PP02- Week Three: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
== Task 2: Performing a content review == | == Task 2: Performing a content review == | ||
You are now going to | You are now going to review and improve/update 3 Physiopedia pages to meet our [[Quality Standards|quality standards]]. | ||
# | #<span style="line-height: 1.5em; font-size: 13.28px;">Follow the instructions on the </span>[[Content Review Guidelines]]<span style="line-height: 1.5em; font-size: 13.28px;"> page to complete your review and make improvements as required.</span> | ||
#Post the pages that you have reviewed in the [https://volunteer-orientation.slack.com/archives/week-3-discussion-1 appropriate channel on Slack]. | |||
#Post the pages that you have reviewed on Slack | |||
== Task 3: Improving your own work == | == Task 3: Improving your own work == | ||
| Line 29: | Line 28: | ||
Now that you have reviewed and updated some pages in Physiopedia consider how you might improve your own page that you created last week. | Now that you have reviewed and updated some pages in Physiopedia consider how you might improve your own page that you created last week. | ||
#'''Reflect on the week so far''' - consider what you learnt in the first | #'''Reflect on the week so far''' - consider what you learnt in the first 2 tasks this week.<br> | ||
#'''Improve your page''' - consider your reflections and make improvements to your page as you feel is appropriate. | #'''Improve your page''' - consider your reflections and make improvements to your page as you feel is appropriate. | ||
== Task 5: Discussion == | == Task 5: Discussion == | ||
Go to | Go to Slack for all online discussions:<br> | ||
#'''Share links to the 3 pages that you | #'''Share links to the 3 pages that you reviewed'''. Do this in the [https://volunteer-orientation.slack.com/archives/week-3-discussion-1 #week-3-discussion-1 channel in Slack] | ||
#'''Share your thoughts on our content review process - '''how did you find this process, what could we do to improve it, are you becoming more confident to edit Physiopedia, can we make any improvements to our quality standards documents, does the content review process make sense, what can we do to improve the review process, how can we engage more people in the review process etc? Do this in the [https://volunteer-orientation.slack.com/archives/week-3-discussion-2 #week-3-discussion-2 channel in Slack] | |||
Please post your discussions in the relevant discussion thread that will be set up for you. | Please post your discussions in the relevant discussion thread that will be set up for you. | ||
Feel free to start your own discussion thread as well, especially if you are after some help! | Feel free to start your own discussion thread as well, especially if you are after some help! | ||
<br><br><br><br> | <br><br><br><br> | ||
Revision as of 11:36, 15 February 2016
- Go back to the Course Home Page
- Go to the Pre-Course Activities
- Go to the Course Activities
Introduction[edit | edit source]
This week you are going to review pages in Physiopedia, make improvements to these pages and reflect upon this experience. It's quite a demanding week so be sure that you put aside enough time to complete the tasks!
We understand that reviewing and editing other peoples work can be a daunting task but this is how we ensure that Physiopedia is constantly improving and being updated. Completing the tasks will help to make you a skilled and confident peer reviewer of Physiopedia and give you a great set of skills for your future volunteer roles.
Task 1: Read about content review[edit | edit source]
- Read about content review - before you do anything else this week read about the content review process in Physiopedia.
- Familiarise yourself with our quality standards - also make sure that you have read the Quality Standards document so that you are aware of the quality that we expect in all Physiopedia pages.
Task 2: Performing a content review[edit | edit source]
You are now going to review and improve/update 3 Physiopedia pages to meet our quality standards.
- Follow the instructions on the Content Review Guidelines page to complete your review and make improvements as required.
- Post the pages that you have reviewed in the appropriate channel on Slack.
Task 3: Improving your own work[edit | edit source]
Now that you have reviewed and updated some pages in Physiopedia consider how you might improve your own page that you created last week.
- Reflect on the week so far - consider what you learnt in the first 2 tasks this week.
- Improve your page - consider your reflections and make improvements to your page as you feel is appropriate.
Task 5: Discussion [edit | edit source]
Go to Slack for all online discussions:
- Share links to the 3 pages that you reviewed. Do this in the #week-3-discussion-1 channel in Slack
- Share your thoughts on our content review process - how did you find this process, what could we do to improve it, are you becoming more confident to edit Physiopedia, can we make any improvements to our quality standards documents, does the content review process make sense, what can we do to improve the review process, how can we engage more people in the review process etc? Do this in the #week-3-discussion-2 channel in Slack
Please post your discussions in the relevant discussion thread that will be set up for you.
Feel free to start your own discussion thread as well, especially if you are after some help!
