Stroke Outcome Measures Overview: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
m (Changed protection level for "Stroke Outcome Measures Overview": Course Page ([Edit=⧼protect-level-ppadmin⧽] (indefinite) [Move=⧼protect-level-ppadmin⧽] (indefinite)))
 
(36 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="editorbox">
<div class="editorbox">
'''Original Editor '''- Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
'''Original Editor '''- [[User:Rachael Lowe|Rachael Lowe]]


'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} &nbsp;  
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} &nbsp;  
</div>  
</div>  
== Introduction  ==
== Introduction  ==
Measuring the effectiveness of interventions is accepted as being central to good practice. &nbsp;This page presents the best available information on how outcome measures for stroke might be classified and selected for use, based upon their measurement qualities.
== EBRSR Review by ICF  ==


The EBRSR reviewed a selection of outcome measures put together a review that&nbsp;provides the best available information on how outcome measures might be classified and selected for use, based upon their measurement qualities<ref>Katherine Salter, Nerissa Campbell, Marina Richardson, Swati Mehta, Jeffrey Jutai, Laura Zettler, Matthew Moses, Andrew McClure. Outcome Measures in Stroke Rehabilitation. EBRSR, 2013</ref>.  
The EBRSR reviewed a selection of outcome measures put together a review that&nbsp;provides the best available information on how outcome measures might be classified and selected for use, based upon their measurement qualities<ref>Katherine Salter, Nerissa Campbell, Marina Richardson, Swati Mehta, Jeffrey Jutai, Laura Zettler, Matthew Moses, Andrew McClure. Outcome Measures in Stroke Rehabilitation. EBRSR, 2013</ref>.  
Line 10: Line 14:
{| width="100%" border="1" align="center" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1"
{| width="100%" border="1" align="center" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1"
|-
|-
| Body structure (impairments)  
| '''Body structure (impairments)'''
| Activities (limitations to activity–disability)<br>
| '''Activities (limitations to activity–disability)<br>'''
| Participation (barriers to participation--handicap)<br>
| '''Participation (barriers to participation--handicap)'''<br>
|-
|-
|  
|  
*Beck Depression Inventory
*Beck Depression Inventory  
*Behavioral Inattention Test
*Behavioral Inattention Test  
*Canadian Neurological Scale
*Canadian Neurological Scale  
*Clock Drawing Test
*Clock Drawing Test  
*Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test
*Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test  
*Fugl-Meyer Assessment
*Fugl-Meyer Assessment  
*General Health Questionnaire -28
*General Health Questionnaire -28  
*Geriatric Depression Scale
*Geriatric Depression Scale  
*Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
*Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale  
*Line Bisection Test
*Line Bisection Test  
*Mini Mental State Examination
*Mini Mental State Examination  
*Modified Ashworth Scale
*Modified Ashworth Scale  
*Montreal Cognitive Assessment
*Montreal Cognitive Assessment  
*Motor-free Visual Perception Test
*Motor-free Visual Perception Test  
*National Institutes of Health Stroke&nbsp;Scale
*National Institutes of Health Stroke&nbsp;Scale  
*Orpington Prognostic Scale
*Orpington Prognostic Scale  
*Stroke Rehabiliation Assessment of  
*Stroke Rehabiliation Assessment of&nbsp;Movement<br>
*Movement<br>


|  
|  
*Action Research Arm Test
*Action Research Arm Test  
*Barthel Index
*Barthel Index  
*Berg Balance Scale
*Berg Balance Scale  
*Box and Block Test
*Box and Block Test  
*Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment&nbsp;Scale
*Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment&nbsp;Scale  
*Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory
*Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory  
*Clinical Outcome Variables Scale
*Clinical Outcome Variables Scale  
*Functional Ambulation Categories
*Functional Ambulation Categories  
*Functional Independence Measure
*Functional Independence Measure  
*Frenchay Activities Index
*Frenchay Activities Index  
*Motor Assessment Scale
*Motor Assessment Scale  
*Nine-hole Peg Test
*Nine-hole Peg Test  
*Rankin Handicap Scale
*Rankin Handicap Scale  
*Rivermead Mobility Scale
*Rivermead Mobility Scale  
*Rivermead Motor Assessment
*Rivermead Motor Assessment  
*Six Minute Walk Test
*Six Minute Walk Test  
*Timed Up and Go
*Timed Up and Go  
*Wolf Motor Function Test<br>
*Wolf Motor Function Test<br>


