Considerations in Cervical Spine and Upper Limb Manual Muscle Testing: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "{{subst:Under Construction}} {{subst:New Page}}")
 
(Creating the Page)
Line 8: Line 8:
</div>  
</div>  
== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==
Muscle strength stands as a cornerstone of the human body's ability to facilitate both stability and mobility within the musculoskeletal system. As an essential component of the objective examination, the assessment of muscle strength not only sheds light on an individual's physical strength but also offers valuable insights into potential neurological deficits.


== Sub Heading 2 ==
When assessing muscle strength, one should consider various factors that can influence the results, including occupation, hand dominance, age, gender, fatigue, medication, and the time of day. These elements can impact muscle strength testing and should be carefully accounted for during the evaluation process.


== Sub Heading 3 ==
=== Occupation ===
Research has demonstrated substantial variations in static muscular strength across diverse occupations.<ref>Chandra AM, Ghosh S, Iqbal R, Sadhu N. [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10803548.2007.11076727 A Comparative Assessment of the Impact of Different Occupations on Workers’ Static Musculoskeletal Fitness.] International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2007 Jan;13(3):271–8.</ref>  Additionally, findings from a study by Singh et al. (2018) suggest that female handicraft workers may experience occupational stress, resulting in decreased grip strength compared to their counterparts in office-based roles.<ref>Singh AK, Meena ML, Chaudhary H, Dangayach GS. [https://research.vit.ac.in/publication/a-comparative-assessment-of-static-muscular-strength-among-female/pdf/postprint-a-comparative-assessment-of-static-muscular-strength-among-female.pdf A comparative assessment of static muscular strength among female operative’s working in different handicraft occupations in India.] Health Care for Women International. 2018 Dec 20;40(4):459–78</ref>
 
=== Hand Dominance ===


== Resources  ==
== Resources  ==

Revision as of 13:33, 25 February 2024

This article or area is currently under construction and may only be partially complete. Please come back soon to see the finished work! (25/02/2024)

Original Editor - User Name

Top Contributors - Lenie Jacobs and Jess Bell  

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Muscle strength stands as a cornerstone of the human body's ability to facilitate both stability and mobility within the musculoskeletal system. As an essential component of the objective examination, the assessment of muscle strength not only sheds light on an individual's physical strength but also offers valuable insights into potential neurological deficits.

When assessing muscle strength, one should consider various factors that can influence the results, including occupation, hand dominance, age, gender, fatigue, medication, and the time of day. These elements can impact muscle strength testing and should be carefully accounted for during the evaluation process.

Occupation[edit | edit source]

Research has demonstrated substantial variations in static muscular strength across diverse occupations.[1] Additionally, findings from a study by Singh et al. (2018) suggest that female handicraft workers may experience occupational stress, resulting in decreased grip strength compared to their counterparts in office-based roles.[2]

Hand Dominance[edit | edit source]

Resources[edit | edit source]

  • bulleted list
  • x

or

  1. numbered list
  2. x

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Chandra AM, Ghosh S, Iqbal R, Sadhu N. A Comparative Assessment of the Impact of Different Occupations on Workers’ Static Musculoskeletal Fitness. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2007 Jan;13(3):271–8.
  2. Singh AK, Meena ML, Chaudhary H, Dangayach GS. A comparative assessment of static muscular strength among female operative’s working in different handicraft occupations in India. Health Care for Women International. 2018 Dec 20;40(4):459–78