Fullerton Advanced Balance (FAB) Scale: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(90 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''Original Editor '''- - [[User:Sweta Christian|Sweta Christian]]  
'''Original Editor '''- - [[User:Sweta Christian|Sweta Christian]]  


'''Lead Editors'''  
'''Top Contributors''' - {{Special:Contributors/{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}
</div>  
</div>  
== Purpose<br>  ==
== Introduction ==


The Fullerton Test is mainly intended to identify highly-active older adults who are at an increased risk to experience fall-related injuries due to sensory impairments. The test uses both dynamic and static balance under different situations to identify balance deficits in older adults.  
The Fullerton Test is mainly intended to identify highly-active older adults who are at an increased risk to experience [[Falls|fall]]-related injuries due to [[Sensation|sensory]] impairments. The test uses both dynamic and static [[balance]] under different situations to identify balance deficits in [[Older People Introduction|older adults]].  


The test is mainly performed on the following population:
The test is mainly performed on the following population: [[Oncological Disorders|cancer]] patients (post-[[Chemotherapy Side Effects and Syndromes|chemotherapy]]), older adults, [[parkinson's]], [[Neurological Disorders|neurological conditions]] and [[Traumatic Brain Injury|Traumatic brain injuries]].  
-breast cancer patients (post-chemotherapy)
-older adults
-Fibromyalgia
-Parkinson's Disease and
-Traumatic brain injuries.  


== Technique<br>  ==
== Key Descriptions and Scoring ==
#The FAB takes 10-12 minutes to administer
#10 performance based activities in both static and dynamic phases
#Score of 0-40/40 points possible (higher scores are better)
#Items scored on a 5 point ordinal scale (0-4)
#ICF domain, activity
The test consists of 10 activities that challenge different aspects of balance, such as standing with eyes closed, reaching forward, turning, stepping, and standing on one leg. Each activity is scored on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4, where higher scores indicate better performance. The total score ranges from 0 to 40, with a score of 25 or lower indicating a high risk of falls


The test includes the following:
== Equipment ==


-10 performance based activities in both static and dynamic phases -Score of 0-40/40 points possible (higher scores are better) -Items scored on a 5 point ordinal scale (0-4)
# Stopwatch
# Pencil
# 2 and 36 inch rulers
# 6 inch high bench (18’X18’ stepping surface)
# Masking tape
# 2 Airex® pads
# Length of non-slip material between pads if floor is not carpeted -Metronome


The test is administered for 10-12 mins.
The following video explains in brief on how the test is performed


{| width="100%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1"
|-
| {{#ev:youtube|v=_okAV4M31bE|300}}
| {{#ev:youtube|cu7z1PG5MwA|300}}
|}
<div class="grammarly-disable-indicator"></div> <div class="grammarly-disable-indicator"></div> <div class="grammarly-disable-indicator"></div> <div class="grammarly-disable-indicator"></div> <div class="grammarly-disable-indicator"></div> <div class="grammarly-disable-indicator"></div> <div class="grammarly-disable-indicator"></div>
== Evidence==


Equipment needed:  
*<u>'''Cutt-off scores'''</u>: Older adults (&gt;=65 years): (Hernandez and Rose, 2008; independently, healthy functioning adults, without fall in previous 12 months, reported falling 2 or more times previous 12 months)


-Stopwatch -Pencil -12 and 36 inch rulers -6 inch high bench (18’X18’ stepping surface) -Masking tape -2 Airex® pads - Length of non-slip material between pads if floor is not carpeted -Metronome
Score of 25/40 produces highest sensitivity (74.6%) and specificity (52.6%) in predicting fall risk In 7 out of 10 cases an individual who scores 25 or lower is at a high risk for falls


The following video explains in brief on how the test is performed {{#ev:youtube|Hq0HYPe3Mvc}}
*<u>'''Test-Retest Reliability'''</u>:&nbsp;


== Evidence'''<u></u>'''  ==
Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.98) (Rose et al, 2006)<br>  


