Functional Gait Assessment: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[[Image:Blender3D NormalWalkCycle.gif|right]] | [[Image:Blender3D NormalWalkCycle.gif|right]] | ||
The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) is | The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) is a modification of the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) that uses higher-level tasks to increase the applicability of the test to people with vestibular disorders and to eliminate the ceiling effect of the original test. Three items were added to the DGI because these were noted to be difficult in people with vestibular disorders. | ||
== Intended Population<br> == | == Intended Population<br> == | ||
== Method of Use == | == Method of Use == | ||
== Reference == | == Reference == | ||
| Line 29: | Line 27: | ||
=== Reliability === | === Reliability === | ||
Intrarater reliability of the total FGA: ICC = 0.83 | Intrarater reliability of the total FGA: ICC = 0.83 | ||
Interrater reliability of the total FGA: ICC = 0.84 | |||
Internal Consistency: Cronbach alpha value 0.79 across both trials | |||
=== Validity === | === Validity === | ||
Concurrent Validity - FGA scores were correlated with the following outcome measure scores; | |||
* ABC Scale: r = -.70 | |||
* DHI: r = -.064 | |||
* PDS: r = -.70 | |||
* Number of falls: r = -.66 | |||
* TUG: r = -.50 | |||
* DGI: r = 0.80 | |||
=== Responsiveness === | === Responsiveness === | ||
Revision as of 05:08, 11 October 2014
Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
Top Contributors - Laura Ritchie, Kim Jackson, Admin, Scott Buxton, Simisola Ajeyalemi, Rachael Lowe, WikiSysop, Lucinda hampton, Alex Benham, Stacy Schiurring, Evan Thomas and Naomi O'Reilly
Objective
[edit | edit source]
The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) is a modification of the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) that uses higher-level tasks to increase the applicability of the test to people with vestibular disorders and to eliminate the ceiling effect of the original test. Three items were added to the DGI because these were noted to be difficult in people with vestibular disorders.
Intended Population
[edit | edit source]
Method of Use[edit | edit source]
Reference[edit | edit source]
Evidence[edit | edit source]
| [1] |
Reliability[edit | edit source]
Intrarater reliability of the total FGA: ICC = 0.83
Interrater reliability of the total FGA: ICC = 0.84
Internal Consistency: Cronbach alpha value 0.79 across both trials
Validity[edit | edit source]
Concurrent Validity - FGA scores were correlated with the following outcome measure scores;
- ABC Scale: r = -.70
- DHI: r = -.064
- PDS: r = -.70
- Number of falls: r = -.66
- TUG: r = -.50
- DGI: r = 0.80
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Miscellaneous[edit | edit source]
Dynamic Gait Index, the 4-item Dynamic Gait Index, and the Functional Gait Assessment show sufficient validity, responsiveness, and reliability for assessment of walking function in patients with stroke undergoing rehabilitation, but the Functional Gait Assessment is recommended for its psychometric properties[2].
Links[edit | edit source]
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1p1HIAUta7ObCYcYSxy0rkyYlyFykuWqZeguP8dJksoZUEAg_o|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Julia Krahm. Functional Gait Assessment. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxzB3ez3y14[last accessed 10/10/14]
- ↑ Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Hsu HW, Wu HC, Hsieh CL. Psychometric Comparisons of 3 Functional Ambulation Measures for Patients With Stroke. Stroke. 2010 Jul 29; online article ahead of print
