Jump to content

Roles and Responsibilities of the Trainer

Original Editor - Wanda van Niekerk based on the course by Claire Boulanger
Top Contributors - Wanda van Niekerk and Jess Bell

Introduction

A trainer plays an important role in bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical or clinical application by facilitating comprehensive knowledge transfer. Trainers aim to create a positive, supportive learning environment that encourages collaboration, and peer learning and provides a safe space for trainees to understand and apply new concepts. By fostering a sense of community within the training group, trainers ensure that participants not only comprehend complex ideas but can also confidently implement them in real-world contexts.

The Many Roles of a Trainer

Trainers have different roles that can be applied during a single training session. These roles include being an instructor, a facilitator, or a coach, depending on the specific training scenario.[1]

Instructors provide clear instructions and advice, presenting facts and theories with expertise. They demonstrate competence in their subject matter and are responsible for assessing knowledge. The approach of an instructor is often more structured and directive, focusing on delivering information / knowledge transfer and evaluating understanding.

Facilitators take a more interactive and collaborative approach to learning. They guide trainees through learning experiences using targeted questions and discussions, preparing activities that enhance group learning. They are skilled at managing group processes and dynamics. They provide meaningful, constructive feedback throughout the learning process that supports growth.

Coaches create a learning environment that values trainees' existing knowledge and experience. They actively encourage open dialogue and experience sharing and through this, help trainees learn from each other's practical knowledge and insights. In the role of a coach, a trainer builds upon the trainees' existing know-how and knowledge and helps them connect their current understanding with new learning concepts. Coaches can enable trainees to extract meaningful lessons from the collective experiences of the group.

Necessary Skills for Effective Training

Technical Skills

Technical skills are fundamental to effective training. These skills encompass expertise, which includes in-depth knowledge about the subject matter, practical experience with the content / subject matter, the ability to translate knowledge effectively and the application of subject-specific training methods.[2] Trainers should be well-versed in the principles of adult learning, being familiar with educational principles,[2] tailoring training to the unique needs of adult learners[2] and providing clear educational aims and objectives.[3] Additionally, technology proficiency is key to the digital learning environment of today.

Professional Skills

Professional skills are just as important for effective and successful training. Communication is an important professional skill,[4] requiring trainers to convey information clearly and concisely in a way that is understandable to learners. This involves communicating in a tactful, non-threatening manner of communication,[5] providing constructive feedback and formal evaluation,[3][6] creating and maintaining an open dialogue[6] and practising active listening to appropriately address trainees' needs and concerns. Proficiency in verbal and non-verbal communication, delivering engaging presentations and effective time management are also key components of professional skills.

Personal skills

Personal skills are also important for trainers. Adaptability and flexibility allow trainers to adjust to different learning environments and trainee needs. Patience is a good skill to have when working with different groups of trainees.[3] Creativity helps trainers develop innovative training approaches, while enthusiasm[3] can inspire and motivate trainees. Being encouraging and supportive creates a positive learning environment and having an approachable personality helps trainees feel comfortable and confident.[3]

After reviewing the literature on trainers' knowledge and skills from the perspectives of trainers, trainees and human resource development practitioners, Wisshak and Hochholdinger[2] identified specific categories of trainers' professional knowledge and skills. These are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Skills and knowledge of trainers[2]
Planning and designing training Trainers should carefully plan and design a training course, with clear learning objectives and knowledge about instructional concepts and principles to draw up a design that meets the needs of the learners.
Group management Training often involves managing groups and trainers should be able to manage possible conflicts that could arise, while still securing sufficient active learning time. Trainers need to communicate effectively and be flexible with changes that can occur, while still providing a positive learning environment and building relationships with trainees.
Methodological implementation of training Trainers should be clear on learning objectives, and provide clarity and structure to training sessions. They should be familiar with various instructional methods and their variations in their field of expertise and be able to use media and learning materials efficiently. Trainers should have the ability to motivate trainees and provide and receive feedback. Trainers must also ensure that the acquired knowledge is consolidated among trainees.
Diagnostics and assessment A needs analysis before and after training is needed for effective training.
Educational sciences Trainers need to have fundamental knowledge about general and adult learning.
Individual differences Trainers should be able to tailor training according to trainees' needs and manage heterogeneity in a group.
Content knowledge They should be knowledgeable about the subject matter and have some practical experience in the field of training.
Content-specific instruction Trainers should be able to apply subject-specific training methods, have content-specific instructional knowledge and be able to explain the subject clearly. They should also have a good idea about the knowledge that trainees have about the training subject.
Consulting and coaching Trainers should have the necessary skills to consult with, and coach trainees who need additional advice.