<u>'''Cutt-off scores'''</u>: Older adults (&gt;=65 years): (Hernandez and Rose, 2008; n=192; mean age=77(6.5) years, independently, healthy functioning adults, n= 133 without fall in previous 12 months / n= 59 reported falling 2 or more times previous 12 months)
*<u>'''Interrater/Interrater Reliability:&nbsp;'''</u>


Score of 25/40 produces highest sensitivity (74.6%) and specificity (52.6%) in predicting fall risk In 7 out of 10 cases an individual who scores 25 or lower is at a high risk for falls
Older Adults: (Rose et al, 2006)&nbsp;: Excellent test re-test reliability (r = 0.96) for total score<br>


*<u>'''Test-Retest Reliability'''</u>: Older Adults: (Rose et al, 2006; n = 46, mean age = 75(6.2) years; with (n = 31) and without balance problems (n = 15)); subset of n = 31 for test-retest, mean age 75 (6.2) years, community dwelling healthy adults)
Breast cancer (post chemotherapy): (Wampler et al, 2007) (treated with taxane chemotherapy)  


Excellent test re-test reliability (r = 0.96) for total score Adequate to excellent for individual test items (r = 0.52 – 0.82) Breast cancer (post chemotherapy): (Wampler et al, 2007; n=40, 20 with breast cancer, 20 healthy controls; mean age for sick = 50.35 (9.34) years; mean age for healthy = 49.60(9.08) years; treated with taxane chemotherapy)
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.98)&lt;u&lt;/u&gt;  


Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.98)
*<u>'''Internal Consistency:'''</u>


Test-retest Reliability Older Adults: (Rose et al, 2006; n = 46, mean age = 75(6.2) years; with (n = 31) and without balance problems (n = 15)); subset of n = 31 for test-retest, mean age 75 (6.2) years, community dwelling healthy adults)  
Older adults: (Rose et al, 2006)&nbsp;: Excellent internal consistency (H coefficients &gt;0.75) for all 10 items


Excellent test re-test reliability (r = 0.96) for total score Adequate to excellent for individual test items (r = 0.52 – 0.82) Breast cancer (post chemotherapy): (Wampler et al, 2007; n=40, 20 with breast cancer, 20 healthy controls; mean age for sick = 50.35 (9.34) years; mean age for healthy = 49.60(9.08) years; treated with taxane chemotherapy)  
Older adults: (Klein et al, 2010)  


Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.98)  
&nbsp; Excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha=0.805)  


*<u>'''Interrater/Interrater Reliability:&nbsp;'''</u>
*'''<u>Content Validity:</u>'''
 
Older adults: (Rose et al, 2006)&nbsp;:Established through literature review, administration of test items to 15 older adults, reviewed by 4 experienced physical therapists
<div class="grammarly-disable-indicator"></div> <div class="grammarly-disable-indicator"></div> <div class="grammarly-disable-indicator"></div>  
== Resources  ==


Older Adults: (Rose et al, 2006; n = 46, mean age = 75(6.2) years; with (n = 31) and without balance problems (n = 15)); subset of n = 31 for test-retest, mean age 75 (6.2) years, community dwelling healthy adults)
*<u>'''Considerations for using the test:'''</u><br>Fairly new measure, with limited psychometric data and testing in populations other than older adults (Langley and Mackintosh, 2007)
*[https://geriatrictoolkit.missouri.edu/fab/FABScaleScoringFormwithCut-OffValues.pdf Link to FAB scale]<br>


Excellent test re-test reliability (r = 0.96) for total score<br>Adequate to excellent for individual test items (r = 0.52 – 0.82)<br>Breast cancer (post chemotherapy): (Wampler et al, 2007; n=40, 20 with breast cancer, 20 healthy controls; mean age for sick = 50.35 (9.34) years; mean age for healthy = 49.60(9.08) years; treated with taxane chemotherapy)
----
<div class="grammarly-disable-indicator"></div>  
== Presentation ==


Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.98)&lt;u&lt;/u&gt;
Reliability of the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale Click Fenter P, Dupree L, Harris C, Koonce K, Teat A. Program in Physical Therapy<br>