|  
|  
*Canadian Occupational Performance&nbsp;Measure
*Canadian Occupational Performance&nbsp;Measure  
*EuroQol Quality of Life Scale
*EuroQol Quality of Life Scale  
*LIFE-H
*LIFE-H  
*London Handicap Scale
*London Handicap Scale  
*Medical Outcomes Study Short- Form&nbsp;36
*Medical Outcomes Study Short- Form&nbsp;36  
*Nottingham Health Profile
*Nottingham Health Profile  
*Reintegration to Normal Living Index
*Reintegration to Normal Living Index  
*Stroke Adapted Sickness Impact Profile
*Stroke Adapted Sickness Impact Profile  
*Stroke Impact Scale
*Stroke Impact Scale  
*Stroke Specific Quality of Life
*Stroke Specific Quality of Life


|}
|}


[http://www.ebrsr.com/sites/default/files/Chapter%2020_Outcome%20Measures.pdf '''See the full 141 page review''']


== US Agency for HCP&amp;R by Problem  ==


The overview below was developed from the&nbsp;"Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: Assessment, Referral, and Patient Management Quick Reference Guide Number 16",&nbsp;published by the US Agency for Health Care Policy and Research<ref>Post-stroke rehabilitation: assessment, referral, and patient management. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Clin Pract Guidel Quick Ref Guide Clin. 1995 May;(16):i-iii, 1-32.</ref>.<br>
The overview below was developed from the&nbsp;"Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: Assessment, Referral, and Patient Management Quick Reference Guide Number 16",&nbsp;published by the US Agency for Health Care Policy and Research<ref>Post-stroke rehabilitation: assessment, referral, and patient management. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Clin Pract Guidel Quick Ref Guide Clin. 1995 May;(16):i-iii, 1-32.</ref>.<br>  


