Diagnostic Approaches to Low Back Pain - Comparing Maitland, McKenzie and Movement Impairment Syndromes: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 57: Line 57:
== References  ==
== References  ==


References will automatically be added here, see [[Adding References|adding references tutorial]].  
References will automatically be added here, see [[Adding References|adding references tutorial]].<br>
 
<ref name="(Gross et al, 2010)">Gross A, Miller J, D’Sylva J, Burnie SJ, Goldsmith CH, Graham N, Haines T, Brønfort G, Hoving JL, 2010, Manipulation
or Mobilisation for Neck Pain, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1</ref> <br>

Revision as of 19:01, 3 January 2014

Welcome to Nottingham University's Spinal Rehabilitation Project. Students are currently creating this page. Please check back in January 2014 to see the finished result.

Sub Heading 1[edit | edit source]

Sub Heading 2[edit | edit source]

Introduction[edit | edit source]


Physiotherapists use a range of techniques to assess and diagnose low back pain. The most commonly used in the UK are those of Geoffrey Maitland (mobilisations), Robin McKenzie (derangement, dysfunction) and Shirley Sahrmann (movement impairment). (For extensive details on each approach, please see the links above for the relevant Physio-pedia pages. A short summary will be provided for each below).


Determining which approach is best to use, in what circumstances, and with which patients, can be confusing, especially for students and newly qualified clinicians. Furthermore, clinicians rarely use just one approach, and can often use these in combination with other modalities such as acupuncture or massage.


This page aims to give clarity to each of the systems, to suggest their benefits and contraindications (? pros and cons - what's the long-hand of this?), and compare them using a generic case study, so that the reader can begin to make up their own mind, based on the evidence and the experiences of practising professionals.



Suggested sections (please comment on):

  • Basic concepts, techniques and any controversy 
  • Relevance, the usual patient that this suits?
  • Anatomy - diagrams, pics etc to illustrate the concept?
  • Pros
  • Cons
  • Any discussions you've found online / elsewhere that have a good debate going!


  • Further resources:
  • Further reading:
  • References


Suggested things to include (please add to): 

  1. Case Study to suit all approaches
  2. interviews with proponents of each style- to gain pros and cons and interesting viewing

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

Extension:RSS -- Error: Not a valid URL: Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.