Overview of Elbow Assessment: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 33: Line 33:
|Posterior elbow
|Posterior elbow
|
|
* Triceps tendinopathy / tendinosis / tendinitis
* triceps tendinopathy / tendinosis / tendinitis
* olecranon impingement
* olecranon impingement
* olecranon bursitis
* olecranon bursitis
Line 69: Line 69:
'''Q: quality of symptoms / pain'''
'''Q: quality of symptoms / pain'''


Find out if symptoms are:
Find out if symptoms are sharp, dull, stabbing, aching, or electric shock-like and if there is any numbness, tingling, or a feeling of weakness / clumsiness.
 
* sharp
* dull
* stabbing
* aching
* electric shock-like
 
Is there any numbness, tingling, or a feeling of weakness / clumsiness?


'''R: radiation of symptoms'''
'''R: radiation of symptoms'''
Line 120: Line 112:


* observe the carrying angle in extension  
* observe the carrying angle in extension  
** average ranges given for carrying angles in the literature vary,<ref>Manandhar B, Shrestha I, Shrestha R. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226732/ Dominance of carrying angle in right-hand among dental students of a teaching hospital: a descriptive cross-sectional study]. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022 Mar 11;60(247):282-5. </ref><ref>Chang CW, Wang YC, Chu CH. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2492992/ Increased carrying angle is a risk factor for nontraumatic ulnar neuropathy at the elbow]. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Sep;466(9):2190-5. </ref> but in females, the carrying angle is around 5-16 degrees and, in men, around 5-14 degrees<ref name=":1">Cunningham S. Overview of Elbow Assessment Course. Plus, 2024.</ref>
** average ranges given for carrying angles in the literature vary,<ref name=":14">Manandhar B, Shrestha I, Shrestha R. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226732/ Dominance of carrying angle in right-hand among dental students of a teaching hospital: a descriptive cross-sectional study]. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022 Mar 11;60(247):282-5. </ref><ref>Chang CW, Wang YC, Chu CH. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2492992/ Increased carrying angle is a risk factor for nontraumatic ulnar neuropathy at the elbow]. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Sep;466(9):2190-5. </ref> but in females, the carrying angle is around 5-16 degrees and, in men, around 5-14 degrees<ref name=":1">Cunningham S. Overview of Elbow Assessment Course. Plus, 2024.</ref>
** the carrying angle tends to be higher in the dominant hand MANANDHAR [[/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226732/|https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226732/]]
** the carrying angle tends to be higher in the dominant hand<ref name=":14" />
* look for any asymmetries, soft tissue changes, scars or swelling
* look for any asymmetries, soft tissue changes, scars or swelling


Line 189: Line 181:
|Firm
|Firm
|}
|}
Please note that passive range of motion is typically 3-5 degrees more than active range of motion. Any restriction in elbow range of motion can increase load on the shoulder and wrist.<ref name=":2" />  
Please note that passive range of motion is typically 3-5 degrees more than active range of motion.<ref name=":2" />
 
Daily activities can be achieved with:<ref name=":2" />
 
* restriction of 30 degrees of elbow extension
* minimum of 130 degrees of elbow flexion, in combination with 50 degrees of pronation and supination
 
=== Resisted Testing ===
=== Resisted Testing ===
The following muscles should be assessed. For more information on the strength assessment, please see [[Assessing Muscle Strength]].
The following muscles should be assessed. For more information on the strength assessment, please see [[Assessing Muscle Strength]].
Line 220: Line 206:
{{#ev:youtube|CGNR4bbnbDA|300}}<ref>Geeky Medics. How to Feel a Pulse | Radial & Brachial Pulses - OSCE Guide | UKMLA | CPSA. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGNR4bbnbDA [last accessed 22/4/24]</ref>
{{#ev:youtube|CGNR4bbnbDA|300}}<ref>Geeky Medics. How to Feel a Pulse | Radial & Brachial Pulses - OSCE Guide | UKMLA | CPSA. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGNR4bbnbDA [last accessed 22/4/24]</ref>


===== Modified Allen test =====
'''[[The Allen Test for Blood Flow|Modified Allen test]]''': assess the patency of the radial and ulnar arteries.{{#ev:youtube|vUxP7bWFgK4|300}}<ref>Paula Humanatomy. The Allen's Test. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUxP7bWFgK4 [last accessed 22/04/2024]</ref>
The [[The Allen Test for Blood Flow|modified Allen test]], which is shown in the optional video below, assesses the patency of the radial and ulnar arteries
* the examiner compresses the radial and ulnar arteries with their thumbs and asks the patient to clench their fist 3-5 times
* the patient then opens their fist, and their palm should have reduced colour (blanched)
* the examiner releases the compression on one artery and notes the time taken for the skin to return to its usual colour
* the test is then repeated, releasing the other artery first, so that you can note if there are differences between sides
 