What Makes a Great Clinical Trainer?

Clinical trainers should also be able to consider ethical factors,[7] engage in continuous education,[8] work as a team and collaborate effectively.[9] The following sections provide different perspectives on what makes a great clinical trainer, as seen through the eyes of clinicians, trainees, interns and students.[10]

Clinician's Perspective

A great clinical trainer recognises the importance of knowledge transfer as a moral, ethical, and professional duty, driven by a natural willingness to help others. A pleasing and graceful demeanour, coupled with a commitment to learning and acquiring new skills, is important. Clinical trainers should be able to impart knowledge with empathy, kindness and a fair-minded approach. The ability to provide constructive feedback in a thoughtful and motivational manner is key.[10]

Trainee's Perspective

A great clinical trainer is knowledgeable and well-organised. They provide constructive feedback with precision and care, offering direct, supportive supervision. They are enthusiastic about their role and have an encouraging and stimulating approach to learning. They are good listeners and are patient, allowing trainees the space to learn, make mistakes and grow at their own pace.[10]

Intern's Perspective

Great clinical trainers effectively impart clinical pearls of wisdom in clinical situations. They show empathy and care towards patients and families, as well as trainees.[10]

Student's Perspective

Great clinical trainers can build meaningful relationships and communicate effectively. They have good interpersonal skills and create an inclusive environment which actively engages students.[10]

Elevating a Trainee's Clinical Competence

Miller's pyramid was developed by George Miller specifically for the assessment of healthcare students. The four tiers of the pyramid are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. The different tiers of Miller's pyramid
Tier Label Description Assessment methods
Tier 1 Knows
  • The assessment of knowledge / fact gathering
  • "Does the person understand what is needed to safely carry out a function?"[11]
  • Training materials may include:
    • presentations
    • information
    • readings
  • Written evaluation
  • Multiple-choice questions
  • Verbalisation of content[11]
Tier 2 Knows How
  • The application of knowledge or competence of a trainee
  • Training materials may include
    • case studies
    • problem-solving activities
  • Assessment of trainees' competencies with[11]:
    • clinical problem-solving exercises
    • extended multiple-choice questions
Tier 3 Shows How
  • Clinical skills competence or performance
  • Training material may include:
    • role play
    • real-life experiences
  • Assessment of trainees' competencies with:
    • standardised patient exercises
    • simulations[11]
    • clinical examinations
    • OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination)[12]
    • Mini-CEX (Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise for trainees)[12]
Tier 4 Does
  • Action and assessment of the trainee's ability to function independently in a clinical setting
  • Attempts to assess this include[12]:
    • patient satisfactory surveys
    • demonstration of post-procedure care
    • other aspects such as functional status, cost-effectiveness and intermediate outcomes


Figure 1. Remodelled version of Miller's pyramid (Figure is from the iDesign Educational Assets (iDea) Book. This figure was adapted from Ramani and Leinster[13] by iDesign.

Cruess et al.[14] suggested a fifth tier, "Is", should be added to Miller's pyramid above "Does". This tier should be a reflection of clinical competence, as well as the concept of professional identity. Miller's pyramid was also remodelled to include a third dimension of professional authenticity. The professional authenticity side of the pyramid focuses on "attitudes", "skills" and "knowledge on a spectrum from novice to expert.[15] Figure 1 shows this remodelled version.



Feedback

Feedback can be described as "specific information about the comparison between a trainee's observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the trainee's performance."[16] Feedback is an important form of interaction between the trainer and the trainee and it helps to narrow the gap between the actual performance and the desired performance.[17] During the feedback process the trainee is provided with information about the quality of their performance and this can lead to improved learning. It can promote learning in the following ways[17]:

  • the trainee is informed of their progress
  • the trainee is informed regarding observed learning needs for improvement
  • the trainee is motivated to engage in appropriate learning activities

Research on feedback during clinical supervision highlights a few key principles that distinguish effective feedback from ineffective feedback. Effective feedback is characterised by being educationally supportive, timely, collaborative and constructive. It focuses on observable behaviours, provides specific actionable suggestions and involves the trainee in self-assessment and improvement planning. In contrast, ineffective feedback tends to be judgemental, untimely, generalised, personality-focused and disconnected from future development strategies.[18]

If you'd like, you can read more about constructive feedback frameworks that you can use and find some tips on providing and receiving constructive feedback here.

