Figure of Eight Method of Measuring Ankle Joint Swelling: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "[[Edema" to "[[Oedema")
 
(27 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="editorbox">
<div class="editorbox">
'''Original Editor '''- Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
'''Original Editor '''- [[User:Christopher Eberley|Christopher Eberley]]


'''Lead Editors''' - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page.&nbsp; [[Physiopedia:Editors|Read more.]]
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}
</div>
== Purpose<br>  ==


The purpose of this assessment technique is to evaluate ankle size and ankle joint swelling.&nbsp; <br>
</div>
 
== Purpose  ==
 
The purpose of this [[Oedema Assessment|assessment technique]] is to evaluate ankle size and [[Ankle Joint|ankle joint]] swelling (edema).
 
The method of measuring joint swelling in a figure of 8 has the following advantages:
# Being readily reproducible;
# Measuring swelling at the various sites of [[Ankle Sprain|ankle sprains;]]
# Requires only a tape measure and marking pen, and
# Feasible in a clinical setting, time-efficient, cost-effective, and easy to carry out.<ref name=":0">Watson CP, Boland RA, Refshauge KM. [http://faoj.org/2008/12/01/measurement-reliability-of-swelling-in-the-acute-ankle-sprain/ Measurement reliability of swelling in the acute ankle sprain.] The Foot & Ankle Journal. 2008;1(12):4.</ref><ref>Esterson PS. [https://www.jospt.org/doi/pdf/10.2519/jospt.1979.1.1.51 Measurement of ankle joint swelling using a figure of 8.] Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1979 Jul 1;1(1):51-2.</ref><br>
 
== Technique  ==
 
=== Equipment needed ===
A retractable one-quarter inch wide plastic tape measure and a marking pen.<ref>Tatro-Adams D, McGann SF, Carbone W. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8535474/ Reliability of the figure-of-eight method of ankle measurement]. / Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995;22:161-163.</ref>.
 
=== Patient position ===
Patients were positioned in long-sitting on a bed with the testing foot resting over the end.<ref name=":0" /> The [[knee]] may be slightly flexed over a bolster to allow for ease of measurement if needed. The ankle should ultimately be maintained in a position of neutral dorsiflexion.
 
=== Therapist position ===
At the end of the bed.
 
Once the patient has assumed their position on the plinth, the following standardized landmarks were marked with a pen prior to measurement: 
 
a) the point midway over the anterior ankle between the [[Tibialis Anterior|tibialis anterior]] tendon and lateral malleolus,


== Technique<br> ==
b) the [[navicular]] tuberosity,  


A retractable one-quarter inch wide retractable plastic tape measure can be used<ref>Tatro-Adams D, McGann SF, Carbone W. Reliability of the
c) the base of the fifth metatarsal, and 
figure-of-eight method of ankle measurement. / Orthop
Sports Phys Ther. 1995;22:161-163.</ref>.&nbsp; The assessment technique can be carried out with the patient long sitting with both feet extending from the end of a plinthe.&nbsp; The knee may be slightly flexed over a bolster to allow for ease of measurement if needed.&nbsp; The ankle should ultimatley be maintained in a position of neutral dorsiflexion.&nbsp;&nbsp;


<br>  
d) the inferior tip of the medial malleolus.<ref name=":0" />


Once the patient has assumed their position on the plinthe the measuring tape is placed midway between the tendon of the tibialis anterior and the lateral malleolus.&nbsp; The tape is pulled medially toward the distal side of the tuberosity of the navicular.&nbsp; The tape can now be drawn across the instep ending proximal to the base of the 5th metatarsal.&nbsp; The tape is then pulled across the tibialis anterior tendon and continues around the ankle joint just distal to the medial malleolus.&nbsp; From the medial malleolus the tape can be drawn across the Achiles tendon circling around the ankle ending just distal to the lateral malleolus.&nbsp; From the lateral malleolus the measurement can be ended where the measurement was begun<sup>1</sup>.
<nowiki/>The therapist placed the zero-point over the mark on the anterior aspect of the ankle and pulled the tape medially over the navicular tuberosity, and then infero-laterally across the medial arch to the proximal aspect of the base of the fifth metatarsal. The tape was then pulled superiorly and medially over the tarsal bones across the inferior aspect of the medial malleolus, and posterolaterally around the [[Achilles Tendon|Achilles tendon]] over the distal lateral malleolus to finish at the zero point. At last, the measurement is recorded.
 
It is necessary to ensure that there was no indentation of soft tissue during measurement.<ref name=":0" /><br>  
 
{{#ev:youtube|cG-A3PbS5ow|400}}<ref> Figure-8 Measurement (CR). Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cG-A3PbS5ow [last accessed 28/2/2021]</ref>


<br>


== Evidence  ==
== Evidence  ==


The intraclass correlation coefficient for interrater reliability is 0.99 and mean intrarater reliability is 0.99 <sup>1</sup><sup></sup> .&nbsp; Figure of eight measurement have also demonstrated criterion-related validity when compared to foot volumetry<ref>Mawdsley R, Hoy D, Erwin P. Criterion-related validity of the
In the laboratory,
figure-of-eight method of measuring ankle edema. J Orthop Sports Phys
* Intrarater and interrater reliability ranged from 0.98 to 0.99 (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC]) for asymptomatic and swollen ankles. 
Ther. 2000;30:148 –153.</ref>.&nbsp; The figure of eight method of measuring ankle joint swelling can be considered both valid and reliable.  
* Highly corelates (r>0.88) with the water displacement method for both injured and uninjured ankles,
In the clinical setting,
*  Intrarater reliability was very high for the figure of eight with (Intraclass correlations coefficients [ICC] = 0.99).
 