{{#ev:youtube|vUxP7bWFgK4|300}}<ref>Paula Humanatomy. The Allen's Test. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUxP7bWFgK4 [last accessed 22/04/2024]</ref>


=== Accessory Movements / Joint Mobility Testing ===
=== Accessory Movements / Joint Mobility Testing ===
Line 254: Line 233:


=== Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ===
=== Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ===
[[Cubital Tunnel Syndrome|Cubital tunnel syndrome]] is a “compression of the ulnar nerve as it courses through the cubital tunnel near the elbow”.<ref name=":4">Anderson D, Woods B, Abubakar T, Koontz C, Li N, Hasoon J, et al. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9476617/ A comprehensive review of cubital tunnel syndrome]. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022 Sep 15;14(3):38239.</ref> It is the second most commonly diagnosed mononeuropathy (after carpal tunnel syndrome), affecting around 5.9% of the general population. Untreated chronic ulnar nerve compression and cubital tunnel syndrome can cause atrophy of the first dorsal interosseous muscle, impact quality of life and prevent participation in activities requiring fine motor function.<ref name=":4" />
[[Cubital Tunnel Syndrome|Cubital tunnel syndrome]] is a “compression of the ulnar nerve as it courses through the cubital tunnel near the elbow”.<ref name=":4">Anderson D, Woods B, Abubakar T, Koontz C, Li N, Hasoon J, et al. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9476617/ A comprehensive review of cubital tunnel syndrome]. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022 Sep 15;14(3):38239.</ref> It is the second most commonly diagnosed mononeuropathy (after carpal tunnel syndrome), affecting around 5.9% of the general population.<ref name=":4" />


'''History:'''
'''History:'''
Line 448: Line 427:
* positive test = reproduction of concordant symptoms, sudden severe pain of lateral epicondyle of humerus
* positive test = reproduction of concordant symptoms, sudden severe pain of lateral epicondyle of humerus


Karanasios et al. note that “Cozen's test and grip strength measurement present high accuracy in the diagnosis of LET [lateral elbow tendinopathy] but are poorly investigated.”<ref name=":9">Karanasios S, Korakakis V, Moutzouri M, Drakonaki E, Koci K, Pantazopoulou V, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of examination tests for lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) - A systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2022 Oct-Dec;35(4):541-51.</ref>  
Karanasios et al.<ref name=":9" /> note that Cozen's test has a sensitivity of 91%. “Cozen's test and grip strength measurement present high accuracy in the diagnosis of LET [lateral elbow tendinopathy] but are poorly investigated.”<ref name=":9">Karanasios S, Korakakis V, Moutzouri M, Drakonaki E, Koci K, Pantazopoulou V, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of examination tests for lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) - A systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2022 Oct-Dec;35(4):541-51.</ref>  
 
* Cozen's test has a sensitivity of 91%<ref name=":9" />
* a grip strength difference of 5%-10% between elbow flexion and extension has a sensitivity of 78-83% and a specificity of 80-90%<ref name=":9" />
 
=== Medial Elbow Tendinopathy ===
=== Medial Elbow Tendinopathy ===
Medial elbow tendinopathy (also known as medial epicondylitis, medial epicondylopathy, golfer's elbow) is less common than lateral elbow tendinopathy.<ref>Curti S, Mattioli S, Bonfiglioli R, Farioli A, Violante FS. [https://academic.oup.com/joh/article/63/1/e12186/7249835 Elbow tendinopathy and occupational biomechanical overload: A systematic review with best-evidence synthesis]. J Occup Health. 2021 Jan;63(1):e12186.</ref> It is “caused by repetitive strain from activities that involve frequent loaded gripping, forearm pronation, and/or wrist flexion.”<ref>Reece CL, Susmarski AJ. Medial Epicondylitis. [Updated 2023 Apr 10]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557869/</ref>
Medial elbow tendinopathy (also known as medial epicondylitis, medial epicondylopathy, golfer's elbow) is less common than lateral elbow tendinopathy.<ref>Curti S, Mattioli S, Bonfiglioli R, Farioli A, Violante FS. [https://academic.oup.com/joh/article/63/1/e12186/7249835 Elbow tendinopathy and occupational biomechanical overload: A systematic review with best-evidence synthesis]. J Occup Health. 2021 Jan;63(1):e12186.</ref> It is “caused by repetitive strain from activities that involve frequent loaded gripping, forearm pronation, and/or wrist flexion.”<ref>Reece CL, Susmarski AJ. Medial Epicondylitis. [Updated 2023 Apr 10]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557869/</ref>
Line 468: Line 443:


