Lumbo Pelvic Stability: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
(Updated the 'Assessment' section.)
Line 10: Line 10:


== Assessment ==
== Assessment ==
Dynamic tests: Runner pose, hopping tests, single leg squat, dip test <ref name=":0" />
Lumbopelvic stability can be assessed with either with equipment or clinical measures such as palpation, active straight leg raise, lumbar lordosis, pelvic inclination and dynamic tests. Dynamic tests include runner pose, hopping tests, single leg squat, dip test. <ref name=":0" />


== Physical Therapy ==
== Physical Therapy ==

Revision as of 21:01, 20 January 2024

Original Editor - Kris Porter Top Contributors - Kris Porter, Kim Jackson, Sehriban Ozmen, Vidya Acharya and Rishika Babburu


This article is currently under review and may not be up to date. Please come back soon to see the finished work! (20/01/2024)

Definition[edit | edit source]

Assessment[edit | edit source]

Lumbopelvic stability can be assessed with either with equipment or clinical measures such as palpation, active straight leg raise, lumbar lordosis, pelvic inclination and dynamic tests. Dynamic tests include runner pose, hopping tests, single leg squat, dip test. [1]

Physical Therapy[edit | edit source]

Training Principles for Phase 1[edit | edit source]

  1. Injury Prevention and Body Mechanics
  2. Total Health (Nutrition, Cardiopulmonary exercise)
  3. Movement Retraining Basics
  4. Core Setting
  5. Evidence for Stability Training for Low Back Pain (and pelvic pain) [1][2]


Criteria for Progression to Phase 2

Below outlines the criteria that each patient must accomplish before allowed to complete the phase 2 exercises. At times, some phase 2 exercises may be given when a patient has not met this criteria. But rarely, will a patient be given the entire cuff program and the big 4 without meeting this criteria. This is based on anecdotal evidence of how best to prevent injury.

  1. Able to engage the primary core muscles without compensatory firing or pain in non-weight bearing (supine or prone)
  2. Able to engage the primary core muscles without compensatory firing or pain in static weight bearing positions (standing)
  3. Core Endurance and Ratio Testing has been completed[3] [4][5]
  4. The Big 4 exercises (or modifications of each one) are tolerated for at least a single hold of 8 seconds[6]

Training Principles for phase 2[edit | edit source]

  1. Movement Retraining Intermediate
  2. Big 4 Exercises

Training principles for Phase 3[edit | edit source]

  1. Static Balance - Stable Surface
  2. Static Balance - Unstable Surface
  3. Dynamic Balance - Stable Surface
  4. Dynamic Balance - Unstable Surface

Training Principles for Phase 4[edit | edit source]

  1. Movement Retraining Advanced
  2. Big 4 Exercises - Advanced

Training Principles for Phase 5[edit | edit source]

  1. Advanced Strength Training and Postural Stability

CRITERIA FOR DISCHARGE FROM PHYSICAL THERAPY

Resources[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 Perrott MA, Pizzari T, Opar MS, Cook J. Athletes with a clinical rating of good and poor lumbopelvic stability have different kinematic variables during single leg squat and dip test. Physiotherapy theory and practice. 2021 Aug 3;37(8):906-15.
  2. Macedo LG, Maher CG, Latimer J, McAuley JH. Motor control exercise for persistent, nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review. Physical Therapy. 2009;89(1):9-25. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19056854.
  3. McGill SM, Childs A, Liebenson C. Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises: clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(8):941-944.
  4. McGill S. Ultimate back fitness and performance. Waterloo Ont.: Wabuno Publishers; 2004.
  5. McGill S. Low back disorders: evidence-based prevention and rehabilitation. Second. Human Kinetics; 2007.
  6. Mcgill S, Karpowicz A. Exercises for Spine Stabilization: Motion/Motor Patterns, Stability Progressions, and Clinical Technique. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2009;90(1):118-126. Available at: http://www.archives-pmr.org/article/S0003-9993%2808%2901505-0/abstract