Fovea Sign: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Be the first to edit this page and have your name permanently included as the originating editor, see the [[Editing pages|editing pages tutorial]] for help.
<div class="editorbox">
'''Original Editors ''' - [[User:Rachael Lowe|Rachael Lowe]]  


{| cellspacing="5" cellpadding="2" style="border: 1px solid rgb(163, 177, 191); margin: 15px 0pt 0pt; width: 300px; vertical-align: top; float: right; background-color: rgb(227, 228, 250); color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}
|-
</div>
| style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" |
== Purpose ==
Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.  
The ulnar fovea sign is a clinical test used to specify the cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain.


Lead Editors - If you would like to be a lead editor on this page, please [[Contact|contact us]].
A positive ulnar fovea sign test is indicative of foveal disruption of the distal radioulnar ligaments and ulnotriquetral ligament injuries. The test is sensitive and examines the presence (or absence if negative) of ulnar fovea disruption. In a validation study, in the clinical observation to locate foveal disruption and ulnotriquetral ligament injuries, the ulnar fovea sign was 95% sensitive and 87% specific. In detecting longitudinal split tears of the ulnotriquetral ligament, the ulnar fovea sign was 90% sensitive and 88% specific.<ref name=":0">Shian Chao Tay, Richard A. Berger. [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363502307001748&hl=en&sa=T&oi=gsb&ct=res&cd=0&d=11369176854005876406&ei=YnU5Y6KBGO2KywSS3bH4Bg&scisig=AAGBfm2xriwEl4ZCCd4w03LJwF6MhqhN5g The “Ulnar Fovea Sign” for Defining Ulnar Wrist Pain:] An Analysis of Sensitivity and Specificity, American Society of the Hand, 2007</ref>


|}
The ulnar fovea sign test can form an important part of the objective examination when the patient has complaints about the ulnar side of the wrist. It is a provocative test to give the patient an irregular soreness in the fovea region of the wrist. The ulnar fovea sign is not utile on patients who have global soreness of the wrist. It is at the most utile in a symptomatic patient who has no other clear evidence of pathology in the wrist and who continues to suffer pain despite affective nonsurgical interventions and for whom wrist arthroscopy should be the following examination.


<br>
The mechanism of injury for foveal injury is excessive traction of the ulnocarpal ligaments, elicited through hyper-radial extension or hyperextension of the wrist in combination with axial loading and/or forearm rotation. This mechanism transcribes forces at the fovea region. When the ulnotriquetral ligament suffers to an extreme traction, the ulnar styloid attachment will break down before the foveal attachment does.


== Purpose<br> ==
In the research “The Ulnar Fovea Sign for Defining Ulnar Wrist Pain: An analysis of Sensitivity and Specificity” was the ulnar fovea sign positive in 156 patients. 90 patients received the diagnosis of foveal disruption and 68 patients of UT ligament injuries. So two patients had a positive ulnar fovea sign, but none of the two possible pathologies <ref name=":0" />.


add the purpose of this assessment technique here<br>
== Anatomy ==
[[File:Fovea.jpg|thumb|Location of the fovea.]]


== Technique<br>  ==
The fovea is situated between the ulnar styloid process and the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon.


Describe how to carry out this assessment technique here
Ligamentous structures in the fovea region when the forearm is in a neutral position form the foveal attachments of the conjoined palmar and dorsal radioulnar ligaments and the ulnocarpal ligaments.


== Evidence  ==
== Technique ==


Provide the evidence for this technique here
{{#ev:youtube|q_Q_n7Adg9g}}
<ref>IAOMUSVIDEO. The Fovea Sign. Available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_Q_n7Adg9g</ref>


== Resources  ==
For the purposes of this test, the patient is facing the therapist with the elbow on a table or plinth. The elbow has to stay in 90° to 110° of flexion with the forearm and the wrist in a neutral position. The thumb of the therapist has to be pressed deep into the soft space among the ulnar styloid process and the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon distally, between the palmar surface of the ulnar head and the pisiform.


add any relevant resources here
When there is a positive ulnar fovea sign, the pain may make the patient grimace during the test. The severity of the soreness of a positive ulnar fovea sign copies the disorders of the patient <ref name=":0" />


== References<br> ==
After eliciting the positive ulnar fovea sign, the stability of the distal radioulnar joint has to be identified. The stability of the distal radioulnar joint is in tact when the congruent articulating surfaces and the radioulnar ligaments are strong and fixed. A radiograph or a CT scan can identify the extent of injury and the area of instability<ref name=":1" /><br><br>A comprehensive wrist examination should be completed in conjunction to the fovea sign test in cases of ulnar-sided wrist pain. Objective components should include active strength in all functional movements, grip strength and range of motion of the wrist and forearm pronation and supination. <br>


<references />  
== Differential Diagnosis ==
When a positive ulnar fovea sign is established there is a possibility of two wrist conditions, the longitudinal split tear of the ulnotriquetral ligament and foveal disruption. A positive ulnar fovea sign test has either a stable dorsal radioulnar ligament joint or an unstable dorsal radioulnar ligament joint. When it’s unstable, a longitudinal split tear of ulnotriqutral ligament is the probable diagnosis. When the stable dorsal radioulnar ligament joint is present, the probable diagnosis is foveal disruption <ref>Shian Chao Tay, Richard A. Berger. Longitudinal Split Tears of the Ulnotriquetral Ligament, Division of Hand Surgery, 2010</ref>. The difference between the two conditions is made clinically, radiographic or with a CT scan<ref name=":1">Claire A. Coggins, MD. [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=https://www.sportsmed.theclinics.com/article/S0278-5919(06)00014-7/abstract&hl=en&sa=T&oi=gsb&ct=res&cd=0&d=8989711950084852172&ei=m3U5Y7aJN5CXywTOrbawDQ&scisig=AAGBfm1GW8DyUzP4Vx_Dgx31OUz9O27VmQ Imaging of Ulnar – sided Wrist Pain], Virginia Commonwealth University, 2006</ref>.