'''Resistive range of motion''': pain with wrist flexion and forearm pronation.
'''Resistive range of motion''': pain with wrist flexion and forearm pronation.
===== Special tests =====
* Palpation
* Active and passive range of motion
* Resistive range of motion


=== Biceps Tendon Rupture ===
=== Biceps Tendon Rupture ===
Line 532: Line 501:


* positive test = decreased range of motion in any of the four manoeuvres
* positive test = decreased range of motion in any of the four manoeuvres
* positive likelihood ratio = 2.47<ref name=":12" />
* positive likelihood ratio = 2.47 and negative likelihood ratio = 0.02<ref name=":12" />
* negative likelihood ratio = 0.02<ref name=":12" />


'''Elbow extension test''':<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":13">Appelboam A, Reuben AD, Benger JR, Beech F, Dutson J, Haig S, et al. Elbow extension test to rule out elbow fracture: multicentre, prospective validation and observational study of diagnostic accuracy in adults and children. BMJ. 2008 Dec 9;337:a2428. </ref>
'''Elbow extension test''':<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":13">Appelboam A, Reuben AD, Benger JR, Beech F, Dutson J, Haig S, et al. Elbow extension test to rule out elbow fracture: multicentre, prospective validation and observational study of diagnostic accuracy in adults and children. BMJ. 2008 Dec 9;337:a2428. </ref>
Line 541: Line 509:
* the patient then extends their elbow
* the patient then extends their elbow
* positive test = decreased range of motion in the involved elbow
* positive test = decreased range of motion in the involved elbow
* positive likelihood ratio = 1.88<ref name=":13" />
* positive likelihood ratio = 1.88 and negative likelihood ratio = 0.06<ref name=":13" />
* negative likelihood ratio = 0.06<ref name=":13" />


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 08:51, 22 April 2024

This article or area is currently under construction and may only be partially complete. Please come back soon to see the finished work! (22/04/2024)
Original Editor - Shala Cunningham Top Contributors - Jess Bell

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Musculoskeletal conditions of the elbow can have a significant physical and socioeconomic impact on both individuals and communities.[1][2] Elbow pain can be caused by many structures, including the bone, tendons, ligaments, bursa, and nerves.[3] It is, therefore, important that rehabilitation providers have a comprehensive understanding of the anatomy of the elbow and the objective assessment of the elbow. This page provides an overview of the elbow evaluation. To review elbow anatomy, please see Functional Anatomy of the Elbow.

Subjective Assessment[edit | edit source]

The mnemonic L-M-N-O-P-Q-R-S-T is used to cover the key aspects you should consider when taking a patient’s history.

L: location of symptoms and level of functional impairment

The location of symptoms can help you start to develop hypothetical diagnoses, based on which tissues are in the area. Potential diagnoses based on location are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Potential diagnoses based on location.
Anterior elbow
  • biceps tendinopathy / tendonitis
  • pronator syndrome
  • anterior capsule strain
  • torn brachialis
Lateral elbow
  • lateral elbow tendinopathy (also known as lateral epicondylalgia, lateral epicondylitis, tennis elbow)
  • radial tunnel syndrome
  • radiocapitellar chondromalacia
Medial elbow
  • medial elbow tendinopathy (also known as medial epicondylalgia, medial epicondylitis, golfer’s elbow)
  • ulnar collateral ligament strain
  • ulnar nerve entrapment
Posterior elbow
  • triceps tendinopathy / tendinosis / tendinitis
  • olecranon impingement
  • olecranon bursitis


Given the high burden of elbow pain,[1] it is important to ascertain how a patient’s pain is affecting their ability to perform activities of daily living, as well as work-, school-, and sport-related tasks and other relevant functional activities.

M: medical factors (medications) and mechanism of injury

We need to find out what medications the patient is taking (including those prescribed by physicians or other healthcare providers or supplements) and what co-morbidities they may have. We also want to determine when and how the injury occurred (was there a specific trauma, overuse,[4] etc)

Red flags: insidious onset, symptoms related to cardiovascular activity (i.e. exertion), and a history of cardiovascular disease.

N: neurological symptoms

Neurological symptoms include numbness, tingling, paraesthesias, sharp, burning pain that radiates down the arm.

When neurological symptoms are present, we need to determine if they are constant or intermittent and if they follow a dermatomal or peripheral nerve pattern. It is important to determine if symptoms are related to neck, shoulder or elbow positions or movements.

