Back and Upper Leg Regional Pain and Gait Deviations: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
(added three updated references)
 
(24 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==
Gait deviations are likely related to the development of and / or associated with musculoskeletal pain syndromes. It is often the complaint of pain that will lead a patient to physiotherapy. It is the role of the physiotherapist to educate the patient on the aetiology of their pain while treating and correcting the noted gait deviation.<ref name=":0">Howell, D, Back and Upper Leg Regional Pain and Gait Deviations. Gait Analysis. Physioplus. 2022</ref><blockquote>"The '''kinesiopathologic model''' was designed specifically to describe the mechanically related processes proposed to contribute to the development and course of low back pain (LBP). The basic premise is that LBP results from the repeated use of direction-specific (flexion, extension, rotation, lateral bending, or a combination of these) stereotypic movement and alignment patterns in the lumbar spine. The model proposes that the patterns begin as the result of adaptations of the musculoskeletal and neural systems due to repeated use of specific movements and alignments during daily activities. The nature and rate of the adaptations can be modified by intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics of the individual, for example, sex, anthropometrics, or typical activities of the person. The typical pattern is one in which, during performance of a movement (eg, forward bending) or assumption of a posture (eg, sitting), the lumbar spine moves into its available range in a specific direction more readily than other joints, such as the knees, hips, or thoracic spine."<ref>Cholewicki J, Breen A, Popovich Jr JM, Reeves NP, Sahrmann SA, Van Dillen LR, Vleeming A, Hodges PW. [https://www.jospt.org/doi/pdf/10.2519/jospt.2019.8825 Can biomechanics research lead to more effective treatment of low back pain? A point-counterpoint debate]. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2019 Jun;49(6):425-36.</ref> </blockquote>
Gait deviations are likely related to the development of and / or associated with musculoskeletal pain syndromes. It is often the complaint of pain that will lead a patient to physiotherapy. It is the role of the physiotherapist to educate the patient on the aetiology of their pain while treating and correcting the noted gait deviation.<ref name=":0">Howell, D, Back and Upper Leg Regional Pain and Gait Deviations. Gait Analysis. Plus. 2022</ref><blockquote>"The '''kinesiopathologic model''' was designed specifically to describe the mechanically related processes proposed to contribute to the development and course of low back pain (LBP). The basic premise is that LBP results from the repeated use of direction-specific (flexion, extension, rotation, lateral bending, or a combination of these) stereotypic movement and alignment patterns in the lumbar spine. The model proposes that the patterns begin as the result of adaptations of the musculoskeletal and neural systems due to repeated use of specific movements and alignments during daily activities. The nature and rate of the adaptations can be modified by intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics of the individual, for example, sex, anthropometrics, or typical activities of the person. The typical pattern is one in which, during performance of a movement (eg, forward bending) or assumption of a posture (eg, sitting), the lumbar spine moves into its available range in a specific direction more readily than other joints, such as the knees, hips, or thoracic spine."<ref>Cholewicki J, Breen A, Popovich Jr JM, Reeves NP, Sahrmann SA, Van Dillen LR, Vleeming A, Hodges PW. [https://www.jospt.org/doi/pdf/10.2519/jospt.2019.8825 Can biomechanics research lead to more effective treatment of low back pain? A point-counterpoint debate]. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2019 Jun;49(6):425-36.</ref> </blockquote>
[[File:Posterior muscles of back and hips, piriformis.jpeg|thumb|Note the interconnected nature of the posterior back, hip, and upper leg musculature.]]
[[File:Posterior muscles of back and hips, piriformis.jpeg|thumb|Note the interconnected nature of the back, posterior hip and upper leg musculature.]]
With the patient's pain as a guide, a goal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy is to identify the anatomical structures associated with the reported pain. Physiotherapists utilise orthopeadic tests to assist in symptom source identification.  However, these clinical tests are often inconsistent in their ability to accurately identify the anatomical source of the patient's symptoms. Additionally, there is a poor correlation between imaging results and symptom source identification in the absence of trauma or pathology. These two statements suggest that musculoskeletal pain may often be anatomically and structurally indeterminable. The kinesiopathological approach is an alternative to these more traditional methods of diagnosis. This methods calls for clinical practice to be guided by the identification and modification of kinematic or motor control impairments within a musculoskeletal function. By correcting deviant movement patterns to a more idealised movement pattern unique to a particular individual, subjective pain can be improved and function can be reestablished.<ref>Lehman GJ. [https://www.jospt.org/doi/pdf/10.2519/jospt.2018.0608 The role and value of symptom-modification approaches in musculoskeletal practice]. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2018 Jun;48(6):430-5.</ref>
With the patient's pain as a guide, a goal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy is to identify the anatomical structures associated with the reported pain. Physiotherapists utilise orthopaedic tests to assist in symptom source identification.  However, these clinical tests are often inconsistent in their ability to accurately identify the anatomical source of the patient's symptoms. Additionally, there is a poor correlation between imaging results and symptom source identification in the absence of trauma or pathology. These two statements suggest that musculoskeletal pain may often be anatomically and structurally indeterminable. The kinesiopathological approach is an alternative to these more traditional methods of diagnosis. This method calls for clinical practice to be guided by the identification and modification of kinematic or motor control impairments within a musculoskeletal function.<ref>Tabatabaei Molazi F, Mahdian SR, Rajabi R, Karimizadeh Ardakani M. [http://ijmpp.modares.ac.ir/files/ijmpp/user_files_749497/fatemehtabatabaei-A-10-70089-1-ed9ced7.pdf Reliability of Corrective Exercise Specialist Raters Assessing Movement System Impairment Approach Items in Transient Low Back Pain Developers During Prolonged Standing]. International Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain Prevention. 2022 Jul 10;7(3):750-8.</ref> By correcting deviant movement patterns to a more idealised movement pattern unique to a particular individual, subjective pain can be improved and function can be reestablished.<ref>Lehman GJ. [https://www.jospt.org/doi/pdf/10.2519/jospt.2018.0608 The role and value of symptom-modification approaches in musculoskeletal practice]. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2018 Jun;48(6):430-5.</ref>