[19]

References

  1. ↑ Boulanger, C. Roles and Responsibilities of the Trainer Course. Plus. 2024
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Wisshak S, Hochholdinger S. Trainers’ knowledge and skills from the perspective of trainers, trainees and human resource development practitioners. International Journal of Training Research. 2018 Sep 2;16(3):218-31.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Royakkers L, Biyani CS, Van Cleynenbreugel B. Training the trainers: A viewpoint. Indian Journal of Surgery. 2022 Jun;84(3):606-7.
  4. ↑ Sutton PA, Beamish AJ, Rashid S, Elsey E, Mohan HM, O'Regan D, Association of Surgeons in Training. Attributes of excellent surgical trainers: an analysis of outstanding trainers. International Journal of Surgery. 2018 Apr 1;52:371-5.
  5. ↑ Levy LS, Sexton P, Willeford KS, Barnum MG, Guyer MS, Gardner G, Fincher AL. Clinical instructor characteristics, behaviors and skills in allied health care settings: A literature review. Athletic Training Education Journal. 2009 Jan 1;4(1):8-13.
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 McCallum CA, Reed R, Bachman S, Murray L. A systematic review of physical therapist clinical instructor demographics and key characteristics: impact on student clinical education experiences. Journal of Physical Therapy Education. 2016 Jan 1;30(3):11-20.
  7. ↑ Ahmady S, Kohan N, Namazi H, Zarei A, Mirmoghtadaei ZS, Hamidi H. Outstanding qualities of a successful role model in medical education: Students and professors' points of view. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2022 Oct 1;82:104652.
  8. ↑ Poitras ME, Bélanger E, Vaillancourt VT, Kienlin S, Körner M, Godbout I, Bernard-Hamel J, O'Connor S, Blanchette P, Khadhraoui L, Sawadogo J. Interventions to improve trainers' learning and behaviors for educating health care professionals using train-the-trainer method: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2021 Jul 1;41(3):202-9.
  9. ↑ Mash B, Edwards J. Creating a learning environment in your practice or facility. South African Family Practice. 2020;62(3).
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 Sharif F, Crothers E, Sharif S, Power E, Amjad B. What Makes a Great Clinical Teacher: Trainer and Trainees Perspective. Irish medical journal. 2023 Apr 20;116(4):760.
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 Hampton D, Melander S, Tovar E, Falls C, Makowski A, Grubbs AB, Chitwood H, Scott L. Value of Miller’s Pyramid for Clinical Skills Assessment in the Evaluation of Competency for Nurse Practitioner Students. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. 2024 Apr 1;20(4):104952.
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 Blazar E, Krishnan V, Mody S, Robinson D. Miller’s Pyramid. Education Theory Made Practical, Volume 4. 2022 Feb 1.
  13. ↑ Ramani S, Leinster S. AMEE Guide no. 34: Teaching in the clinical environment. Medical teacher. 2008 Jan 1;30(4):347-64.
  14. ↑ Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y. Amending Miller’s pyramid to include professional identity formation. Academic Medicine. 2016 Feb 1;91(2):180-5.
  15. ↑ Cheek B. The Miller pyramid and prism. Gp-training. net [Internet]. 2019
  16. ↑ Van den Berg I, Admiraal W, Pilot A. Peer assessment in university teaching: evaluating seven course designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2006 Feb 1;31(1):19-36.
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 Burgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, Mellis C. Feedback in the clinical setting. BMC medical education. 2020 Dec;20:1-5.
  18. ↑ Weallans J, Roberts C, Hamilton S, Parker S. Guidance for providing effective feedback in clinical supervision in postgraduate medical education: a systematic review. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2022 Feb;98(1156):138-49.
  19. ↑ UNSW Health. Giving Feedback. Available from:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wa88vwvhR_U [last accessed 3/12/2024