*<u>'''Internal Consistency:'''</u>
http://slideplayer.com/slide/2558100/


Older adults: (Rose et al, 2006) : Excellent internal consistency (H coefficients &gt;0.75) for all 10 items<br>Older adults: (Klein et al, 2010)


Excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha=0.805)
== References  ==


*'''<u>Content Validity:</u>'''
<references />  


Older adults: (Rose et al, 2006) :Established through literature review, administration of test items to 15 older adults, reviewed by 4 experienced physical therapists
<ref>Rose, D. J., Lucchese, N., et al. (2006). "Development of a multidimensional balance scale for use with functionally independent older adults." Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 87(11): 1478-1485.</ref>Rose, D. J., Lucchese, N., et al. (2006). "Development of a multidimensional balance scale for use with functionally independent older adults." Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 87(11): 1478-1485.


== Resources  ==
<ref>Hernandez, D. and Rose, D. J. (2008). "Predicting which older adults will or will not fall using the Fullerton Advanced Balance scale." Archives of Physical Medicine &amp; Rehabilitation 89(12): 2309-2315</ref>Hernandez, D. and Rose, D. J. (2008). "Predicting which older adults will or will not fall using the Fullerton Advanced Balance scale." Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 89(12): 2309-2315


add any relevant resources here
<ref>Klein, P. J., Fiedler, R. C., et al. (2011). "Rasch Analysis of the Fullerton Advanced Balance (FAB) Scale." Physiother Can 63(1): 115-125</ref>Klein, P. J., Fiedler, R. C., et al. (2011). "Rasch Analysis of the Fullerton Advanced Balance (FAB) Scale." Physiother Can 63(1): 115-125


== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed]) ==
<ref>Wampler, M. A., Topp, K. S., et al. (2007). "Quantitative and clinical description of postural instability in women with breast cancer treated with taxane chemotherapy." Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88(8): 1002-1008</ref>Wampler, M. A., Topp, K. S., et al. (2007). "Quantitative and clinical description of postural instability in women with breast cancer treated with taxane chemotherapy." Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88(8): 1002-1008
<div class="researchbox">
<rss>Feed goes here!!|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss>
</div>
== References  ==


References will automatically be added here, see [[Adding References|adding references tutorial]].  
<ref>Langley, F. A. and Mackintosh, S. F. H. (2007). "Functional balance assessment of older community dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature." Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences &amp; Practice 5(4): 11p</ref>Langley, F. A. and Mackintosh, S. F. H. (2007). "Functional balance assessment of older community dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature." Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences & Practice 5(4): 11p


<references />
<ref>https://www.interactivehealthpartner.com/pdf/FAB10.pdf</ref>https://www.interactivehealthpartner.com/pdf/FAB10.pdf<div class="researchbox"></div>
----
<div class="grammarly-disable-indicator"></div><references />
[[Category:Outcome Measures]]
[[Category:Older People/Geriatrics]]
[[Category:Balance]]
[[Category:Falls]]
[[Category:Balance - Special Tests]]

Latest revision as of 07:54, 6 February 2024

Original Editor - - Sweta Christian

Top Contributors - Sweta Christian, Kim Jackson, Lucinda hampton, Lauren Lopez, WikiSysop, Tolulope Adeniji, 127.0.0.1 and George Prudden

Introduction[edit | edit source]

The Fullerton Test is mainly intended to identify highly-active older adults who are at an increased risk to experience fall-related injuries due to sensory impairments. The test uses both dynamic and static balance under different situations to identify balance deficits in older adults.

The test is mainly performed on the following population: cancer patients (post-chemotherapy), older adults, parkinson's, neurological conditions and Traumatic brain injuries.

