Posterior Drawer Test (Knee): Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:
== References<br>  ==
== References<br>  ==


<references />
(1) Magee DJ. Orthopedic Physical Assessment: 5th Edition. St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier;2008.<br>(2) The Accuracy of the Clinical Examination in the Setting of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries. Rubinstein RA Jr., Shelbourne KD, McCarroll JR, et al: Am J Sports Med 22: 550-557, 1994<br>

Revision as of 00:28, 26 May 2011

Be the first to edit this page and have your name permanently included as the original editor, see the editing pages tutorial for help.

Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.

Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.  Read more.


Purpose
[edit | edit source]

The posterior drawer test evaluates the posterior cruciate ligament.

Technique
[edit | edit source]

The patient laying supine with the knee in ninety degrees of flexion. The foot of the patient is stabilized on the table. The fysiotherapist grabs the anterior aspect of the tibia over the tibial tuberosity and push forward with a steady force. The tibia displaces posteriorly. If the posterior translation of the tibia is more than normal (compared with the healthy side), the test is positive. This is indicative of a posterior cruciate ligament tear. (1)

Evidence[edit | edit source]

Results from a blinded, randomized, controlled study shows that the accuracy for detection of a PCL-tear is 96%, with 90% sensitivity and a 99% specificity. For grade 2 and grade 3 posterior laxity, the examination accuracy was higher than for grade 1 posterior laxity. (2)

Resources[edit | edit source]

- http://www.aclmd.com/Publications/Abstracts%20pdf/PCL_Accuracy.pdf

References
[edit | edit source]

(1) Magee DJ. Orthopedic Physical Assessment: 5th Edition. St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier;2008.
(2) The Accuracy of the Clinical Examination in the Setting of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries. Rubinstein RA Jr., Shelbourne KD, McCarroll JR, et al: Am J Sports Med 22: 550-557, 1994