Outcome Measures for Patients with Lower Limb Amputations: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}    
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}    
</div>  
</div>  
== Sub Heading 1 ==
== General introduction ==


Add text here...  
Outcome measures can be used for many different purposes. A predictive measure should be able to classify individuals according to a set of pre-defined categories either concurrently or prospectively e.g. whether an amputee will use a prosthesis successfully(1)(2). Detecting differences between people or groups demonstrates the discriminative value of an outcome measure e.g. being able to determine the different abilities of a trans-tibial or trans-femoral amputee or differences between prosthetic components from scores or times recorded(3). Whereas an evaluative measure should be able to detect changes, usually over a period of time in an individual or group. An evaluative outcome measure may also detect changes occurring following some kind of intervention, e.g a therapy programme(4) or provision of a prosthetic component. Some outcome measures are designed to do only one of the above, while others may do a combination, though some of the requirements of these different types of outcome measures are competing(5). Whichever purpose it is designed for, the psychometric properties of the outcome measure need to be reported to satisfy the user that it is fit for purpose with the population they wish to use it(6). The psychometric properties of an outcome measure are the characteristics that express it’s adequacy in terms of reliability, validity and responsiveness. Another term often used is clinimetric properties. While being developed from similar origins as psychometrics, clinimetricshas been described as the practice of assessing or describing symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings by means of scales, indices, and other quantitative instruments, all of which should have adequate psychometric properties(7)(8). <br><br>


== Sub Heading 2  ==
== Sub Heading 2  ==

Revision as of 08:57, 17 February 2015

Welcome to WCPT Network for Amputee Rehabilitation Project. This page is being developed by participants of a project to populate the Amputees section of Physiopedia. 
  • Please do not edit unless you are involved in this project, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!!  
  • If you would like to get involved in this project and earn accreditation for your contributions, please get in touch!

Tips for writing this page:

Aim:

  1. To enable the reader to select appropriate outcome measures to demonstrate effective intervention. (See CSP Outcome Measures Toolbox)

A quick word on content:

Content criteria:

  • Evidence based
  • Referenced
  • Include images and videos
  • Include a list of open online resources that we can link to

Example content:

Original Editor - Add a link to your Physiopedia profile here.

Top Contributors - Sheik Abdul Khadir, Lucy Aird, Admin, Tarina van der Stockt, Kim Jackson, Lauren Lopez, 127.0.0.1, Simisola Ajeyalemi and Rachael Lowe  

General introduction[edit | edit source]

Outcome measures can be used for many different purposes. A predictive measure should be able to classify individuals according to a set of pre-defined categories either concurrently or prospectively e.g. whether an amputee will use a prosthesis successfully(1)(2). Detecting differences between people or groups demonstrates the discriminative value of an outcome measure e.g. being able to determine the different abilities of a trans-tibial or trans-femoral amputee or differences between prosthetic components from scores or times recorded(3). Whereas an evaluative measure should be able to detect changes, usually over a period of time in an individual or group. An evaluative outcome measure may also detect changes occurring following some kind of intervention, e.g a therapy programme(4) or provision of a prosthetic component. Some outcome measures are designed to do only one of the above, while others may do a combination, though some of the requirements of these different types of outcome measures are competing(5). Whichever purpose it is designed for, the psychometric properties of the outcome measure need to be reported to satisfy the user that it is fit for purpose with the population they wish to use it(6). The psychometric properties of an outcome measure are the characteristics that express it’s adequacy in terms of reliability, validity and responsiveness. Another term often used is clinimetric properties. While being developed from similar origins as psychometrics, clinimetricshas been described as the practice of assessing or describing symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings by means of scales, indices, and other quantitative instruments, all of which should have adequate psychometric properties(7)(8).

Sub Heading 2[edit | edit source]

Add text here...

Sub Heading 3
[edit | edit source]

Add text here...

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.