{| width="100%" border="1" align="center" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1"
{| width="100%" border="1" align="center" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1"
Line 81: Line 86:
|-
|-
| Level of consciousness  
| Level of consciousness  
| Glasgow Coma Scale  
| [http://www.compassionandsupport.org/pdfs/professionals/molst/glasgow_coma.pdf Glasgow Coma Scale]
| 2 minutes  
| 2 minutes  
| Simple, valid, reliable.  
| Simple, valid, reliable.  
Line 92: Line 97:
| Low sensitivity.
| Low sensitivity.
|-
|-
| Canadian Neurological Scale  
| [http://www.strokecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/canadian.pdf Canadian Neurological Scale]
| 5 minutes  
| 5 minutes  
| Brief, valid, reliable.  
| Brief, valid, reliable.  
Line 104: Line 109:
|-
|-
| rowspan="2" | Measures of disability/activities of daily&nbsp;living (ADL)  
| rowspan="2" | Measures of disability/activities of daily&nbsp;living (ADL)  
| Barthel Index  
| [http://www.strokecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/barthel.pdf Barthel Index]
| 5-10 minutes  
| 5-10 minutes  
| Widely used for stroke. Excellent validity and reliability.  
| Widely used for stroke. Excellent validity and reliability.  
| Low sensitivity for high-level functioning.
| Low sensitivity for high-level functioning.
|-
|-
| Functional Independence Measure (FIM)  
| [http://www.strokengine.ca/pdf/FIMappendixD.pdf Functional Independence Measure (FIM)]
| 40 minutes  
| 40 minutes  
| Widely used for stroke. Measures mobility, ADL, cognition, functional communication.  
| Widely used for stroke. Measures mobility, ADL, cognition, functional communication.  
Line 115: Line 120:
|-
|-
| rowspan="2" | Mental status screening  
| rowspan="2" | Mental status screening  
| Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination  
| Folstein[https://www.mountsinai.on.ca/care/psych/on-call-resources/on-call-resources/mmse.pdf Mini-Mental State Examination]
| 10 minutes  
| 10 minutes  
| Widely used for screening.  
| Widely used for screening.  
Line 136: Line 141:
| Reliability assessed only in stable patients. Sensitivity not tested.
| Reliability assessed only in stable patients. Sensitivity not tested.
|-
|-
| Motricity Index  
| [https://jcphysiotherapy.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/motricity-index-mi.pdf Motricity Index]
| 5 minutes  
| 5 minutes  
| Brief assessment of motor function of arm, leg, and trunk.  
| Brief assessment of motor function of arm, leg, and trunk.  
Line 153: Line 158:
|-
|-
| rowspan="3" | Assessment of speech and language functions  
| rowspan="3" | Assessment of speech and language functions  
| Boston Diagnostic &amp; Aphasia Examination  
| [http://www.kean.edu/~mshulman/documents/BDAEsecond.pdf Boston Diagnostic &amp; Aphasia Examination]
| 1-4 hours  
| 1-4 hours  
| Widely used, comprehensive, good standardisation data, sound theoretical rationale.  
| Widely used, comprehensive, good standardisation data, sound theoretical rationale.  
Line 163: Line 168:
| Time to administer long. Special training required to administer. Inadequate sampling of language other than one word and single sentences.
| Time to administer long. Special training required to administer. Inadequate sampling of language other than one word and single sentences.
|-
|-
| Western Aphasia Battery  
| [http://www.kean.edu/~mshulman/documents/WAB.pdf Western Aphasia Battery]
| 1-4 hours  
| 1-4 hours  
| Widely used, comprehensive.  
| Widely used, comprehensive.  
Line 169: Line 174:
|-
|-
| rowspan="4" | Depression scales  
| rowspan="4" | Depression scales  
| Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)  
| [http://www.hr.ucdavis.edu/asap/pdf_files/Beck_Depression_Inventory.pdf Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)]
| 10 minutes  
| 10 minutes  
| Widely used, easily administered. Norms available. Good with somatic symptoms.  
| Widely used, easily administered. Norms available. Good with somatic symptoms.  
| Less useful in elderly and in patients with aphasia or neglect.High rate of false positives. Somatic items may not be due to depression.
| Less useful in elderly and in patients with aphasia or neglect.High rate of false positives. Somatic items may not be due to depression.
|-
|-
| Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D)  
| [https://www.outcometracker.org/library/CES-D.pdf Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D)]
| &lt; 15 minutes  
| &lt; 15 minutes  
| Brief, easily administered, useful in elderly, effective for screening in stroke population.  
| Brief, easily administered, useful in elderly, effective for screening in stroke population.  
| Not appropriate for aphasic patients.
| Not appropriate for aphasic patients.
|-
|-
| Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)  
| [https://consultgeri.org/try-this/general-assessment/issue-4.pdf Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)]
| 10 minutes  
| 10 minutes  
| Brief, easy to use with elderly, cognitively impaired, and those with visual or physical problems or low motivation.  
| Brief, easy to use with elderly, cognitively impaired, and those with visual or physical problems or low motivation.  
| High false negative rates in minor depression.
| High false negative rates in minor depression.
|-
|-
| Hamilton Depression Scale  
| [http://healthnet.umassmed.edu/mhealth/HAMD.pdf Hamilton Depression Scale]
| &lt; 30 minutes  
| &lt; 30 minutes  
| Observer rated; frequently used in stroke patients.  
| Observer rated; frequently used in stroke patients.  
Line 190: Line 195:
|-
|-
| rowspan="2" | Measures of instrumental ADL  
| rowspan="2" | Measures of instrumental ADL  
| PGC Instrumental Activities of Daily Living  
| [http://www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/igec/tools/function/lawtonbrody.pdf PGC Instrumental Activities of Daily Living]
| 5-10 minutes  
| 5-10 minutes  
| Measures broad base of information necessary for independent living.  
| Measures broad base of information necessary for independent living.  
| Has not been tested in stroke patients.
| Has not been tested in stroke patients.
|-
|-
| Frenchay Activities Index  
| [http://www.rehabmeasures.org/pdf%20library/frenchay%20activities%20index.pdf Frenchay Activities Index]
| 10-15 minutes  
| 10-15 minutes  
| Developed specifically for stroke patients; assesses broad array of activities.  
| Developed specifically for stroke patients; assesses broad array of activities.  
Line 201: Line 206:
|-
|-
| Family assessment  
| Family assessment  
| Family Assessment Device (FAD)  
| [http://www.nctsnet.org/sites/default/files/assets/pdfs/family_assessment_device.pdf Family Assessment Device (FAD)]
| 30 minutes  
| 30 minutes  
| Widely used in stroke. Computer scoring available. Excellent validity and reliability. Available in multiple languages.  
| Widely used in stroke. Computer scoring available. Excellent validity and reliability. Available in multiple languages.  
Line 207: Line 212:
|-
|-
| rowspan="2" | Health status/ quality of life measures  
| rowspan="2" | Health status/ quality of life measures  
| Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) 36-Item Short-Form&nbsp;<span style="line-height: 1.5em;">Health Survey</span>  
| [http://www.brandeis.edu/roybal/docs/SF-36_website_PDF.pdf Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) 36-Item Short-Form&nbsp;<span style="line-height: 1.5em;">Health Survey</span>]
| 10-15 minutes  
| 10-15 minutes  
| Generic health status scale SF36 is improved version of SF20. Brief, can be self – administered or administered by phone or interview. Widely used in the United States.  
| Generic health status scale SF36 is improved version of SF20. Brief, can be self – administered or administered by phone or interview. Widely used in the United States.  
| Possible “floor” effect in seriously ill patients (especially for physical functioning), suggests it should be supplemented by an ADL scale in stroke patients.
| Possible “floor” effect in seriously ill patients (especially for physical functioning), suggests it should be supplemented by an ADL scale in stroke patients.
|-
|-
| Sickness Impact&nbsp;<span style="line-height: 1.5em;">Profile (SIP)</span>  
| [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1776251/pdf/amjph00799-0032.pdf Sickness Impact&nbsp;<span style="line-height: 1.5em;">Profile (SIP)</span>]
| 0-30 minutes  
| 0-30 minutes  
| Comprehensive and well-evaluated. Broad range of items reduces “floor” or “ceiling” effects.  
| Comprehensive and well-evaluated. Broad range of items reduces “floor” or “ceiling” effects.  
Line 218: Line 223:
|}
|}


