Outcome Measures: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:
*[[Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score|Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score]]  
*[[Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score|Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score]]  
*[[Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score|Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score]]  
*[[Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score|Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score]]  
*[[Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)|Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)]]
*[[Neck Disability Index|Neck Disability Index]]  
*[[Neck Disability Index|Neck Disability Index]]  
*[[Neck Pain and Disability Scale|Neck Pain and Disability Scale]]  
*[[Neck Pain and Disability Scale|Neck Pain and Disability Scale]]  
Line 47: Line 48:
*[[Roland‐Morris Disability Questionnaire|Roland‐Morris Disability Questionnaire]]  
*[[Roland‐Morris Disability Questionnaire|Roland‐Morris Disability Questionnaire]]  
*[[Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire|Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2)]]<br>  
*[[Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire|Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2)]]<br>  
*[[Spinal_Cord_Independence_Measure_(SCIM)|Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM)]]
*[[Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM)|Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM)]]  
*[[The Assessment of Pain and Occupational Performance|The Assessment of Pain and Occupational Performance]]  
*[[The Assessment of Pain and Occupational Performance|The Assessment of Pain and Occupational Performance]]  
*[[Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)|Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)]]
*[[Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)|Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)]]

Revision as of 07:36, 15 December 2011

An outcome measure is the result of a test that is used to objectively determine the baseline function of a patient at the beginning of treatment. Once treatment has commenced, the same instrument can be used to determine progress and treatment efficacy. With the move towards Evidence Based Practice (EBP) in the health sciences, objective measures of outcome are important to provide credible and reliable justification for treatment. The instrument should also be convenient to apply for the therapist and comfortable for the patient.

Reliability, validity and responsiveness[edit | edit source]

The outcome measure should have been shown to test the particular aspect of function that it is reported to test (validity) and the results should be the same (or similar) regardless of who administers the test or when it is administered (reliability). Finally, the test or scale should actually be able to test change over time in whatever is being tested (responsiveness). The Chartered Society of Physiotherapists in the United Kingdom makes it clear that standardised outcome measures should be used routinely in normal practice:

"Taking account of the patient’s problems, a published, standardised, valid, reliable and responsive outcome measure is used to evaluate the change in the patient’s health status" (Core standards of physiotherapy practice, 2005).

Statistical analysis[edit | edit source]

Some outcome measures have been statistically tested to determine actual validity and reliability and it must be noted that some are more valid and reliable than others. Analysis should also be performed to determine if the change in score on the test is a result of the intervention (treatment), or not.

Outcome Measures[edit | edit source]


Resources
[edit | edit source]

Regis University site for outcomes information:  This is an excellent site that includes analysis of practice forms, outcome measures and the evidence for a variety of clinical topics.  At the very bottom you will find the “health assessment outcomes indicators”, an 80+ page document that gives an overview of MANY outcomes tools.