12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
== Evidence == | == Evidence == | ||
The SF-12 has been tested in a range of disease populations, including mental health, stroke, and myocardial infarction. | The SF-12 has been tested in a range of disease populations, including [[Mental Health Interventions for People Living With HIV|mental health]], [[stroke]], and [[Myocardial Infarction|myocardial infarction]]. | ||
=== Validity === | === Validity === | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
When compared to the SF-36 in various patient groups varying in age, physical and mental health, the SF-12 scores were similar to the SF-36 but almost always had bigger standard errors<ref>Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996. 34; 3:220-33.</ref>. | When compared to the SF-36 in various patient groups varying in age, physical and mental health, the SF-12 scores were similar to the SF-36 but almost always had bigger standard errors<ref>Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996. 34; 3:220-33.</ref>. | ||
A separate study<ref name=":0">Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D, Lawrence K, Petersen S, Paice C, Stradling J. [https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/oxford-university-press/a-shorter-form-health-survey-can-the-sf-12-replicate-results-from-the-4ndcljbRNl A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies?] Journal of Public Health. 1997. 19; 2: 179-186. Accessed 29 February 2020.</ref> compared the SF-12 to the SF-36 in treatments for congestive heart failure, sleep apnoea, and inguinal hernia. The authors found that the SF-12 agreed with the MCS and PCS of the SF-36, noting that the scores recorded the same level of health and changed over time. | A separate study<ref name=":0">Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D, Lawrence K, Petersen S, Paice C, Stradling J. [https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/oxford-university-press/a-shorter-form-health-survey-can-the-sf-12-replicate-results-from-the-4ndcljbRNl A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies?] Journal of Public Health. 1997. 19; 2: 179-186. Accessed 29 February 2020.</ref> compared the SF-12 to the SF-36 in treatments for [[Congestive Heart Failure|congestive heart failure]], [[Sleep Apnea|sleep apnoea]], and [[Inguinal Hernia|inguinal hernia]]. The authors found that the SF-12 agreed with the MCS and PCS of the SF-36, noting that the scores recorded the same level of health and changed over time. | ||
A third study of responses from nine European countries also confirmed a correlation between SF-12 and SF-36 component summaries and recommended the SF-12 to be useful for the assessment of large populations<ref>Gandek B, Ware J, Aaronson N, Apolone G, Bjorner J, Brazier J, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, Sullivan M.. "Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project." Journal of clinical epidemiology. 1998. 51;11: 1171-1178.</ref>. | A third study of responses from nine European countries also confirmed a correlation between SF-12 and SF-36 component summaries and recommended the SF-12 to be useful for the assessment of large populations<ref>Gandek B, Ware J, Aaronson N, Apolone G, Bjorner J, Brazier J, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, Sullivan M.. "Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project." Journal of clinical epidemiology. 1998. 51;11: 1171-1178.</ref>. |
Revision as of 17:35, 2 December 2022
Original Editor - Evan Thomas
Top Contributors - Lauren Lopez, Uchechukwu Chukwuemeka, Evan Thomas, Kim Jackson, Lucinda hampton and Tolulope Adeniji
Objective[edit | edit source]
The SF-12 is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the impact of health on an individual's everyday life. It is often used as a quality of life measure.
The SF-12 is a shortened version of it's predecessor, the SF-36, which itself evolved from the Medical Outcomes Study[1]. The SF-12 was created to reduce the burden of response[2].
The SF-12 uses the exact eight domains as the SF-36:
- Limitations in physical activities because of health problems.
- Limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems
- Limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems
- Bodily pain
- General mental health (psychological distress and well-being)
- Limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems
- Vitality (energy and fatigue)
- General health perceptions
Intended Population[edit | edit source]
Like the SF-36, the SF-12 is designed as a general measure of health so can be used with the general population.
Method of Use[edit | edit source]
Patients fill out a 12-question survey which is then scored by a clinician or researcher.
Unlike the SF-36, the SF-12 is not available for free by its authors, due to a scoring programme. Find out more about using this health survey here
Evidence[edit | edit source]
The SF-12 has been tested in a range of disease populations, including mental health, stroke, and myocardial infarction.
Validity[edit | edit source]
When compared to the SF-36 in various patient groups varying in age, physical and mental health, the SF-12 scores were similar to the SF-36 but almost always had bigger standard errors[3].
A separate study[4] compared the SF-12 to the SF-36 in treatments for congestive heart failure, sleep apnoea, and inguinal hernia. The authors found that the SF-12 agreed with the MCS and PCS of the SF-36, noting that the scores recorded the same level of health and changed over time.
A third study of responses from nine European countries also confirmed a correlation between SF-12 and SF-36 component summaries and recommended the SF-12 to be useful for the assessment of large populations[5].
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
The SF-12 has been shown to reflect change over time like the SF-36[4].
Miscellaneous[edit | edit source]
There are two versions of the SF-12 which have some differences in scoring so it is recommended that users document which version they are using.
Resources[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Ware J. SF-36 Health Survey Update. Spine. 2000. 25; 24: 3130-3139.
- ↑ Rand Health Care. 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12). Available from: https://www.rand.org/health-care/surveys_tools/mos/12-item-short-form.html. (Accessed 29 February 2020).
- ↑ Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996. 34; 3:220-33.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D, Lawrence K, Petersen S, Paice C, Stradling J. A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies? Journal of Public Health. 1997. 19; 2: 179-186. Accessed 29 February 2020.
- ↑ Gandek B, Ware J, Aaronson N, Apolone G, Bjorner J, Brazier J, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, Sullivan M.. "Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project." Journal of clinical epidemiology. 1998. 51;11: 1171-1178.