Diagnostic Imaging of the Hip for Physical Therapists

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Figure 1: Hip anatomy

Imaging of the hip is advantageous due to its proximity to the ilium, sacrum, lumbar spine, and assorted muscle and soft tissues. It is highly recommended that multiple images of the hip be taken to ensure a correct diagnosis. First, it is recommended that at least one wide field of view be taken to encompass the entire ilium, sacrum, and hip. Second, a more specific image of the suspected region of involvement will allow for inspection of the suspected dysfunction.[1]

Hip Conditions/Pathology[edit | edit source]

Hip Osteoarthritis (OA)[edit | edit source]

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a multi-factorial condition that is essentially a breakdown of hyaline cartilage along articulating joints, and is imaged most often with a radiograph or MRI. Radiographs are the most commonly used source of imaging for hip OA due to their ease of operation, low cost, quick results, and relatively high degree of accuracy. However, an MRI is considered the gold standard for hip OA since articular cartilage is visible and has a much higher resolution of surrounding tissues. There are multiple criteria that are used for OA, including multiple clinical prediction rules that incorporate limited hip internal rotation, hip pain with certain activities, and stiffness in the morning for 60 minutes or less.   Research indicates that imaging techniques for hip OA usually have high sensitivity but at the cost of lower specificity.[2]

Reading Radiograph for Hip OA:[edit | edit source]
  • Look for joint narrowing, subchondral sclerosis (increased white/bright location surrounding the joint), and osteophyte formation
Reading MRI for Hip OA:[edit | edit source]
  • Fast spin-echo images (ex, fast spin-echo T2-weighted fat-suppressed images) or gradient-echo images (ex, T1-weighted 3-dimensional fat-suppressed images)[2]
  • Look for joint narrowing, decreased signal frequency of hyaline cartilage, increased oedema and osteophyte formation

Radiograph OA.jpg

Figure 2: Radiograph of hip with OA. Reprinted from medscape.com.  http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/392096-overview#a19

MRI Hip OA.jpg

Figure 3: Left Hip OA.  Coronal T1-weighted MRI with fat-supression.  Reprinted from: http://imaging.consult.com/image/case/dx/Musculoskeletal?title=Left%20Hip%20Osteoarthritis&image=fig1&locator=gr1&pii=S1933-0332(07)72188-2

Trochanteric Bursitis/Tendonitis[edit | edit source]

Trochanteric bursitis/tendonitis is inflammation of the large bursa by the greater trochanter or tendons around the same region.   Clinically, trochanteric bursitis will likely be positive with max hip flexion, adduction, and internal/external rotation; as well as positive palpation to the affected bursa or tendon.   In addition, tendonitis should have a positive isometric contraction with activation to the affected muscle(s) only.   Radiographs are not as helpful in diagnosing trochanteric bursitis, as soft tissues and muscles are not visible to any degree. Although an increased signal intensity within the trochanteric bursa on T2-weighted MRI sequences can be observed, it is not a definitive diagnostic criterion for trochanteric bursitis. While not routinely used for primary diagnosis, ultrasound can be a valuable tool to directly visualize the trochanteric bursa and confirm increased fluid presence.

Reading MRI for Trochanteric Bursitis/Tendonitis:[edit | edit source]
  • Asymmetrical collection of fluid high signal intensity peripheral of bone
  • Presence of bursal distension

Trochanteric Bursitis.jpg
Figure 4: Coronal T2 weighted MRI of Trochanteric bursitis.   Evidence of bursitis from oedema and inflammation in the left & nbsp; hip, with no apparent bone pathology. Reprinted from tall et al, 2011.[1]

Hip Labral Tear[edit | edit source]

Labral tears are viewed with a conventional MRI (Figure 5) or MR arthrogram (MRA) (Figure 6).   Clinically, you would suspect a labral tear with consistent clicking, catching, or locking of the hip joint.   The clinician will further suspect a labral tear with a positive hip scour test and/or modified hip circumduction test.   In a conventional MRI, labral tears are continuous with the adjacent capsule and bony cortex, and therefore difficult to detect. An MRA should be considered before conventional MRI, as it is more specific and anatomical structures are more clearly delineated. MRA utilizes a dilute gadolinium solution and is injected around the hip and imaged in the same method as the conventional MRI, providing optimal visualization of the labrum and surrounding cartilage.[3][4]  The sensitivity of conventional MRI was 30% with an accuracy rating of 36%, whereas sensitivity and accuracy of MRA for diagnosing hip labral tear were 100% and 94% respectively.[4]

Reading an MRA for Hip Labral Tear:[edit | edit source]
  • Presence of a triangle-like low signal intensity appearing adjacent to hyaline cartilage
  • Potential to view abscesses or oedema associated with labral tears that may be visible as a “bubble” of low signal intensity

Hip Labral Tear.jpg
Figure 5: Hip labral tear examples. A) Hip labral tear in sagittal proton density-weighted MRI  sequence. B) Hip labral tear in axial proton density-weighted MRI  sequence. C) Hip labral tear with adjacent  para labral cyst  in sagittal proton density-weighted MRI  sequence.  Reprinted from tall et al, 2011.[1]

MRA Hip Labral Tear.gif

Figure 6: Hip Labral tear.   Sagittal T1-weighted fat-suppressed image from MR arthrography of the left hip.   Reprinted from Omar et al, 2008.[5]

