Box and Block Test

Objective
[edit | edit source]

The Box and Block Test is an objective measure of assessing unilateral gross manual dexterity

Intended Population
[edit | edit source]

Those with a range of neurological diagnoses including:

  • Stroke
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
  • Neuromuscular Disorders
  • Geriatric
  • Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
  • Fibromyalgia

Method of Use[edit | edit source]

Equipment Required:

  • Stopwatch
  • Wooden box dimensioned in 53.7 cm x 25.4 cm x 8.5 cm
  • Partition (should be placed at the middle of the box, dividing it in two containers of 25.4 cm each)
  • 150 wooden cubes (2.5 cm in size)

Set-Up:

  • A test box with 150 blocks and a partition in the middle is placed lengthwise along the edge of a standard-height table
  • The patient should be seated on a standard height chair facing the box 150 blocks should be in the compartment of the test box on the side of the patient’s dominant hand
  • The examiner should face the patient so she or he could view the blocks being transported

Description:

The patient is allowed a 15-second trial period prior to testing

  • Individuals are seated at a table, facing a rectangular box that is divided into two square compartments of equal dimension by means of a partition.
  • One hundred and fifty, 2.5 cm, colored, wooden cubes or blocks are placed in one compartment or the other.
  • The individual is instructed to move as many blocks as possible, one at a time, from one compartment to the other for a period of 60 seconds.
  • Standardized dimensions for the test materials and procedures for test administration and scoring have been provided by Mathiowetz et al, 1985.
  • To administer the test, the examiner is seated opposite the individual in order to observe test performance.
  • The BBT is scored by counting the number of blocks carried over the partition from one compartment to the other during the one-minute trial period.
  • Patient’s hand must cross over the partition in order for a point to be given, and blocks that drop or bounce out of the second compartment onto the floor are still rewarded with a point.
  • Multiple blocks carried over at the same time count as a single point.
  • Higher scores on the test indicate better gross manual dexterity

Reference
[edit | edit source]

Evidence[edit | edit source]

Reliability[edit | edit source]

Test-retest Reliability:

Acute and Chronic Stroke: (Chen et al, 2009) [1]

  • Excellent test-retest reliability when tested on more affected (r = 0.98) and less affected hand (r = 0.93)


Upper Limb Impairment: (Desrosiers et al, 1994; n = 35 able bodied subjects; mean age = 71.7(60-89) years; n = 34 subjects with impairment; mean age = 74.5(65-87) years) [2]

  • Excellent test-retest reliability of the right hand for able bodied subjects (ICC= 0.97)
  • Excellent test-retest reliability of the left hand for able bodied subjects (ICC= 0.96)
  • Excellent test-retest reliability of the right hand for subjects with impairment (ICC= 0.90)
  • Excellent test-retest reliability of the left hand for subjects with impairment (ICC= 0.89)

Upper Extremity Paresis: (Platz et al, 2005; n = 56 people with upper limb paresis as a result of stroke, Multiple Sclerosis (MS), and traumatic brain injury (TBI); median age = 54(13-92) years; n = 37 for stroke; median age = 62(22-92) years; n = 14 for MS; median age = 43(28-60) years; n = 5 for TBI; median age = 34(13-50) years) [3]

  • Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.96)

Spastic Hemiplegia: (Siebers et al, 2010) [4]

  • Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.95)

Interrater/Intrarater Reliability:

Normal Adults: (Mathiowetz et al, 1985) [5]

  • Excellent interrater reliability for the right hand (r = 1.00)
  • Excellent interrater reliability for the left hand (r = 0.99)

Upper Extremity Paresis: (Platz et al, 2005) [3]

  • Excellent interrater reliability (ICC = 0.99)

Spastic Hemiplegia: (Siebers et al, 2010) [4]

  • Excellent interrater reliability (r = 0.95)

Fibromyalgia: (Canny et al, 2009; n = 30 participants with fibromyalgia; mean age = 46.9(range 20-68) years; n = 30 healthy participants; mean age= 41.2(29-52) years) [6]