== Back Regional Pain ==
== Back Regional Pain ==
Line 14: Line 14:
# Shortened step length<ref name=":1" />
# Shortened step length<ref name=":1" />
# Slow gait cadence
# Slow gait cadence
# Stiff counter rotation between the thoracic spine and the lumbar spine<ref name=":1" />
# Stiff counter-rotation between the thoracic spine and the lumbar spine<ref name=":1" />
# Changes in expected vertical oscillation of centre of mass (COM)
# Changes in expected vertical oscillation of centre of mass (COM)
# Loud foot strike
# Loud foot strike
# Can demonstrate either an increased or decreased pelvic tilt
# Can demonstrate either an increased or decreased [[Pelvic Tilt|pelvic tilt]]
# Can demonstrate either increased or decreased hip extension during terminal stance
# Can demonstrate either increased or decreased hip extension during terminal stance
# Decrease in big toe dorsiflexion, resulting in a functional hallux limitus
# Decrease in big toe dorsiflexion, resulting in a functional [[Hallux Rigidus|hallux limitus]]
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


Line 31: Line 31:
|'''Hip Region'''
|'''Hip Region'''
|
|
* Osteoarthritis<ref name=":2">Harris-Hayes M, Steger-May K, Bove AM, Foster SN, Mueller MJ, Clohisy JC, Fitzgerald GK. [https://bmjopensem.bmj.com/content/bmjosem/6/1/e000707.full.pdf Movement pattern training compared with standard strengthening and flexibility among patients with hip-related groin pain: results of a pilot multicentre randomised clinical trial]. BMJ open sport & exercise medicine. 2020 Mar 1;6(1):e000707.</ref><ref>Harris-Hayes M, Czuppon S, Van Dillen LR, Steger-May K, Sahrmann S, Schootman M, Salsich GB, Clohisy JC, Mueller MJ. [https://www.jospt.org/doi/full/10.2519/jospt.2016.6279 Movement-pattern training to improve function in people with chronic hip joint pain: a feasibility randomized clinical tria]l. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2016 Jun;46(6):452-61.</ref>
* [[Osteoarthritis]]<ref name=":2">Harris-Hayes M, Steger-May K, Bove AM, Foster SN, Mueller MJ, Clohisy JC, Fitzgerald GK. [https://bmjopensem.bmj.com/content/bmjosem/6/1/e000707.full.pdf Movement pattern training compared with standard strengthening and flexibility among patients with hip-related groin pain: results of a pilot multicentre randomised clinical trial]. BMJ open sport & exercise medicine. 2020 Mar 1;6(1):e000707.</ref><ref>Harris-Hayes M, Czuppon S, Van Dillen LR, Steger-May K, Sahrmann S, Schootman M, Salsich GB, Clohisy JC, Mueller MJ. [https://www.jospt.org/doi/full/10.2519/jospt.2016.6279 Movement-pattern training to improve function in people with chronic hip joint pain: a feasibility randomized clinical tria]l. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2016 Jun;46(6):452-61.</ref>
* Can continue status post total joint replacement
* Can continue status post-[[Total Hip Replacement|total joint arthroplasty]]
|
|
* Decreased cadence
* Decreased cadence
Line 49: Line 49:
|'''Lateral Hip'''
|'''Lateral Hip'''
|
|
* Gluteal tendinopathy
* [[Gluteal Tendinopathy|Gluteal tendinopathy]]
* Piriformis syndrome
* [[Piriformis Syndrome|Piriformis syndrome]]
* Complaint of "buttock pain"
* Complaint of "buttock pain"
|
|
Line 67: Line 67:
|'''Anterior Hip'''
|'''Anterior Hip'''
|
|
* Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome<ref name=":2" /><ref>Ranawat AS, Gaudiani MA, Slullitel PA, Satalich J, Rebolledo BJ. [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:eFiXQn7dw4MJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,44&scillfp=16151773003627380027&oi=lle Foot progression angle walking test: a dynamic diagnostic assessment for femoroacetabular impingement and hip instability]. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017 Jan 10;5(1):2325967116679641.</ref>
* [[Femoroacetabular Impingement|Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome]]<ref name=":2" /><ref>Ranawat AS, Gaudiani MA, Slullitel PA, Satalich J, Rebolledo BJ. [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:eFiXQn7dw4MJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,44&scillfp=16151773003627380027&oi=lle Foot progression angle walking test: a dynamic diagnostic assessment for femoroacetabular impingement and hip instability]. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017 Jan 10;5(1):2325967116679641.</ref>
* Acetabular labral tear<ref name=":2" />
* Acetabular labral tear<ref name=":2" />
* Status post repair of the acetabular labrum
* Status post repair of the acetabular labrum
Line 75: Line 75:
|}
|}