O: occupation, including limitations

It is important to determine if there are any work- or activity-related factors that are relevant:

  • is there a possibility of overuse?
  • does the patient perform any repetitive tasks?
  • are they an overhead athlete?

P: palliating and provocating symptoms

Find out what increases or worsens symptoms. It’s also important to determine how long it takes for symptoms to calm down or decrease once aggravated.

Red flags: constant, unrelenting symptoms.

Q: quality of symptoms / pain

Find out if symptoms are sharp, dull, stabbing, aching, or electric shock-like and if there is any numbness, tingling, or a feeling of weakness / clumsiness.

R: radiation of symptoms

Questions to consider for radiating symptoms are:

  • where do the symptoms radiate to?
  • are radiating symptoms provoked by activities or position?
  • how long do radiating symptoms last?

Red flag: radiating symptoms down multiple dermatomes (remember to check peripheral nerve sensory patterns if more than one dermatome appears to be affected).

S: severity of symptoms

It can be helpful to use scales such as the Visual Analogue Scale or the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, but also consider how symptoms affect function and activities. Does the patient have to modify or stop activities due to symptoms?

Red flag: sudden onset of severe pain without incident or accident.

T: timing of symptoms

Find out the timing of symptoms in a 24-hour period and in relation to activity:

  • pain that tends to occur only after activity (not with activity) is more likely to be chronic
  • pain that occurs with activity is more likely to be subacute
  • pain that occurs before, during and after an activity is more likely to be acute

Systems review

  • Ask about constitutional symptoms (fatigue, shortness of breath)
  • Ask about cardiovascular risk factors and symptoms (angina)

Self-Assessment Questionnaires for Elbow Pain[edit | edit source]

Objective Assessment[edit | edit source]

The following sections discuss the general assessment of the elbow.

Observation[edit | edit source]

It is important to look at the whole upper quarter (neck, shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand). Observe both sides to allow for a comparison. Key points at the elbow:

  • observe the carrying angle in extension
    • average ranges given for carrying angles in the literature vary,[5][6] but in females, the carrying angle is around 5-16 degrees and, in men, around 5-14 degrees[7]
    • the carrying angle tends to be higher in the dominant hand[5]
  • look for any asymmetries, soft tissue changes, scars or swelling

Palpation[edit | edit source]

Key palpation points at the elbow are listed in Table 2.

Table 2. Key palpation points for the elbow
Medial elbow
  • medial supracondylar line
  • medial epicondyle
  • ulnar nerve groove
  • ulnar nerve
  • common flexor tendon and pronator teres
Lateral elbow
  • common extensor tendon
  • lateral supracondylar ridge
  • lateral epicondyle
  • radial head
Muscles
  • biceps
  • brachialis
  • brachioradialis
  • common flexor tendon
  • common extensor tendon
  • triceps

Please watch the following video if you would like to learn more about elbow palpation.

[8]

Range of Motion[edit | edit source]

It is important to assess active and passive range of motion and with over-pressure applied. For more information on the range of motion assessment, please see: Assessing Range of Motion.

Table 3 shows normative values for elbow range of motion and typical end feels. Please note that elbow range of motion is influenced by a number of factors, including age, biological sex and body mass index (BMI) and that figures for normal range of motion vary in the literature. You can generally use the unaffected side as a comparison for the affected side.[9]

Table 3. Elbow range of motion and end feel[7][10]
Movement Range of motion Typical end feel
Flexion
  • 0-145 degrees (active)
  • 0-160 degrees (passive)
  • figures given in the literature vary from 130-154 degrees[9]
Soft
Extension
  • 0-15 degrees (hyperextension)
  • values given in the literature range between -6 and 11 degrees[9]
Hard
Pronation
  • 80 degrees
  • values given in the literature range from 75-85 degrees[9]
Firm
Supination
  • 80 degrees
  • values given in the literature range from 80-104 degrees[9]
Firm

Please note that passive range of motion is typically 3-5 degrees more than active range of motion.[9]

Resisted Testing[edit | edit source]

The following muscles should be assessed. For more information on the strength assessment, please see Assessing Muscle Strength.

Flexion:

  • biceps brachii
  • brachialis
  • brachioradialis

Extension:

  • triceps brachii
  • anconeus

Neurovascular Testing[edit | edit source]

Look for any changes in nail quality, colour, temperature and blanching that could suggest neurovascular compromise.

