Impingement / Instability Differentiation: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="noeditbox">Welcome to [[Temple University Evidence-Based Practice Project|Temple University's Evidence-Based Practice project]]. This project was created by and for the students at Temple University in Philidelphia, and is part of the Orthopaedic curriculum. Please do not edit unless you are involved in this project, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!!</div>
Let me know if you need any assistance.Be the first to edit this page and have your name permanently included as the originating editor, see the [[Editing pages|editing pages tutorial]] for help.  
Let me know if you need any assistance.Be the first to edit this page and have your name permanently included as the originating editor, see the [[Editing pages|editing pages tutorial]] for help.  


Line 25: Line 24:
<br>  
<br>  


{| width="200" border="1" align="left" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1"
{| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" align="left" width="200"
|-
|-
|  
|  
Line 108: Line 107:
A total of 5 positive special tests is indicative for subacromial impingement.  
A total of 5 positive special tests is indicative for subacromial impingement.  


{| width="200" border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1"
{| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" width="200"
|-
|-
| Positive tests  
| Positive tests  
Line 124: Line 123:
| 29.1
| 29.1
|-
|-
| <!--StartFragment--><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Cambria; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:Cambria;mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana; mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">≥6 positive</span><!--EndFragment-->  
| <!--StartFragment--><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Cambria;">≥6 positive</span><!--EndFragment-->  
| .30  
| .30  
| .89  
| .89  
Line 131: Line 130:
| 34.0
| 34.0
|-
|-
| <!--StartFragment--><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Cambria; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:Cambria;mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana; mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">≥5 positive</span><!--EndFragment-->  
| <!--StartFragment--><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Cambria;">≥5 positive</span><!--EndFragment-->  
| .38  
| .38  
| .86  
| .86  
Line 138: Line 137:
| 36.0
| 36.0
|-
|-
| <!--StartFragment--><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Cambria; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:Cambria;mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana; mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">≥4 positive</span><!--EndFragment-->  
| <!--StartFragment--><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Cambria;">≥4 positive</span><!--EndFragment-->  
| .70  
| .70  
| .67  
| .67  
Line 145: Line 144:
| 47.0
| 47.0
|-
|-
| <!--StartFragment--><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Cambria; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:Cambria;mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:Verdana; mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">≥3 positive</span><!--EndFragment-->  
| <!--StartFragment--><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Cambria;">≥3 positive</span><!--EndFragment-->  
| .84  
| .84  
| .44  
| .44  
Line 157: Line 156:
Accuracy: The percentage of time that the result of the test reflects the true nature of the condition  
Accuracy: The percentage of time that the result of the test reflects the true nature of the condition  


 
<br>


A second cluster utilizes a slightly different set of special tests.  
A second cluster utilizes a slightly different set of special tests.  


{| width="200" border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1"
{| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" width="200"
|-
|-
| <br>  
| <br>  
Line 206: Line 205:
Any combination of 3 or more positive tests are indicative of sub-acromial impingement  
Any combination of 3 or more positive tests are indicative of sub-acromial impingement  


{| width="200" border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1"
{| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" width="200"
|-
|-
|  
|  
Line 221: Line 220:
|}
|}


Michener et al. 2009
Michener et al. 2009  


== Instability  ==
== Instability  ==
Line 335: Line 334:
The tests above are additional diagnostic tests for instability which may assist you in your examination, however they are not a part of the above mentioned cluster.  
The tests above are additional diagnostic tests for instability which may assist you in your examination, however they are not a part of the above mentioned cluster.  


<br>+LR: describes how much the odds of impingement increase with a positive test<br>-LR: describes how much the odds of impingement decrease with a negative test<br><br>
<br>+LR: describes how much the odds of impingement increase with a positive test<br>-LR: describes how much the odds of impingement decrease with a negative test<br><br>  


== References<br>  ==
== References<br>  ==
Line 343: Line 342:
Farber AJ, Castillo R, Clough, M, et. al. Clinical assessment of three common tests for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. ''J Bone Joint Surg Am''. 2006;88:1467-1474.  
Farber AJ, Castillo R, Clough, M, et. al. Clinical assessment of three common tests for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. ''J Bone Joint Surg Am''. 2006;88:1467-1474.  


Gross ML &amp; Distefano MC. Anterior release test. A new test for occult shoulder instability. ''Clin Orthop Relat Res''. 1997;339:105-108.<br>
Gross ML &amp; Distefano MC. Anterior release test. A new test for occult shoulder instability. ''Clin Orthop Relat Res''. 1997;339:105-108.<br>  


Lo IK, Nonweiler B, Woolfrey M, et. al. An evaluation of the apprehension, relocation, and surprise tests for anterior shoulder instability. ''Amer J Sports Med''. 2004;32:301-307.  
Lo IK, Nonweiler B, Woolfrey M, et. al. An evaluation of the apprehension, relocation, and surprise tests for anterior shoulder instability. ''Amer J Sports Med''. 2004;32:301-307.  