  • Excellent intrarater reliability for participants with fibromyalgia (ICC = 0.90)
  • Excellent intrarater reliability for healthy participants (ICC = 0.98)
  • Excellent interrater reliability for participants with fibromyalgia (ICC = 0.85)
  • Excellent interrater reliability for healthy participants (ICC = 0.80)

Validity[edit | edit source]

Criterion Validity (Predictive/Concurrent):

Stroke:

(Lin et al, 2010; n = 59 patients with stroke; sex = 47 males, 12 females; mean age = 55.5(11.66) years)

Concurrent Validity Pre- and Post- Treatment

Measure Pretreatment (r) Posttreatment (r)
NHPT -0.80 (Excellent) -0.71 (Excellent)
ARAT 0.63 (Excellent) 0.64 (Excellent)
FMA 0.44 (Adequate) 0.35 (Adequate)
MAL-AOU -0.37 (Adequate) 0.49 (Adequate)
MAL-QOM 0.52 (Adequate) 0.52 (Adequate)
SIS 0.59 (Adequate) 0.52 (Adequate)

(ARAT = Action Research Arm Test, BBT = Box and Block Test, CI = confidence interval, FMA = Fugl-Meyer Assessment, MAL-AOU = Motor Activity Log-Amount of Use, MAL-QOM = Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement, NHPT = Nine-Hole Peg Test, SIS = Stroke Impact Scale)

Construct Validity (Convergent/Discriminant)

Upper Limb Impairment: (Desrosiers et al, 1994) [2]

  • Excellent convergent validity with the Action Research Arm Test (r = 0.80)
  • Adequate convergent validity with Functional Autonomy Measurement System (r (right hand) = 0.47; r (left hand) = 0.51)

Upper Extremity Paresis: (Platz et al, 2005) [3]

  • Excellent convergent validity with the Action Research Arm Test (r = 0.95)
  • Excellent convergent validity with the Fugl-Meyer Test (r = 0.92)
  • Excellent convergent validity with the Hemispheric Stroke Scale (r = -0.67)
  • Adequate convergent validity with the Passive Joint motion/Joint pain sub-scale of Fugl-Meyer Test (r = 0.43)
  • Poor convergent validity with the Modified Barthel Index (r = 0.04)

Central Paresis: (Platz et al, 2008; n = 33 neurological patients with central paresis due to stroke, ischemic/anoxic brain damage, traumatic brain injury, or spinal cord injury; n=3 patients with SCI(C3,C4,T8), 6 patients with TBI, and 23 patients with stroke; sex = 20 males, 13 females; mean duration of disease = 19.4 months; mean age = 49.7(17.3) years) [3]

  • Excellent convergent validity with Resistance to Passive Movement (r = -0.680)

Responsiveness[edit | edit source]

Not established

Miscellaneous
[edit | edit source]

Links[edit | edit source]

Box and Block Test

Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]

Extension:RSS -- Error: Not a valid URL: Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10

References[edit | edit source]

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.

  1. Chen, H. M., Chen, C. C., et al. "Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke." Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009 23(5): 435-440
  2. 2.0 2.1 Desrosiers, J., Bravo, G., et al. "Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies." Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994 75: 751-755
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Platz, T., Pinkowski, C., et al. "Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study." Clin Rehabil 2005 19(4): 404-411 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Platz et al" defined multiple times with different content
  4. 4.0 4.1 Siebers, A., Oberg, U., et al. "The effect of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on spasticity and motor function of the affected arm in patients with chronic stroke." Physiother Can 2010 62(4): 388-396
  5. Mathiowetz, V., Volland, G., et al. "Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity." Am J Occup Ther 1985 39(3160243): 386-391
  6. Canny, M. L., Thompson, J. M., et al. "Reliability of the box and block test of manual dexterity for use with patients with fibromyalgia." Am J Occup Ther 2009 63(4): 506-510