Using 2D Motion Analysis to Identify Deviant Movement

Original Editor - Merinda Rodseth based on the course by Damien Howell

Top Contributors - Merinda Rodseth  

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Over the past decade, there has been a growing demand for precise and accurate methods to assess human movement.[1] “Motion and posture analyses are effective tools used in diagnosis, therapy and prevention of musculoskeletal disorders”.[1]

Analysing human movement and posture allows clinicians to observe movement execution and identify injury risk factors in order to make the best decisions to reduce the patient’s recovery time and implement effective treatment plans.[1]

The focus of this page will be to identify and define key reference points useful to describe motion and deviant motion when performing 2D slow-motion video analysis.

Terminology[edit | edit source]

The denotation or definition of a word explains what the word explicitly means, while its connotation is what it implies or is associated with. The connotation is the emotional and cultural baggage that goes with the word and often carries a negative inference  – creating a nocebo effect.[2]

Deviation - “the action of departing from an established course or an accepted standard or deviation from a norm”. Dysfunction - “not operating properly or normally”, "abnormality"

Dysfunction thereby carries a negative connotation, whereas the connotation of deviation is more neutral. Even though these words might be synonymous, describing something as “deviant” depicts a more positive approach and its use recommended.[2]

Movement deviation is also synonymous with movement compensation. Movement deviations/compensations can be good or bad and can have positive or negative effects. Humans and animals alike will automatically or instinctively choose the best compensation to move in order to avoid pain and expend the least amount of energy based on the law of the path of least resistance. Compensatory movements occur at an unconscious level and may continue long after the original injury has healed and the pain alleviated because the movement has become habitual.[2]

Compensatory movements may lead to additional problems or compensations and may in fact not be the best movement strategy for the patient. It might therefore be necessary at times to bring the unconscious compensation to a conscious level for the patient in order to establish if this compensation is indeed the best strategy for the patient.[2]

The movement deviation/compensation may also be the best strategy for the patient at that specific time and they might want to continue with it. Whether this compensation should be altered needs to be established by the physiotherapist after assessing the patient and testing it. This brings us to the use of the words “correct” compared to “alter” when referring to movement deviations.[2]

Correct – To put right

Alter – To change

Only after assessing the patient and establishing a working hypothesis can the decision be made why the compensation exists and if it is in fact ideal for the patient or if there are others available that should rather be considered. The working hypothesis will therefore determine if an intervention to alter the deviation or compensation is justified. It is, therefore, preferable to use the term “alter” rather than “correct” movement.[2]

Key Reference Points[edit | edit source]

A reference point is needed to determine if something is in motion. Motion is described relative to the

  • Position
  • Speed
  • Direction
  • Acceleration

but it is key to have reference points.[2]

There are some established key reference points that are useful when analysing motion to determine whether the movement is deviant or relatively normal.[2]

Movement Relative to the Line of the Horizon[edit | edit source]

Using the line of the horizon as a reference point enables the clinician to observe costly upward accelerations/deflections of the Centre of Mass (CoM).[3] The reference point is the CoM which has been shown to lie a few centimetres in front of the lumbosacral joint in quietly standing humans.[3] Tracking the centre of mass during movement as with walking or running, is however much more complicated.[3] Using the iliac crest as a surrogate for the CoM, vertical displacement is easily determined by comparing the highest point of the iliac crest during float to its lowest point during stance.[4] For runners, this vertical displacement of the CoM should be about 6-8 centimetres compared to around 9 cm in walkers.[2] Vertical displacement has important implications for injury mechanics and energy expenditure.[4][5]

Movement Relative to the Line of Gravity or Vertical[edit | edit source]

Movement relative to the line of gravity is considered relative to the CoM. Viewing a patient from the side (sagittal view), the CoM is inferred to be at the greater trochanter.[2] With the greater trochanter as a body landmark, a vertical line (line of gravity) and a line bisecting the trunk is drawn to measure the deviation of the trunk anteriorly or posteriorly (deviant from vertical).

