McGill Pain Questionnaire: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
=== Reliability === | === Reliability === | ||
<u>Test-retest Reliability:</u> | |||
<u></u>(Ferraz et al., 1990; n = 91 (66 literate & 25 illiterate) <ref>Ferraz, M. B., Quaresma, M. R., et al. "Reliability of pain scales in the assessment of literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis." J Rheumatol 1990 17(8): 1022-1024</ref><br>Excellent test-retest reliability (literate) r = 0.96<br>Excellent test-retest reliability (illiterate) r = 0.95 | |||
=== Validity === | === Validity === |
Revision as of 16:53, 28 August 2014
Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
Top Contributors - Sinead Greenan, Tolulope Adeniji, Evan Thomas, WikiSysop, Kim Jackson and Lucinda hampton
Objective
[edit | edit source]
The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) is a self-reporting measure of pain used for patients with a number of diagnoses. It assesses both quality and intensity of subjective pain.
Intended Population
[edit | edit source]
Validated for patients with Cancer, Chronic Pelvic Pain, Fibromyalgia, Headaches, Herniated intervertebral discs, Ischemic muscular pain, Low back pain, Lumbago-sciatica, Orthodontics / Dental pain, Postoperative complications, Rheumatic pain, Trigeminal neuralgia and atypical facial pain, Vulvar pain
Method of Use[edit | edit source]
The MPQ is composed of 78 words, of which respondents choose those that best describe their experience of pain. Seven words are selected from the following categories: dimension 1 to 10 (pain descriptors), three words; dimensions 11 to 15 (affective components of pain), dimension 16 (evaluation of pain) one word, and dimension 17 to 20 (miscellaneous) one word. Scores are tabulated by summing values associated with each word; scores range from 0 (no pain) to 78 (severe pain). Qualitative differences in pain may be reflected in respondent’s word choice [1]
MPQ Dimensions
Sensory | |
1 | Flickering/beating |
2 | Jumping/shooting |
3 | Pricking/lancinating |
4 | Sharp/lacerating |
5 | Pinching/crushing |
6 | Tugging/wrenching |
7 | Hot/searing |
8 | Tingling/stinging |
9 | Dull/heavy |
10 | Tender/splitting |
Affective: | |
11 | Tiring/exhausting |
12 | Sickening/suffocating |
13 | Fearful/terrifying |
14 | Punishing/killing |
15 | Wretched/blinding |
Evaluative: | |
16 | Annoying/unbearable |
Miscellaneous: | |
17 | Spreading/piercing |
18 | Tight/tearing |
19 | Cold/freezing |
20 | Nagging/torturing |
Reference
[edit | edit source]
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Reliability[edit | edit source]
Test-retest Reliability:
(Ferraz et al., 1990; n = 91 (66 literate & 25 illiterate) [2]
Excellent test-retest reliability (literate) r = 0.96
Excellent test-retest reliability (illiterate) r = 0.95
Validity[edit | edit source]
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Miscellaneous
[edit | edit source]
Links[edit | edit source]
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Extension:RSS -- Error: Not a valid URL: Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10
References[edit | edit source]
References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.