Brachial pulse: you can palpate the brachial pulse just proximal to the elbow, between the medial epicondyle of the humerus and the distal biceps tendon[11]

Radial pulse: you might also palpate the radial pulse at the anterior wrist, proximal to the base of the thumb[11]

Please watch the following video if you would like to learn more about assessing the brachial and radial posts.

[12] Modified Allen test: assess the patency of the radial and ulnar arteries.

[13]

Accessory Movements / Joint Mobility Testing[edit | edit source]

Table 4 identifies which accessory movements to assess at the elbow.[7]

Table 4. Accessory movements of the elbow
Type of distraction When to use
Humeroulnar distraction
  • Test humeroulnar distraction when a patient has a general flexion / extension mobility limitation; this technique can be used as an intervention to improve general flexion / extension mobility
  • Test humeroulnar  distraction when a patient has limited end-range extension or flexion; this technique can be used as an intervention to improve end-range extension / flexion
Radiohumeral distraction
  • When a patient has limited elbow extension and radial head mobility, test radiohumeral distraction; this technique can be used as an intervention to improve general mobility and extension
Radiohumeral anterior (ventral) and posterior (dorsal) glides
  • When a patient has limited supination, test their anterior glide; this technique can be used as an intervention to improve supination
  • When a patient has limited pronation, test their posterior glide; this technique can be used as an intervention to improve pronation

Specific Assessment for Common Elbow Pathologies[edit | edit source]

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome[edit | edit source]

Cubital tunnel syndrome is a “compression of the ulnar nerve as it courses through the cubital tunnel near the elbow”.[14] It is the second most commonly diagnosed mononeuropathy (after carpal tunnel syndrome), affecting around 5.9% of the general population.[14]

History:

  • numbness and tingling in the ulnar nerve distribution distal to the elbow
  • positional complaints
  • trauma to the elbow region
  • repetitive elbow flexion tasks
  • valgus stress

Observation: look for atrophy of the muscles supplied by the ulnar nerve (flexor carpi ulnaris, flexor digitorum profundus 4 and 5, hypothenar muscles, adductor pollicis, lumbricals 4 and 5, dorsal and palmar interossei).

Palpation: look for tenderness at the ulnar groove.

Active and passive range of motion:

  • possible symptoms in full flexion
  • look for symptom reproduction during passive range of motion

Manual muscle testing: likely no symptoms, but look for weakness in muscles supplied by the ulnar nerve (listed above)

Accessory movement testing: should be within normal limits.

Special tests[edit | edit source]

Pressure provocation test:[7][15]

  • flex the patient's elbow to approximately 20 degrees
  • apply and hold pressure just proximal to the cubital tunnel for a maximum of 60 seconds, stopping sooner if / when the patient has symptoms along the ulnar nerve distribution
  • positive test = the patient gets symptoms along the ulnar nerve distribution
  • negative test = compression is held for 60 seconds, and the patient has no symptoms

Elbow flexion test:[7][15][16]

  • flex the patient's elbow, and apply overpressure (i.e. at maximum passive flexion of the elbow)
  • hold this position for a maximum of 60 seconds, stopping sooner if / when the patient complains of symptoms along the ulnar nerve distribution
  • positive test = reproduction of symptoms
  • negative test = no reproduction of symptoms in 60 seconds

Combined pressure and flexion test:[7][15]

  • a combination of the above two tests
  • apply pressure to the ulnar nerve just proximal to the cubital tunnel with the elbow in 20 degrees of flexion
  • maintain this pressure and add in elbow flexion
  • positive test = reproduction of symptoms
  • negative test = no reproduction of symptoms after 60 seconds

Tinel's sign:[15]

  • the therapist taps on the ulnar nerve proximal to the cubital tunnel with their fingers (or lightly with a reflex hammer) four to six times
  • positive test = reproduction of symptoms along the ulnar nerve distribution
  • negative test = no reproduction of symptoms

Table 5 shows the sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios of these tests. Please note that different sources provide different values for sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios. These figures are based on research by Novak et al.[15]

Table 5. Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood of special tests for cubital tunnel syndrome.
Test Sensitivity Specificity Positive likelihood ratio (+LR) Negative likelihood ratio (-LR)
Pressure provocative test 0.89 0.98 44.5 0.11
Elbow flexion test 0.75 0.99 75 0.25
Combined pressure and flexion test 0.98 0.95 19.6 0.02
Tinel's test 0.70 0.98 35 0.31

 

Medial Collateral Ligament (MCL) Tear[edit | edit source]

“Elbow medial collateral ligament sprain occurs when the elbow is subjected to a valgus force exceeding the tensile properties of the medial collateral ligament (MCL). This is an injury seen more often in throwing athletes.”[17]

History:[7]

  • trauma with valgus stress or repetitive stress (e.g. throwing[18])
  • in acute injuries, patients may describe hearing a “pop”[18]
  • in chronic injuries, patients may have noticed that their accuracy / velocity when throwing has decreased[18]
  • pain along the medial elbow
  • swelling
  • bruising
  • if there is a complete rupture, patients will complain of instability

Observation: check for swelling and possible bruising at the medial elbow.

