Jump to content

House–Brackmann Scale

Original Editor - Oyemi Sillo

Top Contributors - Wendy Walker, Oyemi Sillo, Angeliki Chorti, WikiSysop, Kim Jackson and Alexandra Stead  

Objective

The House-Brackmann Scale is one of the most commonly used tools internationally for the clinical evaluation of facial nerve function.[1] [2] The scale is based upon functional impairment, with six grades ranging between I (normal) and VI (no movement). This classification system was first described in 1985 by Dr John W. House and Dr Derald E. Brackmann, otolaryngologists in Los Angeles.[3] 

Intended Population

The scale is used to determine the severity of facial nerve dysfunction in people with facial palsy. It helps determine facial weakness, asymmetry, and progress by evaluating specific movements like eyebrow elevation and mouth movement.

The House-Brackmann Scale can be used irrespective of the cause of the palsy.

Method of Use

The score is determined by measuring: 

  1. the upwards movement of the midportion of the top of the eyebrow
  2. the outwards movement of the oral commissure

For both the eyebrow and oral commissure movement, 1 point is assigned for every 0.25 cm motion up to a maximum of 1cm. The scores for each structure are added together to give the House-Brackmann score. The maximum score obtainable is 8, if both structures move the full 1cm.[3]

For objectivity, measurements should be made on both the normal and the affected side.[4]

You can watch this video for better understanding the fascial nerve paralysis grading system:

[5]

You can also find the grading system criteria and scoring categories below.

House-Brackmann Facial Nerve Grading system criteria

Grade I - Normal

Normal facial function in all areas

□
Grade II - Slight Dysfunction

Gross: slight weakness noticeable on close inspection; may have very slight synkinesis

At rest: normal symmetry and tone

Motion: forehead - moderate to good function; eye - complete closure with minimum effort; mouth - slight asymmetry.

□
Grade III - Moderate Dysfunction

Gross: obvious but not disfiguring difference between two sides; noticeable but not severe synkinesis, contracture, and/or hemi-facial spasm.

At rest: normal symmetry and tone

Motion: forehead - slight to moderate movement; eye - complete closure with effort; mouth - slightly weak with maximum effort.

□
Grade IV - Moderate Severe Dysfunction

Gross: obvious weakness and/or disfiguring asymmetry

At rest: normal symmetry and tone

Motion: forehead - none; eye - incomplete closure; mouth - asymmetric with maximum effort.

□
Grade V - Severe Dysfunction

Gross: only barely perceptible motion

At rest: asymmetry

Motion: forehead - none; eye - incomplete closure; mouth - slight movement

□
Grade VI - Total Paralysis

No movement

□

[3]

House-Brackmann Facial Nerve Grading system scoring
Grade Description Measurement Function % Estimated Function %
I Normal 8/8 100 100
II Slight 7/8 76 - 99 80
III Moderate 5/8 - 6/8 51 - 75 60
IV Moderately Severe 3/8 - 4/8 26 - 50 40
V Severe 1/8 - 2/8 1 - 25 20
VI Total 0/8 0 0

[3]

Evidence

The House-Brackmann grading system has been found to be of high reliability,[6] [7] [8] however, grading of individual items may be more challenging between trained observers[7]and sensitivity to subtle changes is lower. [9]

Clinical Relevance

Although the House-Brackmann grading system is widely established, its clinical usefulness has marked limitations. Having only 6 possible grades on gross motor function, it does not provide detailed information about specific dysfunctional areas in the face, but a simplistic overview.

There is no specific evaluation of synkinesis (aberrant linking of movements which is a sequelae of moderate to severe facial nerve damage) or contracture of the face.

Some report its lack of acknowledging other important areas of fascial palsy (i.e. other than motor) such as emotional expression, aesthetics or impact on quality of life.[10]

But its main limitation for physiotherapists is that it is not sensitive enough to detect the small changes that occur during a course of rehabilitation.

Due to the above limitations, many physiotherapists working with facial palsy do not use this scale but instead use other alternatives such as the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System, the Facial Nerve Grading System 2.0, the Repaired Facial Nerve Recovery Scale (RFNRS) and the FaCE scale.

Resources

House-Brackmann - Fascial Nerve Grading (real patients)

References

  1. ↑ Arne Ernst, Michael Herzog, Rainer Ottis Seidl. Head and Neck Trauma: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Thieme: Germany. 2006
  2. ↑ Di Stadio A. Another Scale for the Assessment of Facial Paralysis? ADS Scale: Our Proposition, How to Use It. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Dec;9(12):MC08-11.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1985; 93: 146–7.
  4. ↑ Chung How Kau, Stephen Richmond. Three-Dimensional Imaging for Orthodontics and Maxillofacial Surgery. Wiley-Blackwell: United Kingdom. 2011
  5. ↑ FreeMedEducation. Facial Nerve Paralysis Grading - House Brackman classification. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtqrboxOjh0 [accessed 14/1/2025]
  6. ↑ Fonseca KM, Mourão AM, Motta AR, Vicente LC. Scales of degree of facial paralysis: analysis of agreement. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 May-Jun;81(3):288-93.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Coulson SE, Croxson GR, Adams RD, O'Dwyer NJ. Reliability of the "Sydney," "Sunnybrook," and "House Brackmann" facial grading systems to assess voluntary movement and synkinesis after facial nerve paralysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Apr;132(4):543-9.
  8. ↑ Mengi E, Orhan Kara C, Necdet Ardıç F, Topuz B, Metin U, Alptürk U, Aydemir G, Şenol H. Comparison of the Reliability of the House- Brackmann, Facial Nerve Grading System 2.0, and Sunnybrook Facial Grading System for the Evaluation of Patients with Peripheral Facial Paralysis. J Int Adv Otol. 2024 Jan;20(1):14-18.
  9. ↑ Tedeschi R, Donati D, Giorgi F. Beyond the smile: a systematic review of diagnostic tools for peripheral facial paralysis. Acta Neurol Belg. 2024 Dec;124(6):1805-22.
  10. ↑ Györi E, Przestrzelski C, Pona I, Hagmann M, Rath T, Radtke C, Tzou CJ. Quality of life and functional assessment of facial palsy patients: A questionnaire study. Int J Surg. 2018 Jul;55:92-97.