Male Urinary Symptom Impact Questionnaire (MUSIQ): Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed]) == | == Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed]) == | ||
<div class="researchbox"> | <div class="researchbox"> | ||
<rss>http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1po | <rss>http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1po</rss> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== References == | == References == |
Revision as of 08:29, 7 June 2017
Original Editor - Kirsten Ryan
Top Contributors - Kirsten Ryan, Admin, WikiSysop, Kim Jackson and George Prudden
Objective
[edit | edit source]
The Male Urinary Symptom Impact Questionnaire (MUSIQ) was designed to measure the effect of interventions for urinary incontinence on health-related quality of life in men.[1]
Intended Population
[edit | edit source]
Community dwelling, racially diverse men with continence problems.[1]
Method of Use[edit | edit source]
The MUSIQ contains 32 items that are each coded on a 4-point scale of impact on quality of life: 0 = not at all, 1 = slightly, 2 = moderately, and 3 = greatly. Total scores range from 0 (no impact) to 96 (maximum impact).[1]
It takes about 20 minutes to complete by either self-administration or interview.[1]
Reference
[edit | edit source]
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Reliability[edit | edit source]
Internal consistency with Cronbach's coefficient was 0.95[1]
Validity[edit | edit source]
Content validity was supported with percentage agreement scores of 100% for clarity and 89% for item fit.[1]
The Pearson's correlation coefficient between the Male Urinary Distress Inventory and the MUSIQ was 0.59 (P < .001).[1]
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Miscellaneous
[edit | edit source]
The MUSIQ addresses the dimensions of mental/psychological health, social health, and global perceptions of function and well-being, focusing on emotional health, social contact, activity, stability of support, and sleep.
Test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change need to be further evaluated. Concurrent validity scores should also be correlated with another generic health-related quality of life instruement. Construct validity should also be reexamined with a larger more symptomatically diverse sample. There was a possibility of floor effect and therefore should be further studied.[1]
Links[edit | edit source]
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1po: Error parsing XML for RSS
References[edit | edit source]
References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.