== Knee Region Pain ==
== Knee Regional Pain ==
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+
|+
Line 85: Line 85:
|
|
* Osteoarthritis
* Osteoarthritis
* Can continue status post total joint replacement
* Can continue status post-total joint arthroplasty
|
|
* Increased lateral trunk lean
* Increased lateral trunk lean
Line 94: Line 94:
|-
|-
|'''Anterior Knee'''
|'''Anterior Knee'''
|Patellofemoral arthralgia
|[[Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome|Patellofemoral arthralgia]]
|
|
* Too long a step
* Too long a step
Line 107: Line 107:
|-
|-
|'''Lateral Knee'''
|'''Lateral Knee'''
|Iliotibial (IT) band syndrome
|[[Iliotibial Band Syndrome|Iliotibial (IT) band syndrome]]
|
|
* Too long a step
* Too long a step
Line 114: Line 114:
* Increased knee extension at foot strike or heel rocker
* Increased knee extension at foot strike or heel rocker
* Loud foot strike
* Loud foot strike
* Insufficient daylight or insufficient separation between the knees
* Insufficient daylight or insufficient separation between the knees
* Foot crossing the midline
* Foot crossing the midline
* Oblique popliteal skin crease (excessive medial femoral rotation)
* Oblique popliteal skin crease (excessive medial femoral rotation)
Line 124: Line 124:
== Back and Upper Leg Region Special Topics ==
== Back and Upper Leg Region Special Topics ==


