Lumbosacral Biomechanics: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(44 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="noeditbox">Welcome to [[Vrije Universiteit Brussel Evidence-based Practice Project|Vrije Universiteit Brussel's Evidence-based Practice project]]. This space was created by and for the students in the Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy program of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. Please do not edit unless you are involved in this project, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!!</div> <div class="editorbox">
<div class="editorbox">
'''Original Editors '''[[User:Bert Lasat|Bert Lasat]]  
'''Original Editors '''[[User:Bert Lasat|Bert Lasat]]<br>


'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.&nbsp; [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]]
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}
</div>  
</div>
== Search Strategy  ==


First I searched for books about lumbosacral biomechanics in the library of the University of Brussels. After I read the literature, I searched on multiple scientifically sites like PubMed, Web of Knowledge,… for information about the lumbosacral biomechanics. <br>Then I had enough information and I started to write this publication.<br><br>
== Introduction ==
[[File:Biomechanical studies.png|thumb|Biomechanical study]]
[[Biomechanics]] is the study of forces and their effects when applied to humans. Basic musculoskeletal biomechanics concepts are important for clinicians eg physical and occupational therapists and orthopaedic surgeons. A therapist assessment of a patient typically includes a biomechanical analysis. As the lumbosacral region is the most important region in the vertebral column in terms of mobility and weight bearing it is important to look at its biomechanics.<ref name="Jensen">Jensen M Biomechanics of the lumbar intervertebral disk: a review. Physical Therapy. 1980; 60(6):765-773.</ref>[[File:Lumbosacral MRI.jpeg|thumb|Lumbosacral MRI|alt=|267x267px]]As the lowest section of the mobile human spine, the lumbosacral spines main role lies in its ability to support the upper body by transmitting forces and bending moments to the [[pelvis]] via both [[Sacroiliac Joint|sacroiliac joints]]. Like all regions of the spine, the lumbosacral spine protects the [[Spinal cord anatomy|spinal cord]] and nerve roots from damage by providing a protective sheath. Mechanical stability is required to fulfill this task and to prevent premature mechanical and biologic breakdown of its structures. A reciprocal  process between the active ([[Paraspinal Muscles|muscles]]), passive (osteoligamentous spine), and neural components is necessary to prevent [[Lumbar Instability|instability]].


== Definition/Description ==
== Biomechanics: Lumbosacral Region ==
[[File:Testing lumbar flexion.jpg|thumb|Lumbosacral flexion]]
The three movements in the spine are flexion, extension, rotation and lateral flexion. These movements occur as a combination of rotation and translation in the [[Cardinal Planes and Axes of Movement|sagittal, coronal and horizontal plane]] <ref name="Bogduk">Bogduk, N. (2012). Radiological and Clinical Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine (5th ed.). China: Churchill Livingstone.</ref>. Movements result in force, a  force simply being a push or pull. Motion is created and modified by the actions of forces. When force rotates a body segment this effect is called a torque or moment of force.<ref>Hall SJ. Kinetic Concepts for Analyzing Human Motion. In: Hall SJ. eds. Basic Biomechanics, 8e New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2019. http://www.sciepub.com/reference/334549 (last accessed 28.11, 2022).</ref> These spinal movements result in various forces acting on the [[Lumbar Anatomy|lumbar spine]] and [[sacrum]], that is:  


Mechanics, the study of forces and their effects, when applied to humans, is called biomechanics. Logically means ‘lumbosacral biomechanics’ the study of forces and their effects at the level of the lumbosacral region.<ref name="1">Gail M., Jensen M. A.. Biomechanics of the lumbar intervertebral disk: a review. Physical Therapy. 1980. 60:6 p765 -773</ref><br>
# compressive force
# tensile force
# shear force
# bending moment
# torsional moment<ref name="Adams" />.