<br>  
<br>


== References  ==
== References  ==


<references />
<references />  
 
[[Category:Neurological - Outcome Measures]]
[[Category:Stroke]]
[[Category:Stroke - Outcome Measures]]
[[Category:Outcome Measures]]
[[Category:Occupational Health]]
[[Category:Older People/Geriatrics]]
[[Category:Older People/Geriatrics - Outcome Measures]]
[[Category:Course Pages]]

Latest revision as of 18:06, 1 March 2022

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Measuring the effectiveness of interventions is accepted as being central to good practice.  This page presents the best available information on how outcome measures for stroke might be classified and selected for use, based upon their measurement qualities.

EBRSR Review by ICF[edit | edit source]

The EBRSR reviewed a selection of outcome measures put together a review that provides the best available information on how outcome measures might be classified and selected for use, based upon their measurement qualities[1].

Body structure (impairments) Activities (limitations to activity–disability)
Participation (barriers to participation--handicap)
  • Beck Depression Inventory
  • Behavioral Inattention Test
  • Canadian Neurological Scale
  • Clock Drawing Test
  • Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test
  • Fugl-Meyer Assessment
  • General Health Questionnaire -28
  • Geriatric Depression Scale
  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
  • Line Bisection Test
  • Mini Mental State Examination
  • Modified Ashworth Scale
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment
  • Motor-free Visual Perception Test
  • National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
  • Orpington Prognostic Scale
  • Stroke Rehabiliation Assessment of Movement
  • Action Research Arm Test
  • Barthel Index
  • Berg Balance Scale
  • Box and Block Test
  • Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment Scale
  • Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory
  • Clinical Outcome Variables Scale
  • Functional Ambulation Categories
  • Functional Independence Measure
  • Frenchay Activities Index
  • Motor Assessment Scale
  • Nine-hole Peg Test
  • Rankin Handicap Scale
  • Rivermead Mobility Scale
  • Rivermead Motor Assessment
  • Six Minute Walk Test
  • Timed Up and Go
  • Wolf Motor Function Test
  • Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
  • EuroQol Quality of Life Scale
  • LIFE-H
  • London Handicap Scale
  • Medical Outcomes Study Short- Form 36
  • Nottingham Health Profile
  • Reintegration to Normal Living Index
  • Stroke Adapted Sickness Impact Profile
  • Stroke Impact Scale
  • Stroke Specific Quality of Life

See the full 141 page review

US Agency for HCP&R by Problem[edit | edit source]

The overview below was developed from the "Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: Assessment, Referral, and Patient Management Quick Reference Guide Number 16", published by the US Agency for Health Care Policy and Research[2].