Palpation: check for tenderness along the medial elbow.

Active and passive range of motion: likely within normal limits.

Accessory movements:

  • excessive medial glide of the ulnar with or without pain is likely, although this test is not commonly performed
  • likely no change observed with a distraction test
Special Tests[edit | edit source]

Moving valgus stress test:[7]

  • “currently accepted as the gold-standard clinical test”,[19] but patient tolerance has to be considered when selecting this test
  • place the patient’s shoulder in 90 degrees of abduction and position their elbow in full flexion
  • apply a valgus stress at the shoulder while externally rotating the shoulder
  • maintain this valgus stress and extend the patient’s elbow
  • positive test = pain or increased mobility compared to the other side

Valgus stress test:[7]

  • apply valgus stress along the lateral elbow towards the midline
  • performed at 30, 60, 70 and 90 of elbow flexion

As shown in Table 6, the moving valgus stress test has better positive and negative likelihood ratios than the valgus stress test.[7][20]

Table 6. Likelihood ratios of moving valgus stress test and valgus stress test.[20]
Test Positive likelihood ratio Negative likelihood ratio
Moving valgus stress test 4.0 0.04
Valgus stress test 1.3 0.81

Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy[edit | edit source]

Lateral elbow tendinopathy (also known as lateral epicondylalgia, lateral epicondylitis and tennis elbow) is one of the most common causes of elbow pain and dysfunction,[21] with a population prevalence of 1-3%.[22] Its peak incidence is in individuals aged 40-50 years. “Although the condition is self‐limiting it is associated with considerable morbidity.”[22]

History:

  • Pain along the lateral elbow, which is usually caused by repetitive elbow or wrist movements
  • Pain with gripping activities (e.g. shaking hands, turning a door knob, holding a coffee cup)

Observation:

  • patients may be hesitant to shake hands
  • they may be wearing a brace

Palpation: tenderness along lateral epicondyle and common extensor tendon / muscles.

Active and passive range of motion:

  • pain with flexion of the wrist with extension of the elbow (active and passive)
  • pain with active extension of the wrist

Resisted range of motion:

  • pain with resisted wrist extension
  • pain with resisted middle finger extension

Accessory movements: usually within normal limits.

Special Tests[edit | edit source]

Muscle tests:[7]

  • pain on palpation
  • pain on stretch of the common extensors
  • pain with resisted wrist extension

Grip strength with dynamometer:[7]

  • compare sides
  • likely painful and limited on the affected side

Mill’s test:[7]

  • the patient’s arm is positioned in elbow flexion
  • the examiner palpates the patient’s lateral epicondyle, and then passively pronates the patient’s forearm, flexes their wrist, and extends their elbow
  • positive test = reproduction of concordant symptoms, pain over lateral epicondyle of humerus
  • the following optional video shows Mill's test

[23]

Cozen’s test:[7]

  • the examiner places their thumb at the patient’s lateral epicondyle
  • the patient’s elbow is flexed and pronated, with their wrist extended and in radial deviation
  • the examiner resists wrist extension / radial deviation
  • positive test = reproduction of concordant symptoms, sudden severe pain of lateral epicondyle of humerus

Karanasios et al.[24] note that Cozen's test has a sensitivity of 91%. “Cozen's test and grip strength measurement present high accuracy in the diagnosis of LET [lateral elbow tendinopathy] but are poorly investigated.”[24]

Medial Elbow Tendinopathy[edit | edit source]

Medial elbow tendinopathy (also known as medial epicondylitis, medial epicondylopathy, golfer's elbow) is less common than lateral elbow tendinopathy.[25] It is “caused by repetitive strain from activities that involve frequent loaded gripping, forearm pronation, and/or wrist flexion.”[26]

History:[7]

  • pain in the medial elbow with wrist flexion and supination
  • pain with activities, such as using a screwdriver, hammering and any squeezing activity (e.g. holding a golf club or a baseball bat)

Observation: patients may be hesitant to shake hands.

Palpation: tenderness along medial epicondyle and common flexor tendon / muscles.

Active and passive range of motion: discomfort with elbow extension and with wrist extension (active and passive).