[[File:Discmig2.jpg|thumb|Direction nucleus pulposus extension ]]For example, with lumbar flexion, a compressive force is applied to the anterior aspect of the disc and a distractive force is applied to the posterior aspect of the disc. The opposite forces occur with lumbar extension<ref name="McKenzie">McKenzie, R. (1981). The lumbar spine : mechanical diagnosis and therapy. Waikanae, New Zealand: Spinal Publications.</ref>.<br>[[File:Discmig1.jpg|thumb|Direction nucleus pulposus  flexion]]'''Load bearing'''


== Clinically Relevant Anatomy  ==
* The lumbar spine complex forms an effective load-bearing system. When a load is applied externally to the vertebral column, it produces stresses to the stiff vertebral body and the relatively elastic [[Intervertebral disc|intervertebral disc (IVD)]], causing strains to be produced more easily in the IVD<ref name="White">White A, Panjabi M. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. 1978, Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co.</ref>. 
* Pressure within the nucleus pulposus (NP) is greater than zero, even at rest, providing a “preload” mechanism allowing for greater resistance to applied forces<ref name="Hirsch">Hirsch C. The reaction of intervertebral discs to compression forces. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1955; 37:1188-1191</ref>. Hydrostatic pressure increases within the intervertebral disc resulting in an outward pressure towards the vertebral endplates resulting in bulging of the annulus fibrosis (AF) and tensile forces within the concentric annular fibres. This transmission of forces effectively slows the application of pressure onto the adjacent vertebra, acting as a shock absorber<ref name="Bogduk" />. The intervertebral discs are therefore an essential biomechanical feature, effectively acting as a [[Cartilage|fibrocartilage]] “cushion” transmitting force between adjacent vertebrae during spinal movement.
* The lumbar disc is more predisposed to injury compared with other spinal regions due to: the annular fibres being in a more parallel arrangement and thinner posteriorly compared with anteriorly, the nucleus being positioned more posteriorly, and the holes in the cartilaginous endplates<ref name="Jensen" />. See [[Biomechanics of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation]]
* When a load is applied along the spine, “shear” forces occur parallel to the intervertebral disc as the compression of the nucleus results in a lateral bulging of the annulus. Shear forces also occur as one vertebra moves, for example, forwards or backwards with respect to an adjacent vertebra with flexion and extension. Torsional stresses result from the external forces about the axis of twist<ref name="Jensen" /> 
and occur in the intervertebral disc with activity such as twisting of the spine.

* The zygapophysial or “facet” joints provide stability to the intervertebral joint with respect to shear forces, whilst allowing primarily flexion and extension movement.


