Male Urinary Symptom Impact Questionnaire (MUSIQ): Difference between revisions
Kirsten Ryan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Kim Jackson (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="editorbox"> | <div class="editorbox"> | ||
'''Original Editor '''- | '''Original Editor '''- [[User:Kirsten Ryan|Kirsten Ryan]] | ||
''' | '''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Objective | == Objective == | ||
The Male Urinary Symptom Impact Questionnaire (MUSIQ) was designed to measure the effect of interventions for urinary incontinence on health-related quality of life in men.<ref name="Robinson">Robinson J, Shea J. Development and testing of a measure of health-related quality of life for men with urinary incontinence. J Am Geriat Soc 2002;50:935-945.</ref> | The Male Urinary Symptom Impact Questionnaire (MUSIQ) was designed to measure the effect of interventions for urinary incontinence on health-related quality of life in men.<ref name="Robinson">Robinson J, Shea J. Development and testing of a measure of health-related quality of life for men with urinary incontinence. J Am Geriat Soc 2002;50:935-945.</ref> | ||
== Intended Population< | == Intended Population == | ||
Community dwelling, racially diverse men with continence problems.<ref name="Robinson" /> | |||
== Method of Use == | == Method of Use == | ||
== | The MUSIQ contains 32 items that are each coded on a 4-point scale of impact on quality of life: 0 = not at all, 1 = slightly, 2 = moderately, and 3 = greatly. Total scores range from 0 (no impact) to 96 (maximum impact).<ref name="Robinson" /> | ||
It takes about 20 minutes to complete by either self-administration or interview.<ref name="Robinson" /> | |||
== Reference == | |||
== Evidence == | == Evidence == | ||
=== Reliability === | === Reliability === | ||
Internal consistency with Cronbach's coefficient was 0.95<ref name="Robinson" /> | |||
=== Validity === | === Validity === | ||
Content validity was supported with percentage agreement scores of 100% for clarity and 89% for item fit.<ref name="Robinson" /> | |||
The Pearson's correlation coefficient between the Male Urinary Distress Inventory and the MUSIQ was 0.59 (P < .001).<ref name="Robinson" /> | |||
=== Responsiveness === | === Responsiveness === | ||
=== Miscellaneous<span style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal; | === Miscellaneous<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal;"></span> === | ||
The MUSIQ addresses the dimensions of mental/psychological health, social health, and global perceptions of function and well-being, focusing on emotional health, social contact, activity, stability of support, and sleep. | |||
= | Test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change need to be further evaluated. Concurrent validity scores should also be correlated with another generic health-related quality of life instruement. Construct validity should also be reexamined with a larger more symptomatically diverse sample. There was a possibility of floor effect and therefore should be further studied.<ref name="Robinson" /> | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
[[Category:Outcome Measures]] | |||
Latest revision as of 00:21, 5 August 2019
Original Editor - Kirsten Ryan
Top Contributors - Kirsten Ryan, Admin, WikiSysop, Kim Jackson and George Prudden
Objective[edit | edit source]
The Male Urinary Symptom Impact Questionnaire (MUSIQ) was designed to measure the effect of interventions for urinary incontinence on health-related quality of life in men.[1]
Intended Population[edit | edit source]
Community dwelling, racially diverse men with continence problems.[1]
Method of Use[edit | edit source]
The MUSIQ contains 32 items that are each coded on a 4-point scale of impact on quality of life: 0 = not at all, 1 = slightly, 2 = moderately, and 3 = greatly. Total scores range from 0 (no impact) to 96 (maximum impact).[1]
It takes about 20 minutes to complete by either self-administration or interview.[1]
Reference[edit | edit source]
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Reliability[edit | edit source]
Internal consistency with Cronbach's coefficient was 0.95[1]
Validity[edit | edit source]
Content validity was supported with percentage agreement scores of 100% for clarity and 89% for item fit.[1]
The Pearson's correlation coefficient between the Male Urinary Distress Inventory and the MUSIQ was 0.59 (P < .001).[1]
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Miscellaneous[edit | edit source]
The MUSIQ addresses the dimensions of mental/psychological health, social health, and global perceptions of function and well-being, focusing on emotional health, social contact, activity, stability of support, and sleep.
Test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change need to be further evaluated. Concurrent validity scores should also be correlated with another generic health-related quality of life instruement. Construct validity should also be reexamined with a larger more symptomatically diverse sample. There was a possibility of floor effect and therefore should be further studied.[1]