# '''Lumbar stenosis gait deviation:''' The illustration is directly from an article by Igawa, I G A W A. And the title of the article, I think, was lumbar stenosis gait compensation. I think that's the same thing as lumbar stenosis gait deviations. So individuals with lumbar stenosis, a common back pain diagnosis in elderly population, are going to have one of two gait deviations or gait compensations. In figure a, this individual is not with an upright posture. He has a relatively long step length. The blue arrow is ground reaction force, the summation of all the forces being transmitted from the ground into the body and in figure a, it goes into the lumbar spine. So there's no lumbar joint moment into extension. We all know that patients with lumbar stenosis don't like to extend their spine. That's the reason they tend to walk, bend over, they tend to lean on their grocery cart, lean forward on their walkers to decrease and avoid pain. He identified a second compensation in figure b. Again, the blue arrow, the ground reaction force, is into the spine so there's no joint moment into lumbar extension, but the difference between a and b is there's a very short step, and again, probably slow velocity. Whereas in c there's a big step and that ground reaction force is posterior to the lumbar spine, that patient in c, if he has lumbar stenosis is probably in pain. When you look, when you think about what's going on with what we cannot see, which is the joint forces, I think a potential another intervention would be to take this subject in b, he's walking erect, he's got good posture with a short step, ask him to take more steps, he or she to take more steps per minute. Increase his cadence, increase his energy expenditure, decrease his body weight, his body mass index as an alternative gait training that could work for patient with back pain.
=== Lumbar Stenosis Gait Deviation ===
# '''Dropped head posture:''' Igawa has done a more recent study published in 2021, where he describes the gait deviation of a dropped head posture. In figure A, this is the individual that's walking down the road with his head pointing, the top of his head pointing down the road, as opposed to pointing to the ceiling. We'll see this in older people with very bad posture. You'll also see it nowadays with people that are looking at their text on their smartphone all the time, developing into this posture. So in figure A, the top of the head's pointing down the road and it's a relatively shorter stride and there's a backward leaning of the torso. And if you look down at the bottom of the illustration, the red arrows are indicating ankle joint moments. So there's greater dorsiflexion in figure A and less ankle plantarflexion external joint moment. We're going to come back to plantarflexion in the elderly and in people with pain in the back and hip. So figure B is a normal posture, it's erect and you have more movement coming from the ankle to propel forward and up. Interesting, dropped head posture gait deviation.
[[Lumbar Spinal Stenosis|Lumbar stenosis]] is a common back pain diagnosis in the elderly population. A patient with lumbar stenosis does not stand or ambulate with upright posture, and tends to avoid lumbar extension to decrease and / or avoid pain.<ref>Nüesch C, Mandelli F, Przybilla P, Schären S, Mündermann A, Netzer C. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636222006191 Kinematics and paraspinal muscle activation patterns during walking differ between patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and controls]. Gait & Posture. 2023 Jan 1;99:44-50.</ref> They may present with a tendency to walk bent over, and lean on their grocery cart or walker. They will likely demonstrate one of two gait deviations to alleviate symptoms associated with lumbar spinal stenosis:<ref name=":3">Igawa T, Katsuhira J, Hosaka A, Uchikoshi K, Ishihara S, Matsudaira K. [https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197228 Kinetic and kinematic variables affecting trunk flexion during level walking in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis]. PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0197228.</ref>
# '''Geriatric gait:''' I want to talk for a moment about what would be classified as geriatric gait. They may be in pain or just, just maybe a geriatric gait. The spatiotemporal changes that occur in old folks is they walk slow, less than 1.4 metre per second or one metre per second. They take shorter steps or strides. They have a slower cadence. We've all seen this. In the kinematics, they have a late or a prolonged heel contact. They're going to have a decreased up and down motion, a decreased vertical oscillation of centre of mass, could have decreased hip extension, may have increased forward lean that we saw with lumbar stenosis gait compensation, and they may have decreased arm swing. Often the older people will just walk with their hands held behind their back and not even swing their arms. This is some interesting work by DaVita and colleagues, originally published in 2002. It's talking about the age lower extremity kinematic forces, comparing it between old folks and young folks. So the amount of propulsive force when walking and running varies across the joints in the lower extremity. How much is being propelled forward or up. Old folks, geriatrics, elderly people use hip joint moments more than ankle, whereas young people use the ankle to propel forward, ankle plantarflexion. They use that more than the hip. So if you look at the table, the propulsive force in the elderly is maybe 75%, whereas in the young it's one-third, roughly speaking, whereas down at the ankle, old folks only use the ankle to propel forward by 12%, a very small amount. So I think this is an interesting thing that we can take advantage of when we get into gait training and intervention with our old folks that are increased risk for falling or having pain, we can get them to use their ankle more. So this graph is the AP force, the fore-aft force that occurs during stance phase. So the horizontal axis is just stance phase, the vertical axis is the force that's the brake or the propel forward, the fore and aft that occurs. And there's in the first half of the first period of stance, there's a negative braking force stopping you from going forward and in the second half from midfoot to forefoot rocker or terminal stance, that's when you propel forward, also propelling up. So DeVita and colleagues did some, they were able to amplify and augment this and provide feedback to a group of normal subjects, trying to get them to increase that propulsive force with an instrumented treadmill and the camera right in front of the treadmill. And they said, we want you to increase that, increase it. And both the old people and the young people were able to increase the total lower extremity propulsive force given that feedback. That was real-time feedback. But what they discovered was both the old people and the young people, to generate that increased force to get it above the threshold, both the young and the old used their hip. They didn't use the ankle. So they did a follow-up study where they gave the feedback and just look at ankle joint plantarflexion external moment and they were able to, with augmented feedback, increase the propulsive force coming from the ankle joint. We don't have in our clinic, these augmented feedbacks, instrumented treadmills, and sophisticated equipment, but what I take from this is when we give a verbal cue, not that I want you to push more, I want you to propel up, leave an imprint from your foot, move from your ankle. Again, we're going to talk about internal cueing and external cueing. Basically the soundbite that I use is I want you to walk with spring in your step. That's going to get you to use the ankle if the gait deviation is decreased vertical oscillation of centre of mass or prolonged heel contact.
#Figure A: Trunk flexion posture with an increased step length and hip extension angle,<ref name=":3" /> and an absent lumbar joint moment into extension.<ref name=":0" />
# '''Osteoarthritis and Total Joint Replacements:''' Next region of pain I want to talk about is hip pain, osteoarthritic pain and the gait deviations that can continue status post total hip joint replacement. Oftentimes patient with hip osteoarthritis develops gait deviations and has a habit and even when they have a normal joint, they may continue to walk with that habit, that deviated habit. The next pain syndrome I want to touch on is knee pain associated with osteoarthritis and/or again status post total knee joint replacement, that gait deviations may continue.
#Figure B: Trunk upright posture with a decreased step length and hip extension angle,<ref name=":3" /> and an absent lumbar joint moment into extension.<ref name=":0" />
#Figure C: Ideal walking posture of healthy people<ref name=":3" />[[File:Lumbar stenosis gait deviation.png|alt=|thumb|500x500px|Blue arrows indicate the ground reaction force vector, red arrow is the hip flexion moment, and green arc is the psoas major. |center]]
 
