Nijmegen Questionnaire: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
The NQ consosts of 16 items to be answered on a five point scale ranging from 'never' counted as zero to 'very often' counted as 4. The total score ranges from 0-64. Completion of the questionnaire only takes a few minutes. | The NQ consosts of 16 items to be answered on a five point scale ranging from 'never' counted as zero to 'very often' counted as 4. The total score ranges from 0-64. Completion of the questionnaire only takes a few minutes. | ||
A score of over 19 denotes the presence of respiratory distress and dysfunction. The higher the score the more distress is present. Values below 20 are considered within normal and functional domain.<ref name="Chaitow">Courtney, R. and Dixhoorn, J. Questionnaites and manual methods for assessing breathing dysfunction. Chapter 6.5 in: Chaitow, L., Bradley, D., and Gilbert, C. Recognizing and treating breathing disorders. 20014, Elsevier</ref> | A score of over 19 denotes the presence of respiratory distress and dysfunction. The higher the score the more distress is present. Values below 20 are considered within normal and functional domain.<ref name="Chaitow">Courtney, R. and Dixhoorn, J. Questionnaites and manual methods for assessing breathing dysfunction. Chapter 6.5 in: Chaitow, L., Bradley, D., and Gilbert, C. Recognizing and treating breathing disorders. 20014, Elsevier</ref> | ||
== Reference<br> == | == Reference<br> == | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
=== Validity === | === Validity === | ||
The sensitivity of the Nijmegen Questionnaire in relation to the clinical diagnosis was 91% and the specificity 95%<ref name="Dixhoorn">van Dixhoorn J, Duivenvoorden HJ. Efficacy of Nijmegen Questionnaire in recognition of the hyperventilation syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29(2):199-206.</ref> | |||
=== Responsiveness === | === Responsiveness === | ||
Advantages of the NQ is that it is short and responsive to treatment<ref name="Chaitow" /> Thus it can be used repeatedly over a course of treatment to measure progress. | |||
<br> | |||
=== Miscellaneous<br> === | === Miscellaneous<br> === | ||
== Links == | == Links == | ||
[http://www.bradcliff.com/?page_id=62 Interactive online questionnaire] | |||
[http://www.buteykokent.co.uk/images/The%20Nijmegen%20Questionnaire.pdf The Nijmegen Questionnaire] | |||
== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed]) == | == Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed]) == | ||
Revision as of 15:17, 30 March 2014
Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
Top Contributors - Sweta Christian, Admin, Kim Jackson, Tarina van der Stockt, Simisola Ajeyalemi, Jess Bell, WikiSysop and Ewa Jaraczewska
Objective
[edit | edit source]
The Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ) gives a broad view of symptoms associated with dysfunctional breathing patterns.
Intended Population
[edit | edit source]
Method of Use[edit | edit source]
The NQ consosts of 16 items to be answered on a five point scale ranging from 'never' counted as zero to 'very often' counted as 4. The total score ranges from 0-64. Completion of the questionnaire only takes a few minutes.
A score of over 19 denotes the presence of respiratory distress and dysfunction. The higher the score the more distress is present. Values below 20 are considered within normal and functional domain.[1]
Reference
[edit | edit source]
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Reliability[edit | edit source]
Validity[edit | edit source]
The sensitivity of the Nijmegen Questionnaire in relation to the clinical diagnosis was 91% and the specificity 95%[2]
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Advantages of the NQ is that it is short and responsive to treatment[1] Thus it can be used repeatedly over a course of treatment to measure progress.
Miscellaneous
[edit | edit source]
Links[edit | edit source]
Interactive online questionnaire
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Extension:RSS -- Error: Not a valid URL: Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10
References[edit | edit source]
References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Courtney, R. and Dixhoorn, J. Questionnaites and manual methods for assessing breathing dysfunction. Chapter 6.5 in: Chaitow, L., Bradley, D., and Gilbert, C. Recognizing and treating breathing disorders. 20014, Elsevier
- ↑ van Dixhoorn J, Duivenvoorden HJ. Efficacy of Nijmegen Questionnaire in recognition of the hyperventilation syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29(2):199-206.