The lumbosacral transition is at the level of L5 - S1.<br>The lumbar spine has normally 5 vertebrae (normal range 4-6), while the sacrale spine consists of a series of 3 – 5 fused sacral vertebrae. Both the lumbar and the sacrale vertebrale bodies are separated by a discus intervertebralis. <br>The intervertebral disk is a unique articular structure, part of a component load-bearing system consisting of disks, vertebrae, ligaments, and muscles. <br>The disk, which is the most important component, absorbs the load and distributes the <br>forces applied to the vertebral spine. The structures that allows this shock-absorbing, force-distributing ability are the nucleus pulposus, the annulus fibrosis and the cartilaginous end-plates.<br>The nucleus pulposus consists of a gelatinous mucoprotein and mucopolysaccharide. Those molecules are responsible for the fact that the nucleus is consisted out 70-90% water. The annulus fibrosus consist of concentric rings of fibrocartilaginous fibers. This structure is encapsulating the nucleus. The last component of the intervertebral disk is the endplate. This plate is a thin layer of cartilage tissue situated between the vertebral body and the disk.<br>The lumbar vertebrae are great because they need to bear a large part of the body weight. L5 has a wedge-shaped vertebrae body and is connected to the sacrum, so that the lumbar spine and pelvis are always in relation to one another. Typical for the lumbar column is that the nucleus pulposus is located posterioly, between the cartilaginous end plates and is surrounded by the annulus fibrosis.<ref name="1" />(Gail M. 1980 (D))<ref name="5">Kapandji I. A.. Bewegingsleer: aan de hand van tekeningen van de werking van de menselijke gewrichten: deel III de romp. Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema &amp;amp; Holkema. second revised press, 1986. p66-69</ref><br>The sacrum is a triangular bone with a concave and convex surface, the facies pelvina, the facies dorsalis and an apex. On the anterior surface of the sacrum the superior and inferior edges of the vertebral bodies correspond as transverse ridges. The sacral vertebrae are finally connected to the coccyx.<ref name="2">Prof. Dr. Vaes P.. Onderzoek en behandeling: deel IIA: extremiteiten en wervelkolom (tekstboek). VUB-uitgave. 2010. p37-44</ref>(Gail M. 1980 (D))<ref name="5" /><br><br>
== Biomechanics and Pathology of the Aging Spine ==
[[File:Stress lumbar vertebra.png|thumb|Stress on lumbar vertebra]]
[[File:Intervertebral disc hernia into adjacent bodies sagittal view Primal.png|thumb|IVD hernia into adjacent bodies]]
As seen above the healthy IVD gives mobility to the spine and transfers load via hydrostatic pressurization of the hydrated NP. Age changes to the tissue properties of the disc, including dehydration and reorganization of the NP and hardening of the AF, noticeably alter the load bearing mechanics in the spine.<ref>Ferguson SJ, Steffen T. Biomechanics of the aging spine. The aging spine. 2005:15-21. Available:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591832/ (accessed 29.11.2022)</ref> Due the IVDs low water content, application of loads causes a greater loss of height than normal, and the disk tends to bulge. The IVD can no longer resist compressive loads and the surrounding structures must take part of them. This is known as stress shielding. So while the healthy spine transmits 5-10% of load through the posterior arch, with IVD ageing this fraction to is 40%, while the anterior arch receives only 20%. The posterior AF is consequently more strained, increasing the chance of developing posterior or posterolateral herniations. The unequal load distribution changes the biomechanics, promoting degeneration of the posterior vertebral elements and making osteoporotic vertebral fractures more likely to develop.<ref>Papadakis M, Sapkas G, Papadopoulos EC, Katonis P. Pathophysiology and biomechanics of the aging spine. The open orthopaedics journal. 2011;5:335.Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3178886/ (accessed 29.11.2022)</ref>


== <br>Biomechanics of the lumbar spine and sacrum (L4-L5 L5-S1)  ==
Experiments indicate [[Disc Herniation|intervertebral disc herniation]] is likely to be as a result of a gradual or fatigue process rather than a traumatic injury <ref name="Adams">Adams M., Bogduk N., Burton K. Dolan P.. The Biomechanics of Back Pain. Eds. 2002. p238</ref>, however clinically there is often a report of a sudden onset of symptoms associated with an incidental high loading of the spine, often in a flexed posture. The stresses most likely to result in injury to the spine are bending and torsion, and these combined movements reflect shear, compression and tension forces<ref name="Jensen" />. Twisting movements are more likely to injure the annulus as only half the collagen fibres are orientated to resist the movement in either direction<ref name="Bogduk" /> See [[Biomechanics of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation]]