=== Dropped Head Syndrome  ===
Dropped head syndrome (DHS) is a relatively rare cervical kyphotic deformity with symptoms that include: neck pain, restrictions to ambulation, and impaired horizontal gaze.<ref>Igawa T, Ishii K, Urata R, Suzuki A, Ui H, Ideura K, Isogai N, Sasao Y, Funao H. [https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/58/4/465/pdf Association between the Horizontal Gaze Ability and Physical Characteristics of Patients with Dropped Head Syndrome]. Medicina. 2022 Mar 23;58(4):465.</ref> Due to the interconnected nature of the spine, the relationship between cervical alignment and other parts of the spinal column can have an effect on the pelvis and lower limbs during dynamic activities. Patients with DHS demonstrate altered kinematics and kinematics of the lower limbs during walking due to changes in the inclination of the head and trunk. This may cause deviant gait features and altered motor control compared to healthy individuals. Similar findings have been reported in individuals using smartphones while walking. The increased cervical flexion angle affects: cervical loading, walking speed, and muscle activity of the lower limbs.<ref name=":4">Igawa T, Ishii K, Suzuki A, Ui H, Urata R, Isogai N, Sasao Y, Nishiyama M, Funao H. [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-97329-w Dynamic alignment changes during level walking in patients with dropped head syndrome: Analyses using a three-dimensional motion analysis system]. Scientific reports. 2021 Sep 14;11(1):1-0.</ref>
 
# Figure A represents an individual with DHS: backward leaning posture of the thorax, increased ankle-joint dorsiflexion angle, and relatively shorter stride length. <ref name=":4" />
# Figure B is ideal walking posture: upright erect posture with decreased ankle dorsiflexion angle allowing for more movement coming from the ankle to propel forward and up. <ref name=":4" />
[[File:Dropped head posture.jpeg|alt=|thumb|Black arrows indicate the backward tilted thorax and pelvis. Blue arrows are the ground reaction force vector. Red arrow is the ankle plantarflexion moment.|center]]
=== Geriatric gait ===
At self-selected walking speeds, elderly adults generate decreased joint torques and power in their lower extremities than young adults. These differences are due to the biomechanical and physiological consequences of aging resulting from changes in the underlying neuromuscular components of motor performance and reduction in motor abilities.<ref name=":5">DeVita P, Hortobagyi T. [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:sEC0gJIDE2EJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,44&scillfp=10103153512704345450&oi=lle Age causes a redistribution of joint torques and powers during gait]. Journal of applied physiology. 2000 May 1;88(5):1804-11.</ref> Pain may also be a factor.<ref name=":0" /><blockquote>'''The spatiotemporal changes that occur in geriatric gait:'''<ref name=":0" />
 
# Decreased walking speed, less than 1-1.4 metres per second
# Shorter step length
# Slower gait cadence
# Late or a prolonged heel contact
# Decreased vertical oscillation of COM
# Could have decreased hip extension  
# Could have increased forward trunk flexion
# Could have decreased arm swing
# Elderly people tend to use hip joint moments more than ankle moments, whereas young people use the ankle to propel forward<ref name=":5" />
</blockquote>
 
=== Osteoarthritis and Total Joint Replacements ===
Oftentimes patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis develop gait deviations which continue due to "habit" after undergoing total joint replacements.<ref name=":0" /> Patients who undergo post-operative rehabilitation report improved joint pain and stiffness but commonly demonstrate incomplete recovery of gait function.<ref>Bączkowicz D, Skiba G, Czerner M, Majorczyk E. Gait and functional status analysis before and after total knee arthroplasty. The Knee. 2018 Oct 1;25(5):888-96.</ref>


