Rehabilitation of Fractures in Disasters and Conflicts: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 117: Line 117:
In disasters and conflicts your assessment of a patient with a fracture should follow the same format as a standard rehabilitation assessment, while understanding that those with poly-trauma, pain or post-operative medications may be unable to complete the assessment within one session. Where this is the case, complete the assessment elements that are possible but limit your treatment plan to what can be done safely until you are able to complete a full assessment. Specific considerations that might impact your fracture assessment within disaster and conflict settings may include:
In disasters and conflicts your assessment of a patient with a fracture should follow the same format as a standard rehabilitation assessment, while understanding that those with poly-trauma, pain or post-operative medications may be unable to complete the assessment within one session. Where this is the case, complete the assessment elements that are possible but limit your treatment plan to what can be done safely until you are able to complete a full assessment. Specific considerations that might impact your fracture assessment within disaster and conflict settings may include:


Limited Medical History  
* Limited Medical History including incomplete background information such as weight-bearing status or post-operative notes, which may be due to the emergency transfer of patient, disrupted services and that the patient has been separated from their family.


* Incomplete Background Information such as weight-bearing status or post-operative notes
<br>Increased Risk of Infection as a result of the mechanism (blast, crush) or the context of the injury (prolonged exposure to dirty water), poor theatre conditions and a contaminated hospital environment, e.g. an emergency camp with limited sanitation services, can also increase the risk of infection. With disrupted care that makes continuity of treatment difficult, leading to extensive or hard to treat infections<br> <blockquote>'''''NOTE:''' Only assess the components you feel competent to complete and which fall within your scope of practice''</blockquote>
* May be due to the emergency transfer of patient, disrupted services and that the patient has been separated from their family
 
<br>Increased Risk of Infection  
 
* The mechanism (blast, crush) or the context of the injury (prolonged exposure to dirty water) could increase the risk of contamination.
* Poor theatre conditions and a contaminated hospital environment, e.g. an emergency camp with limited sanitation services, can also increase the risk of infection.
 
* Disrupted care will make continuity of treatment difficult, leading to extensive or hard to treat infections<br><blockquote>''Remember; Only assess the components you feel competent to complete and which fall within your scope of practice''</blockquote>


=== Subjective Assessment ===
=== Subjective Assessment ===

Revision as of 01:44, 27 February 2022

Welcome to Rehabilitation in Disaster and Conflict Situations Content Development Project. Please do not edit unless you are involved in this project, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!! If you would like to get involved in this project and earn accreditation for your contributions, please get in touch!

Original Editors - Add your name/s here if you are the original editor/s of this page.  User Name

Top Contributors - Naomi O'Reilly, Kalyani Yajnanarayan, Kim Jackson, Vidya Acharya, Jess Bell, Tarina van der Stockt, Aminat Abolade, Anna Fuhrmann, Carin Hunter, Ewa Jaraczewska and Rishika Babburu      

Introduction[edit | edit source]

A fracture is a discontinuity in a bone (or cartilage) resulting from mechanical forces that exceed the bone's ability to withstand them[1], and are one of the most common injuries seen in disaster and conflict settings, with at least one fracture seen in half of the patients presenting for treatment.[2] The number and type of fractures vary depending on the type of disaster or conflict but in general during disasters and conflicts patients present with multiple injuries, with open and complex fractures common, which can complicate your rehabilitation plan.

Given the surge in demand for health services following disasters and conflicts, triage systems are employed whereby following initial evaluation the injured are placed into a specific category based on the probability of survivorship and severity of injury.[3] In the case of fractures those with non-life threatening fractures may have definitive treatment delayed where there is no risk of significant subsequent morbidity or following treatment may be discharged very quickly following application of a cast or splint and even following orthopaedic surgery so rehabilitation professionals need to maintain close contact with the medical team in order to assess those with fractures prior to discharge.[2]

Types of Fracture[edit | edit source]