Michener LA, Walsworth MK, Doukas WC, Murphy KP. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of 5 physical examination tests and combination of tests for subacromial impingement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Nov;90(11):1898-903.<br>
Michener LA, Walsworth MK, Doukas WC, Murphy KP. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of 5 physical examination tests and combination of tests for subacromial impingement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Nov;90(11):1898-903.<br>  


Nakagawa S, Yoneda M, Hayashida K, et. al. Forced shoulder abduction and elbow flexion test: a new simple clinical test to detect superior labral injury in the throwing shoulder. ''J Arthr Relat Surg''. 2005;21:1290-1295.<br>  
Nakagawa S, Yoneda M, Hayashida K, et. al. Forced shoulder abduction and elbow flexion test: a new simple clinical test to detect superior labral injury in the throwing shoulder. ''J Arthr Relat Surg''. 2005;21:1290-1295.<br>  

Revision as of 21:43, 22 March 2011

Let me know if you need any assistance.Be the first to edit this page and have your name permanently included as the originating editor, see the editing pages tutorial for help.

Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.

Lead Editors - If you would like to be a lead editor on this page, please contact us.


Purpose
[edit | edit source]

The purpose of this article is to help healthcare providers differentiate between shoulder impingement and instability by utilizing the most current literature.

 

Impingement[edit | edit source]

Individual special tests for sub-acromial impingement have varying psychometric properties. For this reason, it is best to utilize special test clusters in order to diagnose this injury. Two special test clusters are provided below that can be used in order to diagnose sub-acromial impingement.


Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy% PPV% NPV%
Hawkins-Kennedy .92 .25 72.8 75.2 56.2
Neers .89 .31 72.0 75.9 52.3
Horizontal-adduction .82 .28 66.4 73.7 38.4
Speed .69 .56 64.8 79.2 41.6
Yergason .37 .86 51.2 86.8 35.6
Painful arc .33 .81 46.4 80.5 32.5
Drop arm .08 .97 33.6 87.5 29.9









 

Calis et al. 2000


A total of 5 positive special tests is indicative for subacromial impingement.

Positive tests Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy% PPV% NPV%
All positive .04 .97 31.2 80.0 29.1
≥6 positive .30 .89 47.2 87.0 34.0
≥5 positive .38 .86 52.0 87.1 36.0
≥4 positive .70 .67 68.8 83.7 47.0
≥3 positive .84 .44 72.8 72.8 44.4

Calis et al. 2000

Accuracy: The percentage of time that the result of the test reflects the true nature of the condition


A second cluster utilizes a slightly different set of special tests.


Sensitivity Specificity Positive LR Negative LR
Hawkins-Kennedy .63 .62 1.63 .61
Neers .81 .54 1.17 .35
Painful arc .75 .67 2.25 .38
Empty can .50 .87 3.90 .57
External rotation resistance .56 .87 4.39 .50

Michener et al. 2009


Any combination of 3 or more positive tests are indicative of sub-acromial impingement

Sensitivity Specificity Positive LR Negative LR
3+ positive tests .75 .74 2.93 .34

Michener et al. 2009

Instability[edit | edit source]

Test Sensitivity Specificity +LR -LR
Apprehension test .72 .96 20.2 .29
Relocation test .81 .92 10.4 .20
Anterior drawer test .53 .85 3.57 .56


Farber et al. 2006


Instability can be categorized in a few different ways, including anterior, posterior and multidirectional instability. The 3 tests above focus on the diagnosis for anterior shoulder instability.

Positive tests Sensitivity Specificity +LR -LR
Apprehension, relocation and anterior drawer tests .48 .99 39.1 .52
Apprehension and relocation tests .81 .98 39.7 .19
Relocation and anterior drawer tests .48 .96 18.0 .54
Apprehension and anterior drawer tests .46 .98 23.1 .55


Farber et al. 2006

The above table represents a cluster to help rule in favor of an anterior shoulder instability diagnosis. With positive results of any 2 tests or more, you can be fairly confident ruling in favor of anterior shoulder instability. It should be noted that the apprehension test is only positive in the presence of apprehension and the relocation test is considered positive with the relief of apprehension. In addition, the anterior drawer test is positive when symptoms of instability are reproduced.


Sensitivity Specificity +LR -LR
Anterior release test .92 .89 8.6 .09


Gross et al. 1997

Sensitivity Specificity +LR -LR
Sulcus Sign .17 .93 2.43 .89


Nakagawa et al. 2005


The tests above are additional diagnostic tests for instability which may assist you in your examination, however they are not a part of the above mentioned cluster.


+LR: describes how much the odds of impingement increase with a positive test
-LR: describes how much the odds of impingement decrease with a negative test

References
[edit | edit source]

Caliş M, Akgün K, Birtane M, Karacan I, Caliş H, Tüzün F. Diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests in subacromial impingement syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000 Jan;59(1):44-7.

Farber AJ, Castillo R, Clough, M, et. al. Clinical assessment of three common tests for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1467-1474.

Gross ML & Distefano MC. Anterior release test. A new test for occult shoulder instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;339:105-108.

Lo IK, Nonweiler B, Woolfrey M, et. al. An evaluation of the apprehension, relocation, and surprise tests for anterior shoulder instability. Amer J Sports Med. 2004;32:301-307.

Michener LA, Walsworth MK, Doukas WC, Murphy KP. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of 5 physical examination tests and combination of tests for subacromial impingement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Nov;90(11):1898-903.

Nakagawa S, Yoneda M, Hayashida K, et. al. Forced shoulder abduction and elbow flexion test: a new simple clinical test to detect superior labral injury in the throwing shoulder. J Arthr Relat Surg. 2005;21:1290-1295.

The content on or accessible through Physiopedia is for informational purposes only. Physiopedia is not a substitute for professional advice or expert medical services from a qualified healthcare provider. Read more.