The four main movements in the spine and sacrum are flexion, extension, rotation and lateral bending. <br>There are different forces acting on the lumbar spine and sacrum: compressive force, tensile force, shear force, bending moment and torsional moment.<ref name="3">Adams M., Bogduk N., Burton K. Dolan P.. The Biomechanics of Back Pain. Eds. 2002. p238</ref><br>Compressive force is a force or pressure that attempts to flatten or squeeze a material, in this case the intervertebral disk. With the term tensile force they mean the ability of a material to resist forces that attempt to pull it apart or stretch it.<br>Shear force is a force which acts parallel to the intervertebral disc. Shear force is more commonly from gravity acting on the body and so there’s a greater force on the lumbar spine where the disc’s lay in a steep angle to the horizontal (90°) and in bending postures. A definition of bending moment could be: the internal load generated within a bending element whenever a pure moment is reacted, or a shear load is transferred by beam action from the point of application to distant points of reaction. At last torsional moment means: the algebraic sum of the couples or the moments of the external forces about the axis of twist or both in a body being twisted.<ref name="1" /><br>Not only forces act on the spine and sacrum, also the mass, body weight, stress and displacement have their influences. The vertebral bodies and their discs form a column that permits movements, they resist compression and resist the body weight and forces of the thorax and upper limbs. Forward bending (flexion) is possible because each intervertebral disc compresses, anteriorly and is resisted by tension developed in the posterior part of the annulus fibrosus. Backward bending (extension) and lateral bending are possible because of the actions of the contralateral elements in the opposite direction. <br>In the normal position the sacrum is bending forward so that the upper surface is below horizontal at an angle of 50°. The L5-S1 intervertebral disc is wedge-shaped, by about 16° (between sacrum and bottom of L5). The inferior processi articulares of L5 connect with the sacrum so the sacrum can not slide forward. The mobility in the sacrum contains 2°.<ref name="3" />
The degenerative disc changes associated with aging have been considered normal. For example,


The differences in range of motion between L4-L5 and L5-S1 in the three movements are:<ref name="4">McGill S.. Low Back Disorders: Evidence- Based Prevention and Rehabilitation. Second Edition. Human Kinetics. 2007. p73</ref><br>- More flexion in L4-L5<br>- More extension in L5-S1<br>- More lateral bending in L4-L5<br>- More rotation in L4-L5
# Concentration levels of [[proteoglycans]] within the NP reduces with age, from 65% at early adulthood to 30% at the age of 60, corresponding to a reduction in nuclear hydration and concentration of elastic annular fibres over this time, resulting in a less resilient disc. 
# Narrowing of the disc with age has long been considered, however large post-mortem studies indicate that the dimensions of the disc actually increase between the 2nd and 7th decades. Apparent disc narrowing may otherwise be considered a result of a process other than aging<ref name="Bogduk" />.  
# Reductions in vertebral endplate nutrition and vertebral body bone density levels. The reduction in support from the underlying bone results in “microfracture” and the migration of nuclear material into the vertebral body known as “Schmorl’s nodes”, usually seen in the thoracolumbar and thoracic spines and have a low incidence below the level of L2.
# The lumbar facet joint subchondral bone density increases until the age of 50 after which time it decreases, and the joint cartilage continues to thicken with age despite focal changes, particularly where shear forces during repeated flexion and extension are resisted. Other bony changes also occur at the facet joint including “osteophyte” and “wrap-around bumper” formation presumably due to repeated stress at the superior and inferior articular process regions respectively<ref name="Bogduk" />.<br>  


The differences in stiffness are:<br>- More compression in L5-S1<br>- More shear forces lat and ant/post in L4-L5<br>- More bending in L5-S1<br>- More rotation in L4-L5 <br><br>
The process of degeneration of the lumbar spine has been described in 3 phases<ref name="Frymoyer">Frymoyer JW, Selby DK. Segmental instability. Spine 1985; 10:280-286</ref><ref name="Kirkaldy_Wallis">Kirkaldy-Wallis WH, Wedge JH, Yong-Hing K, Reilly J. Pathology and pathogenesis of lumbar spondylosis and stenosis. Spine 1978; 3(4):319-328</ref>:


== <br>Mechanism of Injury / Pathological Process  ==
# “Early degeneration” involves increased laxity of the facet joints, fibrillation of the articular cartilage and intervertebral discs display grade 1-2 degenerative changes.
# “Lumbar instability” at the effected level(s) develops due to laxity of the facet capsules, cartilage degeneration and grade 2-3 degenerative disc disease. Segmental Instability: may be defined as loss of motion and segmental stiffness such that force application to that motion segment will produce greater displacements than would occur in a normal structure<ref name="Frymoyer" />. Mechanical testing suggests the intervertebral disc is most susceptible to herniation at this stage<ref name="Adams" />.
# “Fixed deformity” results from repair processes such as facet and peridiscal osteophytes effectively stabilising the motion segment. There is advanced facet joint degeneration (or “facet joint syndrome”) and grade 3-4 disc degeneration. Of clinical importance is altered spinal canal dimensions due to fixed deformity and osteophyte formation.