Earthquakes in particular cause a significant burden of injuries, mainly of the limb with fracture incidence shown to correlate with the Richter Magnitude Scale, where high-energy earthquakes cause more fractures.[4][5] MacKenzie et al [6] found that fractures accounted for 65% of the total injuries following earthquakes with lower extremities fractures accounting for 59% of those injuries. Bortolin et al [4] found that 10% of fractures involved the pelvic ring, while spinal column fractures accounted for 17% of the total injuries, with more than 4% of these involving spinal cord injury.[5]

Wounds obtained in armed conflict have their own specific epidemiology and demand principles of management that sometimes differ from civilian practices. In conflict settings the type of fractures will depend on the mechanism of injury and the type of weaponry used which can include gun shot wounds, knife, blast, shrapnel and landmine injuries, with poly-trauma including open fractures with bone and soft tissue injury common, which increases the risk of contamination of the fracture site and wound infection.

High-energy trauma, such as those seen in crush or blast injuries are often associated with fracture such as pelvic fractures that can also result in significant blood loss and poly-trauma that can be more complex to manage, and in many cases less likely to survive in disaster and conflicts settings.[7] Where they do survive, they tend to have extensive associated injuries including severe soft tissue damage and organ damage, or spinal cord injury, which may further limit early rehabilitation and require significant discussion with the medical team to understand precautions and limitations prior to any assessment of treatment. [2]

Given the range of fractures that can be seen within disaster and conflict settings it is important to have an understanding of common features of different types of fracture in order to understand the implications this may have for early rehabilitation. [2]

  1. Ensure you have information about the location of the fracture;
    • Is it through the bone shaft
    • Into a joint or
    • Are there multiple fractures along the bone?
  2. Assess for Deformity;
    • Is the bone in alignment
    • Does it have continuity
    • Did the bone emerge from the skin/soft tissues?
  3. Are there any associated injuries?
    • Is the fracture open or closed
    • What is the condition of the surrounding soft tissues? Check the surgical notes and enquire with the medical team for damage to blood vessels or nerves, as they may impact rehabilitation
  4. What was Medical or Surgical Management?
    • Are they any precautions or restrictions following management?

Bone Healing Considerations[edit | edit source]

Having an understanding of approximate timescales for bone healing is important. If we consider simple fractures we know that generally; paediatric fractures will heal most quickly (approximately 3-6 weeks) and adults upper limb fractures (approximately 6 weeks) will heal faster than adult lower limb fractures (approximately 8-12 weeks).

It is important to understand though that while it is helpful to understand approximate timescales of recovery for different fracture types, every patient will be different and in disaster and conflict situations patients may be more likely to heal slowly as a result of a range of factors including;

  • Multiple Injuries
  • Complex Injuries
  • Vascular Injury (Impair Bone Healing)
  • Infection (Impair Bone Healing)
  • Late or Suboptimal Fracture Management
  • Blast injuries / Gun Shot Wounds that leave shrapnel close to the bone have higher rate of delayed or non-union
  • Blast or Crush Injuries which cause huge soft tissue damage are likely, (if the limb is salvaged) to heal slowly, due to impaired blood flow, and there is a high likelihood of long-term peripheral nerve injury.
  • Patient’s Past Medical History (conditions such as diabetes, which affect vascular supply, will slow or limit healing)
  • Smoking Status (Impairs Bone Healing)
  • Nutritional Status


Weight bearing status should be discussed with the medical or surgical team, with safe limits determined for the initial phase of their recovery being mindful of the above considerations. Given that bone strengthens in response to the load it experiences, once safe limits are in place from the medical team early rehabilitation should include progressive weight bearing, prioritising the safe limits of weight bearing for the initial phase of their recovery and offer basic advice on when and how they can start to increase their weight bearing at home.

Medical and Surgical Intervention Considerations[edit | edit source]

Ideally the medical or surgical team will have recorded precautions and contraindications for rehabilitation before the patients is examined by the rehabilitation professional, but this may not always be the case when working in disasters and conflicts. where post-operative or medical notes may be limited or not available at all. Prior to reviewing the patient you should try to get as much information from the medical team as you can, and if unsure of anything during assessment or treatment clarify first with the team and ensure to follow all precautions and contraindications. [2]

The following table outlines some of the more common fracture management strategies and possible complications that can occur in disaster and conflict settings.

