Neck Disability Index: Difference between revisions
Rachael Lowe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Articles]] [[Category:Assessment]] [[Category:Musculoskeletal/Orthopaedics]] [[Category:Outcome Measures]] [[Category:Patient Guides]] | |||
<div class="editorbox"> | <div class="editorbox"> | ||
'''Original Editor '''- [[User:Rachael Lowe|Rachael Lowe]]<br> | '''Original Editor '''- [[User:Rachael Lowe|Rachael Lowe]]<br> | ||
| Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
== Objective<br> == | == Objective<br> == | ||
The NDI is a modification of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index. It is a patient-completed, condition-specific functional status questionnaire with 10 items including pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation. The NDI has sufficient support and usefulness to retain its current status as the most commonly used self-report measure for neck pain<ref name="Macdermid et al">Macdermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, Goldsmith CH. Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2009 May;39(5):400-17.</ref>. | The NDI is a modification of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index. It is a patient-completed, condition-specific functional status questionnaire with 10 items including pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation. The NDI has sufficient support and usefulness to retain its current status as the most commonly used self-report measure for neck pain<ref name="Macdermid et al">Macdermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, Goldsmith CH. Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2009 May;39(5):400-17.</ref>. | ||
== Intended Population == | == Intended Population == | ||
| Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
Chronic neck pain, musculoskeletal neck pain and whiplash injuries. | Chronic neck pain, musculoskeletal neck pain and whiplash injuries. | ||
== Method of Use<br> == | == Method of Use<br> == | ||
The NDI can be scored as raw score <ref name="Vernon & Mior" /> or doubled, and expressed as a percent <ref name="Riddle & Stratford" />. Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, with the first statement being “0” (ie. No pain) and the last statement being “5” (ie. Worst imaginable pain). A higher score indicates more patient-rated disability. There is no statement in the original literature on how to handle missing data. To use the NDI for patient decisions, a clinically important change was calculated as 5 points, with a sensitivity of 0.78 and a specificity of 0.80<ref name="Stratford et al" />. | The NDI can be scored as raw score <ref name="Vernon & Mior" /> or doubled, and expressed as a percent <ref name="Riddle & Stratford" />. Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, with the first statement being “0” (ie. No pain) and the last statement being “5” (ie. Worst imaginable pain). A higher score indicates more patient-rated disability. There is no statement in the original literature on how to handle missing data. To use the NDI for patient decisions, a clinically important change was calculated as 5 points, with a sensitivity of 0.78 and a specificity of 0.80<ref name="Stratford et al" />. | ||
| Line 40: | Line 41: | ||
Jette DU, Jette AM (1996) Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with spinal impairments. Physical Therapy 76, 930-45<ref name="Jette">Jette DU, Jette AM. Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with spinal impairments. Physical Therapy, 1996; 76:930-45</ref> | Jette DU, Jette AM (1996) Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with spinal impairments. Physical Therapy 76, 930-45<ref name="Jette">Jette DU, Jette AM. Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with spinal impairments. Physical Therapy, 1996; 76:930-45</ref> | ||
==Links== | == Links == | ||
[http://academic.regis.edu/clinicaleducation/pdf%27s/NDI_with_scoring.pdf View Neck Disability Index] | [http://academic.regis.edu/clinicaleducation/pdf%27s/NDI_with_scoring.pdf View Neck Disability Index] | ||
<div class="researchbox"> | <div class="researchbox"> | ||
== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed]) == | == Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed]) == | ||
Revision as of 11:59, 20 June 2009
Original Editor - Rachael Lowe
Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. Read more.
Objective
[edit | edit source]
The NDI is a modification of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index. It is a patient-completed, condition-specific functional status questionnaire with 10 items including pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation. The NDI has sufficient support and usefulness to retain its current status as the most commonly used self-report measure for neck pain[1].
Intended Population[edit | edit source]
Chronic neck pain, musculoskeletal neck pain and whiplash injuries.
Method of Use
[edit | edit source]
The NDI can be scored as raw score [2] or doubled, and expressed as a percent [3]. Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, with the first statement being “0” (ie. No pain) and the last statement being “5” (ie. Worst imaginable pain). A higher score indicates more patient-rated disability. There is no statement in the original literature on how to handle missing data. To use the NDI for patient decisions, a clinically important change was calculated as 5 points, with a sensitivity of 0.78 and a specificity of 0.80[4].
Reference[edit | edit source]
Vernon H, Mior S. (1991) The neck disability index: A study of reliability and validity. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 14, 409-15[2]
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Reliability[edit | edit source]
Vernon H, Mior S. (1991) The neck disability index: A study of reliability and validity. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 14, 409-15[2]
Validity[edit | edit source]
Mark Chan Ci En, Dean A. Clair and Stephen J. Edmondston. Manual Therapy, 2009, 14(4):433-438[5]
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Riddle DL, Stratford PW. Use of generic versus region specific functional status measures on patients with cervical spine disorders. Physical Therapy, 1998;78:951-963[3]
Miscellaneous[edit | edit source]
Stratford PW, Riddle DL, Binkley JM et al (1999) Using the neck disability index to make decisions concerning individual patients Physiotherapy Canada, 2,107-112[4].
Jette DU, Jette AM (1996) Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with spinal impairments. Physical Therapy 76, 930-45[6]
Links[edit | edit source]
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1NwSQ1kPYoZ1BHXGyok_x3pfuZCMJvIb52XKsd8pCQejfeXAV|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSSReferences[edit | edit source]
References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.
- ↑ Macdermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, Goldsmith CH. Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2009 May;39(5):400-17.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability index: A study of reliability and validity. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 1991, 14:409-15
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Riddle DL, Stratford PW. Use of generic versus region specific functional status measures on patients with cervical spine disorders. Physical Therapy, 1998;78:951-963
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Stratford PW, Riddle DL, Binkley JM et al (1999) Using the neck disability index to make decisions concerning individual patients Physiotherapy Canada, 2,107-112.
- ↑ Mark Chan Ci En, Dean A. Clair and Stephen J. Edmondston. Manual Therapy, 2009, 14(4):433-438
- ↑ Jette DU, Jette AM. Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with spinal impairments. Physical Therapy, 1996; 76:930-45