- Compression and tension stresses: normal - gegenerated lumbar disk <br>When a normal lumbar disc is subjected to a compressive force, it will absorb some of the stress. Under the same compressive load, the nucleus of a degenerated disk will not absorb some of the stress and transfer the remainder to the annulus and end-plates; instead, the increased load is distributed to the annulus. Under these conditions the outer annulus fibers receive a large tensile stress without the fiber mechanism to absorb <br>the stress or the hydrostatic nucleus to distribute the forces radially. Consequently, the inner fibers receive a large compressive stress with all consequences.<br>Common diseases in the lumbar spine and sacrum are:<br>- Facet joint syndrome<br>- Disc herniation<br>- Instability<br>- Cauda equine syndroom<ref name="1" /><ref name="2" /><ref name="3" /><br><br>
<br>The incidence of spondylosis and osteoarthritis are the same in patients with symptoms and without symptoms, raising the question of whether these conditions should always be viewed as pathological diagnoses<ref name="Bogduk" />. This has clinical implications particularly with respect to interpretation of radiological investigation findings, and how results are presented to and discussed with patients.


== Outcome Measures  ==
See also [[Effects of Ageing on Joints]]
 
add links to outcome measures here (also see [[Outcome Measures|Outcome Measures Database]])
 
== Examination  ==
 
add text here related to physical examination and assessment<br>
 
== Key Research  ==
 
add links and reviews of high quality evidence here (case studies should be added on new pages using the [[Template:Case Study|case study template]])<br>
 
== Resources <br>  ==
 
add appropriate resources here <br>
 
== Clinical Bottom Line  ==
 
add text here <br>
 
== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed])  ==
 
see tutorial on [[Adding PubMed Feed|Adding PubMed Feed]]  
<div class="researchbox">
<rss>Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss>
</div>
== References  ==
== References  ==
see [[Adding References|adding references tutorial]].


<references />  
<references />  


[[Category:Vrije_Universiteit_Brussel_Project]]
[[Category:Vrije_Universiteit_Brussel_Project]]
[[Category:Pelvis]]

Latest revision as of 02:52, 29 November 2022

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Biomechanical study

Biomechanics is the study of forces and their effects when applied to humans. Basic musculoskeletal biomechanics concepts are important for clinicians eg physical and occupational therapists and orthopaedic surgeons. A therapist assessment of a patient typically includes a biomechanical analysis. As the lumbosacral region is the most important region in the vertebral column in terms of mobility and weight bearing it is important to look at its biomechanics.[1]

Lumbosacral MRI

As the lowest section of the mobile human spine, the lumbosacral spines main role lies in its ability to support the upper body by transmitting forces and bending moments to the pelvis via both sacroiliac joints. Like all regions of the spine, the lumbosacral spine protects the spinal cord and nerve roots from damage by providing a protective sheath. Mechanical stability is required to fulfill this task and to prevent premature mechanical and biologic breakdown of its structures. A reciprocal process between the active (muscles), passive (osteoligamentous spine), and neural components is necessary to prevent instability.

Biomechanics: Lumbosacral Region[edit | edit source]

Lumbosacral flexion

The three movements in the spine are flexion, extension, rotation and lateral flexion. These movements occur as a combination of rotation and translation in the sagittal, coronal and horizontal plane [2]. Movements result in force, a force simply being a push or pull. Motion is created and modified by the actions of forces. When force rotates a body segment this effect is called a torque or moment of force.[3] These spinal movements result in various forces acting on the lumbar spine and sacrum, that is:

  1. compressive force
  2. tensile force
  3. shear force
  4. bending moment
  5. torsional moment[4].

