Functional Gait Assessment: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="editorbox"> | <div class="editorbox"> | ||
'''Original Editor '''- | '''Original Editor '''- [[User:Laura Ritchie|Laura Ritchie]] | ||
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} | '''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Objective<br> == | == Objective<br> == | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Intended Population == | == Intended Population == | ||
Adults with [[ | Adults with [[Parkinsons Disease|Parkinson’s Disease]], [[Stroke|stroke]] or vestibular disorders <ref name="Rehab" /> | ||
== Method of Use <ref name="Rehab" /> == | == Method of Use <ref name="Rehab" /> == | ||
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
<div class="researchbox"> | <div class="researchbox"> | ||
<rss>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=16WqI68KDOBKDOBUEQ668I1H1EILNeJeXf9RS1FfdiI-CsewnM|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss> | <rss>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=16WqI68KDOBKDOBUEQ668I1H1EILNeJeXf9RS1FfdiI-CsewnM|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 05:30, 11 October 2014
Original Editor - Laura Ritchie
Top Contributors - Laura Ritchie, Kim Jackson, Admin, Scott Buxton, Simisola Ajeyalemi, Rachael Lowe, WikiSysop, Lucinda hampton, Alex Benham, Stacy Schiurring, Evan Thomas and Naomi O'Reilly
Objective
[edit | edit source]
The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) is a modification of the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) that uses higher-level tasks to increase the applicability of the test to people with vestibular disorders and to eliminate the ceiling effect of the original test. Three items were added to the DGI because these were noted to be difficult in people with vestibular disorders. [1]
The FGA is used to assess postural stability during various walking tasks. [2]
Intended Population[edit | edit source]
Adults with Parkinson’s Disease, stroke or vestibular disorders [2]
Method of Use [2][edit | edit source]
Time to Administer: 5-10 minutes
Number of Test Items: 10
Scoring: Each item is scored on an ordinal scale from 0 - 3, with
- 0 = severe impairment
- 1 = moderate impairment
- 2 = mild impairment
- 3 = normal ambulation
Thus, the highest score is 30/30.
Evidence[edit | edit source]
| [3] |
Reliability[edit | edit source]
Intrarater reliability of the total FGA: ICC = 0.83 [1]
Interrater reliability of the total FGA: ICC = 0.84 [1]
Internal Consistency: Cronbach alpha value 0.79 across both trials [1]
Validity[edit | edit source]
Concurrent Validity - FGA scores were correlated with the following outcome measure scores; [1]
- ABC Scale: r = -.70
- DHI: r = -.064
- PDS: r = -.70
- Number of falls: r = -.66
- TUG: r = -.50
- DGI: r = 0.80
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Miscellaneous[edit | edit source]
Dynamic Gait Index, the 4-item Dynamic Gait Index, and the Functional Gait Assessment show sufficient validity, responsiveness, and reliability for assessment of walking function in patients with stroke undergoing rehabilitation, but the Functional Gait Assessment is recommended for its psychometric properties[4].
Resources[edit | edit source]
http://www.rehabmeasures.org/Lists/RehabMeasures/DispForm.aspx?ID=893
Links[edit | edit source]
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Failed to load RSS feed from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=16WqI68KDOBKDOBUEQ668I1H1EILNeJeXf9RS1FfdiI-CsewnM|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Wrisley DM, Marchetti GF, Kuharsky DK, Whitney SL. Reliability, Internal Consistency and Validity of Data Obtained with the Functional Gait Assessment. Physical Therapy. 2004; 84(10): 906-918.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 http://www.rehabmeasures.org/Lists/RehabMeasures/DispForm.aspx?ID=893
- ↑ Julia Krahm. Functional Gait Assessment. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxzB3ez3y14[last accessed 10/10/14]
- ↑ Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Hsu HW, Wu HC, Hsieh CL. Psychometric Comparisons of 3 Functional Ambulation Measures for Patients With Stroke. Stroke. 2010 Jul 29; online article ahead of print