{| cellspacing="5" cellpadding="2" style="border: 1px solid rgb(163, 177, 191); margin: 15px 0pt 0pt; width: 100%; vertical-align: top; background-color: rgb(227, 228, 250); color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"
== References ==
|-
<references />
| The content on or accessible through Physiopedia.com is for informational purposes only. Physiopedia is not a substitute for professional advice or expert medical services from a qualified healthcare provider. [[Physiopedia:Terms of Service|Read more]].
 
|}
[[Category:Wrist]]
[[Category:Ligaments]]
[[Category:Musculoskeletal/Orthopaedics]]
[[Category:Primary Contact]]
[[Category:Sports Medicine]]
[[Category:Athlete Assessment]]
[[Category:Assessment]] [[Category:Wrist - Assessment and Examination]]

Latest revision as of 13:17, 2 October 2022

Purpose[edit | edit source]

The ulnar fovea sign is a clinical test used to specify the cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain.

A positive ulnar fovea sign test is indicative of foveal disruption of the distal radioulnar ligaments and ulnotriquetral ligament injuries. The test is sensitive and examines the presence (or absence if negative) of ulnar fovea disruption. In a validation study, in the clinical observation to locate foveal disruption and ulnotriquetral ligament injuries, the ulnar fovea sign was 95% sensitive and 87% specific. In detecting longitudinal split tears of the ulnotriquetral ligament, the ulnar fovea sign was 90% sensitive and 88% specific.[1]

The ulnar fovea sign test can form an important part of the objective examination when the patient has complaints about the ulnar side of the wrist. It is a provocative test to give the patient an irregular soreness in the fovea region of the wrist. The ulnar fovea sign is not utile on patients who have global soreness of the wrist. It is at the most utile in a symptomatic patient who has no other clear evidence of pathology in the wrist and who continues to suffer pain despite affective nonsurgical interventions and for whom wrist arthroscopy should be the following examination.

The mechanism of injury for foveal injury is excessive traction of the ulnocarpal ligaments, elicited through hyper-radial extension or hyperextension of the wrist in combination with axial loading and/or forearm rotation. This mechanism transcribes forces at the fovea region. When the ulnotriquetral ligament suffers to an extreme traction, the ulnar styloid attachment will break down before the foveal attachment does.

In the research “The Ulnar Fovea Sign for Defining Ulnar Wrist Pain: An analysis of Sensitivity and Specificity” was the ulnar fovea sign positive in 156 patients. 90 patients received the diagnosis of foveal disruption and 68 patients of UT ligament injuries. So two patients had a positive ulnar fovea sign, but none of the two possible pathologies [1].

Anatomy[edit | edit source]

Location of the fovea.

The fovea is situated between the ulnar styloid process and the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon.

Ligamentous structures in the fovea region when the forearm is in a neutral position form the foveal attachments of the conjoined palmar and dorsal radioulnar ligaments and the ulnocarpal ligaments.

Technique[edit | edit source]

[2]

For the purposes of this test, the patient is facing the therapist with the elbow on a table or plinth. The elbow has to stay in 90° to 110° of flexion with the forearm and the wrist in a neutral position. The thumb of the therapist has to be pressed deep into the soft space among the ulnar styloid process and the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon distally, between the palmar surface of the ulnar head and the pisiform.

When there is a positive ulnar fovea sign, the pain may make the patient grimace during the test. The severity of the soreness of a positive ulnar fovea sign copies the disorders of the patient [1]

After eliciting the positive ulnar fovea sign, the stability of the distal radioulnar joint has to be identified. The stability of the distal radioulnar joint is in tact when the congruent articulating surfaces and the radioulnar ligaments are strong and fixed. A radiograph or a CT scan can identify the extent of injury and the area of instability[3]

A comprehensive wrist examination should be completed in conjunction to the fovea sign test in cases of ulnar-sided wrist pain. Objective components should include active strength in all functional movements, grip strength and range of motion of the wrist and forearm pronation and supination.

Differential Diagnosis[edit | edit source]

When a positive ulnar fovea sign is established there is a possibility of two wrist conditions, the longitudinal split tear of the ulnotriquetral ligament and foveal disruption. A positive ulnar fovea sign test has either a stable dorsal radioulnar ligament joint or an unstable dorsal radioulnar ligament joint. When it’s unstable, a longitudinal split tear of ulnotriqutral ligament is the probable diagnosis. When the stable dorsal radioulnar ligament joint is present, the probable diagnosis is foveal disruption [4]. The difference between the two conditions is made clinically, radiographic or with a CT scan[3].

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Shian Chao Tay, Richard A. Berger. The “Ulnar Fovea Sign” for Defining Ulnar Wrist Pain: An Analysis of Sensitivity and Specificity, American Society of the Hand, 2007
  2. IAOMUSVIDEO. The Fovea Sign. Available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_Q_n7Adg9g
  3. 3.0 3.1 Claire A. Coggins, MD. Imaging of Ulnar – sided Wrist Pain, Virginia Commonwealth University, 2006
  4. Shian Chao Tay, Richard A. Berger. Longitudinal Split Tears of the Ulnotriquetral Ligament, Division of Hand Surgery, 2010