Direction nucleus pulposus extension

For example, with lumbar flexion, a compressive force is applied to the anterior aspect of the disc and a distractive force is applied to the posterior aspect of the disc. The opposite forces occur with lumbar extension[5].

Direction nucleus pulposus flexion

Load bearing

  • The lumbar spine complex forms an effective load-bearing system. When a load is applied externally to the vertebral column, it produces stresses to the stiff vertebral body and the relatively elastic intervertebral disc (IVD), causing strains to be produced more easily in the IVD[6].
  • Pressure within the nucleus pulposus (NP) is greater than zero, even at rest, providing a “preload” mechanism allowing for greater resistance to applied forces[7]. Hydrostatic pressure increases within the intervertebral disc resulting in an outward pressure towards the vertebral endplates resulting in bulging of the annulus fibrosis (AF) and tensile forces within the concentric annular fibres. This transmission of forces effectively slows the application of pressure onto the adjacent vertebra, acting as a shock absorber[2]. The intervertebral discs are therefore an essential biomechanical feature, effectively acting as a fibrocartilage “cushion” transmitting force between adjacent vertebrae during spinal movement.
  • The lumbar disc is more predisposed to injury compared with other spinal regions due to: the annular fibres being in a more parallel arrangement and thinner posteriorly compared with anteriorly, the nucleus being positioned more posteriorly, and the holes in the cartilaginous endplates[1]. See Biomechanics of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation
  • When a load is applied along the spine, “shear” forces occur parallel to the intervertebral disc as the compression of the nucleus results in a lateral bulging of the annulus. Shear forces also occur as one vertebra moves, for example, forwards or backwards with respect to an adjacent vertebra with flexion and extension. Torsional stresses result from the external forces about the axis of twist[1] 
and occur in the intervertebral disc with activity such as twisting of the spine.

  • The zygapophysial or “facet” joints provide stability to the intervertebral joint with respect to shear forces, whilst allowing primarily flexion and extension movement.

Biomechanics and Pathology of the Aging Spine[edit | edit source]

Stress on lumbar vertebra
IVD hernia into adjacent bodies

As seen above the healthy IVD gives mobility to the spine and transfers load via hydrostatic pressurization of the hydrated NP. Age changes to the tissue properties of the disc, including dehydration and reorganization of the NP and hardening of the AF, noticeably alter the load bearing mechanics in the spine.[8] Due the IVDs low water content, application of loads causes a greater loss of height than normal, and the disk tends to bulge. The IVD can no longer resist compressive loads and the surrounding structures must take part of them. This is known as stress shielding. So while the healthy spine transmits 5-10% of load through the posterior arch, with IVD ageing this fraction to is 40%, while the anterior arch receives only 20%. The posterior AF is consequently more strained, increasing the chance of developing posterior or posterolateral herniations. The unequal load distribution changes the biomechanics, promoting degeneration of the posterior vertebral elements and making osteoporotic vertebral fractures more likely to develop.[9]

Experiments indicate intervertebral disc herniation is likely to be as a result of a gradual or fatigue process rather than a traumatic injury [4], however clinically there is often a report of a sudden onset of symptoms associated with an incidental high loading of the spine, often in a flexed posture. The stresses most likely to result in injury to the spine are bending and torsion, and these combined movements reflect shear, compression and tension forces[1]. Twisting movements are more likely to injure the annulus as only half the collagen fibres are orientated to resist the movement in either direction[2] See Biomechanics of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation

The degenerative disc changes associated with aging have been considered normal. For example,