== Resources  ==
== Resources  ==
Line 133: Line 157:
*Harris-Hayes M, Czuppon S, Van Dillen LR, Steger-May K, Sahrmann S, Schootman M, Salsich GB, Clohisy JC, Mueller MJ. [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:lmbr9GuHh5YJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,44&scillfp=10556444198263071018&oi=lle Movement-pattern training to improve function in people with chronic hip joint pain: a feasibility randomized clinical trial]. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2016 Jun;46(6):452-61.
*Harris-Hayes M, Czuppon S, Van Dillen LR, Steger-May K, Sahrmann S, Schootman M, Salsich GB, Clohisy JC, Mueller MJ. [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:lmbr9GuHh5YJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,44&scillfp=10556444198263071018&oi=lle Movement-pattern training to improve function in people with chronic hip joint pain: a feasibility randomized clinical trial]. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2016 Jun;46(6):452-61.
*Harris-Hayes M, Steger-May K, Bove AM, Foster SN, Mueller MJ, Clohisy JC, Fitzgerald GK. [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:OgubXlaNkrQJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,44&scillfp=17838916680716325201&oi=lle Movement pattern training compared with standard strengthening and flexibility among patients with hip-related groin pain: results of a pilot multicentre randomised clinical trial]. BMJ open sport & exercise medicine. 2020 Mar 1;6(1):e000707.
*Harris-Hayes M, Steger-May K, Bove AM, Foster SN, Mueller MJ, Clohisy JC, Fitzgerald GK. [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:OgubXlaNkrQJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,44&scillfp=17838916680716325201&oi=lle Movement pattern training compared with standard strengthening and flexibility among patients with hip-related groin pain: results of a pilot multicentre randomised clinical trial]. BMJ open sport & exercise medicine. 2020 Mar 1;6(1):e000707.
*Igawa T, Katsuhira J, Hosaka A, Uchikoshi K, Ishihara S, Matsudaira K. [https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197228 Kinetic and kinematic variables affecting trunk flexion during level walking in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis]. PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0197228.
*Igawa T, Ishii K, Suzuki A, Ui H, Urata R, Isogai N, Sasao Y, Nishiyama M, Funao H. [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-97329-w Dynamic alignment changes during level walking in patients with dropped head syndrome: Analyses using a three-dimensional motion analysis system]. Scientific reports. 2021 Sep 14;11(1):1-0.
*Lamoth CJ, Meijer OG, Daffertshofer A, Wuisman PI, Beek PJ. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3454567/ Effects of chronic low back pain on trunk coordination and back muscle activity during walking: changes in motor control]. European Spine Journal. 2006 Feb;15(1):23-40.
*Lamoth CJ, Meijer OG, Daffertshofer A, Wuisman PI, Beek PJ. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3454567/ Effects of chronic low back pain on trunk coordination and back muscle activity during walking: changes in motor control]. European Spine Journal. 2006 Feb;15(1):23-40.


Line 138: Line 164:
'''Clinical Outcome Measures:'''
'''Clinical Outcome Measures:'''


* [[Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score|Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score]] (HOOS) [http://www.koos.nu/HOOSEng.pdf Download PDF here]
* [[Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score]] (HOOS) [http://www.koos.nu/HOOSEng.pdf Download PDF here]
* Please view the following short video for an overview of the [[FABER Test|FABER test]] used in the assessment of pathologies at the hip, lumbar and sacroiliac region.  
* Please view the following short video for an overview of the [[FABER Test|FABER test]] used in the assessment of pathologies at the hip, lumbar and sacroiliac region.  


Line 146: Line 172:


<references />
<references />
[[Category:Plus Content]]
[[Category:Course Pages]]

Latest revision as of 04:54, 30 January 2023

Original Editor - Stacy Schiurring based on the course by Damien Howell

Top Contributors - Stacy Schiurring, Kim Jackson, Jess Bell, Lucinda hampton and Nupur Smit Shah

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Gait deviations are likely related to the development of and / or associated with musculoskeletal pain syndromes. It is often the complaint of pain that will lead a patient to physiotherapy. It is the role of the physiotherapist to educate the patient on the aetiology of their pain while treating and correcting the noted gait deviation.[1]

"The kinesiopathologic model was designed specifically to describe the mechanically related processes proposed to contribute to the development and course of low back pain (LBP). The basic premise is that LBP results from the repeated use of direction-specific (flexion, extension, rotation, lateral bending, or a combination of these) stereotypic movement and alignment patterns in the lumbar spine. The model proposes that the patterns begin as the result of adaptations of the musculoskeletal and neural systems due to repeated use of specific movements and alignments during daily activities. The nature and rate of the adaptations can be modified by intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics of the individual, for example, sex, anthropometrics, or typical activities of the person. The typical pattern is one in which, during performance of a movement (eg, forward bending) or assumption of a posture (eg, sitting), the lumbar spine moves into its available range in a specific direction more readily than other joints, such as the knees, hips, or thoracic spine."[2]

Note the interconnected nature of the back, posterior hip and upper leg musculature.

With the patient's pain as a guide, a goal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy is to identify the anatomical structures associated with the reported pain. Physiotherapists utilise orthopaedic tests to assist in symptom source identification. However, these clinical tests are often inconsistent in their ability to accurately identify the anatomical source of the patient's symptoms. Additionally, there is a poor correlation between imaging results and symptom source identification in the absence of trauma or pathology. These two statements suggest that musculoskeletal pain may often be anatomically and structurally indeterminable. The kinesiopathological approach is an alternative to these more traditional methods of diagnosis. This method calls for clinical practice to be guided by the identification and modification of kinematic or motor control impairments within a musculoskeletal function.[3] By correcting deviant movement patterns to a more idealised movement pattern unique to a particular individual, subjective pain can be improved and function can be reestablished.[4]

Back Regional Pain[edit | edit source]

Potential gait deviations associated with LBP:[1]

  1. Decreased gait velocity, less than 1-1.4 metres per second[5]
  2. Shortened step length[5]
  3. Slow gait cadence
  4. Stiff counter-rotation between the thoracic spine and the lumbar spine[5]
  5. Changes in expected vertical oscillation of centre of mass (COM)
  6. Loud foot strike
  7. Can demonstrate either an increased or decreased pelvic tilt
  8. Can demonstrate either increased or decreased hip extension during terminal stance
  9. Decrease in big toe dorsiflexion, resulting in a functional hallux limitus

