Forcible impact as the knee goes into extension at the end of terminal swing, just before heel strike
  • Inadequate resistance to knee extension
  • Lack of friction of knee flexion / mechanical function of the prosthetic knee
  • Extension aid is too strong
  • Habit - the individual deliberately snaps their knee into extension with excessive force to ensure extension is achieved


Transfemoral and Transtibial Gait Deviations

Table 3. Transfemoral and transtibial amputation gait deviations[23][24]
Deviation Description Potential causes Illustration
Uneven step length Steps are of uneven duration or length, usually with a short stance phase on the prosthetic side
  • Often associated with increased lumbar lordosis
  • Insufficient socket flexion
  • Fixed flexion deformity at the knee
  • Hip flexion contracture
  • Pain leading to decreased weight bearing on the prosthetic side
  • Fear
  • Poor balance
  • Painful, poorly fitting socket
Uneven arm swing (secondary deviation) The arm on the prosthetic side is held close to the body
  • Poor prosthetic fit
  • Poor balance
  • Fear
  • Habit
  • Associated with other gait deviations and a lack of gait rehabilitation

Resources

[25]

References

  1. ↑ Esquenazi A. Gait analysis in lower-limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics. 2014 Feb 1;25(1):153-67.
  2. ↑ Silverman AK, Fey NP, Portillo A, Walden JG, Bosker G, Neptune RR. Compensatory mechanisms in below-knee amputee gait in response to increasing steady-state walking speeds. Gait & posture. 2008 Nov 1;28(4):602-9.
  3. ↑ Murphy DP, editor. Fundamentals of amputation care and prosthetics. Demos Medical Publishing; 2013 Aug 28.
  4. ↑ Pasquina PF, Cooper RA. Lower Extremity Amputation.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Magee DJ, Manske RC. Orthopedic physical assessment-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2020 Dec 11.
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 Agrawal V. Gait Deviations in Individuals with Amputation Course. Plus, 2024.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Enability. Normal Gait. Available from: https://enability.com/normal-gait-1 (accessed 4 November 2024).
  8. ↑ Benton AM, Toderita D, Egginton NL, Liu S, Amiri P, Sherman K, et al. Muscle recruitment during gait in individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation due to trauma compared to able-bodied controls. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Sep 23;12:1429574.
  9. ↑ Ettema S, Kal E, Houdijk H. General estimates of the energy cost of walking in people with different levels and causes of lower-limb amputation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2021 Oct 1;45(5):417-427.
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 Kobayashi T, Koh MWP, Jor A, Hisano G, Murata H, Ichimura D, Hobara H. Ground reaction forces during double limb stances while walking in individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jan 12;10:1041060.
  11. ↑ Varrecchia T, Serrao M, Rinaldi M, Ranavolo A, Conforto S, De Marchis C, et al. Common and specific gait patterns in people with varying anatomical levels of lower limb amputation and different prosthetic components. Human movement science. 2019 Aug 1;66:9-21.
  12. ↑ Wnuk-Scardaccione A, Zawojska K, Barłowska-Trybulec M, Mazur-Biały AI. Exercise therapy in nonspecific low back pain among individuals with lower-limb amputation: a systematic review. Life (Basel). 2023 Mar 13;13(3):772.
  13. ↑ Lee SP, Farrokhi S, Kent JA, Ciccotelli J, Chien LC, Smith JA. Comparison of clinical and biomechanical characteristics between individuals with lower limb amputation with and without lower back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2023 Jan;101:105860.
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 Le Van T. Evaluation of Trans-femoral Prosthesis Function Using Finite Element Analysis [dissertation]. Shibaura Institute of Technology. 2017.
  15. ↑ Enability. Gait assessment forms. Available from: https://enability.com/gait-assessment-forms (accessed 6 November).
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 AustPAR. Prosthetic gait deviations. Available from: http://www.austpar.com/portals/gait/analysing_gait.php (accessed 5 November 2024).
  17. ↑ Winter DA, Sienko SE. Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait. Journal of biomechanics. 1988 Jan 1;21(5):361-7.
  18. ↑ Marks M, Dudek N. Prosthetic gait deviations. Available from: https://www.capmr.ca/ccrc/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Amputation-Rehab-5-Gait-Deviations-Dudek.pdf (accessed 4 November 2024).
  19. ↑ Bowker HK, Michael JW. Editors. Atlas of limb prosthetics: surgical, prosthetic, and rehabilitation principles. Rosemont, IL, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, edition 2, 1992, reprinted 2002.
  20. ↑ 20.0 20.1 Motylinski J, Stauffer S, Horne J. Gait and prosthetic alignment. Available from: https://www.pennmedicine.org/-/media/academic%20departments/physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation/gait_and_prosthetic_alignment_independence_prostheticsorthotics.ashx (accessed 5 November 2024).
  21. ↑ 21.0 21.1 AustPAR. Causes of amputee gait abnormalities. Available from: http://www.austpar.com/portals/gait/gait_abnormalities.php (accessed 11 November).
  22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 Bowker HK, Michael JW, editors. Atlas of limb prosthetics: surgical, prosthetic, and rehabilitation principles. Rosemont, IL, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, edition 2, 1992, reprinted 2002.
  23. ↑ Gailey R. Rehabilitation of a traumatic lower limb amputee. Physiotherapy Research International. 1998 Nov;3(4):239-43.
  24. ↑ British Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Amputee Rehabilitation. Evidence based clinical guidelines for the physiotherapy management of adults with lower limb prostheses, 3rd Edition, 2020.
  25. ↑ PT Final Exam. PT Final Exam. June 2019. Available from: https://youtu.be/VtPQrHmnmhw