Lumbar Assessment

Notes on Assessment[edit | edit source]

Assessment of the lumbar spine should allow clinical reasoning to include appropriate data collection tests from those listed below.  

Examination procedures should be performed from standing-sitting-lying and pain provocation movements saved until last.


Subjective
[edit | edit source]

Patient Intake[edit | edit source]

  • Self‐report (patient history, past medical history, drug history, social history)
  • Performance‐based outcome measures
  • Region‐specific questions

Special Questions
[edit | edit source]

  • Red Flags:

During the investigationyou must pay attention to any ‘red flag’ that might be present. Koes et al (2006) [1]mentioned the following ‘red flags’:

  • Onset age < 20 or > 55 years
  • Non-mechanical pain (unrelated to time or activity)
  • Thoracic pain
  • Previous history of carcinoma, steroids, HIV
  • Feeling unwell
  • Weight loss
  • Widespread neurological symptoms
  • Structural spinal deformity

 Yellow Flags

Investigations
[edit | edit source]

  • Radiological Considerations

Objective[edit | edit source]

Observation[edit | edit source]

  • Posture
  • Movement Patterns

Functional Tests
[edit | edit source]

Functional Demonstration of pain provoking movements

Movement Testing[edit | edit source]

  • AROM, PROM, and Overpressure
  • Passive Intervertebral Motion 
  • Muscle Strength

Neurologic Assessment[edit | edit source]

  • Myotomes
  • Dermatomes
  • Reflexes
  • Neurodynamic testing

Palpation[edit | edit source]

It is crucial for a reliable diagnosis and intervention of treatment to adequately palpate the lumbar processi.
Within the scientific world there has been a debate about the palpation of the processi spinosi because scientists assumed that often different persons indicated the processi on a different place (Mckenzie et al)[2]. However, Snider et al (2011)[3] has shown that the indicated points of the different therapists lie that the distance between the indicated points of the different therapists is much smaller than it had always been claimed. Obviously there were differences because some therapists have more experience and others have more anatomical knowledge. Also the difference in personality between the therapists led to differences in locating the processi.
Furthermore, this investigation has proven that it is more useful to indicate different points instead of just 1 point. Also it’s proven that a manual examination to detecte the lumbar segmental level is highly accurate when accompanied by a verbal subject response (Philips 1996)[4]
There are of course elements that hinder the palpation. For example, a BMI (body mass index) of 30kg/m2 considerably diminishes the accuracy (Ferre et al)[5]. Anatomical abnormalities might also cause problems. The abnormality of the 12th rib leads, for example, to a negative palpal accuracy in the region L1-L4 for all therapists [6].

Clear Adjacent Joints[edit | edit source]

  • Thoracic spine - seated rotation with combined movements and overpressure
  • Sacroilliac joints - sacral clearing test, cluster tests
  • Hips - PROM with overpressure

Special Tests[edit | edit source]

Active Sit-Up Test

Alternate Gillet Test

Crossed Straight Leg Raise Test

Extensor Endurance Test

FABER Test

Fortin's Sign

Gaenslen Test

Gillet Test

Gower's Sign

Lumbar Quadrant Test

POSH Test

Posteroanterior Mobility

Prone Knee Bend Test

Prone Instability Test

Resisted Abduction Test

Sacral Clearing Test

Seated Forward Flexion Test

SIJ Compression/Distraction Test

Slump Test

Sphinx Test

Spine Rotators & Multifidus Test

Squish Test

Standing Forward Flexion Test

Straight Leg Raise Test

Supine to Long Sit Test

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Koes B.W. van Tulder M. W., Thomas S.; diagnosis and treatment of low back pain; BMJ volume 332, 17 june 2006; 1430-1434
  2. McKenzie AM, Taylor NF. Can physiotherapists locate lumbar spinal levels by palpation? Physiotherapy 1997;83: 235-9.
  3. Karen T. Snider, Eric J. Snider, Brian F. Degenhardt, Jane C. Johnson and James W. Kribs; palpatory accuracy of lumbar spinous processes using multiple bony landmarks. ournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics; 2011
  4. Phillips D. R.; Twomey L. T.; A comparison of manual diagnosis with a diagnosis established by a uni-level lumbar spinal block procedure; manual therapy, march 1996, pages 82-87
  5. 3. Ferre RM, Sweeney TW. Emergency physicians can easily obtain ultrasound images of anatomical landmarks relevant to lumbar puncture. Am J Emerg Med 2007;25:291-6.
  6. Karen T. Snider, Eric J. Snider, Brian F. Degenhardt, Jane C. Johnson and James W. Kribs; palpatory accuracy of lumbar spinous processes using multiple bony landmarks. ournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics; 2011