Key Descriptions and Scoring[edit | edit source]

  1. The FAB takes 10-12 minutes to administer
  2. 10 performance based activities in both static and dynamic phases
  3. Score of 0-40/40 points possible (higher scores are better)
  4. Items scored on a 5 point ordinal scale (0-4)
  5. ICF domain, activity

The test consists of 10 activities that challenge different aspects of balance, such as standing with eyes closed, reaching forward, turning, stepping, and standing on one leg. Each activity is scored on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4, where higher scores indicate better performance. The total score ranges from 0 to 40, with a score of 25 or lower indicating a high risk of falls

Equipment[edit | edit source]

  1. Stopwatch
  2. Pencil
  3. 2 and 36 inch rulers
  4. 6 inch high bench (18’X18’ stepping surface)
  5. Masking tape
  6. 2 Airex® pads
  7. Length of non-slip material between pads if floor is not carpeted -Metronome

The following video explains in brief on how the test is performed

Evidence[edit | edit source]

  • Cutt-off scores: Older adults (>=65 years): (Hernandez and Rose, 2008; independently, healthy functioning adults, without fall in previous 12 months, reported falling 2 or more times previous 12 months)

Score of 25/40 produces highest sensitivity (74.6%) and specificity (52.6%) in predicting fall risk In 7 out of 10 cases an individual who scores 25 or lower is at a high risk for falls

  • Test-Retest Reliability: 

Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.98) (Rose et al, 2006)

  • Interrater/Interrater Reliability: 

Older Adults: (Rose et al, 2006) : Excellent test re-test reliability (r = 0.96) for total score

Breast cancer (post chemotherapy): (Wampler et al, 2007) (treated with taxane chemotherapy)

        Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.98)<u</u>

  • Internal Consistency:

Older adults: (Rose et al, 2006) : Excellent internal consistency (H coefficients >0.75) for all 10 items

Older adults: (Klein et al, 2010)

  Excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha=0.805)

  • Content Validity:

Older adults: (Rose et al, 2006) :Established through literature review, administration of test items to 15 older adults, reviewed by 4 experienced physical therapists

Resources[edit | edit source]

  • Considerations for using the test:
    Fairly new measure, with limited psychometric data and testing in populations other than older adults (Langley and Mackintosh, 2007)
  • Link to FAB scale

Presentation[edit | edit source]

Reliability of the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale Click Fenter P, Dupree L, Harris C, Koonce K, Teat A. Program in Physical Therapy

http://slideplayer.com/slide/2558100/


References[edit | edit source]


[1]Rose, D. J., Lucchese, N., et al. (2006). "Development of a multidimensional balance scale for use with functionally independent older adults." Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 87(11): 1478-1485.

[2]Hernandez, D. and Rose, D. J. (2008). "Predicting which older adults will or will not fall using the Fullerton Advanced Balance scale." Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 89(12): 2309-2315

[3]Klein, P. J., Fiedler, R. C., et al. (2011). "Rasch Analysis of the Fullerton Advanced Balance (FAB) Scale." Physiother Can 63(1): 115-125

[4]Wampler, M. A., Topp, K. S., et al. (2007). "Quantitative and clinical description of postural instability in women with breast cancer treated with taxane chemotherapy." Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88(8): 1002-1008

[5]Langley, F. A. and Mackintosh, S. F. H. (2007). "Functional balance assessment of older community dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature." Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences & Practice 5(4): 11p

[6]https://www.interactivehealthpartner.com/pdf/FAB10.pdf

  1. ↑ Rose, D. J., Lucchese, N., et al. (2006). "Development of a multidimensional balance scale for use with functionally independent older adults." Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 87(11): 1478-1485.
  2. ↑ Hernandez, D. and Rose, D. J. (2008). "Predicting which older adults will or will not fall using the Fullerton Advanced Balance scale." Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 89(12): 2309-2315
  3. ↑ Klein, P. J., Fiedler, R. C., et al. (2011). "Rasch Analysis of the Fullerton Advanced Balance (FAB) Scale." Physiother Can 63(1): 115-125
  4. ↑ Wampler, M. A., Topp, K. S., et al. (2007). "Quantitative and clinical description of postural instability in women with breast cancer treated with taxane chemotherapy." Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88(8): 1002-1008
  5. ↑ Langley, F. A. and Mackintosh, S. F. H. (2007). "Functional balance assessment of older community dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature." Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences & Practice 5(4): 11p
  6. ↑ https://www.interactivehealthpartner.com/pdf/FAB10.pdf
Retrieved from "https://www.physio-pedia.com/index.php?title=Fullerton_Advanced_Balance_(FAB)_Scale&oldid=349960"