Damien's Image - Line of gravity – Vertical Relative to Centre of Mass.jpg

Movement Relative to the Line of Progression down the Road or Track[edit | edit source]
Foot progression angle. Toe-out deviation of both feet in the stance and swing phase

Measuring along the line of progression allows for the measurement of the foot progression angle which can easily be made from the posterior view.[4] The foot progression angle can be defined as the angle between the foot axis and the direction of walking.[6]

This longitudinal line bisecting the foot can be used to indicate whether the patient is running with toes out or toes in.[2] During toe-out, the lateral aspect of the shoe is visible from the posterior view whereas the big toe (first ray) and medial aspect of the shoe can be seen with toe-in progressions.[4]

Line of Gravity Relative to the Center of Mass[edit | edit source]

CoM is a parameter widely used in clinical and practical applications and provides useful information about the energy requirements of gait and as a descriptor of pathological gait.[7]  Stability of the body is dependant on the relationship between the CoM and the base of support (BoS).[5] With the CoM lying a few centimetres in front of the lumbosacral joint in stance, a line through the sacrum is inferred to depict the CoM.[2][7] The CoM should remain within in base of support during the stance phase, with the line depicting the CoM passing through the sacrum.[2][8] The line of gravity therefore theoretically divides the body in half. During each step, the CoM oscillates laterally towards the weight-bearing leg, then swings back towards the opposite leg during the next step.[3] Lateral displacement of the CoM is of particular clinical importance as it has been implicated in many pathological conditions and orthopaedic impairments.[3]

Image on the left: stance phase left - the line through sacrum also passes through the medial heel.Image on the right: during stance phase right - the line from the medial heel passes to the left of the sacrum and 2/3rds of the mass including the head is to the right of the line of gravity.
Movement Relative to a Joint axis[edit | edit source]

Using the point of maximum determination for joint range of motion (joint axis reference point) can also give an indication of symmetry by comparing it to the adjacent limb.[2]

In the image below, the picture on the left was captured with the left big toe in maximum dorsiflexion whereas the image on the right captured maximum dorsiflexion of the right big toe (views from the right and left sides of the treadmill). These images also enable us to make a comparison of symmetry between the two sides of the body as movement relative to an adjacent limb.

Maximum joint deviaton Damien image.jpg

Movement Relative to the Adjacent Limb or Body Region[edit | edit source]

Movement can also be described as it relates to the adjacent body segment for example:[2]

  • the trunk shifting to the right but not the left
  • A greater degree of trunk rotation to the left during gait compared to the right
Movement Relative to an External Object or Target[edit | edit source]

Hitting a target can also suffice as a point of reference for describing motion.[2] For golf, the point of determination can be when the golf club hits the ball and it is at this point that the physiotherapist will analyse the golfers thoracic spine and hip position and movement compared to established norms.

For rock climbers, “hitting the target” infers the moment the climber grabs the rock or ledge and it is at this moment in time that the motion is analysed. In this instance, the external point (rock/ledge) is the point of reference.[2]

Image on the left - point of determination is when the golf club hits the ball – notice spinal flexion and decreased hip flexion. The image on the right was captured when the left hand reached the handhold

Besides the reference points already discussed, motion can also be described relative to normative values and relative to the uninvolved side.[2]

Frames of Reference useful to Describe Motion[edit | edit source]

Gait is one of the most commonly assessed human motions and refers to “the displacement of the centre of gravity during locomotion”.[9] This is achieved in humans through the synchronised and coordinated movement of the trunk and the lower, resulting in a change in the body centre-of-mass position.[9] Gait is characterised by repetitive cycles for each foot where each cycle can be divided into 2 phases: Stance phase with the foot in contact with the ground, and Swing phase with the foot off the ground, [9][10] which brings us to the use of frames of reference for describing motion.