Type Name Approx time to administer Strengths Weaknesses
Level of consciousness Glasgow Coma Scale 2 minutes Simple, valid, reliable. None observed.
Stroke deficit scales NIH Stroke Scale 2 minutes Brief, reliable, can be administered by non-neurologists. Low sensitivity.
Canadian Neurological Scale 5 minutes Brief, valid, reliable.
Global disability scale Rankin Scale 5 minutes Good for overall assessment of disability. Walking is the only explicit assessment criterion. Low sensitivity.
Measures of disability/activities of daily living (ADL) Barthel Index 5-10 minutes Widely used for stroke. Excellent validity and reliability. Low sensitivity for high-level functioning.
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) 40 minutes Widely used for stroke. Measures mobility, ADL, cognition, functional communication. “Ceiling” and “floor” effects.
Mental status screening FolsteinMini-Mental State Examination 10 minutes Widely used for screening. Several functions with summed score. May misclassify patients with aphasia.
Neurobehavioral Cognition Status Exam (NCSE) 10 minutes Predicts gain in Barthel Index scores. Unrelated to age. Does not distinguish right from left hemisphere. No reliability studies in stroke. No studies of factorial structure. Correlates with education.
Assessment of motor function Fugl-Meyer 30-40 minutes Extensively evaluated measure. Good validity and reliability for assessing sensorimotor function and balance. Considered too complex and time-consuming by many.
Motor Assessment Scale 15 minutes Good, brief assessment of movement and physical mobility. Reliability assessed only in stable patients. Sensitivity not tested.
Motricity Index 5 minutes Brief assessment of motor function of arm, leg, and trunk. Sensitivity not tested.
Balance assessment Berg Balance Assessment 10 minutes Simple, well established with stroke patients, sensitive to change. None observed.
Rivermead Mobility Index 5 minutes Valid, brief, reliable test of physical mobility. Sensitivity not tested.
Assessment of speech and language functions Boston Diagnostic & Aphasia Examination 1-4 hours Widely used, comprehensive, good standardisation data, sound theoretical rationale. Time to administer long; half of patients cannot be classified.
Porch Index of Communicative Ability (PICA) 1/2-2 hours Widely used, comprehensive, careful test development and standardisation. Time to administer long. Special training required to administer. Inadequate sampling of language other than one word and single sentences.
Western Aphasia Battery 1-4 hours Widely used, comprehensive. Time to administer long. “Aphasia quotients” and “taxonomy” of aphasia not well validated.
Depression scales Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) 10 minutes Widely used, easily administered. Norms available. Good with somatic symptoms. Less useful in elderly and in patients with aphasia or neglect.High rate of false positives. Somatic items may not be due to depression.
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) < 15 minutes Brief, easily administered, useful in elderly, effective for screening in stroke population. Not appropriate for aphasic patients.
Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) 10 minutes Brief, easy to use with elderly, cognitively impaired, and those with visual or physical problems or low motivation. High false negative rates in minor depression.
Hamilton Depression Scale < 30 minutes Observer rated; frequently used in stroke patients. Multiple differing versions compromise interobserver reliability.
Measures of instrumental ADL PGC Instrumental Activities of Daily Living 5-10 minutes Measures broad base of information necessary for independent living. Has not been tested in stroke patients.
Frenchay Activities Index 10-15 minutes Developed specifically for stroke patients; assesses broad array of activities. Sensitivity and interobserver reliability not tested; sensitivity probably limited.
Family assessment Family Assessment Device (FAD) 30 minutes Widely used in stroke. Computer scoring available. Excellent validity and reliability. Available in multiple languages. Assessment subjective; sensitivity not tested; “ceiling” and “floor” effects.
Health status/ quality of life measures Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey 10-15 minutes Generic health status scale SF36 is improved version of SF20. Brief, can be self – administered or administered by phone or interview. Widely used in the United States. Possible “floor” effect in seriously ill patients (especially for physical functioning), suggests it should be supplemented by an ADL scale in stroke patients.
Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) 0-30 minutes Comprehensive and well-evaluated. Broad range of items reduces “floor” or “ceiling” effects. Time to administer somewhat long. Evaluates behavior rather than subjective health; needs questions on well-being, happiness, and satisfaction.


References[edit | edit source]

  1. Katherine Salter, Nerissa Campbell, Marina Richardson, Swati Mehta, Jeffrey Jutai, Laura Zettler, Matthew Moses, Andrew McClure. Outcome Measures in Stroke Rehabilitation. EBRSR, 2013
  2. Post-stroke rehabilitation: assessment, referral, and patient management. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Clin Pract Guidel Quick Ref Guide Clin. 1995 May;(16):i-iii, 1-32.