Crank Test: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 82: Line 82:
| 33.8<br>
| 33.8<br>
|}
|}
 
<ref name="Munro et al">Munro W, Healy R. The validity and accuracy of clinical tests used to detect labral pathology of the shoulder-a systematic review. Manual Therapy 2009; 14(2):119-30.</ref>
<br><br><br>
<br>
 
here


== Resources  ==
== Resources  ==

Revision as of 07:09, 2 July 2009

Be the first to edit this page and have your name permanently included as the originating editor, see the editing pages tutorial for help.

Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.

Lead Editors - If you would like to be a lead editor on this page, please contact us.


Purpose
[edit | edit source]

To identify glenoid labral tears.

Technique
[edit | edit source]

Patient is upright with the arm elevated to 160° in the scapular plane. Joint load is applied along the axis of the humerus with one hand while the other hand performs humeral rotation. The test can be repeated in supine. A positive test is indicated during the manuver (usually during external rotation) if there is reproduction of symptoms with or without a click.

Evidence[edit | edit source]


First author
Sensitivity (95% CI)
Specificity (95% CI)
+LR (95% CI)
-LR (95% CI)
Accuracy (%)
Guanche 2003
0.4
0.73
1.481
0.821
Liu 1996
0.906 (0.750–0.980)
0.933 (0.779–0.992)
13.594 (3.547–52.099)
0.100 (0.034–0.296)
91.9
Mimori 1999
0.833 (0.516–0.979)
1.000 (0.292–1.000)
6.462 (0.477–87.549)
0.220 (0.068–0.711)
86.6
Myers 2005
0.346
0.7
44.4
Nakagawa 2005
0.58
0.72
66
Parentis 2006
0.087
0.826
Stetson and Templin 2002
0.462 (0.266–0.666)
0.564 (0.396–0.722)
1.059 (0.612–1.831)
0.955 (0.608–1.497)
33.8

[1]

Resources[edit | edit source]

add any relevant resources here

References
[edit | edit source]

  1. Munro W, Healy R. The validity and accuracy of clinical tests used to detect labral pathology of the shoulder-a systematic review. Manual Therapy 2009; 14(2):119-30.