* Inter-rater reliability was also very high (ICC > 0.99).
* The standard error of measurement (SEM) was small for all measurements: ±0.2cm for the figure of eight method.<ref name=":0" />
The figure of eight measurement has also demonstrated criterion-related validity when compared to foot volumetry<ref>Mawdsley R, Hoy D, Erwin P. [https://www.jospt.org/doi/abs/10.2519/jospt.2000.30.3.149 Criterion-related validity of the figure-of-eight method of measuring ankle edema.] J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000;30:148 –153.</ref>. The figure of eight method of measuring ankle joint swelling can be considered both valid and reliable.


<br>


== Resources  ==


{{#ev:youtube|X1oy1Fz7x5U|300}}


== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed])  ==
<div class="researchbox">
<br>
</div>


== References  ==
== References  ==


References will automatically be added here, see [[Adding References|adding references tutorial]].
<references /><br>


<references />
[[Category:Ankle - Assessment and Examination]]
[[Category:Assessment]]
[[Category:Special_Tests]]
[[Category:Ankle]]
[[Category:Musculoskeletal/Orthopaedics]]
[[Category:EIM_Student_Project_2]]
[[Category:Primary Contact]]
[[Category:Sports Medicine]]
[[Category:Athlete Assessment]]
[[Category:Ankle - Special Tests]]

Latest revision as of 11:45, 3 August 2022

Purpose[edit | edit source]

The purpose of this assessment technique is to evaluate ankle size and ankle joint swelling (edema).

The method of measuring joint swelling in a figure of 8 has the following advantages:

  1. Being readily reproducible;
  2. Measuring swelling at the various sites of ankle sprains;
  3. Requires only a tape measure and marking pen, and
  4. Feasible in a clinical setting, time-efficient, cost-effective, and easy to carry out.[1][2]

Technique[edit | edit source]

Equipment needed[edit | edit source]

A retractable one-quarter inch wide plastic tape measure and a marking pen.[3].

Patient position[edit | edit source]

Patients were positioned in long-sitting on a bed with the testing foot resting over the end.[1] The knee may be slightly flexed over a bolster to allow for ease of measurement if needed. The ankle should ultimately be maintained in a position of neutral dorsiflexion.

Therapist position[edit | edit source]

At the end of the bed.

Once the patient has assumed their position on the plinth, the following standardized landmarks were marked with a pen prior to measurement:

a) the point midway over the anterior ankle between the tibialis anterior tendon and lateral malleolus,

b) the navicular tuberosity,

c) the base of the fifth metatarsal, and

d) the inferior tip of the medial malleolus.[1]

The therapist placed the zero-point over the mark on the anterior aspect of the ankle and pulled the tape medially over the navicular tuberosity, and then infero-laterally across the medial arch to the proximal aspect of the base of the fifth metatarsal. The tape was then pulled superiorly and medially over the tarsal bones across the inferior aspect of the medial malleolus, and posterolaterally around the Achilles tendon over the distal lateral malleolus to finish at the zero point. At last, the measurement is recorded.

It is necessary to ensure that there was no indentation of soft tissue during measurement.[1]

[4]


Evidence[edit | edit source]

In the laboratory,

  • Intrarater and interrater reliability ranged from 0.98 to 0.99 (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC]) for asymptomatic and swollen ankles. 
  • Highly corelates (r>0.88) with the water displacement method for both injured and uninjured ankles,

In the clinical setting,

  • Intrarater reliability was very high for the figure of eight with (Intraclass correlations coefficients [ICC] = 0.99).
  • Inter-rater reliability was also very high (ICC > 0.99).
  • The standard error of measurement (SEM) was small for all measurements: ±0.2cm for the figure of eight method.[1]

The figure of eight measurement has also demonstrated criterion-related validity when compared to foot volumetry[5]. The figure of eight method of measuring ankle joint swelling can be considered both valid and reliable.



References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Watson CP, Boland RA, Refshauge KM. Measurement reliability of swelling in the acute ankle sprain. The Foot & Ankle Journal. 2008;1(12):4.
  2. Esterson PS. Measurement of ankle joint swelling using a figure of 8. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1979 Jul 1;1(1):51-2.
  3. Tatro-Adams D, McGann SF, Carbone W. Reliability of the figure-of-eight method of ankle measurement. / Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995;22:161-163.
  4. Figure-8 Measurement (CR). Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cG-A3PbS5ow [last accessed 28/2/2021]
  5. Mawdsley R, Hoy D, Erwin P. Criterion-related validity of the figure-of-eight method of measuring ankle edema. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000;30:148 –153.