Resistive range of motion: pain with wrist flexion and forearm pronation.

Biceps Tendon Rupture[edit | edit source]

“Distal biceps tendon ruptures are mostly caused by a sudden extension force on the flexed elbow. Recent literature shows an increasing incidence, while the age of patients with a distal biceps rupture is decreasing."[27]

History: patient reports a specific incident, with an immediate decrease in elbow flexion strength.[7]

Observation: can observe the defect after a few days as the biceps muscle retracts.

Palpation:

  • may be able to palpate a defect
  • may be tenderness along the biceps

Active and passive range of motion: Limited elbow flexion active range of motion, but full passive range of motion.

Resistive range of motion: weakness with resisted elbow flexion.

Special Tests[edit | edit source]

Biceps squeeze test:[7]

  • the patient is seated with their elbow flexed 60-80 degrees and their forearm in slight pronation (i.e. resting in lap)
  • the examiner squeezes the patient’s biceps firmly with both hands - one hand along the muscle belly and one hand at the distal myotendinous junction
  • positive test = lack of forearm supination when the biceps is squeezed

Hook test:[7][27]

  • the examiner uses their index finger to palpate the biceps tendon in the antecubital fossa
  • positive test = NO tendon

Passive forearm pronation test:[7][27]

  • the patient is seated with their elbow at 90 degrees of flexion
  • the examiner passively moves the patient’s forearm from a supinated position into pronation
  • positive test = loss of visual and palpable proximal to distal movement of the bicep muscle belly

Biceps crease interval:[7][27]

  • the patient is seated with their elbow at 90 degrees of flexion
  • the examiner fixates the patient’s wrist and places their finger on the patient’s antecubital fossa
  • the examiner passively extends the patient’s elbow and supinates their forearm  and then measures the distance from the antecubital crease to the distal muscle belly
  • positive test = distance more than 6 cm

Zwerus et al.[27] note that the “Hook test, PFP [passive forearm pronation test], BCI [biceps crease interval]/BCR [biceps crease ratio], biceps squeeze test, and supination-pronation test were investigated for individual use and showed a sensitivity ranging from 81% to 100% and a specificity from 50% to 100%.” In their study, they found that the “combination of a positive Hook test and BCI serves best to accurately diagnose acute complete ruptures of the distal biceps tendon.”[27]

Elbow Fracture[edit | edit source]

Seven percent of all fractures are elbow fractures.[28] Extra-articular fractures are more common in children, while articular fractures are more common in adults aged over 50 years. Elbow fractures in younger adults tend to be caused by high-energy injuries (e.g. motor vehicle crashes, sports, falls from a height), but in adults aged more than 80 years, they tend to be low-energy injuries (e.g. a fall from a standing height).[28]

Special Tests[edit | edit source]

Four-way range of motion test:[7][29]

  • the patient is seated with their injured arm at their side and their elbow extended
  • the patient is asked to actively:
    • extend to a full locked position
    • flex their elbow to 90 degrees
    • while flexed, pronate to their full range of motion
    • while flexed, supinate to their full range of motion
  • positive test = decreased range of motion in any of the four manoeuvres
  • positive likelihood ratio = 2.47 and negative likelihood ratio = 0.02[29]

Elbow extension test:[7][30]

