Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire: Difference between revisions
Eva Huysmans (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Eva Huysmans (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''Original Editor '''- Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page. | '''Original Editor '''- Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page. | ||
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} | '''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Summary == | |||
The publication of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (Melzack, 1975) represented a major (r)evolution in pain research. Pain was mainly described and measured in terms of intensity. Thanks to the MPQ the qualitative aspect of pain became also, besides the intensity of pain an important subject in the pain research.[1] Words related to pain where brought together and categorized in three dimensions of pain experience: words that describe the sensory qualities of the experience in terms of temporal, spatial, pressure, thermal, and other properties; words that describe affective qualities in terms of tension, fear, and autonomic properties that are part of the pain experience; and evaluative words describing the subjective overall intensity of the total pain experience.[2] | |||
The MPQ may be used in the first place for a standard registration and evaluation of the complaints of pain in an individual patient. Furthermore, it can also be used for diagnostics and to control the effects of therapies and/ or pain reliefs in individual patients.[1]<br>The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire is a shorter version of the original MPQ. The pain rating index has 2 subscales: 1) the sensory subscale with 11 words and 2) the affective subscale with 4 words from the original MPQ. These words or items are rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, <br>1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe. There’s also one item for present pain intensity and one item for a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) for average pain.[4]<br>The SF-MPQ was further revised in 2009 for the use in neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain conditions (SF-MPQ-2). This new version includes 7 additional symptoms related to neuropathic pain, for a total of 22 items with 0-10 numerical response options.[4] | |||
== Intended Population == | == Intended Population == | ||
| Line 21: | Line 24: | ||
==== Miscellaneous ==== | ==== Miscellaneous ==== | ||
Dworkin et al<ref>Robert H. Dworkin, Dennis C. Turk, Dennis A. Revicki, Gale Harding, Karin S. Coyne, Sarah Peirce-Sandner, Dileep Bhagwat, Dennis Everton, Laurie B. Burke, Penney Cowan, John T. Farrar, Sharon Hertz, Mitchell B. Max, Bob A. Rappaport and Ronald Melzack. [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T0K-4W14HV5-1&_user=10&_coverDate=07%2F31%2F2009&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=bfb80faeae41ad1112754f5decd1d64c Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2)]. Pain, July 2009, 144(1-2):35-42</ref> amended the SF-MPQ to produce a measure (the SF-MPQ-2) that has excellent reliability and validity and provided support for four readily interpretable subscales—continuous pain, intermittent pain, predominantly neuropathic pain, and affective descriptors.<br> | Dworkin et al<ref>Robert H. Dworkin, Dennis C. Turk, Dennis A. Revicki, Gale Harding, Karin S. Coyne, Sarah Peirce-Sandner, Dileep Bhagwat, Dennis Everton, Laurie B. Burke, Penney Cowan, John T. Farrar, Sharon Hertz, Mitchell B. Max, Bob A. Rappaport and Ronald Melzack. [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;_udi=B6T0K-4W14HV5-1&amp;_user=10&amp;_coverDate=07%2F31%2F2009&amp;_rdoc=1&amp;_fmt=&amp;_orig=search&amp;_sort=d&amp;view=c&amp;_acct=C000050221&amp;_version=1&amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;_userid=10&amp;md5=bfb80faeae41ad1112754f5decd1d64c Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2)]. Pain, July 2009, 144(1-2):35-42</ref> amended the SF-MPQ to produce a measure (the SF-MPQ-2) that has excellent reliability and validity and provided support for four readily interpretable subscales—continuous pain, intermittent pain, predominantly neuropathic pain, and affective descriptors.<br> | ||
== Contact == | == Contact == | ||
<div class="researchbox"> | <div class="researchbox"> | ||
== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed]) == | == Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed]) == | ||
Revision as of 22:41, 18 June 2013
Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
Top Contributors - Eva Huysmans, Evan Thomas, Rachael Lowe, Admin, Tony Lowe, WikiSysop, Kim Jackson, 127.0.0.1, Louis Curtil, Scott Buxton, Oyemi Sillo, Vanessa Rhule, Lauren Lopez and Lucinda hampton
Summary[edit | edit source]
The publication of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (Melzack, 1975) represented a major (r)evolution in pain research. Pain was mainly described and measured in terms of intensity. Thanks to the MPQ the qualitative aspect of pain became also, besides the intensity of pain an important subject in the pain research.[1] Words related to pain where brought together and categorized in three dimensions of pain experience: words that describe the sensory qualities of the experience in terms of temporal, spatial, pressure, thermal, and other properties; words that describe affective qualities in terms of tension, fear, and autonomic properties that are part of the pain experience; and evaluative words describing the subjective overall intensity of the total pain experience.[2]
The MPQ may be used in the first place for a standard registration and evaluation of the complaints of pain in an individual patient. Furthermore, it can also be used for diagnostics and to control the effects of therapies and/ or pain reliefs in individual patients.[1]
The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire is a shorter version of the original MPQ. The pain rating index has 2 subscales: 1) the sensory subscale with 11 words and 2) the affective subscale with 4 words from the original MPQ. These words or items are rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none,
1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe. There’s also one item for present pain intensity and one item for a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) for average pain.[4]
The SF-MPQ was further revised in 2009 for the use in neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain conditions (SF-MPQ-2). This new version includes 7 additional symptoms related to neuropathic pain, for a total of 22 items with 0-10 numerical response options.[4]
Intended Population[edit | edit source]
Reference[edit | edit source]
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Reliability[edit | edit source]
Validity[edit | edit source]
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Miscellaneous[edit | edit source]
Dworkin et al[1] amended the SF-MPQ to produce a measure (the SF-MPQ-2) that has excellent reliability and validity and provided support for four readily interpretable subscales—continuous pain, intermittent pain, predominantly neuropathic pain, and affective descriptors.
Contact[edit | edit source]
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Extension:RSS -- Error: Not a valid URL: Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10
References[edit | edit source]
References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.
- ↑ Robert H. Dworkin, Dennis C. Turk, Dennis A. Revicki, Gale Harding, Karin S. Coyne, Sarah Peirce-Sandner, Dileep Bhagwat, Dennis Everton, Laurie B. Burke, Penney Cowan, John T. Farrar, Sharon Hertz, Mitchell B. Max, Bob A. Rappaport and Ronald Melzack. Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2). Pain, July 2009, 144(1-2):35-42
Databases searched: PubMed, Vubis, PEDro, Google scholar
Keywords: “The McGill Pain Questionnaire”, “Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire”, “SF-MPQ”, “Responsiveness” AND “McGill Pain Questionnaire”, “SF-MPQ-2”, “psychometric properties McGill Pain Questionnaire”, “psychometric properties” AND “McGill Pain Questionnaire”, “reliability” AND “McGill Pain Questionnaire”, “validity” AND “McGill Pain Questionnaire”, “scoring” AND “McGill Pain Questionnaire”, “reliability” AND “SF-MPQ”, “validity” AND “short-form McGill pain questionnaire”, “psychometric properties” AND “short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire”
Search timeline: april 30, 2013 – may 1, 2013 – may 3, 2013 – may 20, 2013 – may 29, 2013