Intervention Description What to Watch for in Disaster and Conflict
Casting
  • Normally cheap and readily available - Plaster of Paris most commonly used
  • Used to immobilise and protect a fractured bone while it heals.
  • Fit should not be too tight to eliminate blood flow
  • Only apply or assist with application if within your scope of practice
Internal Fixation
  • Often contraindicated in conflicts and disasters, due to the risk of infection, suboptimal operating conditions and challenges with long-term follow-up.
  • Should only take place in fixed facility, so less likely to encounter them in field hospital / tented facility.
External Fixation
  • More commonly used in disasters and conflicts
  • Generally used on fractured bone which has fragmented into multiple pieces, or used to temporarily stabilise a patient with multiple injuries until they receive definitive orthopaedic surgery.
  • External fixators may enable earlier weight bearing compared to a cast; however, always check with the surgical team.
  • Pin Site Infection
  • Wound Infection
  • Insufficient Stabilisation from Fixation
  • Undiagnosed Nerve Injury
  • Inappropriate Pin Placement Through Tendon or Nerves
Traction
  • Widely used for fractures and dislocations including neck of femur, femoral shaft, displaced acetabulum and some pelvic fractures
  • Temporary measure while awaiting definitive treatment, or when casting unsuitable.
  • Skin Traction
    • Short-term treatment adult femoral fractures
    • Definitive treatment paediatric patients
  • Skeletal Traction
    • Less effective for adults as definitive treatment
    • Effective definitive treatment paediatric hip fracture

Assessment Considerations[edit | edit source]

In disasters and conflicts your assessment of a patient with a fracture should follow the same format as a standard rehabilitation assessment, while understanding that those with poly-trauma, pain or post-operative medications may be unable to complete the assessment within one session. Where this is the case, complete the assessment elements that are possible but limit your treatment plan to what can be done safely until you are able to complete a full assessment. Specific considerations that might impact your fracture assessment within disaster and conflict settings may include:

  • Limited Medical History including incomplete background information such as weight-bearing status or post-operative notes, which may be due to the emergency transfer of patient, disrupted services and that the patient has been separated from their family.

Increased Risk of Infection as a result of the mechanism (blast, crush) or the context of the injury (prolonged exposure to dirty water), poor theatre conditions and a contaminated hospital environment, e.g. an emergency camp with limited sanitation services, can also increase the risk of infection. With disrupted care that makes continuity of treatment difficult, leading to extensive or hard to treat infections

NOTE: Only assess the components you feel competent to complete and which fall within your scope of practice

Subjective Assessment[edit | edit source]

Important fracture specific information to consider during subjective assessment in disaster and conflict settings;

History of Presenting Condition[edit | edit source]

  • Timeline of Injury and Treatment to date
  • Mechanism of Injury will indicate the extent of the associated soft-tissue injuries, any possible additional injuries and the risk of complications;
    • High- or low-energy?
    • Any twisting? These answers
  • Treatment Information
    • Is the treatment definitive or is further surgery required?
    • Note any post-operative instructions (such as weight-bearing status) from the operation notes or the orthopaedic team

Social History[edit | edit source]

  • Daily activities that the patient needs to complete for independence;
    • Will the patient need to manage with one hand?
    • Will the patient have to use stairs?
    • Will the patient be able to self-propel a wheelchair (considering environmental and personal factors)?
    • What will the patient sleep on?
    • Does the patient have access to adequate nutrition to support bone healing

Pain[edit | edit source]

  • Is the pain controlled to allow the patient to move and mobilise (as allowed by the weight-bearing status)?
  • Is the pain proportionate to the injury and in the expected location?
  • Is the pain coming from an undiagnosed injury or might it indicate a serious complication?