  • the patient is seated with their arms supinated
  • the patient is asked to actively flex their shoulders to 90 degrees
  • the patient then extends their elbow
  • positive test = decreased range of motion in the involved elbow
  • positive likelihood ratio = 1.88 and negative likelihood ratio = 0.06[30]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 Janela D, Costa F, Molinos M, Moulder RG, Lains J, Bento V, et al. Digital rehabilitation for elbow pain musculoskeletal conditions: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 27;19(15):9198.
  2. Lucado AM, Day JM, Vincent JI, MacDermid JC, Fedorczyk J, Grewal R, Martin RL. Lateral elbow pain and muscle function impairments. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Dec;52(12):CPG1-CPG111.
  3. Chung HJ, Joo YB, Park JY, Lee WY. Differential diagnosis of elbow pain. Ewha Med J 2023;46(4):e13.
  4. Javed M, Mustafa S, Boyle S, Scott F. Elbow pain: a guide to assessment and management in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Nov;65(640):610-2.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Manandhar B, Shrestha I, Shrestha R. Dominance of carrying angle in right-hand among dental students of a teaching hospital: a descriptive cross-sectional study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022 Mar 11;60(247):282-5.
  6. Chang CW, Wang YC, Chu CH. Increased carrying angle is a risk factor for nontraumatic ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Sep;466(9):2190-5.
  7. 7.00 7.01 7.02 7.03 7.04 7.05 7.06 7.07 7.08 7.09 7.10 7.11 7.12 7.13 7.14 7.15 7.16 7.17 7.18 7.19 7.20 7.21 Cunningham S. Overview of Elbow Assessment Course. Plus, 2024.
  8. Clinical Physio. Elbow Palpation | Clinical Physio Premium. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZcbF0obRFc [last accessed 22/4/2024]
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 Zwerus EL, Willigenburg NW, Scholtes VA, Somford MP, Eygendaal D, van den Bekerom MP. Normative values and affecting factors for the elbow range of motion. Shoulder Elbow. 2019 Jun;11(3):215-24.
  10. Physiopedia, Range of Motion Normative Values.
  11. 11.0 11.1 Zimmerman B, Williams D. Peripheral Pulse. [Updated 2023 Apr 8]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542175/
  12. Geeky Medics. How to Feel a Pulse | Radial & Brachial Pulses - OSCE Guide | UKMLA | CPSA. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGNR4bbnbDA [last accessed 22/4/24]
  13. Paula Humanatomy. The Allen's Test. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUxP7bWFgK4 [last accessed 22/04/2024]
  14. 14.0 14.1 Anderson D, Woods B, Abubakar T, Koontz C, Li N, Hasoon J, et al. A comprehensive review of cubital tunnel syndrome. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022 Sep 15;14(3):38239.
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 Novak CB, Lee GW, Mackinnon SE, Lay L. Provocative testing for cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 1994 Sep;19(5):817-20.
  16. Kearns G, Wang S. Medical diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome ameliorated with thrust manipulation of the elbow and carpals. J Man Manip Ther. 2012 May;20(2):90-5.
  17. Rahman RK, Levine WN, Ahmad CS. Elbow medial collateral ligament injuries. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2008;197-204.
  18. 18.0 18.1 18.2 Gehrman MD, Grandizio LC. Elbow ulnar collateral ligament injuries in throwing athletes: diagnosis and management. J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Mar;47(3):266-73.
  19. Wigton MD, Schimoler PJ, Kharlamov A, Miller MC, Frank DA, DeMeo PJ. The moving valgus stress test produces more ulnar collateral ligament change in length during extension than during flexion: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jun;29(6):1230-5.
  20. 20.0 20.1 O'Driscoll SW, Lawton RL, Smith AM. The "moving valgus stress test" for medial collateral ligament tears of the elbow. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Feb;33(2):231-9.
  21. Ma KL, Wang HQ. Management of lateral epicondylitis: a narrative literature review. Pain Res Manag. 2020 May 5;2020:6965381.
  22. 22.0 22.1 Buchbinder R, Johnston RV, Barnsley L, Assendelft WJ, Bell SN, Smidt N. Surgery for lateral elbow pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16;2011(3):CD003525.
  23. Clinical Examination Videos. Tennis elbow test - Mills test. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBReeVQqmpc [last accessed 22/04/2024]
  24. 24.0 24.1 Karanasios S, Korakakis V, Moutzouri M, Drakonaki E, Koci K, Pantazopoulou V, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of examination tests for lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) - A systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2022 Oct-Dec;35(4):541-51.
  25. Curti S, Mattioli S, Bonfiglioli R, Farioli A, Violante FS. Elbow tendinopathy and occupational biomechanical overload: A systematic review with best-evidence synthesis. J Occup Health. 2021 Jan;63(1):e12186.
  26. Reece CL, Susmarski AJ. Medial Epicondylitis. [Updated 2023 Apr 10]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557869/
  27. 27.0 27.1 27.2 27.3 27.4 27.5 Zwerus EL, van Deurzen DFP, van den Bekerom MPJ, The B, Eygendaal D. Distal biceps tendon ruptures: diagnostic strategy through physical examination. Am J Sports Med. 2022 Dec;50(14):3956-62.
  28. 28.0 28.1 Breda G, De Marco G, Cesaraccio P, Pillastrini P. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests to rule out elbow fracture: a systematic review. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Jun;26(2):182-90.
  29. 29.0 29.1 Vinson DR, Kann GS, Gaona SD, Panacek EA. Performance of the 4-way range of motion test for radiographic injuries after blunt elbow trauma. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;34(2):235-9.
  30. 30.0 30.1 Appelboam A, Reuben AD, Benger JR, Beech F, Dutson J, Haig S, et al. Elbow extension test to rule out elbow fracture: multicentre, prospective validation and observational study of diagnostic accuracy in adults and children. BMJ. 2008 Dec 9;337:a2428.