Lumbar Assessment: Difference between revisions

m (Text replace - ''''Lead Editors'''' to ''''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}')
No edit summary
Line 49: Line 49:
*Muscle Strength<br>
*Muscle Strength<br>


=== Special Tests ===
=== Special Tests ===
 
Active Sit-Up Test
Alternate Gillet Test
Crossed Straight Leg Raise Test
Extensor Endurance Test
FABER Test
Fortin's Sign
Gaenslen Test
Gillet Test
Gower's Sign
Lumbar Quadrant Test
POSH Test
Posteroanterior Mobility
Prone Knee Bend Test
Prone Instability Test
Resisted Abduction Test
Sacral Clearing Test
Seated Forward Flexion Test
SIJ Compression/Distraction Test
Slump Test
Sphinx Test
Spine Rotators & Multifidus Test
Squish Test
Standing Forward Flexion Test
Straight Leg Raise Test
Supine to Long Sit Test


== References  ==
== References  ==

Revision as of 10:54, 30 April 2014

Subjective[edit | edit source]

When evaluating the lumbar spinal column, it is convenient to use the index card of “centers for rehab services”. So you can see if there are problems like Lumbar Instability.

Patient Intake[edit | edit source]

  • Self‐report
  • Performance‐based outcome measures
  • Region‐specific historical examination

Special Questions
[edit | edit source]

  • Red Flags:

During the investigationyou must pay attention to any ‘red flag’ that might be present. Koes et al (2006) [1]mentioned the following ‘red flags’:
• Onset age < 20 or > 55 years
• Non-mechanical pain (unrelated to time or activity)
• Thoracic pain
• Previous history of carcinoma, steroids, HIV
• Feeling unwell
• Weight loss
• Widespread neurological symptoms
• Structural spinal deformity

  • Yellow Flags

Investigations
[edit | edit source]

  • Radiological Considerations

Objective[edit | edit source]

Observation[edit | edit source]

  • Posture
  • Movement Patterns

Functional Tests
[edit | edit source]

Provocation tests: these tests are used to measure the pain. The test is positive when it causes pain while being carried out.
• Regional test:
     - Subject lies on his belly
     - Ventral and vertical pressure on the low back. This means you push the back in lordosis/extension.
• Segmental test:
     - Subject lies on his belly
     - “muzzle grip” around a processus spinosus
mobility tests:
• flexion when lying on one’s side: to investigate the mobility towards flexion of the lumbosacral facet joint in the anterior posterior region
      - regional or segmental
• extension when lying on one’s side: to investigate the mobility towards extension of the lumbosacral facet jointin the anterior posterior region
      - Regional or segmental
• lateral flexion when lying on one’s belly: to investigate the mobility towards lateral flexion
      - fixing of T12 with “muzzle grip”
• rotation when lying on one’s belly: to investigate the mobility towards rotation
      - fixing of T12 with thumb on homolateral side

Palpation[edit | edit source]

It is crucial for a reliable diagnosis and intervention of treatment to adequately palpate the lumbar processi.
Within the scientific world there has been a debate about the palpation of the processi spinosi because scientists assumed that often different persons indicated the processi on a different place (Mckenzie et al)[2]. However, Snider et al (2011)[3] has shown that the indicated points of the different therapists lie that the distance between the indicated points of the different therapists is much smaller than it had always been claimed. Obviously there were differences because some therapists have more experience and others have more anatomical knowledge. Also the difference in personality between the therapists led to differences in locating the processi.
Furthermore, this investigation has proven that it is more useful to indicate different points instead of just 1 point. Also it’s proven that a manual examination to detecte the lumbar segmental level is highly accurate when accompanied by a verbal subject response (Philips 1996)[4]
There are of course elements that hinder the palpation. For example, a BMI (body mass index) of 30kg/m2 considerably diminishes the accuracy (Ferre et al)[5]. Anatomical abnormalities might also cause problems. The abnormality of the 12th rib leads, for example, to a negative palpal accuracy in the region L1-L4 for all therapists [6].

Neurologic Assessment
[edit | edit source]

Movement Testing[edit | edit source]

  • AROM, PROM, and Overpressure
  • Passive Intervertebral Motion
  • Muscle Strength

Special Tests[edit | edit source]

Active Sit-Up Test Alternate Gillet Test Crossed Straight Leg Raise Test Extensor Endurance Test FABER Test Fortin's Sign Gaenslen Test Gillet Test Gower's Sign Lumbar Quadrant Test POSH Test Posteroanterior Mobility Prone Knee Bend Test Prone Instability Test Resisted Abduction Test Sacral Clearing Test Seated Forward Flexion Test SIJ Compression/Distraction Test Slump Test Sphinx Test Spine Rotators & Multifidus Test Squish Test Standing Forward Flexion Test Straight Leg Raise Test Supine to Long Sit Test

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Koes B.W. van Tulder M. W., Thomas S.; diagnosis and treatment of low back pain; BMJ volume 332, 17 june 2006; 1430-1434
  2. McKenzie AM, Taylor NF. Can physiotherapists locate lumbar spinal levels by palpation? Physiotherapy 1997;83: 235-9.
  3. Karen T. Snider, Eric J. Snider, Brian F. Degenhardt, Jane C. Johnson and James W. Kribs; palpatory accuracy of lumbar spinous processes using multiple bony landmarks. ournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics; 2011
  4. Phillips D. R.; Twomey L. T.; A comparison of manual diagnosis with a diagnosis established by a uni-level lumbar spinal block procedure; manual therapy, march 1996, pages 82-87
  5. 3. Ferre RM, Sweeney TW. Emergency physicians can easily obtain ultrasound images of anatomical landmarks relevant to lumbar puncture. Am J Emerg Med 2007;25:291-6.
  6. Karen T. Snider, Eric J. Snider, Brian F. Degenhardt, Jane C. Johnson and James W. Kribs; palpatory accuracy of lumbar spinous processes using multiple bony landmarks. ournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics; 2011