Hip Regional Pain[edit | edit source]

Region of Pain Relavent Diagnoses Expected Gait Deviations
Hip Region
  • Decreased cadence
  • Shorter step or stride length
  • Increased base of support (BOS)
  • Decreased counter-rotation between the thoracic spine and the lumbar spine
  • Decreased range of motion in the sagittal and frontal plane at the hip
  • Decreased extension particularly in terminal stance
  • Increased toe out
  • Increased lateral trunk lean
  • Increased contralateral pelvic drop
  • Increased lateral shift of COM
  • Late or prolonged heel off
  • Decreased propulsive ankle force
Lateral Hip
  • Too long a step
  • Contralateral pelvic drop
  • Lateral shift of COM
  • Loud foot strike
  • Decreased daylight or insufficient separation between the knees
  • Foot crossing the midline of the body
  • Oblique popliteal skin crease (excessive medial femoral rotation)
  • Varus or valgus thrust
  • Lateral deviation of the knee during stance phase
  • Increased pronation of the foot
Anterior Hip
  • Unfortunately, the literature on femoroacetabular impingement is somewhat ambiguous[6]
  • Some literature suggests that individuals with an FAI will demonstrate biomechanical differences when ambulating on stairs[9]

Knee Regional Pain[edit | edit source]

Region of Pain Relavent Diagnoses Expected Gait Deviations
Knee Region
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Can continue status post-total joint arthroplasty
  • Increased lateral trunk lean
  • Lateral shift of COM
  • Decreased knee extension during stance phase
  • Increased degree of toe out (more than 10 to 15 degrees from the foot progression line)
  • Demonstrate a varus thrust, lateral deviation of the knee or a valgus thrust (varus thrust is most common)
Anterior Knee Patellofemoral arthralgia
  • Too long a step
  • Contralateral pelvic drop
  • Increased degree of toe-out or toe-in
  • Decreased daylight or insufficient separation between the knees
  • Foot crossing the midline
  • Oblique popliteal skin crease (excessive medial femoral rotation)
  • Increased pronation
  • Heel whip
  • Increased hip or knee extension at terminal stance
Lateral Knee Iliotibial (IT) band syndrome
  • Too long a step
  • Contralateral pelvic drop
  • Lateral shift of COM
  • Increased knee extension at foot strike or heel rocker
  • Loud foot strike
  • Insufficient daylight or insufficient separation between the knees
  • Foot crossing the midline
  • Oblique popliteal skin crease (excessive medial femoral rotation)
  • Varus or valgus thrust
  • Increased pronation
  • Heel whip

Back and Upper Leg Region Special Topics[edit | edit source]

Lumbar Stenosis Gait Deviation[edit | edit source]

Lumbar stenosis is a common back pain diagnosis in the elderly population. A patient with lumbar stenosis does not stand or ambulate with upright posture, and tends to avoid lumbar extension to decrease and / or avoid pain.[10] They may present with a tendency to walk bent over, and lean on their grocery cart or walker. They will likely demonstrate one of two gait deviations to alleviate symptoms associated with lumbar spinal stenosis:[11]

  1. Figure A: Trunk flexion posture with an increased step length and hip extension angle,[11] and an absent lumbar joint moment into extension.[1]
  2. Figure B: Trunk upright posture with a decreased step length and hip extension angle,[11] and an absent lumbar joint moment into extension.[1]
  3. Figure C: Ideal walking posture of healthy people[11]
    Blue arrows indicate the ground reaction force vector, red arrow is the hip flexion moment, and green arc is the psoas major.

Dropped Head Syndrome[edit | edit source]

Dropped head syndrome (DHS) is a relatively rare cervical kyphotic deformity with symptoms that include: neck pain, restrictions to ambulation, and impaired horizontal gaze.[12] Due to the interconnected nature of the spine, the relationship between cervical alignment and other parts of the spinal column can have an effect on the pelvis and lower limbs during dynamic activities. Patients with DHS demonstrate altered kinematics and kinematics of the lower limbs during walking due to changes in the inclination of the head and trunk. This may cause deviant gait features and altered motor control compared to healthy individuals. Similar findings have been reported in individuals using smartphones while walking. The increased cervical flexion angle affects: cervical loading, walking speed, and muscle activity of the lower limbs.[13]

  1. Figure A represents an individual with DHS: backward leaning posture of the thorax, increased ankle-joint dorsiflexion angle, and relatively shorter stride length. [13]
  2. Figure B is ideal walking posture: upright erect posture with decreased ankle dorsiflexion angle allowing for more movement coming from the ankle to propel forward and up. [13]
Black arrows indicate the backward tilted thorax and pelvis. Blue arrows are the ground reaction force vector. Red arrow is the ankle plantarflexion moment.