  1. Concentration levels of proteoglycans within the NP reduces with age, from 65% at early adulthood to 30% at the age of 60, corresponding to a reduction in nuclear hydration and concentration of elastic annular fibres over this time, resulting in a less resilient disc.
  2. Narrowing of the disc with age has long been considered, however large post-mortem studies indicate that the dimensions of the disc actually increase between the 2nd and 7th decades. Apparent disc narrowing may otherwise be considered a result of a process other than aging[2].
  3. Reductions in vertebral endplate nutrition and vertebral body bone density levels. The reduction in support from the underlying bone results in “microfracture” and the migration of nuclear material into the vertebral body known as “Schmorl’s nodes”, usually seen in the thoracolumbar and thoracic spines and have a low incidence below the level of L2.
  4. The lumbar facet joint subchondral bone density increases until the age of 50 after which time it decreases, and the joint cartilage continues to thicken with age despite focal changes, particularly where shear forces during repeated flexion and extension are resisted. Other bony changes also occur at the facet joint including “osteophyte” and “wrap-around bumper” formation presumably due to repeated stress at the superior and inferior articular process regions respectively[2].

The process of degeneration of the lumbar spine has been described in 3 phases[10][11]:

  1. “Early degeneration” involves increased laxity of the facet joints, fibrillation of the articular cartilage and intervertebral discs display grade 1-2 degenerative changes.
  2. “Lumbar instability” at the effected level(s) develops due to laxity of the facet capsules, cartilage degeneration and grade 2-3 degenerative disc disease. Segmental Instability: may be defined as loss of motion and segmental stiffness such that force application to that motion segment will produce greater displacements than would occur in a normal structure[10]. Mechanical testing suggests the intervertebral disc is most susceptible to herniation at this stage[4].
  3. “Fixed deformity” results from repair processes such as facet and peridiscal osteophytes effectively stabilising the motion segment. There is advanced facet joint degeneration (or “facet joint syndrome”) and grade 3-4 disc degeneration. Of clinical importance is altered spinal canal dimensions due to fixed deformity and osteophyte formation.


The incidence of spondylosis and osteoarthritis are the same in patients with symptoms and without symptoms, raising the question of whether these conditions should always be viewed as pathological diagnoses[2]. This has clinical implications particularly with respect to interpretation of radiological investigation findings, and how results are presented to and discussed with patients.

See also Effects of Ageing on Joints

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Jensen M Biomechanics of the lumbar intervertebral disk: a review. Physical Therapy. 1980; 60(6):765-773.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Bogduk, N. (2012). Radiological and Clinical Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine (5th ed.). China: Churchill Livingstone.
  3. Hall SJ. Kinetic Concepts for Analyzing Human Motion. In: Hall SJ. eds. Basic Biomechanics, 8e New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2019. http://www.sciepub.com/reference/334549 (last accessed 28.11, 2022).
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Adams M., Bogduk N., Burton K. Dolan P.. The Biomechanics of Back Pain. Eds. 2002. p238
  5. McKenzie, R. (1981). The lumbar spine : mechanical diagnosis and therapy. Waikanae, New Zealand: Spinal Publications.
  6. White A, Panjabi M. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. 1978, Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co.
  7. Hirsch C. The reaction of intervertebral discs to compression forces. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1955; 37:1188-1191
  8. Ferguson SJ, Steffen T. Biomechanics of the aging spine. The aging spine. 2005:15-21. Available:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3591832/ (accessed 29.11.2022)
  9. Papadakis M, Sapkas G, Papadopoulos EC, Katonis P. Pathophysiology and biomechanics of the aging spine. The open orthopaedics journal. 2011;5:335.Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3178886/ (accessed 29.11.2022)
  10. 10.0 10.1 Frymoyer JW, Selby DK. Segmental instability. Spine 1985; 10:280-286
  11. Kirkaldy-Wallis WH, Wedge JH, Yong-Hing K, Reilly J. Pathology and pathogenesis of lumbar spondylosis and stenosis. Spine 1978; 3(4):319-328