Femoroacetabular Impingement[edit | edit source]

Simply stated, a femoroacetabular impingement is a morphological impairment of the femoral head and acetabulum.   This condition is hard to detect clinically without imaging, as it often goes unnoticed until the condition has caused other pathology such as a labral tear.   Thus, imaging of the hip is crucial with failure to respond to conservative treatments, as conditions such as femoroacetabular impingement will likely continue to cause damage.   An oblique (10° oblique from the midline) axial MRI sequence of the acetabulum is the most appropriate imaging for femoroacetabular impingement since it allows calculation of the alpha angle. (Figure 7)[1] The alpha angle is the angle formed by the femoral head and the centre of the anatomical neck.  A normal alpha angle is considered 55° or less.[1]

There are multiple types of abnormal shapes the femoral head presents with to lead to femoroacetabular impingement. The “cam type” involves wedging of an abnormally shaped femoral head into the acetabulum, which is most pronounced during hip flexion. This leads to chondral and labral injury secondary to shear forces. The “pincer type” (common in middle-aged women) involves excessive contact between the acetabular rim over the femoral head and neck junction, resulting in a pinching of the labral tissue. There was found to be 86–92% sensitivity in the detection of femoral and acetabular cartilage abnormalities including femoroacetabular impingement using axial MR imaging.[6]

Reading MRI for Femoroacetabular Impingement:[edit | edit source]
  • Assess the angle between the femoral head and the femoral neck, keeping in mind that normal is 55°
  • Abnormal shape to the femoral head (ex. Migration of the femoral head in one direction)
  • Congruency of the femoral head in the acetabulum

Hip Alpha Angle.jpg
           Figure 7: Normal alpha angle. Reprinted from Orthopaedia.com

Hip Impingement.jpg

Figure 8: Femoroacetabular impingement. (A) Anteroposterior and (B) frog-leg lateral aspect of femoroacetabular impingement. (C) An oblique axial T1-weighted MRI indicating inflammation from impingement. (D) An oblique axial T1-weighted was used to calculate the alpha angle. Reprinted from Medscape.com - “Cam Impingement.”

Hip Fracture[edit | edit source]

Hip fractures encompass a wide range of variety of types and imaging techniques. The most common types of hip fractures include stress fractures and occult fractures (not detectable via radiograph). Initially, radiographs are usually taken if the fracture is suspected due to ease of use and immediate results. However, radiographs have poor reliability in picking up fractures in the early stages.[7] MRI is considered the gold standard due to high sensitivity in detecting hip fractures.[7]

Berger et al demonstrated that radiographs had a sensitivity of 15–35% on initial examination of stress fractures, increasing to 30–70% on follow-up visits.[7] The same study also indicated MRI having a specificity of 86%, a sensitivity of 100%, an accuracy of 95%, a positive predictive value of 93%, and a negative predictive value of 100%.[7]

It is suggested that the best method of detecting occult fractures is a combination of a T1 and T2 weighted MRI.[8]  This allows the differentiation of fractures versus soft tissue injuries and is important as it will significantly alter the course of intervention.

Reading MRI for Hip Fracture:[edit | edit source]
  • Low-intensity signal located within or on the edge of the bone
  • T2 weighted MRI – oedema surrounding bone
  • In the case of a large fracture –displacement of bone

Links To Diagnostic Imaging Pages[edit | edit source]

Diagnostic Imaging for the Physical Therapist

Diagnostic Imaging of the Ankle and Foot for the Physical Therapist

Diagnostic Imaging of the Knee for the Physical Therapist

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Tall M a, Thompson AK, Greer B, Campbell S. The pearls and pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging of the lower extremity. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy. 2011;41(11):873-86. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22048192. Accessed March 18, 2012.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Recht MP, Goodwin DW, Winalski CS, White LM. MRI of articular cartilage: revisiting current status and future directions. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2005;185(4):899-914. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16177408. Accessed March 24, 2012.
  3. Grainger a J, Elliott JM, Campbell RS, et al. Direct MR arthrography: a review of current use. Clinical radiology. 2000;55(3):163-76. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10708607. Accessed March 18, 2012.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Chan Y-S, Lien L-C, Hsu H-L, et al. Evaluating hip labral tears using magnetic resonance arthrography: a prospective study comparing hip arthroscopy and magnetic resonance arthrography diagnosis. Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association. 2005;21(10):1250. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16226655. Accessed March 24, 2012.
  5. Omar I, Zoga A, Kavanagh E, Koulouris G, Bergin D, Gomez A, Morrison W, Meyers W. Athletic Pubalgia and “Sports Hernia”: Optimal MR Imaging Technique and Findings. Radiological Society of North America. 2008;28; 1415-1438. Available at http://radiographics.highwire.org/content/28/5/1415.full
  6. James SLJ, Ali K, Malara F, et al. MRI findings of femoroacetabular impingement. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2006;187(6):1412-9. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17114529. Accessed March 24, 2012.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Berger FH, de Jonge MC, Maas M. Stress fractures in the lower extremity. The importance of increasing awareness amongst radiologists. European journal of radiology. 2007;62(1):16-26. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17317066. Accessed March 31, 2012.
  8. Ohishi T, Ito T, Suzuki D, Banno T, Honda Y. Occult hip and pelvic fractures and accompanying muscle injuries around the hip. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. 2012;132(1):105-12. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21874573. Accessed March 31, 2012.