Cozen’s Test: Difference between revisions

(Updated categories)
mNo edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
== Evidence  ==
== Evidence  ==


Sensitivity and specificity has not yet been determined.  
A study that analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests for lateral epicondylitis indicated that Cozen's test has a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 0%,<ref>Saroja, G., Aseer P, A. and P M, V. (2014). DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF PROVOCATIVE TESTS IN LATERAL EPICONDYLITIS. ''International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research'', 2(6), pp.815-823.</ref> indicating a high probability of detecting lateral epicondylitis in individuals who have the condition but a poor probability of determining the absence of disease in disease-free individuals.


== References  ==
== References  ==

Revision as of 00:27, 1 April 2021

Purpose[edit | edit source]

The purpose of Cozen's test (also known as the "resisted wrist extension test" or "resistive tennis elbow test") is to check for lateral epicondylalgia or "tennis elbow".

Patient Position[edit | edit source]

The patient should be seated, with the elbow extended forearm maximal pronation, wrist radially abducted, and hand in a fist.

Examiner Position[edit | edit source]

The therapist should stabilise elbow while palpating lateral epicondyle, other hand placed on the dorsum of the hand.

Technique[edit | edit source]

The patient is asked to move the wrist to dorsal flexion and the therapist provides resistance to this movement, in the position described above.[1] The test is positive if pain on the lateral epicondyle is elicited.
 

Cozen's test video provided by Clinically Relevant

Helpful Tips[edit | edit source]

To reduce the likelihood of finding pathology at the origin of extensor digitorum, keep the patient’s fingers flexed during resisted wrist extension. During isometric wrist extension, the counter-force should be applied on the dorsoradial aspect of the fist to reduce involving extensor carpi ulnaris and thus obtaining a false-positive finding if there is pathology within this muscle/tendon.[2]

Evidence[edit | edit source]

A study that analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests for lateral epicondylitis indicated that Cozen's test has a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 0%,[3] indicating a high probability of detecting lateral epicondylitis in individuals who have the condition but a poor probability of determining the absence of disease in disease-free individuals.

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Zwerus EL, Somford MP, Maissan F, Heisen J, Eygendaal D, van den Bekerom MP. Physical examination of the elbow, what is the evidence? A systematic literature review. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Oct 1;52(19):1253-60.
  2. Kochar M, Dogra A. Effectiveness of a specific physiotherapy regimen on patients with tennis elbow: clinical study. Physiotherapy, 2002; 88: 333–341.
  3. Saroja, G., Aseer P, A. and P M, V. (2014). DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF PROVOCATIVE TESTS IN LATERAL EPICONDYLITIS. International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research, 2(6), pp.815-823.