Ottawa Ankle Rules: Difference between revisions
Andrea Nees (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Evan Thomas (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="editorbox"> | |||
'''Original Editor '''- [[User:Jill Nicole Hickey|Jill Nicole Hickey]] | |||
'''Original Editor '''- [[User:Jill Nicole Hickey|Jill Nicole Hickey]] | |||
'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]] | '''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Purpose<br> == | == Purpose<br> == | ||
To see if there is an indication for X-rays after an acute ankle injury.<ref name="Bachmann et al.">Bachmann LM, Haberzeth S, Steurer J, ter Riet G. The accuracy of the Ottawa knee rule to rule out knee fractures: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jan 20;140(2):121-4.</ref> <ref name="Emparanza et al">Emparanza JI, Aginaga JR, Estudio Multicéntro en Urgencias de Osakidetza: Reglas de Ottawa (EMUORO) Group. Validation of the Ottawa Knee Rules. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Oct;38(4):364-8.</ref> | To see if there is an indication for X-rays after an acute ankle injury.<ref name="Bachmann et al.">Bachmann LM, Haberzeth S, Steurer J, ter Riet G. The accuracy of the Ottawa knee rule to rule out knee fractures: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jan 20;140(2):121-4.</ref> <ref name="Emparanza et al">Emparanza JI, Aginaga JR, Estudio Multicéntro en Urgencias de Osakidetza: Reglas de Ottawa (EMUORO) Group. Validation of the Ottawa Knee Rules. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Oct;38(4):364-8.</ref> | ||
== Variables: == | == Variables: == | ||
Line 18: | Line 16: | ||
#Inability to bear weight both immediately after injury and for 4 steps during intial evaluation<ref name="Flynn et al">Flynn TW, Cleland JA, Whitman JM. User's guide to the musculoskeletal examination. Evidence in motion; 2008.</ref> | #Inability to bear weight both immediately after injury and for 4 steps during intial evaluation<ref name="Flynn et al">Flynn TW, Cleland JA, Whitman JM. User's guide to the musculoskeletal examination. Evidence in motion; 2008.</ref> | ||
== Evidence<br> == | == Evidence<br> == | ||
Sensitivity = 98% <ref name="Backmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT, et al.">Bachmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT, et all. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematice review. BMJ 2003; 326(7386):417.</ref> | Sensitivity = 98% <ref name="Backmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT, et al.">Bachmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT, et all. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematice review. BMJ 2003; 326(7386):417.</ref> | ||
Line 24: | Line 22: | ||
- LR = 0.10 | - LR = 0.10 | ||
Bachmann LM, Haberzeth S, Steurer J, ter Riet G. The accuracy of the [[Ottawa Knee Rule|Ottawa knee rule]] to rule out knee fractures: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jan 20;140(2):121-4. | Bachmann LM, Haberzeth S, Steurer J, ter Riet G. The accuracy of the [[Ottawa Knee Rule|Ottawa knee rule]] to rule out knee fractures: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jan 20;140(2):121-4. | ||
== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed]) == | == Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed]) == |
Revision as of 23:38, 28 March 2013
Original Editor - Jill Nicole Hickey
Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. Read more.
Purpose
[edit | edit source]
To see if there is an indication for X-rays after an acute ankle injury.[1] [2]
Variables:[edit | edit source]
- Bony tenderness along distal 6 cm of posterior edge of tibia/tip of medial malleolus
- Bony tenderness along distal 6 cm of posterior edge of fibula or tip of lateral malleolus
- Bony tenderness at the base of 5th metatarsal
- Bony tenderness at the navicular
- Inability to bear weight both immediately after injury and for 4 steps during intial evaluation[3]
Evidence
[edit | edit source]
Sensitivity = 98% [4]
- LR = 0.10
Bachmann LM, Haberzeth S, Steurer J, ter Riet G. The accuracy of the Ottawa knee rule to rule out knee fractures: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jan 20;140(2):121-4.
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1Vy-VINwlaUmvVLdQopxCRbome4n8hgucX4pU4cvolrwOqUkR|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS
References[edit | edit source]
References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.
- ↑ Bachmann LM, Haberzeth S, Steurer J, ter Riet G. The accuracy of the Ottawa knee rule to rule out knee fractures: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jan 20;140(2):121-4.
- ↑ Emparanza JI, Aginaga JR, Estudio Multicéntro en Urgencias de Osakidetza: Reglas de Ottawa (EMUORO) Group. Validation of the Ottawa Knee Rules. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Oct;38(4):364-8.
- ↑ Flynn TW, Cleland JA, Whitman JM. User's guide to the musculoskeletal examination. Evidence in motion; 2008.
- ↑ Bachmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT, et all. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematice review. BMJ 2003; 326(7386):417.