Frames of reference are useful for enhanced description, communication and analysis of motion.[2] The following are examples of useful frames of reference:[2]

1. The anatomical planes of the body

2. The phases of gait [8][9][10]

  • Stance
  • Swing
  • Double support

Periods of the phases of gait

  • Heel rocker - Foot strike, initial contact
  • Ankle rocker - Midstance, weight acceptance
  • Forefoot rocker - Terminal stance, heel off

Gait diagram.png

3. Sport-specific agreed upon phases

Phases of a rowing stroke motion

Motion is described relative to the:

  • Slide
  • Catch of the oar
  • Leg drive
  • Finish

Phases of a golf swing

Describe the frame of reference relative to the:

  • Backswing
  • Downswing
  • Follow-through
Kate-Lynn Downey - Symmetrical Versus Asymmetrical.jpg

4. Symmetric versus asymmetric movement

  • The assumption is the direction, magnitude, and speed of movement on the one side of the body should match or equal the movement on the other side of the body for the majority of activities observed.[2]
  • As a starting point, the reference limb is the more involved/painful limb and is considered deviant until proven otherwise.[2]
  • These assumptions deserve to be tested or challenged

In order to determine symmetry, it is important to define when the determination/comparison is made (point of determination). The point of determination for symmetry can be:[2]

  • When pain is elicited during movement
  • During a phase or period of gait
    • Swing, stance, or double support
    • Heel rocker, ankle rocker, or forefoot rocker
  • At the maximum deflection of range of motion for a joint between one side and the other
  • At the maximum deviation of the centre of mass from the reference point or line of reference (line of progression, from vertical, from a horizontal line)
  • At the point when the limb reaches the target, hits the golf ball, release the ball

Alternatively, to determining asymmetry, the analysis can compare the observed movement relative to normative data - the theoretical ideal movement.

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Roggio F, Ravalli S, Maugeri G, Bianco A, Palma A, Di Rosa M, Musumeci G. Technological advancements in the analysis of human motion and posture management through digital devices. World Journal of Orthopedics. 2021 Jul 18;12(7):467.
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.14 2.15 2.16 2.17 2.18 2.19 2.20 2.21 2.22 Damien Howell. Using 2D Motion Analysis to Identify Deviant Movement. PhysioPlus Course. 2021
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Tesio L, Rota V. The motion of body center of mass during walking: a review oriented to clinical applications. Frontiers in neurology. 2019 Sep 20;10:999.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Souza RB. An evidence-based videotaped running biomechanics analysis. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics. 2016 Feb 1;27(1):217-36.   
  5. 5.0 5.1 Devetak GF, Bohrer RC, Rodacki AL, Manffra EF. Center of mass in analysis of dynamic stability during gait following stroke: A systematic review. Gait & posture. 2019 Jul 1;72:154-66. 
  6. Müller, M., Schwachmeyer, V., Tohtz, S., Taylor, W.R., Duda, G.N., Perka, C. and Heller, M.O., 2012. The direct lateral approach: impact on gait patterns, foot progression angle and pain in comparison with a minimally invasive anterolateral approach. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 132(5), pp.725-731.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Jeong B, Ko CY, Chang Y, Ryu J, Kim G. Comparison of segmental analysis and sacral marker methods for determining the center of mass during level and slope walking. Gait & posture. 2018 May 1;62:333-41.   
  8. 8.0 8.1 Haddas R, Ju KL, Belanger T, Lieberman IH. The use of gait analysis in the assessment of patients afflicted with spinal disorders. European Spine Journal. 2018 Aug;27(8):1712-23.
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Alharthi AS, Yunas SU, Ozanyan KB. Deep learning for monitoring of human gait: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2019 Jul 15;19(21):9575-91.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Shortland AP. Gait and clinical gait analysis. In: Clinical Engineering 2020 Jan 1 (pp. 473-489). Academic Press.