Lumbar Differential Diagnosis

Original Editor - Nick Rainey based on the course by Nick Rainey
Top Contributors - Jess Bell, Carin Hunter, Jorge Rodríguez Palomino and Ewa Jaraczewska

Diagnosis versus Classification

Diagnosis is typically looked at as a pathoanatomical model, whereas the goal of classification systems is to guide treatment. This ensures not all back pain is treated the same. If a patient does not have a clear diagnosis, they are referred to as having non-specific low back pain.

Two patients with the diagnosis of an L5/S1 disk herniation on MRI, but one improves with repeated extensions and is classified with having an extension directional preference, while the other does not.

Imaging

Please see more information in XXX but to summarise:

• Imaging is needed if red flags are present or if no improvement with conservative care within 6 weeks. If you’re unsure about a red flag you can often treat a little to see if they improve.
• Imaging is recommended if it will change the course of treatment
• A lot of imaging findings correlate with low back pain. This doesn’t mean we can’t help them, but most imaging findings that people have do have a correlation with low back pain. That doesn’t mean everyone with imaging findings has pain, but often the more findings there are the higher chance the person has pain. We can still help them though!

Differential diagnosis

Piriformis syndrome, discogenic, spinal stenosis refers to central canal stenosis, there’s also foraminal and lateral recess stenosis, SIJ pain (not dysfunction), Maigne syndrome, true instability, osteoarthritis, piriformis syndrome, sciatica, CES

Differential diagnosis - unclear presentations is where we can be really valuable

• We aren’t exact with neuro testing, but we’re close
• When looking at extremities higher likelihood it’s spine if the extremity has full ROM

Rastogi, Ravi, et al. "Exploring indicators of extremity pain of spinal source as identified by Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT): a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study." Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (2022): 1-8.

Rosedale, Richard, et al. "A study exploring the prevalence of Extremity Pain of Spinal Source (EXPOSS)." Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 28.4 (2020): 222-230.

Brief overview of how we treat using a signs and symptoms approach with asterisk signs.

We have reviewed examination and assessment of the lumbar spine. Now we will move to specific diagnoses and treatments.

Think about the following questions while listening.  

Is there a difference between flexion position to relieve pain and end range flexion?

For the spine, how do you balance the philosophies of extension to relieve symptoms and grading back into aggravating movements/positions to decrease pain and have full return of function? In here they related acute pathology like a “brain freeze”. How is back pain that doesn’t have either identifiable pathology on MRI or pathology that is likely causative on MRI?

Starting at 1 hr and 16 mins the discussion turns to non-specific low back pain.

What is the difference between reasoning and certainty?

How do you balance use of a pathoanatomical approach and signs and symptoms approach* with 1) Grade 2 ankle sprain 2) Partial thickness rotator cuff tear 3) R sided low back pain with imaging findings of R L4/L5 disc bulge and facet arthropathy

*Pathoanatomical approach means that you are treating to improve anatomy while a signs and symptoms approach means you test signs and ask for symptoms, treat, and then retest to assess for progress.

In this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVy_FGngB-M) you can see a live patient examination differentiating between hip and lumbar pain.

Rastogi, Ravi, et al. "Exploring indicators of extremity pain of spinal source as identified by Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT): a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study." Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (2022): 1-8.

Notice that spine was greater than half of the time for hip, thigh/leg, and arm/forearm.

It’s also interesting to note that Table 1 reported that in the extremity group 10% had current spinal pain while 19% in the spinal group had current spinal pain. Thus, current spinal pain raises the pre-test probability of the extremity being from a spinal source from 10% to 19% overall. It’s unknown what the pre-test probability for current spinal pain for each of the body regions.

Rosedale, Richard, et al. "A study exploring the prevalence of Extremity Pain of Spinal Source (EXPOSS)." Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 28.4 (2020): 222-230.

Article link (no need to explore the whole article for this module unless you choose to do so)

This article looks at likelihood to improve with MDT/repeated motion spine treatment. These are the odds ratios of indicators.

Data is taken from 319 participants who had extremity pain that neither they or a referring physician thought was from the spine.

To be classified as the spine or extremity group they had to have improvement in their asterisk sign by repeated motions. The article does mention future visits, but I don’t know how many visits the participants came to. My guess is that they didn’t participate in many, but were able to figure out their response in 2-3 visits.

Additional Reading

Physiopedia Pages:

• Low Back Pain
• Low Back Pain Guidelines
• Differentiating Inflammatory and Mechanical Back Pain
• Non Specific Low Back Pain
• Specific Low Back Pain

Podcast Links:

1. The Back Pain Podcast: Piriformis syndrome
2. The Back Pain Podcast: Is my pain from my sacroiliac joint?
3. Modern Pain Podcast: Lumbar Stenosis
4. The Back Pain Podcast Episode 82: Flexion, Extension, Radicular Pain & Disc Pathology with Adam Meakins and Dr. Mark Laslett