Geriatric gait[edit | edit source]

At self-selected walking speeds, elderly adults generate decreased joint torques and power in their lower extremities than young adults. These differences are due to the biomechanical and physiological consequences of aging resulting from changes in the underlying neuromuscular components of motor performance and reduction in motor abilities.[14] Pain may also be a factor.[1]

The spatiotemporal changes that occur in geriatric gait:[1]

  1. Decreased walking speed, less than 1-1.4 metres per second
  2. Shorter step length
  3. Slower gait cadence
  4. Late or a prolonged heel contact
  5. Decreased vertical oscillation of COM
  6. Could have decreased hip extension
  7. Could have increased forward trunk flexion
  8. Could have decreased arm swing
  9. Elderly people tend to use hip joint moments more than ankle moments, whereas young people use the ankle to propel forward[14]

Osteoarthritis and Total Joint Replacements[edit | edit source]

Oftentimes patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis develop gait deviations which continue due to "habit" after undergoing total joint replacements.[1] Patients who undergo post-operative rehabilitation report improved joint pain and stiffness but commonly demonstrate incomplete recovery of gait function.[15]

Resources[edit | edit source]

Optional Recommended Reading:


Clinical Outcome Measures:

[16]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Howell, D, Back and Upper Leg Regional Pain and Gait Deviations. Gait Analysis. Plus. 2022
  2. Cholewicki J, Breen A, Popovich Jr JM, Reeves NP, Sahrmann SA, Van Dillen LR, Vleeming A, Hodges PW. Can biomechanics research lead to more effective treatment of low back pain? A point-counterpoint debate. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2019 Jun;49(6):425-36.
  3. Tabatabaei Molazi F, Mahdian SR, Rajabi R, Karimizadeh Ardakani M. Reliability of Corrective Exercise Specialist Raters Assessing Movement System Impairment Approach Items in Transient Low Back Pain Developers During Prolonged Standing. International Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain Prevention. 2022 Jul 10;7(3):750-8.
  4. Lehman GJ. The role and value of symptom-modification approaches in musculoskeletal practice. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2018 Jun;48(6):430-5.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Lamoth CJ, Meijer OG, Daffertshofer A, Wuisman PI, Beek PJ. Effects of chronic low back pain on trunk coordination and back muscle activity during walking: changes in motor control. European Spine Journal. 2006 Feb;15(1):23-40.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Harris-Hayes M, Steger-May K, Bove AM, Foster SN, Mueller MJ, Clohisy JC, Fitzgerald GK. Movement pattern training compared with standard strengthening and flexibility among patients with hip-related groin pain: results of a pilot multicentre randomised clinical trial. BMJ open sport & exercise medicine. 2020 Mar 1;6(1):e000707.
  7. Harris-Hayes M, Czuppon S, Van Dillen LR, Steger-May K, Sahrmann S, Schootman M, Salsich GB, Clohisy JC, Mueller MJ. Movement-pattern training to improve function in people with chronic hip joint pain: a feasibility randomized clinical trial. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2016 Jun;46(6):452-61.
  8. Ranawat AS, Gaudiani MA, Slullitel PA, Satalich J, Rebolledo BJ. Foot progression angle walking test: a dynamic diagnostic assessment for femoroacetabular impingement and hip instability. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017 Jan 10;5(1):2325967116679641.
  9. Lewis CL, Sahrmann SA, Moran DW. Effect of hip angle on anterior hip joint force during gait. Gait & posture. 2010 Oct 1;32(4):603-7.
  10. Nüesch C, Mandelli F, Przybilla P, Schären S, Mündermann A, Netzer C. Kinematics and paraspinal muscle activation patterns during walking differ between patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and controls. Gait & Posture. 2023 Jan 1;99:44-50.
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 Igawa T, Katsuhira J, Hosaka A, Uchikoshi K, Ishihara S, Matsudaira K. Kinetic and kinematic variables affecting trunk flexion during level walking in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0197228.
  12. Igawa T, Ishii K, Urata R, Suzuki A, Ui H, Ideura K, Isogai N, Sasao Y, Funao H. Association between the Horizontal Gaze Ability and Physical Characteristics of Patients with Dropped Head Syndrome. Medicina. 2022 Mar 23;58(4):465.
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 Igawa T, Ishii K, Suzuki A, Ui H, Urata R, Isogai N, Sasao Y, Nishiyama M, Funao H. Dynamic alignment changes during level walking in patients with dropped head syndrome: Analyses using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. Scientific reports. 2021 Sep 14;11(1):1-0.
  14. 14.0 14.1 DeVita P, Hortobagyi T. Age causes a redistribution of joint torques and powers during gait. Journal of applied physiology. 2000 May 1;88(5):1804-11.
  15. Bączkowicz D, Skiba G, Czerner M, Majorczyk E. Gait and functional status analysis before and after total knee arthroplasty. The Knee. 2018 Oct 1;25(5):888-96.
  16. YouTube. Fabers Test Hip and SIJ | Clinical Physio Premium. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6trjwpyjdM [last accessed 23/06/2022]