Sensation[edit | edit source]

Nerve and vascular injuries, can occur as a result of high-energy injuries, surgical repair or procedures including internal or external fixators and pressure from splints may all cause nerve injuries so sensation and movement should always be monitored post-operatively as rehabilitation professionals may be the first to pick up these injuries. The following table highlights the fractures that can result in nerve injury.

Injury Type Nerve Commonly Affected Clinical Signs
Shoulder Fracture Dislocation
  • Axillary Nerve
  • Deltoid Weakness
    • Decreased Shoulder Abduction
    • Decreased Shoulder Flexion
  • Loss of sensation over lateral aspect of upper arm (Sargeant’s Patch)
Humeral Fracture

Proximal or Shaft

  • Radial
  • Wrist Drop
  • Loss of Sensation in first web-space
Humeral Fracture

Supracondylar

  • Median
    • Anterior Interosseus Branch
  • Loss of Thumb IP Flexion
    • Unable to Perform ‘OK’ sign
Radial Head Dislocation +/- Ulna-Radial Fracture 'Monteggia'
  • Radial
    • Posterior Interosseus Branch
Loss of Wrist Extension

Loss of MCP Joint Extension - All Digits

Fibular Head Fracture

Knee Dislocation

  • Common Peroneal
  • Foot Drop
Hip Fracture

Acetabulum, Fracture

Pelvic Fracture

  • Sciatic Nerve - Posterior
  • Femoral Nerve - Anterior
  • Foot Drop
  • Decreased Hip Flexion Power
  • Decreased Knee Extension Power

Objective Assessment[edit | edit source]

Given the increased risks of infections when working with disasters and conflict settings your first role as a rehabilitation professional is to monitor for any current or potential fracture complications either directly related to the fracture itself, related to other injuries sustained or as a result of the environment. Rehabilitation professionals should always perform a neurovascular assessment using the 5 P's following fractures to monitor for compromised blood flow or nerve damage, as neurovascular compromise can lead to permanent injury.

PP logo.PNG

Treatment Considerations[edit | edit source]

Summary[edit | edit source]

Complex poly-trauma presentations frequently complicate the assessment and early rehabilitation of fractures in disaster and conflict settings, with a need for increased awareness and monitoring for red flags and complications that occur even alongside what would typically be considered a simple fracture as a result of the environment and conditions in which the fracture occurs.

It is important to complete a detail initial assessment, including social history top have an understanding of support structures so that you can appropriately prioritise the rehabilitation. Involvement of the patient in goal setting is really import and ensuring adequate education around the management of the fracture through the different stages of treatment, including advice on return to activity and use of the limb within any weight-bearing limits set by the medical / surgical team.[2]

Resources[edit | edit source]

References [edit | edit source]

see adding references tutorial

  1. Radiopedia Fracture Available from:https://radiopaedia.org/articles/fracture-1 (last accessed 2.4.2020)
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Lathia C, Skelton P, Clift Z. Early rehabilitation in conflicts and disasters. Handicap International: London, UK. 2020.
  3. Wolfson N. Orthopaedic triage during natural disasters and mass casualties: do scoring systems matter?. International orthopaedics. 2013 Aug;37(8):1439-41.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Bortolin M, Morelli I, Voskanyan A, Joyce NR, Ciottone GR. Earthquake-related orthopedic injuries in adult population: a systematic review. Prehospital and disaster medicine. 2017 Apr;32(2):201-8.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Bartholdson S, von Schreeb J. Natural disasters and injuries: what does a surgeon need to know?. Current trauma reports. 2018 Jun;4(2):103-8.
  6. MacKenzie JS, Banskota B, Sirisreetreerux N, Shafiq B, Hasenboehler EA. A review of the epidemiology and treatment of orthopaedic injuries after earthquakes in developing countries. World journal of emergency surgery. 2017 Dec;12(1):1-7.
  7. AO Foundation. Management of limb injuries during disasters and conflicts. International Committee of Red Cross. 2016.
  8. NURSINGcom. The 5 P's of Circulatory System Check | Nursing Mnemonic. Available from: https://youtu.be/wzxm-2iWGlA[last accessed 26/02/2022]